Send us your Inside the Boiler Room questions

After a brief hiatus, we're going to run a new installment of "Inside the Boiler Room." Send us your questions for Mark and Domenico!

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

Welcome back guys! ;o)

  • 6 votes
#1 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 10:59 AM EDT

I am excited to see you back. I have so many questions during this wild time. I just don't know where to start.

  • 4 votes
#1.1 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:03 AM EDT

I do have a question; which did you prefer when you were in IA - the fried buter or the fried kool-aid?

  • 9 votes
#1.2 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:07 AM EDT

I would like to see a large WPA type stimulus injected onto this economy, right now.

Do either of you think that feasible?

  • 9 votes
#1.3 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:26 AM EDT

Question:

Sarah Palin is coming back to Iowa this weekend. Do you have any idea as to why? I heard she's bringing Christine O'Donnell with her. The state fair has now ended here, and the fried butter and the side-shows are all gone. Any idea as to why this visit??

  • 5 votes
#1.4 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:37 AM EDT

The last thing that is needed right now is a federally funded wpa. The unions don't need any more help right now, it's the rest of the public sector that the administration is ignoring!

  • 8 votes
#1.5 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:28 PM EDT

My question, gents: Is it possible for the MSNBC political team to expand its reach of interview guests or frequent commentators to include people like Joseph Stiglitz on economics, Thomas Frank on conservative political tactics, or Naomi Kelin on Tea Party platform positions? And if so, is it possible that some of the outrageous assertions made by people such as the spokesperson from the Heritage Foundation or the former RNC chair can be refuted in a facutal sense rather than often passing by unchallenged?

  • 6 votes
#1.6 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:38 PM EDT

130 hours until obama's 'jobs' speech. Like Chris Matthews there's a tingling up and down my legs in anticipation! Getting rid of obamacare would create more jobs that federal spending projects!

  • 8 votes
#1.7 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:38 PM EDT

Ben Snead -

The canard that "the unions" were the intended and principal target of the last stimulus package has been pounded to dust. And the Obama Administration went out of its way to adi the public sector - although so much of that was diverted by governors balancing budgets (Rick Perry wasn't the only one!) or by governors refusing assistance on ideological grounds (as well as an unreasoning hatred for the President).

The great majority of economists are pleading for a substantial stimulus plan similar to that whose details are now being leaked.

  • 5 votes
#1.8 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:42 PM EDT

Mark and Domenico:

Buncha lazy folks here. Nothin' but questions, know what I mean? They could look 'em up, but nooooo, they want you to.

So, as a lefty-sorta-guy, I'm going to do what the right says we don't. I ain't takin', I'm givin'!

Herewith a list of answers:

Yes!

No!

Romney.

Obama.

Palin, are you kidding?

Yes, Perry and Bachmann do get a lot of money from the government.

No one is dumber than Inhofe.

A lot. Yes, that's two words.

Of course you have to increase the tax rate.

Yes, the Tea Partiers will calm down after they burn a witch.

A lot of people would like to wipe the smirk off Cantor's face.

  • 5 votes
#1.9 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:00 PM EDT

Will you both please start pushing the candidates for substance instead of generalities concerning issues such as tax reforms, governments role in stimulating economic recovery, healthcare solutions etc. More in depth interviews and reporting, if you can catch them that is.

  • 4 votes
#1.10 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:01 PM EDT

Is NBC going to re-schedule the Debate on the 7th as Jay Carney so graciously offered to let you do? Or does NBC agree that this is the most petty administration in history?

  • 4 votes
#1.11 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:39 PM EDT

Now now David, nobody in the Tea Party has ever suggested burning Nancy Pelosi... we need her...she's the baseline for "Stupid Liberal"

  • 2 votes
#1.12 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:49 PM EDT

Hi, Mark & Dom-

President Obama's job approval as measured by Gallup is currently at 39% (approve) vs 54% (disapprove).

Rasmussen is only a bit more charitable (go figure!) to the President.

Isn't the 2012 Presidential election contest likely to be between President Obama...and some reasonable alternative?

Perhaps even...

ANY reasonable alternative...?

Thanks.

I just love you guys.

You're the best!

  • 2 votes
#1.13 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:56 PM EDT

Nice suck up there MB.

Think it will work?

  • 1 vote
#1.14 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:03 PM EDT

Please, someone, drill down on the many idiotic claims from GOP/TP candidates. Most notably Bachmann's $2 gas and how removing all taxes for companies off-whoring (excuse me, off-shoring) would turn around the economy and create jobs over night. If you must, get out a white board the way Bachmann does--oh, and please let people know that Bachmann is not Jewish. Thanks!

Has anyone done research into imposing a tariff on off-shoring, and to avoid the tariff the majority of production must be done in the US with American labor?

Are you ready for the Romeny and Huntsman "job plan"? Let me guess, it will be to remove all regulation and taxes that supposedly impede the so-called "job creators." Come on, how many folks in the richest 2% are creating jobs--anyone have real data on this? I don't mean corporations, but those who are defined as small business and in particular those who file as individuals.

Ed Shultz -- Your next assignment is to go to Eric Cantor's district to see if those poor people need charitable assistance from progressives.

Thanks!

  • 2 votes
#1.15 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:06 PM EDT

Naw, White Collar...

Hardly.

lol

It hasn't worked yet.

This is still (and, always) First Read.

And, anyway...

What makes you think that Mark & Dom are incapable of answering my question?

    #1.16 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:38 PM EDT
    Reply

    My question is: do you think corporations are deliberatley holding back on hiring in order to hurt President Obama's re-election because they feel Republicans will keep taxes lower for the wealthiest and relax environmental and financial regulations? This is the feeling I get from comments from Maria Bartiromo on Meet The Press and on her own show, and she seems to be speaking for these decision-makers.

    • 4 votes
    Reply#2 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:17 AM EDT

    I know I am deliberatley holding off on any major purchases until he is elected out of office. I will not spend one dime of my hard earned cash to stimulate his economy.

    I want a new car and a new house, but not until he is gone. I have friends who are doing the same thing.

    • 3 votes
    #2.1 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:28 PM EDT

    Corporations are too uncertain about the costs of obamacare! It's cost are still going up and no one can quantify it's costs. Defunding obamacare is a priority to getting the economy back on track! Only then will the private sector see job creation. Do you think that obama will consider redacting or defunding obamacare to help the economy?

    • 7 votes
    #2.2 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:34 PM EDT

    Wow, rick, that's sticking to your idealogical guns in one of the best house buyer's markets ever.

    His economy? How about our economy?

    Buy that new house and new car. I will not tell anyone.

    • 3 votes
    #2.3 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:39 PM EDT

    Robin hot in NM

    Cause healthcare insurance worked out so well during the Bush administration....and that's what you want to go back to...people going bankrupt from medical bills they couldn't pay ... emergency rooms providing basic healthcare for the non-insured at exorbient costs to the rest of us...oh, yeah the good old days.

    • 3 votes
    #2.4 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:50 PM EDT

    Amy, obamacare went way too far in the other direction! Many companies, large and small.. are afraid to expand these days because of the yet undetermined costs of obamacare. I have to consider the effects of obamacare one of the major reasons the job market sucks!

    • 4 votes
    #2.5 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:12 PM EDT

    Gosh Rick,

    Why didn't you buy the new car and house when President Bush was in office. Things were great then.

    • 3 votes
    #2.6 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:35 PM EDT

    Yeah Amy... it's a giant conspiracy between all taxpayers and those greedy corporations... they're colluding against Obozo just so the economy will tank, their wealth will diminish, and we'll be in a recession for another decade.... you don't suppose it has anything to do with Obozocare, or onerous regulation... or gov't borrowing/spending that's off the chart... or Bernanke's "print more money" policy, or outright attacks on companies like Boeing whom Obozo's union goons have targeted do you? what an idiot you are...

    • 2 votes
    #2.7 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:56 PM EDT

    Fed Up-2683606

    I think you are one of those low information voters that is stuck on stupid. W. Bush caused these budget woes and President Obama has been doing his best to correct the situation.

    Do yourself a favor and stop listening to right wing media.

    • 4 votes
    #2.8 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:13 PM EDT

    All I know is what Maria Bartiromo tells me, and she tells me, with a big smile on her face, that Wall Street is "looking for leadership" (code word: holding out for a Republican administration which will revert to Bush regulatory practices) before they start hiring.

    • 3 votes
    #2.9 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:23 PM EDT

    @rick, Texas - Wow Governor Perry, thank you for taking the time to visit First Read and talk about your spending and economic plans!

    Amy B. You have to admit Maria Bartiromo has such a great smile! ;}

    • 3 votes
    #2.10 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:24 PM EDT

    A response to a couple of questions:

    1. We have a WPA in place now except now you don't even have to pretend you are working. Lyndon Johnson called "The Great Society"

    2 Does anybody think EMTLA has anything to do with the high cost of health care? Keep in mind that hospitals report that 50% of the costs of emergency room visits go uncollected now.

      #2.11 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:26 PM EDT

      Maria Bartiroma is a beautiful woman but she could lighten up on the eye shadow. Does seems like heavy eyeliner is some kind of code in Republican circles; Michele Bachmann often sports a smokey eye.

      • 1 vote
      #2.12 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 4:27 PM EDT

      I would really like to hear which regulations are keeping businesses from investing. I'm talking specific regulations.

      • 2 votes
      #2.13 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 4:41 PM EDT

      Yes, Maria Bartaloma is a stone fox. Wished she was on Dancing with the stars.

      • 2 votes
      #2.14 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 8:14 PM EDT
      Reply

      Will the nomination of a real conservative like Rick Perry help or hurt the chances of the GOP taking the US Senate?

      • 1 vote
      Reply#3 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:44 AM EDT

      What do you think was the primary cause of the 2008 recession?

        #3.1 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 7:24 PM EDT
        Reply

        Question: When Obama cates the White House in 2013, what will be his new occupation? Will he go back to Chicago and become an ambulance chaser (the most likely scenario). Or will he move to Hollywood (the only place where he will still be popular) and go into professional wrestling, calling himself "The Rock" Obama where his mantra will be "Grope n' Strange!" "Grope n' Strange!" He and Michelle will be divorced at this point and she will be pushing hair care products on infomercials.

        • 11 votes
        Reply#4 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:45 AM EDT

        I don't know who you are, but you aren't worthy of carrying Presidnt Obama's golf clubs. Isn't the library restricting your computer time? Surely your hour is up.

        • 1 vote
        #4.1 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:52 PM EDT

        Amy, your left wing friends make snarky personal atatcks and vicious insults at Republicans all day long, and you are good with that.

        But any lame jokes at your hero's expense, you get all worked up.....unless you have a pecuniary interest in the Nanny State (as many who post here no doubt do), you need help for your Obama-mania..it is so 2008...

        • 7 votes
        #4.2 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:58 PM EDT

        It slays me how Republicans call liberals "libtards,"smear our politicians and claim God and Christ are on their side, and their side alone...then turn around and play victim when any liberal stands up for her beliefs. Darn right I get angry when right-wing posters insult the President. I voted for Obama in the primaries in 2008 and I will work to re-elect him in 2012 and I won't let some lazy, old, male stand in my way.

        • 2 votes
        #4.3 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:13 PM EDT

        Lazy, Old, Male?????

        I am not Lazy or Old! I work for a living Amy!

        Now get back to answering phones and stop spending so much time on FR. You'll need to bank a lot of hours if you intend to help get Obama re-elected.

        • 5 votes
        #4.4 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:49 PM EDT

        Amy,

        I think Bob was pointing out how hypocritical you are.

        • 3 votes
        #4.5 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:56 PM EDT

        White Collar Auto

        Every Tea Party supporter, I personally know, has a beer belly the size of a baby walrus and gets some form of disability, food stamp benefit or housing assistance and claims they are taking the government's money just to "show them!" Oh, and they hate President Obama, but can't explain why.

        • 1 vote
        #4.6 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:32 PM EDT

        Amy,

        Sounds to me like you have Daddy issues. You just described the average UAW "Worker", except for the hate Obama part.

        I find it hard to believe that you "Personally know" anybody who supports the Tea Party. Your ilk are to close minded to even consider a contrary opinion.

        • 2 votes
        #4.7 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:37 PM EDT

        White Collar Auto

        It's impossible to completely avoid Tea Party types, especially when they are sitting across from you at Thanksgiving.

        • 1 vote
        #4.8 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:51 PM EDT

        PPS I loved my Dad. He was a Republican, but the smart kind, not the stupid kind. Eisenhower couldn't get nominated in this primary - too liberal.

        • 1 vote
        #4.9 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:55 PM EDT

        Damage123,

        Close, but Moochelle will be hawking some diet product on the Oprah Winfrey network.

          #4.10 - Thu Sep 1, 2011 1:29 AM EDT
          Reply

          Hi guys and welcome back:

          Do you believe that the 2012 Republican Presidential nomination field is basically set? (With the exception of maybe Sarah Palin). If not, who could be a late entrant that could significantly impact the race? If the field is set, how do you see the next few months (before any primaries) playing out between the GOP candidates?

          Most importantly, who are your picks for the Super Bowl and NCAA College Football champs?

          Thanks as always!

          • 1 vote
          Reply#5 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:49 AM EDT

          NCAA Champ! Now there's a question worth asking!

          Season starts tomorrow. I can't wait. Go PAC-12!!!!

          • 1 vote
          #5.1 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:42 PM EDT

          Grimey, face facts. You will be voting for President Obama in 2012 or staying home. THere is no moderate Republican choice in this race.

          • 2 votes
          #5.2 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:16 PM EDT

          Never too early for Mark & Domenico to jump on the Steeler bandwagon! I'll save a spot for them.

          • 3 votes
          #5.3 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:19 PM EDT
          Reply

          After the "super committee" unveils that it intends to balance the budget by cutting social security and medicare working Americans have paid into all their lives which city will be the first to see rioting and bloodshed in the streets?

          • 3 votes
          Reply#6 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:50 AM EDT

          Detroit or Chicago. High minority population.

          • 3 votes
          #6.1 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:30 PM EDT

          Probably Texas, seeing as they have so many on welfare. That's where the term welfare state came from.

          • 1 vote
          #6.2 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:04 PM EDT

          Los Angeles, Compton, South Central area in California, hands down. We already have a few riots under our belt, what's one more.

          • 3 votes
          #6.3 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:51 PM EDT
          Reply

          I hope its not true for all our sake.

            Reply#7 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:51 AM EDT

            How can the President go "big" on a jobs proposal without causing another debt ceiling fight?

            • 1 vote
            Reply#8 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:58 AM EDT

            By law, the President and the Federal Reserve are required to keep unemployment under a certain percentage.

            http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/08/11-0

            "In the aftermath of the rise in unemployment which followed the “oil crisis” of 1975, Congress addressed the weaknesses of the 1946 act through the passage of the Humphrey-Hawkins Full Employment Act of 1978. The purpose of this bill as described in its title is:

            An Act to translate into practical reality the right of all Americans who are able, willing, and seeking to work to full opportunity for useful paid employment at fair rates of compensation; to assert the responsibility of the Federal Government to use all practicable programs and policies to promote full employment, production, and real income, balanced growth, adequate productivity growth, proper attention to national priorities.

            The Act sets goals for the President. By 1983, unemployment rates should be not more than 3% for persons age 20 or over and not more than 4% for persons age 16 or over, and inflation rates should not be over 4%."

            • 2 votes
            #8.1 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:10 PM EDT

            Perfect - Government could be required to do direct hiring under this law! We do need something huge that only the government can and should do immediately. Direct hiring for infrastructure would be a great first step. Deficits can wait. Jobs cannot. High speed rail, schools, roads, bridges, etc...And revenue increases. All good here.

            • 2 votes
            #8.2 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:15 PM EDT
            Reply

            Damage123 - Question: When Obama cates the White House in 2013, what will be his new occupation? Will he go back to Chicago and become an ambulance chaser (the most likely scenario). Or will he move to Hollywood (the only place where he will still be popular) and go into professional wrestling, calling himself "The Rock" Obama where his mantra will be "Grope n' Strange!" "Grope n' Strange!" He and Michelle will be divorced at this point and she will be pushing hair care products on infomercials.

            Question: Will FR and the Vine start screening the IQ's of posters before giving them access?

            • 5 votes
            Reply#9 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:00 PM EDT

            Excellent query sir.

            • 3 votes
            #9.1 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:16 PM EDT

            Better hope not Richard, there wouldn't be any tea people GOP republicans on this blog.

            • 1 vote
            #9.2 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:06 PM EDT
            Reply

            I would be interested in a discussion of the role of religion in the upcoming presidential election. Certain presidential hopefuls seem to be exploiting their brand of belief for support and in the present climate do you see that being an advantage, or could it eventually work against them?

            • 4 votes
            Reply#10 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:13 PM EDT

            Mark - you may be able to find some interesting information related to your question in a new book, American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us. It was just published, and in the usual authors' media tour, the two men who wrote it delivered some surprising news about the Tea Party's composition and attitudes. The book, though, is less about poltics than it is the role of religion in society.

            • 4 votes
            #10.1 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:29 PM EDT

            Thanks, John.

            • 2 votes
            #10.2 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:40 PM EDT
            Reply

            The 2008 Democratic primary was long and contentious and there was real fear the party would fracture even though Obama and Clinton were close in ideology. The 2012 Republican primary is shaping up to be an interesting contest as well, but the candidates are much further apart in ideology. Do you think the differences between "conservative" and "ultra-conservative" has the potential to bring a third-party candidate to the general election? Think Sarah Palin - going rogue!

            • 3 votes
            Reply#11 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:26 PM EDT

            Gents, (First Time Questioner and avid reader of FR).

            Do you believe Obama's polling numbers are primarily low due to the fact the left is growing tired of his middle-right compromising starting points?, and that while they are dispirited today they will ultimately come home for the re-elect, where unlike 2010 you will have the entire spectrum of the electorate voting? I think his polling numbers today make him look more vulnerable than he actually will be (especially with no opponent yet) - and a guy like Perry really helps the D's. Do you think he needs to go big / unattainable to draw the 15 month contrast with the republicans on the jobs plan and campaign on it? I do.

            Thanks for your time,

            Achilles LV

            • 5 votes
            Reply#12 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:07 PM EDT

            Achilles

            Nice to read a literate and reasonable comment on FR. I hope you come back often!

            • 1 vote
            #12.1 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:45 PM EDT

            What kind of boost would Rubio as VP give to either Perry or Ronmey?

              #12.2 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 4:23 PM EDT
              Reply

              Apologies fellas - kind of answered my own questions! Good Talk!

              • 1 vote
              Reply#13 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:09 PM EDT

              My question is this.....

              Since the media can no longer report that most americans are satisfied with Obama's job performance why do so many in the media lie about him being personally liked? It seems on MSNBC that every hour someone is saying "...but people like Obama personally".

              The VAST majority of people I come in contact with CANNOT stomach the guy. And I'm from liberal Massachusetts.

              I mean really!!

              • 5 votes
              Reply#14 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:23 PM EDT

              Rob you need to get out more. Just conversing with people that agree with you makes you, well uninformed. That has to be what, maybe 10 people Rob.

              • 1 vote
              #14.1 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:11 PM EDT

              Actually I have 140 employees over 50% are nonwhite employees. And as I said the VAST majority not only think he sucks at his job but can't stand him.

              • 3 votes
              #14.2 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:17 PM EDT

              this seems to be another example of someone who claims to be busy running a company and talking to lots of people, but who's writing messages on this board each and every day.

              • 1 vote
              #14.3 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:21 PM EDT
              Reply

              If we're voting, I like discussion threads on a WPA - large style infrastructure jobs program (incidently, there were never any unions in the WPA) or, possibilities for a third party (although I think Ron Paul is a better possibility than Palin). Most WPA projects of the 30s are still serving us well today as court houses, jails, bridges, etc. although the shameful lack of maintenance has degraded some of them lately. There are other examples such as our interstate highway system, under Republican Dwight Eisenhower or the building of the National Park System - begun by Republican Theodore Roosevelt. These create real stimulus, teach practical job skills, and leave the public with long long range prizes for their efforts. Nobody has benefited more or more directly from the interstate highway system than business/manufacturing by broadening and accessing markets for domestically produced goods.

              • 3 votes
              Reply#15 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:15 PM EDT

              Glad to see the Boiler Room feature back---thanks Mark & Domenico. My question relates to the politics of the President's jobs proposals. I think a large program that paid for itself from other budget cuts (and not tax increases) would put the ball in the Republicans' court in that they would have to defend their opposition to it in the face of having run on a jobs platform. Do you think that is likely to happen?

              • 1 vote
              Reply#16 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:29 PM EDT

              My questions: Are there really no moderate Republican candidates out there? Has the conservative right and/or Tea Party gained that much control over the party?

              • 2 votes
              Reply#17 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:32 PM EDT

              Following on that question, Independent, I wonder if the Republicans are considering any changes to their primary system in light of the ability of one wing of the party to hijack it.

                #17.1 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 6:13 PM EDT
                Reply

                Has anyone noticed that a coalition of World forces came together to liberate a country ran by tyrannical dictator who hates the U.S.? An operation that took months not years, an operation that stopped the normal military contractors from screwing the American taxpayer out of the usual 100's of billions, an operation where American troops were not required to give their lives by the thousands, an operation that united World leaders instead of antagonizing them. The current administration made the right call on Libya, and it worked, it is a damn shame the press has chose for the most part to marginalize a truly historic victory for this nation and the World. My question is why?

                • 4 votes
                Reply#18 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:33 PM EDT

                My question is why?

                Maybe because Liyba is now in complete caos with imprisoned al qauda terrorists now running free in a power struggle to take over in a counrty that DOES have unsecured weapons of mass destruction.

                So much for you break it you own it........The Obama doctrine let's F' up a sh@thole and run.

                  #18.1 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 4:13 PM EDT

                  Your right Rob we should have done nothing to help the Rebels over throw a good man like Qaddafi who has our nations good interests at heart, the thousands of his own people he was prepairing to slaughter are just the price that has to be paid to keep Libya's status quo.

                  • 1 vote
                  #18.2 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 4:28 PM EDT

                  w

                  Than why ignore Syria? The crackdown there is far worse and they have asked for outside help to stop the killing of innocent civilians. What's the difference? Don't they deserve "humanitarian " protection too? Last time I looked, they were humans too! Or are you ready to concede that there never was a "humanitarian mission" in Libya? It was all about protecting European oil supplies at a time of increasing oil prices.

                    #18.3 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 5:14 PM EDT
                    Reply

                    I would like to know why Rick Perry says that "having american people ,be required, to carry health insurance is unconsitutional." If in fact in his own state Auto Insurance is mandatory. Does this mean that automoblies are more valueable than a human life?

                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#19 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:37 PM EDT

                    Can we expect George W. to offer any pearls of wisdom about the upcoming election? How about a few dozen I'm sorry's for ruining our economy, starting B.S. wars and introducing us to the beginning of the Tea Party?

                      Reply#20 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:50 PM EDT

                      Question: Why is Obama announcing his Jobs Plan on the same night as the GOP debate?

                        Reply#21 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:56 PM EDT

                        Answer= Because he doesn't know how to manage a calendar.

                          #21.1 - Thu Sep 1, 2011 11:38 AM EDT
                          Reply

                          Questions for you to ask Mr. Obama :

                          What is your plan to stop deficit spending and debt creation? When, if ever, will your plan result in a balanced budget? Why have you not put forward a plan to reach a balanced budget sometime in the relatively near future, given that the overwhelming majority of Americans favor a balanced budget? Specifically, what taxes are you proposing to raise and how much revenue will your proposed increases generate over what period of time? How much spending are you proposing over the same period of time? Will you agree to exclusively utilize any revenues raised from increased taxes to pay off the debt? What effect will legalizing 10 to 20 million illegals have on the ability of our existing legal citizens to obtain work when the unemployment rate is still at 9%? Why have you committed our resources to military actions in Libya, Yemen and Somalia, without Congressional approval and when Sec Gates says our national security interests are not at stake? What actions, beyond sanctions, are you prepared to take to prevent Iran from building/acquiring nuclear weapons? What steps are you going to take, if any, to prevent the Chinese from continuing to steal our economy., manufacturing base and jobs by use of unfair trade practices that include anti-competitive wage/benefits and unfair anti-competitive production and safety standards? When you give speeches you have a tendency to talk in generalized terms, can you please give our readers specific details in all of your answers?

                          • 3 votes
                          Reply#22 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:15 PM EDT

                          Questions for you to ask Republicans in Congress:

                          What is your plan to stop deficit spending and debt creation? When, if ever, will your plan result in a balanced budget? Why have you not put forward a plan to reach a balanced budget sometime in the relatively near future, given that the overwhelming majority of Americans favor a balanced budget? Specifically, what taxes are you proposing to raise and how much revenue will your proposed increases generate over what period of time? How much spending are you proposing over the same period of time? Will you agree to exclusively utilize any revenues raised from increased taxes to pay off the debt? What effect will legalizing 10 to 20 million illegals have on the ability of our existing legal citizens to obtain work when the unemployment rate is still at 9%? Why have you committed our resources to military actions in Libya, Yemen and Somalia, without Congressional approval and when Sec Gates says our national security interests are not at stake? What actions, beyond sanctions, are you prepared to take to prevent Iran from building/acquiring nuclear weapons? What steps are you going to take, if any, to prevent the Chinese from continuing to steal our economy., manufacturing base and jobs by use of unfair trade practices that include anti-competitive wage/benefits and unfair anti-competitive production and safety standards? When you give speeches you have a tendency to talk in generalized terms, can you please give our readers specific details in all of your answers?

                            #22.1 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 7:54 PM EDT

                            w bush

                            The answer to your question is see the Cut , Cap and Balance bill the House passed which Harry Reid refused to bring to a vote in the Senate while Obama threatened to veto it if Reid allowed it to come to a vote in the Senate.

                              #22.2 - Thu Sep 1, 2011 11:37 AM EDT
                              Reply

                              Through the eyes of a tea partier, what is the difference between Christine O'Donnell and Sarah Palin other than the cost of the speaker? Why the cat fight for Palin? Did she feel threatened by a Christine O'Donnell maybe? How?

                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#23 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:19 PM EDT

                              HEY MARK AND DOMENICO........how much is the DNC paying you shills, I MEAN "journalists"?

                                Reply#24 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:47 PM EDT

                                What is the temperature inside this boiler room?

                                  Reply#25 - Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:49 PM EDT
                                  Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.