2012: Perry’s word, record attract scrutiny

BACHMANN: Bachmann begins a tour of South Carolina this week with events Tuesday in Spartanburg and Greenville, NBC’s Jamie Novogrod reports. But the congresswoman is not visiting the Palmetto State only to hold rallies and town halls. This week marks the beginning of Bachmann's fundraising drive. A fundraising team is now in place -- some of it drawn from the group of staffers who left Newt Gingrich several weeks ago, according to the Bachmann campaign -- and its objective is to find what the campaign calls "high dollar donors." Bachmann will be meeting privately with donors, and the choice to travel to South Carolina after the Ames Straw Poll was guided, in part, by fundraising opportunities in the state, according to the campaign. The campaign says it remains proud of its grassroots outreach, which has yielded about $50 dollars a donor, but, spokeswoman Alice Stewart says, "It's important to have a mix."

“Fresh from a first-place finish in the Iowa Presidential Straw Poll, U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann will bring her campaign to the Upstate on Tuesday,” the Greenville News writes. “Bachmann has been in Iowa for the past few days, but plans to turn her attention south, recognizing South Carolina's importance as the first in the South primary.” 

“Republican presidential candidate Rep. Michele Bachmann has assets worth up to $2.8 million, the largest of which are the building housing her husband’s psychotherapy clinic and a family farm, according to disclosure forms she filed late Friday,” Roll Call reports.

CAIN: “His campaign might be limping along nationally, but Republican presidential hopeful Herman Cain got a warm reception from an Indianapolis crowd that had its first chance Monday to root on someone who hopes to defeat President Barack Obama in 2012,” the Evansville Courier & Press reports. “Cain, the former Godfather's Pizza executive, repeatedly lambasted Obama during a 48-minute speech in front of 200 people at the swank Columbia Club, on the city's inner circle.’

At the same event last night, Herman Cain said he supports Indiana State Treasurer Richard Mourdock’s challenge to Sen. Richard Lugar, the AP writes. 

PAWLENTY: The Boston Globe’s editorial page laments that Pawlenty was beholden to the Ames Straw Poll: “Pawlenty was a credible contender. Unlike those who are showcasing their values and economic theories, Pawlenty built his campaign around people, working-class voters he called ‘Sam’s Club Republicans.’ In a field that is light in governing experience, he had spent eight years wrestling with a more liberal legislature in a state whose varied political passions mirror those of the country. Pawlenty wasn’t a perfect candidate - or even, necessarily, the best option for the GOP. That’s an assessment voters should make. Instead, he felt compelled to prove himself in a bogus forum and, when he lost, looked like a chump. It’s too bad, because he had more to offer.”

PERRY: Per NBC’s Carrie Dann, Gov. Rick Perry broadly attacked the Federal Reserve last night, accusing the agency of manipulating currency for political gain. "Printing more money to play politics at this particular time in American history is almost treacherous or treasonous in my opinion," Perry said. He went on to say that promoters of such an idea -- hinting but not naming Ben Bernanke specifically -- would get an "ugly" treatment in his home state of Texas. "We have tried to print the money and it didn't work. All it has done is devalue the American dollar," he told reporters after the event. Perry also declined earlier to say whether or not he believes the current president loves America. "You need to ask him," he said.

The Washington Post's Dan Balz: “Texas Gov. Rick Perry turned his rhetorical fire on Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke here Monday night, saying that the chairman would be committing a ‘treasonous’ act by ordering the printing of more money. Doing so, Perry said, would amount to a political decision to help President Obama win reelection in 2012.”

The New York Times gives A1 treatment to the Texas miracle... lucky or leadership?

We missed this yesterday, but the Boston Globe’s Johnson has a good run down of Rick Perry’s stances on policy, including having called Social Security a “Ponzi scheme” and wanting to use Predator drones, used to kill terrorists in hard-to-get-to places like Northwest Pakistan and Yemen, to secure the U.S.-Mexico border.

Liberal Catherine Poe, writing in The Washington Times: “So what’s not to love about Perry? He sounds like Perry the Perfect. His sumptuous mansion, the one he chose to live in while the Governor’s house is repaired and renovated, also sounds perfect. Do you want to see taxpayers seethe? Then ask Texans about the rental bill they’ve been footing for the past four years. Rick Perry and his family currently reside in a $1 million plus residence with all expenses paid, including new window treatments by Neiman Marcus, all financed by Texans to the tune of  $700,000. So far.” Here’s a link to a video made by the Texas Democratic Party, hitting Perry on the house. Poe also takes aim at Texas’ job creation record, its economy, that it’s the country’s biggest polluter, a poor health record, and his emergency management.

“Newly-declared Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry is a ‘good-looking rascal,’ former President Bill Clinton said Monday,” the New York Daily News writes. “But Perry's anti-Washington posturing is ‘crazy,’ Clinton said.”

Perry told FOX, per the New York Daily News: "I hope I'm President Obama's worst nightmare. He's the real problem. It's his policies."

The LA Times: "Perry has received a total of $37 million over the last decade from just 150 individuals and couples, who are likely to form the backbone of his new effort to win the Republican presidential nomination ... Nearly half of those mega-donors received hefty business contracts, tax breaks or appointments under Perry, according to a Los Angeles Times analysis."

Good question from the Texas Tribune: While Perry campaigns, who's in charge in Texas?

Perry is holding a conference call with Republican donors in California today.

He’ll headline a fundraiser Friday in Columbia, SC, for the state GOP.

PAUL: NBC’s Anthony Terrell reports that Ron Paul 2012 campaign releases a new ad today, going after "failed leadership," "smooth talking politicians" -- while split screening images of Rick Perry, Mitt Romney and Barack Obama. The ad continues about "games of 'he said, she said rhetoric and division" --  while split screening images of Harry Reid with Rick Perry, then pictures of Nancy Pelosi with Michele Bachman during those lines. Near the end, the ad declares that Paul is "the one who will stop the spending, save the dollar, create jobs, bring peace, the one who will restore liberty. Ron Paul, the one who can beat Obama and restore America now.” Politico reports the ad will air in Iowa and New Hampshire.

ROMNEY: So Mitt Romney used his private-sector experience against Rick Perry and, in a twist, his government experience against Herman Cain, per the Boston Globe: “I think understanding how the economy works by having worked in the real economy is finally essential for the White House, and I hope people recognize that. I respect the other people in this race, but I think the only other person that has that kind of extensive private-sector experience, besides me, in the Republican race is Herman Cain. And I respect Herman Cain, but I also think it’s helpful to have had that government experience that I’ve had.”

In New Hampshire, “responding to a question of C. Lynn Graton of Holderness about buying American-made products, Romney said ‘we need to bring back manufacturing,’ and the way to do that he said is to hold down the burdens created by government,” the New Hampshire Union Leader reports. "‘We must make sure that when we make (foreign trade) agreements they are being honored and they work for us not just the other guy,’ Romney said.”

Romney is out with a second Web video hitting Obama on his bus tour.

Today, per NBC’s Garrett Haake, Romney holds three events across New Hampshire today, and an undisclosed number of Granite State events tomorrow. On Friday, he heads to Utah for two fundraisers.

NBC’s Ali Weinberg contributed.

Discuss this post

Folks, beware of this guy, he basically wants to get rid of the federal government and pave the way for corporations and the wealthy to do whatever they want. Forget workers rights, clean air, water, etc. He basically turned TX into a 3rd world economy where the rich thrive and everyone else tread water with the bulk of the job growth being minimum wage, that's why corporations flock there, low wage workforce and deregulation. TX is one of the worst polluter states as well. Please read his book "Fed Up!" it will scare you if you haven't drank the republican kool aid already, this guy is far beyond "far right". He would basically gut the Constitution as we know it if he could. Top Ten wacky ideas from the book below:

— 10. Social Security Is Evil: According to Perry Social Security is “by far the best example” of a program “violently tossing aside any respect for our founding principles.” (page 48)

— 9. Private Enterprise Blossomed Under Conscription and Wartime Price Controls: Not only does he argue that the New Deal failed to end the Great Depression, but he asserts “recovery did not come until World War II, when FDR was finally persuaded to unleash private enterprise.” (page 48)

— 8. Medicare Is Too Expensive But Must Never Be Cut: Both establishing Medicare in 1965 and expanding it to include prescription drugs in 2003 are examples of “an irresponsible culture of spending in Washington” (page 63), but establishing “‘councils of experts’ and panels of various sorts” to assess the cost effectiveness of different Medicare-eligible treatments is a “frightening” “scheme” that “undermines freedom” and can be fairly labeled “death panels” (page 81).

— 7. All Bank Regulation Is Unconstitutional:Criticizing the Security and Exchange Commission’s rulemaking process under the Dodd-Frank financial regulation bill, Perry asserts that “if the Constitution were shown the appropriate respect, Washington regulation writers wouldn’t have to worry about underrepresented views, because they wouldn’t have control over them in the first place” (page 94).

— 6. Consumer Financial Protection Is Unconstitutional: Further reiterates his view that all federal financial regulation is illegitimate, listing the SEC on page 44 as part of a “federal alphabet soup” in which “undemocratic unelected Washington bureaucrats” are “now (dubiously) empowered to dictate their own preferences to the American people.”

— 5. Almost Everything Is Unconstitutional: Regrets the existence of jurisprudence construing the Commerce Clause to permit “federal laws regulating the environment, regulating guns, protecting civil rights, establishing the massive programs and Medicare and Medicaid, creating national minimum wage laws, [and] establishing national labor laws.” Perry makes a partial exception for laws barring racial discrimination which he says fulfill “the intent behind the passage of the Reconstruction Era amendments.” (page 51)

— 4. Federal Education Policy Is Unconstitutional:Cites the willingness of Republicans to vote for reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as a “perfect example” of “losing sight of the fact that perfectly laudable policy choices at the local level are not appropriate (much less constitutional) at the federal level.” (page 87)

— 3. Al Gore Is Part Of A Conspiracy To Deny The Existence Of Global Cooling:Jokes that the Social Security Trust Fund “must be somewhere in Al Gore’s lockbox, right next to his notes from inventing the Internet and that global cooling data he doesn’t want anyone to see” (page 60). Argues that moderates oppose curbing greenhouse gas emissions because “they know that we have been experiencing a cooling trend” (page 92).

— 2. Not Only Is Everything Unconstitutional, Activist Judges Are A Problem: Having called the majority of the duly enacted modern welfare state and federal regulatory apparatus unconstitutional, Perry pivots to the complaint that “the [Supreme] court too often chooses to take it upon itself to govern and to develop policy” (page 114).

— 1. The Civil War Was Caused By Slaveowners Trampling On Northern States’ Rights: Rather than simply citing chattel slavery as an exemption to his “states’ rights are good” principle, Perry argues that slaveholder activism in the 1850s was an example of big government federal overreach. “In many ways it was was the northern states whose sovereignty was violated in the run-up to the Civil War,” he argues, citing the Fugitive Slave Act and completely ignoring the human rights of the enslaved African-Americans of the south. He says “we can never know what would have happened in the absence of federal involvement,” ignoring again the fact that federalism would have bought peace at the price of continued slavery.

  • 12 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 9:42 AM EDT

Mav, Great information.

  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:00 AM EDT

Of the entire Republican field running, the most scariest and dangerous to the country is Rick Perry. The DNC just needs keeps hammering the Perry record and statements and we the people will see that this Tea Bagging, Red Neck Cowboy fails.

  • 5 votes
Reply#3 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:00 AM EDT

No matter what the DNC does Job1. Americans like a candidate that is loud and dumb.

  • 4 votes
#3.1 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:31 AM EDT
Reply

At some point in this election these three, Bachmann, Romney and Perry will turn on each other. Then it will be a case of who is the farthest right so the Republican primary voters will get out and vote for them. Then it will be all over. This race in 2012 is President Obama's to lose. These three will eat each other and create lots of fodder for him. I hope he uses it wisely. I am afraid however, that he has surrounded himself with a bunch of chicken s#$ts lately. Please get aggressive against these far right idealogues. Keep harping on positive job growth and the end of social security and medicaire under their (Republican) rule.

  • 7 votes
Reply#4 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:04 AM EDT

Let me fix that post.

"Folks, beware of this guy, he basically wants to get rid of the private sector and pave the way for the government to do whatever they want."

Barack Obama, that is.

    Reply#5 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:27 AM EDT

    "Good question from the Texas Tribune: While Perry campaigns, who's in charge in Texas?"

    Good question.

    Hey, while Obama campaigns, who is in charge of the US?

    Oh, never mind, Obama never shows any leadership in any event. He was never "in charge" of anything in his life.

      Reply#6 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:30 AM EDT

      Bob it's well published that the lieutenant Governor runs the state of Texas. They always have, that's why Bush and Perry could be Governor of that state. They didn't have to do anything. The governor of Texas is just a figure head.

      • 5 votes
      #6.1 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:36 AM EDT

      Rick Perry was Lt Governor also. So Perry does have the experience of running a state, then. Thanks for clearing that up.

      • 2 votes
      #6.2 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:49 AM EDT

      Your welcome Bob. And thinks for clearing up why Texas is ranked 47th out of 50 states.

      • 5 votes
      #6.3 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:59 AM EDT

      Texas is tied with Mississippi for the largest percentage of hourly workers who make minimum wage or less, at 9.5%.

      http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903999904576470232177476242.html

      • 1 vote
      #6.4 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:51 AM EDT

      Yes, but it doesn't cost $300,000 for an old broken down house like it does in Portland and the heavy taxes that go with it.

      • 1 vote
      #6.5 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:44 PM EDT
      Reply

      If Perry gets elected, he had better hope he has a congress that will be mostly Repbs. If not, he has to remember that he can't pass legislation alone. If he has a Dem. congress and they don't work with him, he will be in the same boat as Pres. Obama. Enough said!

      • 4 votes
      Reply#7 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:38 AM EDT

      “In many ways it was was the northern states whose sovereignty was violated in the run-up to the Civil War,” he argues, citing the Fugitive Slave Act and completely ignoring the human rights of the enslaved African-Americans of the south. He says “we can never know what would have happened in the absence of federal involvement,” ignoring again the fact that federalism would have bought peace at the price of continued slavery."

      Too bad you libs dont study history, you just spew the lame talking points.

      There is truth in what Perry says. The South attempted to 'nationalize' recognition of slavery with the Fugitive Slave Act and the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott (which basically mandated recognition of a slave's status nationwide. )

      Stephen Douglas argued slavery could be expanded and legalized in the US territories if voters approved(popular sovereignty) It was Lincoln and Northern Republicans who wanted slavery to be kept as a purely state matter, limited in its place in Southern states. Lincoln argued (in his famous Cooper Union speech) the Founding Fathers wanted slavery limited and eventually done away with.

        Reply#8 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:44 AM EDT

        Bob, I'm guessing you're not African American?

          #8.1 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:53 AM EDT

          Nah, I would guess that he isn't, rationalizing slavery - that's quite the stretch. I suppose it would have just simply went away.

            #8.2 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 12:50 PM EDT
            Reply

            I think it's so funny the Republicans want to run George W. Bush against Obama. Be my guest.

            • 5 votes
            Reply#9 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:47 AM EDT

            I think its funny that the Democrats think the flat failure that is Barack Obama has any chance of winning a second term.

            Better chance of the Bengals winning the Super Bowl.

            • 1 vote
            #9.1 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:51 AM EDT

            I don't do sports analogies, Bob.

            President Obama will will re-election, the question is how many Democrats can we get elected to the House to get his jobs plan enacted?

            • 2 votes
            #9.2 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:54 AM EDT
            Reply

            Gov. Perry hasn't said anything that shows he has the intellect to be president, and in fact has spouted off several statements that sound like bullying. He uses the word "treason" with abandon when he, in fact, has said things that could reasonably be called "treasonous." One can try, but not possibly imagine, Gov. Perry as a statesman. It will be interesting to see if the citizens of the US really want a "bully" President.

            • 4 votes
            Reply#10 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:54 AM EDT

            Kate I hate to say it but all you have to do is look back at Cheney/Bush. That is just what US citizens want. The electorate didn't learn a thing from the Cheney/Bush era. They will put us right back where we were with the loud, proud and dumb crowd. And it's not just the tea people, independents like the loud, proud and dumb crowd also.

            • 5 votes
            #10.1 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:07 AM EDT
            Reply

            The Republican Party / Tea Party definitely does not care about the average American! To not see that, to ignore that, to deny that is absolutely ridiculous and for the average American it amounts to being totally self punishing. Everything they have done has continually and belligerently demonstrated their complete focus on their political ambitions above all else; all of their stubbornly sought positions clearly identify their self-serving concentration; and every statement they arrogantly make seeks to con, excite and manipulate public opinion into accepting and supporting their irresponsible partisan attitude. They are completely committed to doing whatever it takes to return to “more of the same”, Bush-Cheney style, which used government and America’s resources to benefit only Special Interests and the powerful, influential and extremely wealthy few, who strongly supported them and who completely dictated to them, all while giving the majority only apathy, the costs and an abundance of subterfuge to rationalize and confuse. That is all clearly evident and has been proven, just as the “trickle down” theory, which they continually support and try to push, has been proven by Bush-Cheney to be a totally irresponsible fraud that just makes the wealthy wealthier and solicits political support from those few who benefit.

            They talk about jobs and the economy, constantly faulting Obama and the Democrats, yet they have blocked every effort, offered nothing constructive and just advocate giving more to the wealthy, which has already failed (the wealthy won’t ever invest without a sound economy to warrant it). Their strategy to have the problems continue and the Democrats faulted clearly demonstrates their irresponsible self-focus without any real concern for the people. They are cocky, being arrogant and confident in the power, influence and money provided by their supporters to be used to coerce and intimidate their own, to insure unity, and then to provide the substantial backing needed to con and manipulate public opinion; past successes have emboldened them in the manipulation of the Christian block (2000), with the Swift-boat propaganda (2004) and with the extremes and excitement generated by the Tea Party movement (2010 & now), all having been designed, organized, financed and guided by those intending to benefit. We see the manipulation by 3rd party groups like Norquist’s “anti-Taxes” pledge, like Rove’s and Cheney’s groups and several others all providing the substantial money and then their just as substantial demands. This isn’t conjecture as all of it is well documented and obvious to anyone who is willing to look and simply open to recognizing the corruption; just recognizing the truth in all that is stated here should prove the point beyond any doubt. The Democrats are not perfect, not even close, but really offer far more to the average American and this country really can’t afford to return to “more of the same”, Bush-Cheney style, which is what the Republicans are seeking.

            • 2 votes
            Reply#11 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:10 PM EDT

            Wow, I could have changed a few words to Obama and Democrats and got a more factual rant. Isn't it funny how all the people that go off on the Tea Party sound more scary than the group their ranting about.

            • 1 vote
            #11.1 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:35 PM EDT
            Reply

            "Perry’s word, record attract scrutiny"

            A more accurate heading would have been, "Perry's word, record attract scrutiny from Liberal Press"

            • 1 vote
            Reply#12 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:50 PM EDT

            Except for Romney, these guys are all ridiculous loons. Bachmann has said plenty of crazy stuff, and if she makes it very far, the quotes will be used to show her true lack of intellect or understanding. Perry's book shows that he believes plenty of crazy stuff as well. What's with the pro-slavery and anti-gay stuff? Is the GOP turning into the cracker/regressive party? Unfortunately Romney is running away from every reasonable position he took as MA governor and may have to move so far right to win the GOP nomination that he will be unelectable in the general.

              Reply#13 - Tue Aug 16, 2011 2:59 PM EDT
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.