Pelosi mocks Perry's debate challenge

 

Rick Perry found himself on the receiving end of some mocking by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, who rebuffed Perry's challenge to a debate on Monday.

Pelosi, at her weekly press conference on Capitol Hill, dispensed with Perry's debate request by mocking the Texas governor's flub last week at a debate with fellow Republicans.

He did ask if I could debate here in Washington on Monday. It is my understanding that such a letter has come in," Pelosi said. "Monday I'm going to be in Portland in the morning, I'm going to be visiting some of our labs. I'm in California in the afternoon, that's two. I can't remember what the third is."

Perry's been riding a wave of government reform messaging, having called for reforms to Congress, including term limits for lawmakers and new rules that would see lawmakers jailed for insider trading. (Pelosi, along with Republicans, was the subject of a "60 Minutes" piece on congressional insider trading.)

Perry's campaign struck back on Twitter: ".@NancyPelosi Perhaps the third activity that you have forgotten is the ongoing insider trading?"

Discuss this post

Mud fight, mud fight!

  • 5 votes
#1 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 12:45 PM EST

So gang - did you hear the great news?

Seems Treasury has revised it's assessment of just how bad the auto bailout was.

You know how Obama said it'd only cost $14.3 billion? Yeah, not so much. See Treasury just said its cost NOW is $23 billion - that's cause the GM stock price sucks and is going to get worse, so look for further revisions.

Oh, and cause I know you libbies are all about fair taxes - GM gets to carry forward tax losses [Oh, you have not heard of that either, it's unprecedented]. So really the cost of this bailout is $35-40 billion, cause GM gets a pass on paying its taxes.

I know you will be outraged. Another corporate giant not paying its taxes.

Pretty great stuff right gang? Obama "saved" GM. Except - all he did was pump a bunch of cash into a failing company. It didn't work with Solyndra, it won't work here.

Unless - you all head out right now and buy some Volts. Come on 'Lean Forward.'

  • 6 votes
#1.1 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 12:55 PM EST

I'm actually a little disappointed. I would love to see Nancy debate Rick, I think it would help shape the image of the Republican party nicely. Also too, Nancy has taken a lot of abuse from people like Rick, I'd love to see her respond to their charges.

  • 10 votes
#1.2 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 12:56 PM EST

Yeh, no, you're right, Spankers, we should have let GM just go belly-up and put all those workers on unemployment and put all the retirees out on the street! Serves 'em right for being in a union, right?

Screw GM, right? It's not like they were ever part of that "American Exceptionalism" that y'all like to wax poetic about, right?

  • 9 votes
#1.3 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:04 PM EST

I think Rick needs to take a nap, he's showing signs of another "Senior Moment".

  • 6 votes
#1.4 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:08 PM EST

Noid - do you have any understanding of the bankruptcy process?

But let's put that aside - They did nothing to fix GM, just infused it with fat stacks of cash. So what benefit is that?

Gm sucked before the bailout, and it sucks after. But now it makes crap like the Volt, which won't sell and the Cruze, which is panned as a turgid POS.

So what now Noid? GM stock continues to decline. We gonna go all Frannie and Freddie and just keep bailing it out?

Great plan.

But let me ask - do retiree have a right to a pension? Is this like health care to you all?

If they do, even after the company is gone, then what don't they have a 'right' to?

Noid - $15Trillion and counting. What now brown cow?

  • 3 votes
#1.5 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:11 PM EST

Tom, you must not have heard about the senior gang my mother has in Ohio. They would rip your face off for comparing them to Rick Perry. (Although they do like the afternoon nap. )

  • 4 votes
#1.6 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:11 PM EST

Did I miss something or did this article have some mention of GM? Let's keep on topic and not use the smoke and mirrors to deflect what might be unpleasant.

If Pelosi did debate ol' Ricky she'd wipe the floor with him.

  • 11 votes
#1.7 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:12 PM EST

LOL -- Nice one Mrs. Pelosi!

  • 7 votes
#1.8 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:19 PM EST

Spanky-

But let's put that aside - They did nothing to fix GM, just infused it with fat stacks of cash. So what benefit is that?

Gm sucked before the bailout, and it sucks after. But now it makes crap like the Volt, which won't sell and the Cruze, which is panned as a turgid POS.

just so you know, you posts was full of deflections of the topic and then lies... first of all, GM wasn't just infused with cash, their whole business model was revamped to have a more attractive portfolio for customer delight. This has actually made their vehicles more viable for future purchases.... the second thing is that GM was allowed to renegotiate it's pension contracts, thus making the company leaner in terms of their capital expenditure...

So what now Noid? GM stock continues to decline. We gonna go all Frannie and Freddie and just keep bailing it out?

Great plan.

The reason why their stock is seriously suffering is primarily a result of the EU crises which was not anticipated by any reputable economist 2yrs ago, and I mean NONE, NADA, not ONE. So to blame the administration or their products for this is plain being ignorant to facts.

But let me ask - do retiree have a right to a pension? Is this like health care to you all?

If they do, even after the company is gone, then what don't they have a 'right' to?

Pensions and providing health care were the way the businesses handed out incentives 30yrs ago and all large companies did this, not just unionized companies.... it seems that most have done the wrong projections, so it's hurting their businesses in one way or the other - thus the switch to 401Ks and IRA accounts. Business's created this problem, not the government or the unions - they simply offered more than they could afford to pay, including GM, Ford and all other American car companies.

Noid - $15Trillion and counting. What now brown cow?

Tell your friends to close tax loop-holes and you'll see that $15trillion start to shrink... but who am I kidding, you guys are invested seeing your corporations get away with almost murder - in terms of tax write offs and safe havens to hide their stash.

  • 10 votes
#1.9 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:30 PM EST

Spanks: But let's put that aside - They did nothing to fix GM, just infused it with fat stacks of cash. So what benefit is that?

That's what Liberals term as "growing the economy". Just borrow hundreds of billions of dollars, and when jobs aren't created, just claim that they "saved" or "supported" millions of jobs. Libs - no accountability.

$15 trillion on the debt. To the Libs, that's just a number, just like it's a number in Greece, Italy, Ireland, and Spain.

Markets are still open. Did any OWStreeters even get close to a door on Wall Street?

Next the OWS misfits are going to shut down the NY trains. That should convince the people in New York that actually work for a living to join up with them.

Pelosi supports OWS. Maybe someone should mock her for it. Right after they mock her for her insider trading.

  • 4 votes
#1.10 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:49 PM EST

Tunde Akins: GM wasn't just infused with cash, their whole business model was revamped to have a more attractive portfolio for customer delight. . . . The reason why their stock is seriously suffering is primarily a result of the EU crises . . . Pensions and providing health care were the way the businesses handed out incentives 30yrs ago and all large companies did this, not just unionized companies.... it seems that most have done the wrong projections, . . .

You're not listening TA. The US taxpayer is out $35-$40 billion dollars because of Obama. Everyone else like Ford, Toyota, BMW and all the other manufactures in the US had the same cry story you outlined, they made it through without getting $35-$40 billion dollars from the taxpayers. I bet those other manufacturers sure wish they could add that money to their bottom lines. Instead they have to earn it rather than having it given to them.

  • 2 votes
#1.11 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:59 PM EST

Markets are still open. Did any OWStreeters even get close to a door on Wall "Street?"

Does Sean Hannity know you aren't happy about that, Smiff?

  • 3 votes
#1.12 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 2:10 PM EST

Buzzers: Does Sean Hannity know you aren't happy about that, Smiff?

Buzzy you sound like a good candidate for the OWS. Uneducated, poor, not too bright, always angry about something, easily led. Perfect match.

  • 4 votes
#1.13 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 2:23 PM EST

Pelosi would be walloped by Pelosi! She would clean his plate! Does he think he could get away with this? And what is the point in making a challenge to someone who is not running for the republican nomination? Rick is severely confused!

  • 3 votes
#1.14 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 2:35 PM EST

how small and petty for a PRESIDENTIAL hopeful to want to take on Congressional Opponents.

Perry is not even remotely ready for primetime,...and the twitter response? Really?

  • 9 votes
#1.15 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 2:50 PM EST

Buzzy you sound like a good candidate for the OWS. Uneducated, poor, not too bright, always angry about something, easily led. Perfect match.

This is the most perfect example of POT and KETTLE you are ever going to see. JAS trolled all day for the opportunity to post this tripe.

  • 3 votes
#1.16 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:11 PM EST

Hi Clara!!! I think Perry is just looking for people to debate to get some practice in. You know it's not his thing!

  • 5 votes
#1.17 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:12 PM EST

Punk, stay on topic. I have reported your post as No Value, and I and others will continue to do so until you stop this constant, tiring BS.

This thread is about Perry's debate challenge, I guess with Pelosi? WTF?

  • 6 votes
#1.18 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 4:35 PM EST

Who will Perry challenge next? Oh, oh! How about the House "Sergeant at Arms"? Awh hell, I doubt Perry could take him. Hmmmmm.......................

  • 1 vote
#1.19 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 5:18 PM EST
Reply

If Perry cannot take on the GOP field of dreamers, whatever makes him think he could take on Ms. Pelosi? Oh, I guess that goes to that boasting of being dumb thing.

  • 11 votes
Reply#2 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 12:46 PM EST

Which is exactly why she should agree to the debate.

Republicans are building a narrative around their party that would ultimately be to the benefit of Nancy Pelosi. The GOP is painting itself as, "The Party of Stupid." Any debate between Pelosi and Perry would most likely further that narrative.

If the default outlook for non-ideological middle of the road voters is that voting for a Republican is basically voting for a stupid person then Republicans will have a hard time winning national elections.

  • 4 votes
#2.1 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:09 PM EST

Good point, nisl. However, I hate the idea of Nancy lowering herself down to his level. Just a gut reaction with me.

  • 3 votes
#2.2 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:13 PM EST

Phinephancy - Don't think of it as Nancy lowering herself. Think of it as Nancy giving the Republicans more rope and a pamphlet on how best to tie a noose.

There is wisdom to the old saying, "If your opponent is self destructing, get out of the way!" But if your opponent is preparing to commit political suicide I don't necessarily think it a bad idea to tell them what a great idea it is.

And really, this is a great opportunity to brand the entire GOP as bunch of dolts. The GOP has already done most of the work, but a little encouragement via a debate between Perry and Pelosi could be a very good thing.

  • 5 votes
#2.3 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:27 PM EST
Reply

Perry is an idiot!

Debating Palin, perhaps, just perhaps he would come out better in a debate!

Nancy Pelosi is leagues above Slick Rick on every level!

  • 8 votes
Reply#3 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 12:49 PM EST

Then she should prove it, by doing the debate. If the liberals are scared of debating Rick Perry, what will they do when they have to debate someone that doesn't screw up 10 times a day.

  • 2 votes
#3.1 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:20 PM EST

The last time I looked Nancy was not running for President. Does this mean Rick is running for speaker of the house.

  • 7 votes
#3.2 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:38 PM EST

Leagues above and thats exactly why she should ignore him. Comparing a dollar bill and a penny can only decrease the perceived value of the dollar and can only increase the value of the penny. Perry need not be compared w/ anyone. His opponents in the gop have done him no damage, his fatal blows are ALL self inflicted. Just stay out of his way

  • 1 vote
#3.3 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 4:25 PM EST
Reply

This guy is a classic diversionist. Got nothing to win on, so continue to sling red meat at the base you need to succeed in the Primary...and what better way to do it than start some sort of fight Speaker Pelosi?

All too typical and definitely weak Perry, pretty weak.

  • 4 votes
Reply#4 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 12:55 PM EST

I thought Rick Perry was running for President.

Does he want to be Speaker of the House? If so doesn't he need to debate John Boehner? Or maybe he's moving to San Francisco and running for the seat in Nancy Pelosi's district?

Help! I'm confused!

  • 8 votes
Reply#5 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 12:59 PM EST

Not to worry, Da Noid. Just remember that this is the man who brags about bad grades and not being the brightest of bulbs. Then, grab a cold one, put your feet up, and thank your lucky stars you are nothing like him.

  • 3 votes
#5.1 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:07 PM EST

Da Noid--I think you are fine--Perry is the one who is confused!

"We have met the enemy and he is us!" Pogo by Walt Kelly

  • 3 votes
#5.2 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:12 PM EST
Reply

Da Noid,

I really don't think Perry does not know what he is doing from one day to the next. He really is trying to find some "new" soundbite to help his sinking campaign.

He should be training his sights on Romney ,Cain, and even old Newt. He does have to begin gathering his primary voters if he is going to stay in the race.

  • 5 votes
Reply#6 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:06 PM EST

Tsk, tsk Northstar, that's using common sense. Something which is short supply in the GOP field. Hang your head down, now, and say you are sorry. Then, heads up and be happy you are a progressive!

  • 6 votes
#6.1 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:09 PM EST
Reply

phinephancy,

I have been a happy liberal Democrat for years and proud of it.

  • 8 votes
Reply#7 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:13 PM EST

Me too! Come from a long line of them. I was just laughing at the GOP (Rick Perry). Sorry if you misunderstood.

  • 4 votes
#7.1 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:24 PM EST

phinephancy,

I share with you the humor the GOP candidates provide on a daily basis.

As some one posted here a couple of weeks ago: "Would rather spend a evening with the liberal bloggers on FR than the angry, snide, elitist GOPTP posters."

So keep posting and giving us updates from the Senior gang in Ohio.

  • 1 vote
#7.2 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:59 PM EST

I'm with you Northstar & Pinephancy, but I guess you probably noticed that by my handle. My Daddy was a wonderful man and a Union Iron worker, so to heck with Loretta Lynn, I am very proud to be a Union Iron worker's daughter! yes, you can thank us for being able to watch TV and listen to the Radio for all these years. And of course a big thank you to those who were the first non-rescue personnel to help on Sept. 11!

  • 2 votes
#7.3 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:57 PM EST

Union baby, Tennessee,

I have seen your posts on FR. They warm the cockles of my heart. The DFL in my moniker is Democratic, Farmer, Labor. Democrats in MN are proud of our state's history in fighting for common interests of the family farms and labor by electing politicians that works for all of its citizens.

    #7.4 - Fri Nov 18, 2011 12:36 AM EST
    Reply

    To quote conservative poster friend, Albany Joe "HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA"! Obviously, Rick Perry needs practice but beyond that, what would be the point of debating the former Speaker except that she's a she democrat. He'd have better luck and better odds of winning if he asked to debate Speaker John Boehner. No, that wouldn't work, Boehner would get too emotional.

    • 5 votes
    Reply#8 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:24 PM EST

    Hmmm, Dopey and Weepy? Weren't they two of the seven dwarfs?

    • 5 votes
    #8.1 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:25 PM EST

    I can see it now- Perry looses his cool, puts the slug on Nancy, and BOEHNER cries.

    • 4 votes
    #8.2 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:54 PM EST
    Reply

    Spanky, how many loads of OUR CASH went to the middle east to prop up IRAQ after we invaded? How much cash did the we give AIG (don't here much there). BILLIONS missing in IRAQ, hand it out to KARZI in AFGAN and how much to Pakistan? You Righties love handing out cash by the CARGO plane load to our enemies (future ones too) but have a prob when the govt saves a sh!tload of AMERICAN JOBS! TEABAGGING TRAITORS!

    • 10 votes
    Reply#9 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:52 PM EST

    btorched has you there, 'counsellor'.

    • 2 votes
    #9.1 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:55 PM EST

    Btorched all you'll get from spankster is NADA. You see he is like most connie yellow streaks who never served their country in any capacity. They prefer to serve themselves at the expense of their fellow Americans. They are the paper pushers who value cleverness as opposed to creative thought and innovation..They have no "skin" in this game and have betrayed everything our fathers and grandfathers fought and died for. You have only to look at who is running for the republican nomination. We are becoming more like a banana republic with each passing year. The republicans will only accelerate the process.

    • 4 votes
    #9.2 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 2:44 PM EST
    Reply

    Pelosi is a little too conservative for me but I still like her.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#10 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 2:16 PM EST

    Hey, give Nancy Pelosi credit, she has a sense of humor.

    She showed more wit than Fiesty and the liberal gang in here, ever have. They are like Ed Schultz and Rachel Maddow, humorless state run media automatons.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#11 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 2:18 PM EST

    Pelosi against Perry in a debate?? Now that's someone Perry could wipe his ass with easily. Even if he forgot everything, he would still beat her. She is one crazy loon. The poster girl for why not to vote Democratic. A load of laughs.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#12 - Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:09 PM EST

    Is Perry Criminally insane? Why is he after a Woman? That has nothing to do with his Campaign for President. Stalker...just saying....

      Reply#13 - Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:41 AM EST

      When is the last time FR ran anything that was anti Obama... as katt Williams would say... NOT NEVA

      Its easy for the liberals to stay on topic when they just recite the DNC talking point emails...

        Reply#14 - Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:11 PM EST

        Seriously, is Perry stalking Pelosi she has nothing to do with his Campaign for President. Does he have something against Women in Powerful Positions in Government.

          Reply#15 - Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:20 PM EST

          someone should investigate Pelosi's investment account with Hambrecht & Quist from the 70's and the 80's 

            Reply#16 - Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:05 AM EST
            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.