E-mail updates
Follow on Twitter
Subscribe to RSSMASSACHUSETTS: The Boston Globe sits down with Elizabeth Warren: “Warren is the would-be Senate candidate who has yet to declare her intentions, but has made enough moves in the race that nearly everyone who is watching closely sees her as the biggest name in a Democratic field attempting to defeat Republican Scott Brown next year,” the paper writes. “In an interview yesterday, the Harvard Law School professor did nothing to dispel the assumption that she plans to run, answering detailed questions about the economic issues she would emphasize in her campaign and the patchwork details of her personal story.”
Globe columnist Brian McGrory says forget the comparisons to Martha Coakley: “Think of Martha Coakley, all tailored and scripted, and now think of the exact opposite. Think of Brown, cautiously circling every critical issue before tiptoeing ahead with a last-minute stand, and think of the opposite of that as well. Think of our governor, preaching the virtues of togetherness in that pleasantly wispy voice of his, and think of the opposite. She talks from her gut as well as her sizable brain. She bothers not with polls and focus groups. She far prefers to fight for what she believes in rather than compromise it all away. As I said, it may take a little while to get used to this.”
NEW HAMPSHIRE: “Embattled New Hampshire Republican Party Chairman Jack Kimball promised to increase fund-raising, retire debt, and hire new staff in a last-ditch effort to save his job,” the Boston Globe reports. “The action plan was outlined in a memorandum sent last night to the party’s Executive Committee, which plans to vote Thursday on whether to oust the chairman. Despite calls to step down by New Hampshire’s top Republican elected officials, Kimball has refused to do so and showed the same defiance in his strategy plan.”
More: The delegation called on the 36-member Executive Committee to defer any action on Kimball to the entire Republican State Committee. It includes nearly 500 members and chose Kimball last January in a 222-199 vote. Last week, US Representatives Charlie Bass and Frank Guinta, US Senator Kelly Ayotte, Senate President Peter Bragdon, and House Speaker William O’Brien called on Kimball to step down. O’Brien was formerly a staunch supporter of Kimball, delivering the speech nominating Kimball for chairman.
Leave a Comment:
Elizabeth Warren will run...She will win.
Who cares?
MA. is already tired of the GOP.
Who cares?
We got your back Elizabeth, trust and believe!
Bravo! But still the question remains... who cares?
But- does she gots a pick-em-up truck? I hear tea bagEEs like those a bunch....
I have a pick up truck Dash. I find it comes in real handy when transporting the moonshine through the backroads. I keep my Remington .610 in the rack next to the back window. That's the trooper model by the way, with the short barrel. It's loaded with double ought shells. I hear they sting real good when librls gets in my way.
Idiot!
The biased boring broadsheet Boston Globe has been shilling for the moonbat Professor for months, with one puff piece after another.
Now she gets the front page love.
The Globe is gearing up for the campaign... they are, in the classic description... "the bowtied bumkissers of Morrisey Boulevard"
We need more people in Congress who are serious-minded, and fewer showboaters and demagogues. Elizabeth Warren would bring intellect and integrity to a body sorely lacking in both.
But Amy, that's what you liberals said about Obama. Look what we got? A lying, conniving, lazy, ideologue that is only concerned about his re-election. He's bumbling the economy, sitting at a 38% approval rating and offers zero hope and change. The best hope this country has is in a change of presidents.
Right. Because the GOP didn't hold the entire country and our economy hostage worried about THEIR re-election. Because a certain someone said his "Top priority was to make Obama a one term president". I'm going to need you to have a stadium full of seats.
Sorry, Ms Warren, Senator Kerry already holds the "rich snotty moonbat egghead" US Senate seat .
Amen Amy! We need people who will fight! Elizabeth Warren can win if we vote!!
Win what Tommy? More social programs... more entitlement programs to the poor and those that don't want to work. I can't wait.
Entitlement Program are those programs paid into by citizens during their working years such as Social Security and Medicare.
If you work you can check your check-stub and it will show you how much FICA (Social Security) and Medicare is taken out each time.
You do an injustice to those who have worked their whole lives.
I do not know of give-away programs. Food stamps are given to those that have run out of unemployment. I do not know who else recieves them but I am sure they would like to meet you in person as a hungry person will kill for himself/herself and their children!
Information probably has no influence on a t-bagger as they can not read, understand what is being said, and only love the Constitution (eventhough they have no idea what it says) without the Amendments.
It was reported yesterday on CNN (CIA outlet) that Republicans won't to put blacks to work. What they failed to mention it was back on the plantation (before the 14th Amendment).
The T-baggers love the Constitution but they hate those Amendments!
I do not believe they can read, write, or think for themselves.
We as good Americans must pity them and ignore them. They do so much love attention!
2001 vs. 2012
For those replicans who do not understand that once bushie2/chiny started two wars unfunded (still unfunded) tax breaks for the wealthy up to 2010 belongs tto bushie2/chiny/and the pharmaceutical give-away to drug companies(still unfunded) . All still belong to bushie2/chiny. We still are paying thru deficit spending.
One can not explain anything to a t-bagger, so I refuse to try.
The U.S. budget situation has deteriorated significantly since 2001, when the CBO forecast average annual surpluses of approximately $850 billion from 2009–2012. The average deficit forecast in each of those years as of June 2009 was approximately $1,215 billion. The New York Times analyzed this roughly $2 trillion "swing," separating the causes into four major categories along with their share:
CBO data is based only on current law, so policy proposals that have yet to be made law are not included in their analysis. The article states that "President Obama’s agenda ... is responsible for only a sliver of the deficits", but that he "...does not have a realistic plan for reducing the deficit..."[77] Presidents do not, acting alone, have constitutional authority to levy taxes or spend money; all such proposals must originate in Congress, but the President has a veto over new laws, and his priorities influence Congressional action.[78