HUDSON, N.H. -- Presidential candidate Rick Perry's gaffe during Wednesday's CNBC debate sent at least a few of his New Hampshire supporters running in the opposite direction. Tonight, a couple of them showed up at Jon Huntsman's town hall meeting at the Hudson American Legion in search of a new candidate.
Mike Valade of Hudson called himself a "Reagan conservative" who has voted in every New Hampshire primary since 1980. Until two nights ago, he was an ardent Perry supporter.
But not anymore. Friday evening, he said, he was "out shopping." He wasn't alone.
"We're looking for a clear articulate conservative spokesman for the Republicans against Obama," Valade said of his fellow New Hampshire Republican voters.
"Gov. Perry, who was a leading contender for that role, has fallen -- splat -- flat on his face in the mud. Nose in the mud," Valade told NBC News.
Citing Perry's last three debate performances, Valade said the Texas governor's inability to recall the third federal department he would eliminate was the last straw in what he called "distracted" appearances.

Jim Cole / AP
Former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, Republican presidential candidate, smiles as Carter Mead shows off the decorations on his prosthetic leg during a tour of Next Step Orthotics and Prosthetics, Friday, in Manchester, N.H. Huntsman later held a town hall meeting in Hudson. Former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, second from right, later introduced Huntsman at the Hudson meeting.
"Gov. Perry was the man. He had the political belief and the experience and background," Valade said with a sigh. "But he's proven he doesn't have the one vital element to make it happen. He can't stand up there and explain himself very well at all ... it's going to be required in this campaign, clearly."
Standing in the back of the American Legion banquet hall, Valade wondered aloud if the former Utah governor could win him over and feasibly snag the nomination.
According to the latest CBS/National Journal poll, Perry has dropped to garner just 8 percent of likely Republican voters, while Huntsman flounders at 1 percent nationally. In New Hampshire, both Perry and Huntsman got 4 percent in the Harvard/St. Anselm College poll last month.
Valade admitted Huntsman's tenure as Obama's top envoy to China bothered him a "little bit." At this point with his choices however, he does not consider it a deal-breaker.
"Romney doesn't have the views. Since Perry has self-destructed, I guess many people here are looking at maybe Gov. Huntsman to be that man," he said before the town hall began. Valade is also taking a second look at former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson, a candidate who aggressively campaigns in New Hampshire but has fallen off the national radar in polling.
When Huntsman walked into the room, Valade stood in the back row and watched former Homeland Security chief Tom Ridge introduce the former ambassador to China.
Huntsman gave his standard stump speech in bits and pieces, using questions as prompts. He said he relished his underdog position, promising, "We will win New Hampshire."
As usual, Huntsman was wonkish on China, touted his Wall Street Journal-endorsed economic plan, and lacked specifics on social security and health care in what sounded like the umpteenth introduction of himself in a state in which he has focused his entire campaign. (Huntsman has done nearly 100 events here since June.) About 70 voters attended, a far cry from Perry's Granite State campaign stops which have attracted four times that. Several voters identified themselves as registered independents.
Meanwhile in the back row, Valade hoped to ask a question on tax reform. Ultimately he didn't get called on.
Eighty minutes of voter questions and answers ranging from drug legalization to campaign finance reform to foreign policy to job creation later, Valade seemed to have found a new home for his vote.
He sought out this reporter in the dispersing crowd to deliver his verdict. "Worthy!" he said excitedly.
"Huntsman is worthy," Valade reiterated as he rushed out the door. "Probably going to get my vote."
That is, for now.


Folks in New Hampshire watch where they step. Rick may not need them He-Man rattler boots good for steppin' in stuff.
He's named after a spider and once in a while suddenly appears from a nook...
Perhaps he's really Peter Parker?
We're looking for a clear articulate conservative spokesman for the Republicans against Obama,
Good luck with that one....The best joke of the vine.
Perry forgetting what departments he would cut out of the budget, Cain not remembering a judgement or sexual (settlement) against him, Romney forgetting the position he took yesterday, Bachmann forgetting to check the facts before making statements, Gingrich forgetting he cheated on his wife when she had cancer, then makes ethics statements, and Ron Paul ... well .........
Meanwhile, many democrats around the country are looking for someone, anyone that could replace the inept and incompetent twosome of Obama and Biden.
Obama's base is shrinking every day... perhaps many of those lost are considering one of the capable Republican candidates.... each superior to Obama in many ways!
Meanwhile ... many Democrats are wondering how it was even possible for Obama to keep the ship afloat after the horrible mess created by Bush ... and the Republicans lacking any resemblance of self respect ... won't admit they failed and are responsible ...
And to brag about the clowns they have running now ... beyond laughable .....
FEAR NOT
After SC, Republicans will have a front runner. Expect the pachyderm herd to get in line.
1. Who really is CONSERVATIVE?
2. Who is ARTICULATE enough to stand on the stage with Obama?
3. Who has the ability to be COMMANDER IN CHIEF?
Now that Cain, Perry & Bachmann are finish we can get back on a normal path !!!!!!!!!!!
I wonder if any of those guys, Cain, Romney, or Perry, can be as prolific at cronyism as Obama.
The latest example to add to the list....
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-smallpox-20111113,0,4293298.story
People who continue to support this crook are delusional idiots. Just sayin', dawg.
The Republican community cannot bare to read the truth ... truth hurts!!!!
They can say "delusional idiots" and hey ... it's ok
Perry supporters bought a turd and they know it. That is why they are "shopping around". You really trust a guy that wants to wholesale cut government departments he can't even name. He made those wholesale cuts in Texas. Remember the cutting for state funds for EMS and fire departments? He cut funding from fire departments during a drought! Then they had terrible wild fires! That's the kind of judgement we don't need. I think he is a drunk. From his various TV appearances he seems like he has had more than a couple of drinks. I support making government do more with less. Cut ALL departments 10%. Not just cut departments.
Romney's going to be the nominee. It was never going to be Perry. I just try to show the brain dead what they'll never see at FR.
If Romney was President, GM/Chrysler would be closed. If Perry was President SS/Medicare would have been eliminated. If Cain, Bachman. Gingrich, and the rest were President, clean air/water, national parks, safe streets, etc would no longer exist as the EPA/ Forest Service and others would be closed All to balance the budget, kill unions and remove the regulations that protect you and I.
This country is one short vote from the rope and the hate that brings lynching. Save this country and yourself by removing the Republican party from office. Think about it.
The Democrats are one step away from Mugabe! Newt is the best. I thought Perry was a mediocre Governor but that they would run Daniels with him, then have Newt as Secretary of State, and maybe Haley Barbour and some smarter Republicans in his cabinet, but he has been a real dissappointment. I wish Cain and Bachmann and Ron Paul and Gary Johnson and Rick Santorum would drop out. Michelle Bachmann had no business running at all - none. Neither did Herman Cain. I am surprised Linda McMahon did not also run for President - everyone else did. I think Newt is the only one up there with ideas and understanding - no more Mugabebama. Wow. The Democrats are liars and they have the very far left in power. I would love to see someone like Brian Schweitzer in there instead of Mengistu's illegitimate son.
@newscover...... bottom feeding liberal..... there, I said it!! "delusional idiots".
And then there were two:
Romney or Gingrich...
The debates have done their jobs and separated the wheat from the chaff. Mr. Romney is the every position man having held dear each and every possible position necessary to appeal to one voting block or another.
Gingrich has pressed on with an undying philosophical and professorial tone that has finally risen to the surface over the flavor of the day pretenders. Gingrich will crush Romney in a debate one on one but will he get that chance.
Gingrich will smoke Obama when he gets to debate him if he wins. Romney will also do well debating Obama on his record.
Pachyderms in '12.
Otherwise we continue down the rat hole following the European socialist debt model that they are all to clearly demonstrating as folly. Need we see more to turn the ship from this direction? Obama campaigned in '08 that we should model that system and now we are seeing it unravel. Do you not think the Republicans are licking their chops at the debate points and ads they can run?
Rather than go "out shopping" they should save up for 2016.
Why is that, John? Because if Obama gets re-elected we'll ALL be in the poor house?
Please tell me you are just misinformed. Under GOP, the concept of "Poor House" would have new meaning:
The GOP/Koch/Norquist Party wants to get rid of all of our safety nets and they have been very, very, very loud about it.
According to a new study by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, "shows that in the absence of the social safety net, the poverty rate would rise to 28.6 percent".
Under GOP, the poverty rate would DOUBLE.
"Social safety net programs, as defined by the CBPP, include unemployment insurance, Social Security, veterans' benefits, housing assistance, and a raft of other measures, including half a dozen initiatives included in the 2009 Recovery Act".
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/11/poverty-government-programs_n_1088277.html
Conservatives enjoy watching the poor suffer. It reminds them that capitalism is working and that Jesus's work is being done on earth.
these guys all want to take everything from you and give to the rich so they can build more factory's in china.
that the bottom line because al wise said so. avg middle class don't have 1000 dollars in the bank. how can at the end of the year will they be able to pay 9 or 20 % flat tax??someone tell me , it will kill jobs and small
bussiness's . crazy stuff
D-1129384
Don't agree with that comment at all. I don't like seeing the poor suffer any more than the next guy. But face the facts.....the poor are poor for their own doing, no one made them poor except themselves, the government sure as hell didn't have anything to do with it.
I'm on my 3rd (and best ever) job in 4 years. When I got laid off after working a 10 year job, I didn't sit on my ass and cry "poor me", I went out and looked to open doors. Even when I found the next job at 1/2 the pay, I was still out their looking to open better doors.
My brother-in-law is poor, he's always crying. Yet I go there on a Saturday, and he's sitting on his ass watching TV drinking a beer. Which is true for a vast majority of the poor. Go out and educate yourself, look for a second or better job, at the very least read a damn book. There's plenty of Gov't sponsored education assistance available.
To say that me as a Conservative enjoy watching the poor suffer is just flat out wrong. We're just tired of guys like my brother-in-law leeching the system for free handouts costing the country billions when there's plenty of opportunities other than sitting on your ass and depending on the Government to pay for your remote and 12 pack.
Capitalism is easy to capitalize on if you're motivated to do something other than stand in the welfare line so you can go get your next 12 pack.
Hey Al
I'm sure if you owned a business, you wouldn't give me or anyone else one red cent of your profits....
People open businesses to improve their lives and create jobs.....I don't ever recall anyone opening a business with the plan to give everything away....unless it was called welfare.....
To paraphrase,
"Let them eat cake."
History saw just how well that sort of thinking turned out for Marie Antoinette and French royalty.
Want some free advice? Pop for the Kevlar-reinforced turtleneck the next time you buy clothes.
Laker Steve What your saying we should be indebted to you for opening a business. I get the feeling you think because if one has a business he should get extra benefits like paying less in tax's. That would be corporate welfare.
Laker Steve, I'm glad you know at least one poor person -- many Republicans I've talked to seem to get their ideas about poverty from sitcoms.
I teach at a community college, where many of my students are working full time, taking a full load of classes, AND raising kids. I sure couldn't have finished school under those conditions, but somehow, they manage. Some of them have been kicked out of their homes, some of them are vets, and none of them want a free ride from the government -- just a little help while they try to fight and claw their way up to the middle-class American dream.
We already have upper class welfare. We need upper class welfare reform.
Backhouse,
Well put. The Republicans won't be happy until we look like Brazil--no middle class, just filthy rich and (literally) filthy poor.
Rick Perry wants to eliminate the Dept. of Commerce.
The mission of the department is to "promote job creation and improved living standards for all Americans by creating an infrastructure that promotes economic growth, technological competitiveness, and sustainable development." Among its tasks are gathering economic and demographic data for business and government decision-making, issuing patents and trademarks, and helping to set industrial standards.
No more entrepreneurship... No more Patents for your inventions. No more fair Labor!
Perry's an IDIOT!
@Laker Steve-I will pray for you to gain some wisdom. You obviously have been brain-washed. You cannot compare every unemployed person with your brother-in-law. Have you not seen the news where thousands of people show up to apply for a few jobs? Not every poor person is on drugs, alchohol or whatever you may think. Some just don't get the opportunities. And, yes, there are some people who give up so, how about trying to encourage your brother-in-law?
Huntsman would actually have a good chance in a general election. But at the current time, he is really the right flank of the Democratic Party, and completely outside of the Republican tent. He is far too nuanced and reasonable for the Tea Party. And there is really nothing about him that makes me want to vomit. I think the Teabaggers would rather lose than nominate Huntsman. They believe they are in the midst of another historic shift to the right that will realign politics for generations. I think they are right. They are about to push the envelope off the table. They are sending professional women, policemen, firemen, and many others running to the Democratic Party for generations. And they are causing young people to ask if Republicans are just a bunch of selfish prigs.
I have been to new hamp great state , great people , The thing about the people in New Hamp from what I remember AND I DO REMEMBER They don't particularly like it when politicians step on their rights and freedoms ,they don't like being told what they can or can not do , WHEN they do that the folks in New Hamp don't step back ,they don't kick and complain, THEY STOMP ON YA ,and fully expect them folks will be doing a lot of stomping this election , OH by the way some of then folks wear caulks , ( I think that's what they are called ) boots with spikes in them ,
Me I want to see the Newt — Obama debates this will be historical , the super bowl of debates , they will sell TICKETS pay per view , Vegas will have odds on who wins ,
Odds will favor Obama. Newt has a habit of putting his foot in his mouth.
Besides the has not all the nay Sayers called Obama an intellectual. That right there will make him a favorite.
If what you say is true, Darrel, then I don't understand why anyone from NH would vote republican. Republicans want to control every aspect of your personal life according to what they say their bible dictates. The dems helping the less privileged, not demonizing homosexuality, wanting people to have healthcare, all these and more do not stop personal freedoms - they promote personal freedom and responsibility. Booing a gay soldier, laughing if an uninsured man dies, laughing at electrifying a border fence to murder people and continuing corporate welfare at the expense of our country - those actions take away our freedoms and choices.
Maybe next week it will be Huntsman's turn to be flavor of the week....
"Maybe next week it will be Huntsman's turn to be flavor of the week...."
No -- Huntsman has a functioning brain. That is an automatic disqualification for a teapublican presidential candidate.
Huntsman could be, maybe, the first of the new. The teabaggers are fighting over who gets to be the last of the old.
I'm mystified why candidates like Huntsman or Buddy Roemer can't get any traction with these folks . . . do they expect their candidate du jour to win a general election through prayer inspired divine intervention ? Without a significant amount of support from non-affiliated and conservative Democrat voters . . . the next year is shaping up to be a total waste of their time and money . . .
Huntsman will never have a chance, because conservatives have painted Obama as Hitler for whoam Huntsman served as his Goebbles.
There's no room in the middle for the right (however democrats managed to give a Republican a critical job)
There are no longer moderate Democrats and we have all been driven to the left by the upsurge in the National Socialist Movement that we see going on in the republican party that also has made no room for the moderates!
According to republicans the radical far left is the group that wants food to eat and a dry place to sleep. I do realize that is a pretty outragious demand of the 99%.
I know it is just too much asking the rich to invest in their own country. Somehow republicans seem to think that if we don't have the poor and old dying in the streets we are too socialist.
Didn't the constitution say of the people, by the people and for the people? Or have the republicans taken that part out like the church/state separation?
@clwyd
Do yourself a favor and Google National Socialist Party. It's more like the tea party then the Democrats. I know it's tough for you but please, get a clue.
"I'm mystified why candidates like Huntsman or Buddy Roemer can't get any traction with these folks"
Buddy Roemer? Im am mystified you can put on your pants in the morning.
Also mystified why you leftists think we should care for your opinion.
After all, you geniuses nominated a totally unqualified failure as President..
Whoever it is, the candidate will beta the total failure Obama.
I know the republicans sound more like the National Socialist Party. That is what I said!
was he a total failure when he ordered the termination of our most feared enemy?
Or was it a failure when he extended the tax break for the struggling rich?
Or was he a failure when ended the war in iraq and set the timetable for an afghan exit? (that's a lot more than I saw the last butthole do)
Congress is a failure, no president can do any more or any less that the legislative branch is willing to do. Republicans in Congress stated what their top priority was to see him fail, they could care less that the American people are collateral damage in their political war against the duly elected president. I will forever punish all republicans with my vote, because they tolerated and went along with that crap. Friends don't let friends vote republican.
D-1129384
Lets not get facts in the way of democrat rhetoric,
Bush ordered the termination of Osama,
Obama just gave the "GO" order when our forces finally got the chance.
Typical of democrats claiming more than what they actually did.
If if lets you sleep at night Egilman to think that then knock yourself out. LOL "When our forces finally got the chance" Yea, 7 years an Bush couldn't manage it, he's still looking for WMD's. Typical of a republican, making crap up to cover their utter failures.
I think sally summed it up pretty well
Sally-1456674
Please don't insult me by calling me a Republican, Because I am not.
And why don't you offer some fact or facts to disprove my point rather than pointless liberal quips?
Bush flubbed his (our) chance to get OBL early on at Bora Bora....decided to let the locals handle it instead of sending our soldiers in to finish him off. That was the biggest blunder Bush ever did....and that's saying a lot.
So say what you will about Obama...but the truth is his handling of OBL and Libya and Iraq and Afghanistan and Egypt have been on the mark each and every time because his executive powers in those regards are not limited by the 'idiot fringe' we now have in Congress. That same 'idiot fringe' is exactly why our President has had such limited success with domestic policies. Blocking every attempt he makes just for political reasons even if it means the harming of America.
November 2012 we have a chance to change that for his next 4 years....vote those treasonous bastards (tea baggers) out and let the best President we have had for a very long, long time bring us the change this country so very much needs.
Don't you love it? Are they shopping at Walmart or Saks Fifth Avenue? looks like Walmart to me - I as a dyed in the wool Democrat - since I was 5 and my grandfather looked up from his Lithuanian paper "Draugas" and said "Barbora" - never vote for a Republican, they will steal your lunch
My grandfather came to this country without any education - was self taught - had 10 children - one lost at six weeks - one lost in the "Bataan Death March", one served on the PT boats and a third later in the army - and most of his daughters and grandchildren and great grandchildren all and I say all have college degrees
So why wouldn't I listen to my grandfather? Yes boys and girls, simplisticly the Republicans have stolen our lunch
Now it makes sense. Rather than looking at the facts of this presidency- nine percent unemployment, (but only because so many people are no longer counted in the labor force, which is down to 1983 levels. We're they counted, unemployment would be at 20%); 25 million people unemployed or underemployed; a staggering economy; Iran about to announce that they have nuclear weapons; North Korea at about the same place; Libya fallen into the hands of alQaeda; the Muslim Brotherhood in charge of Egypt- to name but a few of Obama's "accomplishments", and you plan to vote to continue the disaster because you approach politics with all the intellectual maturity of a five year old.
There's a reason five year olds can't vote. Too bad there are so many people who are chronologically older- but remain, in their thinking, that tender age.
Good grief.
Barbara, Another way of looking at it...a Democrat will steal your lunch and give it to someone without the forethought to make one for themselves.
watt75, Another way of looking ay it...a republican will steal your lunch and say TUFF S#!T your on your own.
nojo:
How much does the RNC pay you to spout that daily spin and dribble? Just curious.
Not that it matters because regardless of how hard you keep trying, you and the RNC and your cohorts simply can NOT pin the messes on our President when every voter sees and knows what the Republicans are up to. Heck, McConnell stated it pubolicly and made not bones about it, so everone SEES what you are doing, and so does your mother. It really gets old, but it does not change anyone's mind.
But, as usual, you and RNC and teanuts just don't GET IT do you....
(sigh...)
Watt, I wonder just who was it that gave several tax cuts in the time of war to the richest in our nation? The result being a huge debt. Now the very republicans who voted to create that debt act like it was the democrats doing.
So who was it that stole our lunch and gave it to someone like the rich and left nothing for the rest of us? Even now we are not allowed to ask the rich to invest in their own country.
Is there no lie that a republican won't tell themselves? Interesting that for the personal responsibility crowd, it is always someone else fault.
No Jo - Five year olds grow up and like the Chinese listen to their elders - too bad you didn't have that and to disparage me like that is downright silly - you missed the whole point - As you grow up and get educated you look back and take - the best and elininate the worst Education is all about making you think PS one of my cousins is a VP at Dupont - my second cousin is Beruta Galdikas - one of Leekey's girls world reknowned for studying Orangatangs
Plenty of Texans have been posting warnings about Perry so it's suprising that people took so long to figure things out for themselves. Why do you think he avoided requests by his Democrat opponents in the last election to debate them. He refused to debate. Now you understand why. Had he taken on the challenge, Texas might have have elected a Democrat in the last election. Also, it has been written over and over that in Texas Perry makes sure he fills open government positions with his biggest supporters. Could you imagine Perry as President (think Warren G. Harding. If you read his Wikipedia entry under 'Scandals': "Upon winning the election, Harding appointed many of his longtime allies and campaign contributors to prominent political positions in control of vast amounts of government money and resources." Sounds like Texas under Perry!). If I were to vote Republican, I think John Huntsman would be the best of the bunch.
The religious cult member?
Weve GOT the most corrupt administration since Harding. In fact, Obama, makes Harding look like a Boy Scout.
Every day, we learn more about the recipients of his Dollars to Donors program- borrowed billions that went into the pockets of his big dollar donors for sketchy businesses- some of which have Gone bankrupt, some of which created jobs, okay, in China, Finland, and other foreign countries.
Well, you probably don't know much about it. You read this blog, and think progress, and media matters, and that's it. It's the Obama range- where never is heard a discouraging word.
Perry is a lousy debater, and seems to have no inclination to do the things necessary to get better. That's a shame, because debates have been making and breaking candidacies since Kennedy/Nixon. He's also the most moderate candidate- see his views on immigration- with the best plans to jump start the economy.
So, now we'll choose between Gingrich and Romney- either of whom will eat Obama's lunch during debates.
NoJo
"Weve GOT the most corrupt administration since Harding. In fact, Obama, makes Harding look like a Boy Scout."
Can you prove any of the crap you spew? Good God you're tiresome. We get it, you hate President Obama but please quit lying all the time.
So correct Dennis...
But maybe we let her keep spouting off -
might be VERY beneficial for Obama and the Democrats.
It just gets old after awhile. Blah, Blah, Blah hate Obama, Blah, Blah, Blah, socialist, communist, every "ist". Teleprompter, class warfare, Blah, Blah, Blah, hate Obama.
This person is becoming boring. Trolls are getting old.
Heading out to work. Later guys. Keep the heat on these clowns.
No Joe, As a former retired history teacher I assure you that you must have been asleep in your history classes. Harding had all kinds of corrupt credentials? Please give a list of Obamas. I could probably come up with 100 or more on Harding so get busy! No, I don't intend to list them as I figure your suffering brain farts like the rest of the republicans. Perry, Cain and Bachmann!! lol!
No Joe appears to have blatted and fled. Like many Obama-haters, he's strong on rhetoric and weak on facts.
Actually, I think no jo is a she. But yes to all the above--Dennis P. and Not As Stupid are right on target. Her idiotic posts are tiresome.
You are correct Jack - she earned the title Granny 'Poll' Dancer with good reason! ;o)
I guess you missed the iWatch report.
Here's this- from Newsweek, no less
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/11/13/how-obama-s-alternative-energy-programs-became-green-graft.html
Dollars to Donors. They just cover the tip of the iceberg- iWatch covered just about every dollar that ended up in Obama donors pockets.
All$780 billion of them.
But you go on ahead with your chanting. Let's see, what is it today? It's not "hope for change" anymore. Nor is it "yes, we can"- because, no, he couldn't. WTf is gone. So is "I need another term to finish the job"- since the electorate responded, "heaven forfend!"
Oh, yeah- I remember- "we can't wait!"
And he's right- we can't.
Obama has been a lame duck since last November. Next November, we send him the moving cartons.
We can't wait.
...And she STILL doesn't get it...
Must be getting paid by the word for all the venemous horse hockey dribble she posts.
Chance are pretty high she will NEVER get it.
I have to agree Sally =
Her mind reminds me of concrete;
all mixed up and permanently set...
Actually - I consider No Jo a coward - hiding behind a stupid name - spouting - attacking everyone - with no thought or solutions - nothing but derisive hate - what is the saying? All show and no go! Maybe not I revert to the "good sisters" "empty barrels make the most noise"
Well reasoned response to No Joe's requested link by the nobama fan club...not! He will be one and done, as long as there are more taxpayers voting than parasites. I know which camp most of the posters in this thread are in.
NoJoes link is to an article written by a CONSERVATIVE writer, what a surprise he blames everything on Obama, same guy has another book "Do as I Say (Not as I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy", Bill O'Reilly, loved it, so that gives ya an idea as to how much truth is in it.
We all know what you mean chas... "as long as you can push through the disfanchisement anti-voting measures Republicans are working on in several states and prevent citizens (Democrats) from casting their ballots." Why don't you say it like it is instead of wrapping it in the right-wing spin and talking points?
Be more truthful... the truth will set us free!
OWS!
President Obama for President 2012!
Hey, I don't like Rick Perry, but crying out loud, why does he die on this moment? He forgets something for bit. Big deal- he's got plenty of other flaws that don't seem to be on anyone's radar, but suddenly he's at a loss for words and now there's no way he can ge the GOP nomination? that's crazy.
Why on earth don't people care more about policy?
Herman Cain proposes the craziest tax plan to screw the poor and help the rich, but for some reason its a problem he may have done something ten years ago that is stupid but doesn't make him bad at executing good policy. Herman Cain makes the a solid endorsement for abortion being the heavy hand of big government as his belief, but somehow manages to call himself pro-life?
Why do we give these guys a pass on their policy proposal, but care so much about being tounge tied or trying too hard to get banged?
I think it was more that he wants to kill a whole department of government, but he just can't remember who or why. So instantly you see that these are not his ideals and are nothing more than talking points fed to him.
So even if I could not remember the name of a department I could surely tell you what it does and why I want it gone. That is if you know what you are talking about. It became obvious that Rick doesn't have a clue.
Cain's 999 plan is just a give-a-way to his rich brothers of another mother Koch brothers. Cain claims he has never offended anyone. I was very offended by the most powerful woman in congress being called Princess Pelosi. I don't know if he sexually harassed women, but I do know he has no respect for women.
I think that if Cain can pull himself out of the hole he has dug his crazy policies will get more attention. A vote for Cain is a vote for war in Iran.
Obama/Biden 2012
Nancy Pelosi literally grew up in government and politics, by the time she was 15 she already knew more about government and politics than Cain will ever know.
Not only was she the most powerful woman in congress, she also held the highest office a woman has held yet in the US. To demean her by her sex, rather than policy is truly offensive to anyone that believes in equal rights.
Oh yeah...
...and there's Huntsman for all the I and Me and Special people.
The field that refuses to winnow itself -- with the exception of Pawlenty -- keeps reminding everybody but the Truest of Believers just how chaff-heavy the GOP/T candidate cluster is. To mix metaphors, it's like a crowd of three-year-olds competing for a piece of candy being held above them: "Me!", "Me!", "No, me!", and so on. How can any of these people serve others if they're each and all so dedicated to serving themselves? But maybe being about self first is what makes them GOP/Ters.
Screw that "moment of silence" Take a look at Perry's actual record, Texas is on the bottom of the list is almost any category you want to pick, Job creation,,,,,,,Do we ALL want to work for minimum wage and no benefits? Do we want our States to exist on Federal Aid? Ron Paul is in the same shape, Bachmann as President? Hahahaha A 5 year old could out think her on her feet,,,,Romney? He might as well be Obama in a Republican suit. Save your time and effort for 2016 and hope the Republican party makes a better recovery than the USA has been allowed by them.
I do not get the right wing at all. I am not sure they even think beyond their noses.
We have a Governor, (whom I do not like) with years of experience running for President. He gets tongue tied and he forgets his talking points, (he needs to get in touch with Obama about teleprompter), and the GOP have all but dismissed him. We have another guy that believes speak only when spoken to. The company he worked for paid out hush money, not once, but twice to women. His foreign policy cannot be any worse, He would deal with terrorist, he would stop China from building nuclear power. His 9-9-9 plan has many holes in it. And you right wingers boo the people that ask him questions about his character................................ Are you guys for real??? No one is condemning him yet, (except for me), and the way to find things out is to ask questions... and you forbid that? Lord help us if by some chance the GOP gets in office. All government employees kiss their job goodbye... Those of you living in snow country.... winter is coming.... who will plow the roads? Think outside of the [fox]....please for the sake of America.
Tom - What baffles me most about these people is they all want to get rid of government, yet they want to head it - sorry does not equate If we have no government, what would you be President of?
K Street - now I got it!!
But they can look as much as they like and the shelves are empty! Except for the," Crazy Lady Doll," "The Religious Cult Cuddly Dolls," The "Frugal Millionaire Doll," The Alzheimer's Patient Doll," The "Texas Southern Drawl and Secede Doll," and nothing else!
I am Independent, but decidedly Conservative, and after viewing the candidates over the past several months I believe Jon Huntsman is the real deal. An articulate smart decent man with an outstanding political record of Conservative stands on issues balanced with a savy pragmatism to solve problems. Believe me we have problems that need solving. He can hold his own intellectually with the President, or anyone else. If you're still looking, and are still undecided as to who can win the general election then give Huntsman a view. We need someone who has some gravitas to lead this country, and someone who doesn't want to fundamentally transform us into a European type of economic system. Give Huntsman a second look.
You can believe all you want, but he is going no-where in the middle of the right wing Gestapo Republican Party!
Romney will get in long before Huntsman would, Although I think Huntsman is not quite the flip flopper Romney is. I don't think Romney is sure which party is in yet.
But in any case, all the Republicans are basically on the same page..... cut, cut, cut, that is the big three and for wall street and corporations... cut, cut more taxes..... After you lay half of America off... no jobs, no welfare, no Social Security, no unemployment insurance...... who is going to pay for the cuts to the top 1%? No one will have any money except the top 1%.. factories and business will close up because no one is buying anything. You people really need to wake up and see what you are voting for..
An example:
Private Sector
And we think private enterprise is the solution to our Social Security and Medicare?
Yesterday - Jefferson County, Alabama filed bankruptcy - and became the latest victim of the high crimes on Wall Street. The decision made by Jefferson county to file bankruptcy represents the largest-ever municipal bankruptcy in American history. In a twisted scheme of corruption and financial manipulation - mega banks JP Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs allegedly paid off elected officials to invest in junk bonds to help finance a new sewer system.
But when the junk investments went bust - so too did Jefferson County - running out of money. Meanwhile - the mega banks were unscathed - making enormous profits off of fees. From ripping off customers with fine print and overdraft charges - to swindling an entire county - it's all in a day's work for the banksters on Wall Street.
That's why all need to get out there and OCCUPY SOMETHING!
Tom-4181228
I cant let this one slide,
Jefferson County went bankrupt because of a scandal over bringing the county sewer system up to new federal standards, way too much corruption.
This has been going on for a couple of years now, the people in government (mostly democrats) are in jail,
This is how the Republicans took over Alabama in a landslide directly caused by Democrat corruption.
Before you spout this crap you had better research your facts.
Just for good measure,
Here is the proof....
()
Looks like Newsvine doesn't like links or posted urls so lets try this again...
wbhm.org/News/2009/langfordconvicted
Just add the usual HTTP:// to the front and .html to the end
Larry D - you are probably right, but if Huntsman were to be elected - the current Republicans in Congress would treat him the same as Obama
Cure for our ills - get rid of all the Tea party delegates - bridle and saddle Mitch McConnel - actually with his deferments and lies he should have a seeing eye dog at his side - elect Republicans who will not sign Herr Grover Norquist's - road to ruin pledge - and Democrats and Republicans work for the common good and not your pocketbooks
How's that for wishful thinking?
A kind note from a liberal Democrat to all my fellow Americans who happen to be right wing Republicans: I am not the youngest voter any more, having watched presidential elections since 1952. This is the FIRST time I can ever remember the Republican party having such a hard time deciding who to run for POTUS. The Republican "front man" was always pretty much a given. So...............what's up with you guys? Anyone care to venture a guess as to why they seem so lost? Did they fail to "groom and promote" young Republican activists? Has the party moved that far to the right during Bush's time in office, that there are no "moderate" Republicans left? Can they possibly recover by 2016? Love to hear from you.
"This is the FIRST time I can ever remember the Republican party having such a hard time deciding who to run for POTUS"
No offense, sir, but your memory is failing you, badly.
My memory tells me that many posters repeat the same old tired talking points. Perhaps a coincidence, but perhaps... you are another lame programmed so-called "Soros monkey"poster.
Kind of nasty, aren't we? How about an example of the Republicans going through a similar process as now? Don't you like self reflection? Your propensity for name calling could be one of the reasons why the Republicans are in retreat! (Ohio, Mississippi) How about a discussion?
Bob..188....The same old talking points keep coming up because you and your buddy NOjo keep spouting the same lies and half truths. Consider yourself invited to go elswhere and spin them.
Poor booby & the nut job from NJ - they do appear to be quite hungover this morning from all the venom they were swilling last night!
Honestly Feisty, they get so tiresome these one note johnnies. If they could present a decent argument for their so called points, we might get somewhere. They are not even pseudo intellectuals, there doesn't seem to be any 'there' there.
Hope you are enjoying a good weekend friend.
The posts from NJ and Bob losta#s all revolve around one theme - I HATE/DETEST OBAMA, and you posters who support him are STUPID. It never varies from that theme. Nothing debatable, nothing note worthy of reading.
Obama/Biden 2012!!!!
It's ironic that Bob numbers used the word "programmed". I think he read my post yesterday, which I'll reproduce here. . . .
Does anyone but me have trouble differentiating Bob 1887910 from Bob 1805084? It's as if they're clones, programmed at the same factory, the Bob 1 Million Series. Maybe when the Bob 2 Million Series comes out they'll have rid the system of glitches. This one seems to be stuck on "Leftists are un-American."
Huntsman would be a good choice for the Republican party. He certainly is much more moderate than their current front runners. I would seriously consider him over any of the radical conservatives which have seemed to taken over the Republicans at this point in time.
Extremists with extreme views will not win the Presidency.
That's nice, another Huntsman vote form a liberal; but Republicans will choose our own candidate; we dont care what leftists want; stick with your failed President, thanks.
Well Bob as much as you don't care to hear it OUwhine makes a valid point, people are rejecting the extreme views of the republican candidates you can ignore the results in Ohio, you can ignore OWS, that is your choice, but the elctorate is tired of being ignored and insulted by republican leadership, it only sells to an ever shrinking republican base. The republicans who turned on republican policies in Ohio and joined with independents and democrats to kill that agenda do you really think they are going to now vote for a candidate that is just proposing more of the same, they are with us now. The truth is that republicans best chance in the general is a more moderate candidate.
but Republicans will choose our own candidate;
True Bob -- the teatards get to pick which candidate Obama will beat.
Well, Bob this moderate is waiting to see which "failed" candidate your teabaggers will nominate.
May I suggest someone who is higher up in the polls as an anti-Romney while you are out shopping? Don't just waste your vote
If you want articulate with a lot of historical knowledge on how things work and do not work, check out Gingrich. He's moved up some.
There is a also a blue light special on Mr. Cain right now, he is looking for supporters he lost with the past week. Give it time, this will probably blow over as no newer evidence has come to light and the accusers have retreated from the spotlight by the end of the week when Mr. Cain's lawyer emerged.
I would not recommend Mr. Huntsman...while he may be an excellent person, his poll numbers are too low to come up in time to actually make the cut in the primaries and you'd be wasting your vote. If you truly want an Anti-Romney, of the candidates in the race, you are stuck with a decision between Gingrich and Cain but ultimately, it is your decision on how you vote.
JRS-619990
Are you serious about Cain??? Let's say this does blow over as you say.... I think this blue light light special is a red light special. Forget about the women, although I think he should be behind bars! But in any case. He knows NOTHING about government or foreign policy... Of course he did say he would run it like a business... that brings back to mind one other person that said that......little bush!! He done such a fine job.....
Cain, he said he would deal with terrorist... later same day he said he misspoke and he would not deal with terrorist! Asking about nuclear power and he said he was worried about China developing nuclear power!!!!!! His 9-9-9 will work for every one... those that said it won't need to do the math. Couple days later he said well ok, so we will have a 9-0-9. This guy is nothing more than a puppet for koch brothers.
Don't forget, Tom, the demi-god of supply-side economics (even though he actually recognized demand as the prime driver of any economy), Adam Smith, thought that a businessman should never be in charge of government, or making regulations. He said that any regulation propsed by a businessman should be ". . . long and carefully examined, not only with the most scrupulous, but the most suspicious attention. It comes from an order of men, whose interest is never exactly the same with that of the publick, who have generally an interest to deceive and even to oppress the publick, and who accordingly have, upon many occasions, both deceived and oppressed it . . ." ('The Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations', Book 1, Chapter 11, Part 2).
You can see just where letting industry lobbyists write the legislation has gotten us.
Personally, I like the Richard Pryor Approach...
Vote: None of the above.
careful with that kind of thinking... 2012 could turn into another 2010..... God help we do not want a house majority along with Senate and the White House!!! Might as well move to Mexico... if they will let us in.. hahaha
GOTTA VOTE FOLKS!!!
I would vote Huntsman over Obama but none of the others.
I thought I might too, but his support of Ryans plan for ss and mc scares me. Maybe it is just because of the turbulence in the market, but I still trust the government over WS as my retirement safety net. I am guessing this is why he never says a whole lot on the issue of entitlement or health care reform.
Why would you vote for Huntsman when he has been in the race for a year and only 1% of the repulbican'ts support him? His belonging to the Mormon religious cult will prevent him or Romney from ever winning!
I don't think his belonging to the Mormon faith will hurt him. I think most of America is evolved enough so this is not an issue. He isn't a polygamist.
The problem is that the Mormon faith isn't a faith, but a cult!
No, clwyd-2621393, the problem is your thinking. Freedom of, and freedom from* religion are two founding principles of this country. Neither Romney, nor Huntsman's faith should be an issue. The only thing that sold matter to any true US Citizen voter is the candidate's policy positions. I couldn't care less, if they were devil worshippers, it is their positions on policy that I disagree with.
*If you actually read history, you will know that this is definitely a principle the Founding Fathers wanted to be guaranteed in this country, no matter what Faux Noise, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glen Beck, Pat Robertson, Newt Gingrich, etc., tell you.
clwyd.....all religions are cults. What I don't want is any candidate imposing their religion on the rest of us. Choice of religious beliefs is a personal matter.
When your cult tells you that if you do everything right for the "Temple" you could become a God in the afterlife? Do you know what some of the things are that a Mormon is supposed to do? It is a cult and would interfere with governing!
Only eleven of the Senate seats in this election are held by Republican. It is not likely that either party will gain sufficiently to achieve a filibuster-proof majority so the stalemate will probably continue there. Its virtually impossible for the GOP to gain thirteen seats and highly unlikely that Democrats will gain eight. So expect the standoff-stalemate to continue in the Senate. It is less a challenge in the House where Democrats only need to gain 40 seats to win back a majority. The House is more volatile for both parties and with the current dissatisfaction with congress in general, its hard to predict how things will shake out.
Jim in Texas - actually at the begining of each Congress - the Senate can choose to change the 60 vote criteria - what they cannot change are the inordinate amount of fillibusters - that has been the scourge - of these dealings
The "shoppers" in New Hampshire may want to hold off until 2016. The selection of merchandise will probably be much better.
Happy shopping!! Paul is clown, Bachmann is a clowness! Perry's obviously another dumb cowboy...Cain's a misogynist who doesn't know beans about the world. Sanctorum is sanctimonious and self-righteous (which should appeal to all the Hypochristian on the right!) but that's all he is. Mitt is, um... well, um... well, it depends upon WHICH Mitt you want to talk about. The only one in the crowd that is the least bit presidential is Huntsman and he was one of President Obama's most effective "employees"!
the only guy who has a chance of beating obama, is huntsman, a moderate republican , more like eisenhower, a true, caring american, who would pull many independents. but no one knows he exist, and the far right doesn't want him to exist!
Hutsman? maybe he needs a sweater to go along with his ivy league look. that ought to do it. Heck, maybe we just get a much ado about nothing candidate and try david letterman. That ought to work.
jolly joker - now you attack Huntsman's sweaters? By god you are really a deep thinker - by the way what kind of shoes does he wear? I see if he had cow manure on his boots and coveralls he would be one of yours, sorry ain't gonna happen - wait maybe you don't like his haircut - oh wait maybe his fingernails aren't dirty enough - and let's throw a little grease on his face. Who are you? Don't answer that I already know a person running for the highest office in this country - you want to have a beer with - worked out really well with the last one - faking clearing his empty cowless fields