Herman Cain is the most awesome presidential wannabe of all time!
Who cares if his messaging is inconsistent? Who cares that, when compared back to back, his messaging proves Cain is lying? Who cares that Cain doesn't know what a neocon is and didn't know China had nukes?
Those things don't matter. What matters is that Herman Cain is the best chance Republicans have of defeating Obama. He is charismatic, he looks good in a pimp hat and his porn mustache tells us he is a very serious man!
Say nisl - which was the party against civil rights?
You see, I ask for a stupid question and you deliver the goods.
The answer, in a nutshell, is Republicans. When the Civil Rights legislation passed (due to LBJ's hard work) LBJ said, "We've lost the South for a generation." Sure enough, the racist elements of the Democratic party (Dixiecrats) left the Democratic party after the Civil Rights legislation passed (due to LBJ's hard work) and joined the Republican Party. Shortly after that Lee Attwater instituted the "Southern Strategy".
Lee Atwater's description of the Southern Strategy, "You start out in 1954 by saying, “N*, n*, n*” By 1968 you can’t say “n*"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states’ rights and all that stuff. You’re getting so abstract now [that] you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites."
She claimed harassment over an e mail comparing men and women to computers. She demanded a pay raise - $16k, a Harvard Fellowship slot, reinstatement of lost sick leave, and to be able to work from home.
Per the e mail - men are like computer cause they have to be turned on and women cause any little mistake is stored forever in their memory.
Yep, definitely sexually harassing.
DBO is right again - Cain's problems are his positions of certain things.
I agree with that Spanky, but it's fun to watch the Libs get tied into knots when I flip the racism card.
In fact DBO compared Cain to a turd earlier and I jokingly said he was a raciist (hey DBO you asked why....cause turds are usually dark and smelly and that's not nice) and tossed in a few more lines to stir the pot. Just to see what kind of reaction I would get. It was pretty entertaining. Why Clara even called me ignorant.
Romney is the nominee now and has been for the past 6 months. Cain is just exposing the Left for who they really are. They don't really support minorities rights, just the ones that agree with them.
INVENTOR OF DEMOCRATIC SEX ABUSE MACHINE COMES FORWARD!
Cain lashed out at the "Democrat machine" for trying, he said, to knock his campaign for the presidency off-track.
CBTBT News - Professor Ned Brainard, also known as the inventor of flying rubber or "flubber", admitted during a press conference held at Midfield College that he is behind the "Democratic machine" that Herman Cain has accused of trying to "knock his campaign for the presidency off track." The machine, featuring a hybrid ray was based on research gleaned from development of the "Orgasmatron" featured in Woody Allen's movie, "Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex, But were Afraid to Ask". Since that time, Professor Brainard revealed that George Soros owned the rights to the machine, and had financed most of his research efforts.
The professor, a registered Democrat, decided to come forward before anyone else could claim responsibility for the machine, as he has yet to seek a patent. Professor Brainard explained how the machine works.
"Basically the sex abuse machine that I invented, also know as the "Harassmatron" was used successfully against Mr. Cain on at least four occasions. The machine requires a subject with a pompous, overblown impression of themselves to work properly. When the subject is exposed to rays from the machine, they imagine that they are uber-desirable, a "Brad Pitt type" so to speak, and that their superior position renders their victims unable to refuse their advances. So much so," the professor continued, "that even when the advances are refused, the subject will use his power and position to get the intended victim to submit or leave quietly."
When asked if there were any damaging side effects from the use of this machine, Professor Brainard offered,
"So far, the only side effect we've noticed is a convenient memory loss. However, I would like to note that Mr. Cain was a willing participant in this scientific study, and actually requested that we expose him to the sexual abuse rays on several occasions, and even tried to expose himself a few times when I left the room."
When asked to explain that last remark, Professor Brainard said,
"I meant expose himself to the ray. This is Midfield College. This isn't Penn State."
Cain, in the midst of multiple sexual harassment charges, issued this statement.
We're glad that the Democratic machine has been identified. We apologize to the Rick Perry campaigns and Mitt Romney campaigns because this sounded like something crooked that they would do. But we seriously doubted all along that another Republican would have utilized scientific methods and research to do or prove anything.
Cain has raised almost one million dollars JUST SINCE his press conference yesterday.
I have been posting this analogy to Reagan for weeks but Cain is definitely this year's Teflon-coated candidate. Nothing sticks or scratches.
Why?
I guess Mitt is seen as so inauthentic - that "For Pete's Sake" comment will haunt him. And he is coming across as a bit too remote - he has not done a Sunday morning TV interview on ANY show - even Fox - since March 2010.
Scary Perry is just that - scary! All of his comments about evolution - the "rock" incident - that very strange and bizarre behavior in NH - plus he just does not connect.
And Cain is seen as genuine - a rags to riches success story - and very personable.
I have compared this campaign to 1980 -
Mitt is the George H.W. Bush candidate - looks great on paper but lacks any spark.
Perry is the John Connally figure - handsome and rich but no "there" there.
Cain is the Ronald Reagan-like candidate in that people who like him seem to give him the benefit of the doubt. The "Teflon" thing - probably because like Reagan he projects optimism, likeability, a strong belief in a core set of issues - Reagan often messed up his facts - was dubbed the "amiable dunce" - but people cut him slack - just as they are with Cain.
One problem Cain is a dunce and he is not aimiable, only republicans cut him slack, in a head to head match-up with Obama he is polling 15 points behind, and that won't get better, because you only get one chance to make a first impression and he blew that.
I still remember in 1991, when George HW Bush was flummoxed while visiting a grocery store with laser barcode price tag scanners. Amazed by the "new technology", which we had all been utilizing since 1974, the former director of our Central Intelligence Agency could hardly hold back his excitement.
And then there was the first Gulf War which failed to finish Saddam off, because Bush stopped short of invading Iraq. And the "no new taxes" pledge which he promptly violated. And the 1989 bailout of the troubled savings and loans....and then there was bowlegged Barbara Bush....and can't forget raising "W"...........
I wish this clown would just go away. This country is in enough trouble without morons like him and his stupid antics. He's not entertaining, he's an idiot!
Now that it looks as if the real scandal is about serial harassees as oppose to a harasser let's get back to the allegation I spoke of yesterday concerning Larry Sinclair. Check out the video below.
A few responses yesterday were "there's a difference between consensual and nonconsensual sex" but I guess my issue was not so much the homosexual relationship charge but that Obama as a sitting state senator was accused of buying, selling, and using cocaine.
So why the 24/7 coverage of Cain and not a peep about Obama and cocaine? Why do the Cain allegations deserve merit but not the Obama allegation?
Hey MSNBC...where's the vid of all the stupid things Obama has said?...wonder when that's coming out...you have a lot to work it. My God you're so bias it's sickening.
I don't FEAR Herman Cain. He may not be bedecked in expensive furs and jewels, nor know the answer to any and all questions, but the bedecked don't either.
Cain has what the other Republican candidates lack: no, not charisma, but CREDIBILITY.
Whatever the news sources have conjured up about Cain's past - sexual harassment, the sole ordnance of the feminist left - even the unsupported allegations are not as egregious as those of former President, Billy 'Bob' Clinton.
An Arkansas judge who heard Paula's accusation at trial of the disgusting behavior toward her by Clinton awarded her almost a million dollars to be paid by none other than Clinton. It was paid.
A charge of sexual harassment is a 'nothing charge' unless the incident was recorded/videotaped. Otherwise it's just a 'he said, she said'. It would never make it to trial.
Our legal system assumes we're all innocent until PROVEN GUILTY in a court of law by the judgement of our peers, jurors.
So you malevolent Cain libelers and slanderers can go pound sand.
A charge of sexual harassment is a 'nothing charge' unless the incident was recorded/videotaped. Otherwise it's just a 'he said, she said'. It would never make it to trial.
Kind of amazing that people are prosecuted, sign settlements, and are convicted every day of crimes for which there is no video or audio tape, eh? What we do have on tape, however, is Mr. Cain lying to us several times.
"I don't recall a settlement"
"There was a settlement"
"I don't recall ever meeting this woman"
"I may have met this woman"
"There's nothing in my closet"
"I won't talk about it."
The point is not that he may or may not have done terrible things, but that he's willing to lie his way through an attempted cover-up of the accusations and not discuss it. That's not something we usually enjoy in our Presidents, and won't this time either. Having topped out at 26% of the GOP's 50% of voters support is nothing to brag about. (It's really just 13%, do the math). I could garner that much support simply by divorcing that Kardashian woman or being on Dancing with the Stars.
Cain will be gone tomorrow and it will be on to the next Republican idiot. They're pretty low in the barrel now though. When you get down to Santorum you're down to raving lunatic idiots. Never in modern history has there been anything remotely approaching the ridiculous nature of this primary season. I would be embarrassed to state that I watched the debates. I mean the highlights are always good comedy, but listening to this group try to state something thoughtful is like waiting for Godot. Clinton, Kerry, Dukakis, McCain and Papa Bush are intellectual towers compared to this group. They didn't have that panache to get away from answering "trick questions" about Ubecki Becki. (W hated those trick questions too.) Can you see anybody up there on that debate podium giving FDR's fireside chats? Can you see them on Mt. Rushmore? Stop laughing!!
Make sure to send your donation today to keep the CainTrain on track! lol
Why couldn't you throw your support behind someone who;
Plays hide the pepperoni with white females...
Lacks basic of knowledge on foreign policy;
Like NOT knowing China aquired nuclear capabilities in the 1960's
Ubecki-beck-becki-stan...
Democrats are brainwashed and need to get off the 'plantation'
NINE-NINE-NINE = YES WE CAIN! ;o)
Herman Cain is the most awesome presidential wannabe of all time!
Who cares if his messaging is inconsistent? Who cares that, when compared back to back, his messaging proves Cain is lying? Who cares that Cain doesn't know what a neocon is and didn't know China had nukes?
Those things don't matter. What matters is that Herman Cain is the best chance Republicans have of defeating Obama. He is charismatic, he looks good in a pimp hat and his porn mustache tells us he is a very serious man!
PS - Just typing that made me laugh:)
John McCain: "Today we are all Ubeki-beki-beki-stan-stanians!"
"I wee-ill NOT be deterred"
*tee-hee* *snicker*
Cain/Palin '12- Because one cannot be deterred by themselves.
LOL -
Yeah - some how 'bomb bomb bomb Uzbekistan doesn't have the right rhythm... ;o)
Here's a idea for the Cain Campaign, how about using 'Girls Just Want to Have Fun' as your theme song? ;o)
NO?
Now who doesn't love them some David Gregory?
When asked about the GOP forcing Cain to get out of the race he says:
"there are no Grand Wizards" in the GOP to force Cain out.
So what's a grand wizard, and in which organization can they be found? And might that organization have a particular interest in a black politician?
Is Gregory saying that there are Grand Wizards in the democratic Party? Does Al and Jesse know of this?
Why is Gregory so overtly racist?
Why is Gregory so overtly racist?
Maybe he wants to join the Republican party and is just trying to fit in.
Any other stupid questions?
Maybe Nisl - glad to see you have no issue in referring to Grand Wizards in a conversation about a black man.
How very enlightened of you nisl.
Say nisl - which was the party against civil rights?
Say nisl - which was the party against civil rights?
You see, I ask for a stupid question and you deliver the goods.
The answer, in a nutshell, is Republicans. When the Civil Rights legislation passed (due to LBJ's hard work) LBJ said, "We've lost the South for a generation." Sure enough, the racist elements of the Democratic party (Dixiecrats) left the Democratic party after the Civil Rights legislation passed (due to LBJ's hard work) and joined the Republican Party. Shortly after that Lee Attwater instituted the "Southern Strategy".
Lee Atwater's description of the Southern Strategy, "You start out in 1954 by saying, “N*, n*, n*” By 1968 you can’t say “n*"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states’ rights and all that stuff. You’re getting so abstract now [that] you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites."
Shoot. I thought Grand Wizzards was something like Angry Birds, only from Disney. (now, Grand DREGONS- they be something different altogether...)
DrEgons, DrAgons- Birds, Boids, whatever.....
Stay tuned More bad news to come for Cains stained train
Cain, Cain, Cain, Cain of Fools sung by the Queen of Soul to the King of Fling.
Hang in there Hermann!
"AP Exclusive: Accuser filed complaint in next job"
See- this is why we need to stay away from all that harassment stuff until, and unless something factual comes up.
Let Herman crash and burn on his own, soley on 'China nukes', Becki Stan Stan and that 9 9 9 nonsense.
Another real peach, this one.
She claimed harassment over an e mail comparing men and women to computers. She demanded a pay raise - $16k, a Harvard Fellowship slot, reinstatement of lost sick leave, and to be able to work from home.
Per the e mail - men are like computer cause they have to be turned on and women cause any little mistake is stored forever in their memory.
Yep, definitely sexually harassing.
DBO is right again - Cain's problems are his positions of certain things.
I agree with that Spanky, but it's fun to watch the Libs get tied into knots when I flip the racism card.
In fact DBO compared Cain to a turd earlier and I jokingly said he was a raciist (hey DBO you asked why....cause turds are usually dark and smelly and that's not nice) and tossed in a few more lines to stir the pot. Just to see what kind of reaction I would get. It was pretty entertaining. Why Clara even called me ignorant.
Romney is the nominee now and has been for the past 6 months. Cain is just exposing the Left for who they really are. They don't really support minorities rights, just the ones that agree with them.
I object, 'counselor'- I distictively said he was 'de terred', not A turd.
INVENTOR OF DEMOCRATIC SEX ABUSE MACHINE COMES FORWARD!
CBTBT News - Professor Ned Brainard, also known as the inventor of flying rubber or "flubber", admitted during a press conference held at Midfield College that he is behind the "Democratic machine" that Herman Cain has accused of trying to "knock his campaign for the presidency off track." The machine, featuring a hybrid ray was based on research gleaned from development of the "Orgasmatron" featured in Woody Allen's movie, "Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex, But were Afraid to Ask". Since that time, Professor Brainard revealed that George Soros owned the rights to the machine, and had financed most of his research efforts.
The professor, a registered Democrat, decided to come forward before anyone else could claim responsibility for the machine, as he has yet to seek a patent. Professor Brainard explained how the machine works.
When asked if there were any damaging side effects from the use of this machine, Professor Brainard offered,
When asked to explain that last remark, Professor Brainard said,
Cain, in the midst of multiple sexual harassment charges, issued this statement.
Cain has raised almost one million dollars JUST SINCE his press conference yesterday.
I have been posting this analogy to Reagan for weeks but Cain is definitely this year's Teflon-coated candidate. Nothing sticks or scratches.
Why?
I guess Mitt is seen as so inauthentic - that "For Pete's Sake" comment will haunt him. And he is coming across as a bit too remote - he has not done a Sunday morning TV interview on ANY show - even Fox - since March 2010.
Scary Perry is just that - scary! All of his comments about evolution - the "rock" incident - that very strange and bizarre behavior in NH - plus he just does not connect.
And Cain is seen as genuine - a rags to riches success story - and very personable.
I have compared this campaign to 1980 -
Mitt is the George H.W. Bush candidate - looks great on paper but lacks any spark.
Perry is the John Connally figure - handsome and rich but no "there" there.
Cain is the Ronald Reagan-like candidate in that people who like him seem to give him the benefit of the doubt. The "Teflon" thing - probably because like Reagan he projects optimism, likeability, a strong belief in a core set of issues - Reagan often messed up his facts - was dubbed the "amiable dunce" - but people cut him slack - just as they are with Cain.
One problem Cain is a dunce and he is not aimiable, only republicans cut him slack, in a head to head match-up with Obama he is polling 15 points behind, and that won't get better, because you only get one chance to make a first impression and he blew that.
Mitt is the George H.W. Bush candidate
That is NOT fair to H.W. Bush. H.W. Bush was, in my opinion, a fairly good President. H.W. was certainly underrated.
I still remember in 1991, when George HW Bush was flummoxed while visiting a grocery store with laser barcode price tag scanners. Amazed by the "new technology", which we had all been utilizing since 1974, the former director of our Central Intelligence Agency could hardly hold back his excitement.
And then there was the first Gulf War which failed to finish Saddam off, because Bush stopped short of invading Iraq. And the "no new taxes" pledge which he promptly violated. And the 1989 bailout of the troubled savings and loans....and then there was bowlegged Barbara Bush....and can't forget raising "W"...........
people stand an watch car wrecks too ,,,,he's a sideshow...nothing more....
I wish this clown would just go away. This country is in enough trouble without morons like him and his stupid antics. He's not entertaining, he's an idiot!
I couldn't agree more! Obama must go..We'll do our best to vote him out 11/2012. We're counting on your help!
hey mr. conservative hate to bring you down but you got mitt romney cain and perry what a fantasy team...i think i'ld punt about now....
I wish this clown would just go away. This country is in enough trouble as it is without more morons like him. He's not entertaining, he's an idiot!
Now that it looks as if the real scandal is about serial harassees as oppose to a harasser let's get back to the allegation I spoke of yesterday concerning Larry Sinclair. Check out the video below.
A few responses yesterday were "there's a difference between consensual and nonconsensual sex" but I guess my issue was not so much the homosexual relationship charge but that Obama as a sitting state senator was accused of buying, selling, and using cocaine.
So why the 24/7 coverage of Cain and not a peep about Obama and cocaine? Why do the Cain allegations deserve merit but not the Obama allegation?
here we go....
http://www.veoh.com/watch/v18885631Kb2qFKtG?h1=Larry+Sinclair+Obama+Steamy+Love+Affair
Nice try. The guy is a fraud and a forger, and really stinks at photoshopping.
obama didn't deny it that cains problem he can't tell the truth....
focus is rough for rob huh......
Hey MSNBC...where's the vid of all the stupid things Obama has said?...wonder when that's coming out...you have a lot to work it. My God you're so bias it's sickening.
HEY everybody- Look over THERE!
shiny stuff conservative victory...
I don't FEAR Herman Cain. He may not be bedecked in expensive furs and jewels, nor know the answer to any and all questions, but the bedecked don't either.
Cain has what the other Republican candidates lack: no, not charisma, but CREDIBILITY.
Whatever the news sources have conjured up about Cain's past - sexual harassment, the sole ordnance of the feminist left - even the unsupported allegations are not as egregious as those of former President, Billy 'Bob' Clinton.
An Arkansas judge who heard Paula's accusation at trial of the disgusting behavior toward her by Clinton awarded her almost a million dollars to be paid by none other than Clinton. It was paid.
A charge of sexual harassment is a 'nothing charge' unless the incident was recorded/videotaped. Otherwise it's just a 'he said, she said'. It would never make it to trial.
Our legal system assumes we're all innocent until PROVEN GUILTY in a court of law by the judgement of our peers, jurors.
So you malevolent Cain libelers and slanderers can go pound sand.
ThinkingClearly,
You're not.
Kind of amazing that people are prosecuted, sign settlements, and are convicted every day of crimes for which there is no video or audio tape, eh? What we do have on tape, however, is Mr. Cain lying to us several times.
"I don't recall a settlement"
"There was a settlement"
"I don't recall ever meeting this woman"
"I may have met this woman"
"There's nothing in my closet"
"I won't talk about it."
The point is not that he may or may not have done terrible things, but that he's willing to lie his way through an attempted cover-up of the accusations and not discuss it. That's not something we usually enjoy in our Presidents, and won't this time either. Having topped out at 26% of the GOP's 50% of voters support is nothing to brag about. (It's really just 13%, do the math). I could garner that much support simply by divorcing that Kardashian woman or being on Dancing with the Stars.
allegations are enough in d.c. this is the court of public opinion so i don't have to pound salt right
Cain will be gone tomorrow and it will be on to the next Republican idiot. They're pretty low in the barrel now though. When you get down to Santorum you're down to raving lunatic idiots. Never in modern history has there been anything remotely approaching the ridiculous nature of this primary season. I would be embarrassed to state that I watched the debates. I mean the highlights are always good comedy, but listening to this group try to state something thoughtful is like waiting for Godot. Clinton, Kerry, Dukakis, McCain and Papa Bush are intellectual towers compared to this group. They didn't have that panache to get away from answering "trick questions" about Ubecki Becki. (W hated those trick questions too.) Can you see anybody up there on that debate podium giving FDR's fireside chats? Can you see them on Mt. Rushmore? Stop laughing!!
his new claim is he's gay....