The Washington Post: “A report offering new details regarding the House ethics committee’s handling of the investigation of Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) has led to calls for a new probe — this time, of the panel itself. Politico reported Monday that two of the committee’s former attorneys may have compromised the Waters investigation by improperly communicating with Republican committee members.”
Politico adds, “Rep. Maxine Waters is calling for the House Ethics Committee to dismiss the long-running case against her, claiming she can’t get fair treatment from the secretive panel in the wake of allegations that staffers improperly shared information in an investigation into her finances.”
More: “Waters … was reacting to a POLITICO story Monday that included internal emails, memos and documents from inside the Ethics Committee that revealed bitter internal disputes on the panel over the allegations against Waters. Blake Chisam, the former staff director and chief counsel for the Ethics Committee, accused the two lead investigators on the Waters case of secretly feeding information to Republicans on the Ethics Committee, including Alabama Rep. Jo Bonner. Chisam also accused the staffers of misleading lawmakers and other staff on the status of the Waters investigation. Bonner is now chairman of the Ethics Committee.”


This is depressing. Reminds me of the worst lapses in professionalism of the Bush era. Remember Rove engineering the firing of Republican Attonerys General for not prosecuting enough Democrats? It's scary when the people in charge of oversight are themselves corrupt.
So, is this basically saying she has no other defense than to say that she was caught unfairly?
No, it's saying that the investigation into her possible ethical lapses or breaches was partisan, that the committee investigating her ethics was itself unethical in its behavior.
Only relevant question - did she violate ethics?
Well kate, did she?
Pretty simple really kate - if she did not do anything wrong there would be no information to "secretly feed" to anyone.
But i get it you hate that fact.
If you read the article, Maxine Waters does not deny the information being funneled but that she can't get a fair hearing. Question is would this information have been found out or would she have been able to hide it, either way she never said the information was false.
Depressin Amy, I am sure it is for liberals, yet all the liberals were out in force with thier guilty verdicts and posts on Rupert Murdoch before any investigation was complete. It looks like much ado about nothing now. Too bad Fox will be around to drive liberals nuts.
A little off topic but Fox has a new show called the 5, pretty fun, never knew Beckel could be a riot and though I don't agree with his views alot he presents them well enough to get you to think.
we're a couple of weeks into the Murdoch thing and this Richard guy is already pronouncing it much ado about nothing? Is this news from Fox or from his fantasy?
I couldn't say opa, the ball is in the court of the english parliament, not fox. Why not let the FBI investigate on this side of the pond.