Michele Bachmann kicks off her presidential campaign, President Obama heads back to Iowa, and the candidates scramble to raise money before the first major filing deadline.
Produced and edited by Andrew Gross and Domenico Montanaro
All it (the recipe) says is: "Don't let your meatloaf". You can handle that, Kirby- I have faith in you.
Feisty- if I get there, and the Cuervo jug is already empty, you guys aren't gonna go in the back room and plot against me, are you? (tee-Hee, *snicker*)
If you and Kirby are done with your meat loaf jokes, can you get the the old beat box/quarter machine cranked up? I'd like to send out a little dedication to a few of our new/old/new name/same-old/same-old friends who worked so hard this week - you got any Johnny Rivers' "Secret Agent Man"?
Commin' right up, JoAnne! A good choice to be sure!
Hell, in keeping with the 'everything has humor in it if you look hard enough' category, I'm gonna toss in a copy of 'Wipeout", too! I'd say it's certainly been that kind of week (for the Repubs and Eric Cantor. You didn't think I meant anything else, did you??)
DBO, I have a great pitcher of mojitos. "Secret recipe" from my communist friend Maria , the Mojito Queen. When your song is over, you can put on the song I brought" Quateque Campesino" by the Buena Vista Social Club.
" When your song is over, you can put on the song I brought" Quateque Campesino" by the Buena Vista Social Club."
I'd LOVE to, but I don't acutally bring a record-player. See, the tunes are in the DDI jukebox. BUT- if you know someone that could break into it, I could slip the ol' wax on there, and the dancing could start. But keep the faith- I think there are several break-in artists nearby that might be able to help!
Absolutely I would like the recipe. I haven't been able to make the mac & cheese balls because my deep frier went to heaven, but even though I live alone I like to cook.
You see all of the pages are going to none other than KEITH OLBERMANN. The more you guys lie and spin, the deeper you are making the hole. You see I figure KO still has a huge axe tp grind, and I am more than happy to give him the fodder.
Lol what a great week it has been on this board for Indies and Reps alike. NO MORE LIBERAL MOB collapse a thons, no more flagging as adverts (as you guys were trying to do to ME all day yesterday)
Its a little like this. You are attempting to justify something THAT CANNOT BE JUSTIFIED.
Trying to SILENCE FREE SPEECH FROM OTHER WHO DIFFER FROM YOUR POLITICAL VIEW WILL NOT BE TOLERATED.
I simply cannot wait for Keith's call. As a huge fan and supporter of his free clinics, I am sure we will have MUCH to talk about.
I am QUITE certain he will be thrilled at my sports knowledge, too. Thanks for making all my dreams come true.
When recently asked if I could have dinner with anyone I wanted, who would it be? My response was Keith. I just CANNOT thank you enough!
PS. I don't want you to go anywhere. Every village needs one and you're now my very special friend! Thanks again. I am not aware that anyone tried to collapse you yesterday. Is your paranoia showing?
I am going to have to disagree. By now, they have adopted a common front- it was all a lot of nothing, boy are you guys easily fooled, we have nothing to hide.
Remember, they think there is nothing left to see. They also probably have the moderators ready to delete anything, or anybody, who refers to the most egregious admissions.
So be it.
It will be interesting to see if Comcast has any input. As a named "target", I am having my son the lawyer make the contact.
No one loves a good round of "fun and games" as much as me, and I love having you around Nojo, but really the remedy for you, or anyone here that doesn't like what's going on is to simply leave.
If you don't like what's happening all you need to do is go somewhere else. There are a bajillion other sites, many that are very good.
Me, I think it just makes it all the funner. And that is a real word, I don't care what anyone says.
And that's what I am talking about. Just look at Feisty. She cannot help herself.
I don't know why or how, but NoJo you have a special power over Feisty. Whatever you say she has to respond, and usually in a totally stupid, but very entertaining way.
Nojo - you own Feisty. It is just so terribly obvious. :)
Oh, but Spanky, if I leave, think of all the fun you miss!
That, by the way, is the reason for the contact- I have no intention of allowing them to keep me off this board.
Know what's funny? It was getting boring.
Now, I will just keep on keeping on- I will have this iPad with me in the grave, if needs be.
Look at all the material Obama is handing out- the future in manufacturing, it seems, is in military strength diapers.
We have been Poised for Progress for at least six months, by my count. I guess it comes more slowly when you are Leading From Behind. Ah, WTF. He still thinks people will give him time to Finish the Job.
Now that is the truth Nojo - it was getting really boring.
No longer an issue. Plus for me all the "good stuff" is coming up - debt ceiling, the dems acting like tea party members and cutting stuff, and hopefully and end to all these damn wars.
Besides, as unemployment contunues to rise, and the real estate markets continue to tank, Obama and his loyal minions here just get more desperate and more shrill.
Good times, right Nojo?
Besides I'd miss my good buddy Drive By. And I know he'd miss me, right DBO?
Now, drive by, I do not expect you to read the New Yorker, but an account of the interview that became the article was on this very site.
The highly educated, erudite reporter got a quote from the White House- something to the effect of 'Obama being adept at leading from behind',(please note the single quote marks- this is not an exact quote), and the besotted reported used it in his article. Seems that both he and his editor were in full swoon and never evaluated how outright STUPID that remark was- and how it would be used against him.
It became the headline of a First Read thread. I'm sure you can find it if you want to read it.
Well I was going to celebrate my return to First Read after taking some time off to take care of some personal problems by coming up with stem-winder full of references to the Dew Drop Inn and all to close out the week. But I see that something else has come up. Then I was going to come up with a post all full of high minded appeal about God, Mother and Country and Freedom of Speech and such like. Naw Lets keep this simple and to the point.
I’ve got a relationship with a group of posters on F.R. Most cases it goes back years (before they brought in Newsvine) and we added personal messages to our posts. Newsvine changed that a little bit and we could form a group and keep the personal over there and focus a bit more on the Political. If you will look at it you’ll find it was one of the first groups formed under the new format. We thought it was private. Turns out due to one glitch or the other it wasn’t.
I make no apology for simply being friends. Some of you’ll ought to try it sometime. Course I understand for some of you’ll it’s kind of hard because you have to put a little something into it. For me politics is best when you put a little into it. Personal relationships mean a lot and it goes beyond simply taking a position on something. F.R. is a way to understand what these positions mean and how they affect folks all over the country. But that’s just me.
I guess by now some of you have figured out that I don’t like you very much. Heck I thought that I’d already cleared that up. But you see you don’t have to agree with me politically to be a friend. You do however have to put something into the relationship besides hate and negativity. All my friends at Libs R Us have and I have gotten more out of it than you can ever imagine.
Now I think all accusations of collusion and influence and who’s hoodooing who out of what have been pretty well covered by the members and Mr. Murray. Some of you’ll are going to believe there is a vast conspiracy and not be satisfied with the answers that you get no matter what they are as long as they don’t fit in with your narrow range. That’s a shame but been my experience that folks are folks and there just ain’t much you can do about some of them.
So now we’re at this point. Come Monday morning if I have time I’m going to put up a post. If you care to respond to it by all means do so. If you disagree with it put it out there. If I simply drive you nuts by by simply existing simply put me on ignore. Come next Friday you will find me right here being somewhat irreverent on T.W.A. Some of you are going to like what I do and some of you aren’t. Life’s a funny old dog that way. But for God’s sake you don’t have to go to all the trouble of printing or hacking my account. Heck nothing I got is that d@mn important.
Mixed, Groucho, Nojo and some others while I think that you are carrying this thing way to far I do think that is your right. Don’t particularly like it but it is what it is.
Now I’m Here or doublea or whatever your posting under today is a different story. Most of what he’s put up is at best a lie and at worst a deliberate misconstruction. You have threatened both me and my friends with lawsuits and everything else.
I’ve got a better idea. I’m going to be in St. Louis the 8th. Be there or be square.
Hello IR, only you can put into words the way most of us feel. Thank you.
I, too, am looking forward to seeing you in St Louis and sharing some laughs, it will be great fun.
I must say, I am really flattered that some misguided posters here think we are worthy to be discussed on the Daily Show or any other media outlet they have thought about sending the Libs r us link to, too funny. You can post anything you like, I would say the same things to y'all and talk about the same dull topics if you were here right in front of me, nothing to hide, never been paid for any line or post, but thank you for the compliment in thinking it was worthy of paid work. I must look into that as a career sometime.
My friends and I will be back here next week and every week thereafter so get used to it. To our great hosts Mark, Dominec, and Ali and all the other contributors to FR. Thank you for an interesting week, life is never too dull in politics.
See you over at the DDI, can taste those margaritas already.
Independent Redneck said.....You do however have to put something into the relationship besides hate and negativity. All my friends at Libs R Us have and I have gotten more out of it than you can ever imagine.".......
Right. And if you don't apply that to BOTH sides of the aisle, you're a hypocrite. The moderators here are definitely guilty of that. One standard for Republicans and a different standard for liberals. That's what the manin beef is here. I repeat: if you don't apply that to BOTH sides of the aisle, you're a hypocrite.
Oh well! Could be worse; you could have a stick in your eye! LOL
Damage123 - if you HATE it so much at First Read, then why are you still here? if you don't like the moderators, then do something about it instead of continually bitchin' and moanin' about it.
Mark Murray has graciously said - more than once - that if there are any concerns, contact him and he will forward them on to Newsvine to get these issues resolved.
So what are you waiting for? Are you too lazy to get up off your butt and e-mail mark Murray or the moderators directly to get your concerns resolved?
Damage 123--well done, thanks for proving exactly what IR said is true--hate and negativity throughout the whole thing. Some double standard since yours is still here. Have a nice weekend.
Damage I've got a pretty good working relationship with folks on both sides of the aisle. I have a tendency to stay away from the some of the ones that are pretty out there on the theory that talking to them just encourges them to fall down whatever rabbit hole they're going down but other than that most of the time I can have a decent discusion when I have the time and inclination
I’ve got a relationship with a group of posters on F.R.-
so you are in the "group"
I make no apology for simply being friends.-
and no one has a problem with "being friends" so a little disingenuous, no? But there is a big difference between "friends" and a private group with designs on controlling the discourse on a public message board, and that is the issue here and you durn well know it.
All my friends at Libs R Us have and I have gotten more out of it than you can ever imagine.-
Out of friendship? Or do you mean things like getting folks "you don't like" banned? badgering the moderators to do your collective bidding? , or the practice of "ganging up" on those you disagree with? Those are all topics of "friendly" discussion within the group.
Now I think all accusations of collusion and influence and who’s hoodooing who out of what have been pretty well covered by the members and Mr. Murray. Some of you’ll are going to believe there is a vast conspiracy and not be satisfied with the answers that you get no matter what they are as long as they don’t fit in with your narrow range. That’s a shame but been my experience that folks are folks and there just ain’t much you can do about some of them.
You are incorrect-MB and other "outsiders" have asked questions about journalistic ethics, violations of the so-called COH, and collaborating to delete posts that have been met thus far with "crickets". It is true that some folks may not be satisfied with the answers, but this is a case where there are still many unanswered questions.
I too have been here a while and have a very different perspective on your friends and your group's actions on this blog. Our views are different because our vantage points are likewise. A group of "insiders" creates a group of outsiders simply by it's existence and folks within naturally begin to develop an "us vs them" mentality whether they see it or not. It is also natural to defend your friends, even when their actions are ones you would probably not condone in others, so I do understand. I just have a different perspective.
I look forward to your reply, if any, and of course to your continued participation in our lively discussions of all things political...
Danger...................Friends as in social friends most of the conversations we had related to that.Course you knew that. Didn't you.......As far as having anybody banned as far as I can tell I can't or even collude to. That relates to a Newsvine function.............As far as me and my friends colluding to "control" the discusion you flatter me but as far as I can tell the discusion goes on for pages and pages on some threads so I hardly see where we could control anything.........As far as the questions that you are presenting Mr. Murray seems to me he's done a pretty good job of answering them. but hey thats just me I'm not as demanding as you are
All this shows me is that certain posters like no jo and Groucho are exactly what I believed them to be. People without character. You could leave your JOURNAL in front of me, and I would not touch it. To deny that you contribute daily to the tone of FR defies credulity. You are bullies, and this has become ugly, and I have decided that it is no longer worth it to me. That you use an innocent group of friends to berate a host is beyond the pale.
So you win. I have done nothing wrong, and yet you have bullied me off this board. Good for you. But, what is the prize?
I will go for once last drink with my friends at the Dew Drop Inn, which I think had sniffer dogs go through it to make sure it didn't have bugs, and then I am off to do things with people that have some honor.
In closing: I would like to paraphrase Dante: I am much to lazy to look it up, I like fine literature, and should be pretty accurate. But since I know it will over your heads anyway, I will use what I remember, changing one word (yeah, I know, who rewrites Dante, right?) because the other word will just not work.
"....as is the wont, the blame will fall upon the injured party in the common cry. But justice (my word) which the truth demands will witness to the truth. Still, I would not have thee hate thy neighbor...."
I am routinely chided and ridiculed (see friendly transcripts) over my civility, and have been tempted to get "feisty" on more than one occasion, but the site has a very strict code of honor...
For the last time. I would never be like you Feisty, only you would deride a person's home life. I used a quote from Groucho...Marx that is and have posted it several times. You on the other hand have been an insult-fest and bully here from day one. I put you in your place a long time ago and was done with you, but you still stalk my posts and repeat ad infinitum, ad nauseum, the one and only negative comment, and one you know to be a quote that you have intentionally misconstrued..
again and for the last time
What number is this, anyway?' Rosten, 'Crestview 829.' Voice, 'Aha, so you admit it! Why, if you were a man you'd come over and knock my teeth out.' Rosten 'I -' Voice, 'And if you were half a man you'd knock half my teeth out.' Rosten, 'Who -?' 'And if you were a woman we could dance the night away in wild abandon.'
What's the matter NJNB - hubby out of town AGAIN? I would be more worried about WHAT was UPwith that then spreading you your HATRED every chance you get? Do YOU think the hubby wants to get it on with a BITTER OLD BROAD that couldn't day something NICE if they had a GUN to their head? And therein lies the title you've so succesfully earned as the seond biggest LIAR on this blog right behind JS1!
and this sad commentary that sums up your personality...
Notice to NJNB - there were MORE people defending my comments then those that came to your rescue!
Houston, you are becoming "Mary's little lamb"...you are too smitten...I'm flattered but also a little creeped out...
And I said your nasty attitude would have you looking for your teeth on the floor in the real world...and I stand by it...no threat implied, as I would never want to meet you, just an observation...
and everywhere that Danger went, Little Houston! was sure to go...
See nojoe and the dragon above to see how intelligent reasonable people disagree, and think on how your obnoxious posts and attitude are a turn-off to most reasonable people, me included.
Stalking me and trying to assuage some long ago ego bruise is kind of sad.
Like I said - pull up your MAN pants for once in your life!
Exodite and I shared some posting back and forth. He was great. I don't know where he went. I took some time off this blog because of the absolute hatred that comes from both sides, but decided to put that aside and just play in the mud a little. Most of the time it is fun, sometimes, not so much.
Thanks for your post . . . it took the bad taste out of my mouth . . . you're the real deal.
newday:
We'll leave the light on for ya . . . you will be missed! :o)
First Read Reporters and Moderators:
Thanks for taking the time to fight the lies and clear our names . . . I am truly grateful that you care enough to set the record straight and listen to our comments . . . you all are gems!
Not sure what "lies" you refer to, Nash, or what name clearing. . .
You, obviously, never needed any special privileges- we have gone toe to toe, but I do not remember your ever going over the line.
Not true of some others.
Hard to believe you would have participated in collapse a thons- or flagging posts as advertising that were NOT.
Of course, Amy surprised me too,
But I digress.
This was about YOUR group trying to get certain posters, ( myself included) off the boards, so you could have, what, a public chartroom?
Your private chartroom was not good enough?
Divergent voices force people to think- go back into my news vine page, and see my exchange with Mark, (Yellowdog), regarding Perry. I respect him- he gives me food for thought.
I thought that was the actual purpose of this site.
From the link I was sent, it's no rumor, Groucho. There has been a coordinated effort between a group of liberal posters, Mark Murray, and the moderators to (a) delete and suspend posters with whom they disagree, and (b) allow ANYTHING at all from the members of their group.
It seems that they have a little convention planned for July- Murray will attend in his role of Deputy Political Director here, and a round table discussion, (with Skype link for those who cannot attend in person), to discuss, among other things, removing voices that counter theirs.
Nice, huh? Real professional.
You made a statements of fact that were untrue. That is called a lie.
No Jo, as someone who reads this site every day, in order to keep my mind alive at work, and because I care about my country, and, yes, I support President Obama, I acknowledge spending too much time being irritated by right wing trolls, and discussing how much they irritate me, in a private chat room. Guilty of wasting my time on that.
But getting people banned for disagreeing with me? Hardly. Flagging posts that published our private chat room? Yes, I sure did that.
Perhaps you might ask yourself why a group of intelligent, social people are freaking out about having their privacy invaded. Perhaps you could try putting yourself in their position. Perhaps you might realize they discussed their personal histories and relationships in a room they thought was private. Perhaps you might realize they were building friendships, which require trust to grow. Perhaps you might realize this blog, and that group, was an important part of these people's day. Perhaps, then, you would realize, the attack on this group wasn't a matter of exposing schemes and strategy, but of destroying the home away from home of a group of friendly people. I would hope you could recognize that, at least.
Nash, yup are under the mistaken impression that the pages that,prove these allegations are gone. Disappeared. Poof.
Not so.
Your little group engaged in all the activities I described. My name was top of the list of discussion topics for your roundtable with Murray- how to "deal with the bobs and nojoes" was the quote, I believe.
Amy admitted flagging posts that were not advertising as advertising.
The proof that members of your group are NOT subject to the CoH was provided by fiesty, last week, with her venomous attack on me. An attack that was saved, and reposted, by many.
Her clearing her news vine page has not stopped people from having access, it seems.
So, keep your "special relationship" with the COI of news vine, Tyler, Sally, and Mark Murray. It seems you have someone in your group who has had enough, and it MIGHT have been Fiesty's over the top attack on me that precipitated this "outing".
You can keep trying to discredit me, but it is your merry little band of cohorts who have been discredited.
Please provide evidence to support your claim that I or anyone else has coordinated with the moderators of this board or other NBC personnel in any effort, let alone efforts centered around you.
Your delusions of grandeur are simultaneously sad/amusing. You simply don't have enough game for that level of effort.
You keep saying that you have proof of these allegations. But no such proof of collusion or a "special relationship" has been provided.
Only proof that what is said about you in a private chat group was not to your liking. Oh well.
So, in closing, if you continue to make that claim and are unable to back it up, that would be textbook lying. I only point that out because you asked, not because I expect you to acknowledge it.
After years of attempting to interact with you, I could pretty much write your posts myself at this point. . . you will simply redouble your efforts to broadcast the lie, attempt to ask me a different question to change the subject, or just ignore what I said and write another one of your grandiose accusatory posts.
It's all good . . . I thank you for the entertainment you have provided me this week . . . life as a nefarious co-conspirator was pretty exciting for a while . . . alas . . . all great stories have an ending.
The most common strategy for "dealing with the nojos and bobs," as discussed in our private chat room, was putting said posters on "ignore! " The second strategy was venting about them in our private chat room. The third strategy was validating each other's attempts to argue back, as in " you sure told him! " Not sure what Ron meant when he wrote of asking Mark about "dealing" with you, and I'm not going to speculate, but what in the world are you imagining, that Newsvine would ban you for being right wing? Have you read the First Read blog? Nobody gets banned for being disagreeable, controversial, or argumentative, and you know that. As you well know, the only people who have been deleted were people who used this board to deliberatly attack fellow posters. (and its not against code to insult people in private chat rooms.)
Nash, the proof has been up, and read, by many on these boards- and Murray, himself, has admitted that he is joining you for your little roundtable, the first topic of discussion of which is, apparently, "how to deal with the bobs and nojoes".
Please.
Amy admitted flagging posts as advertising when they were not. So did a few others.
I could not possibly care less how you feel about me, or my posting about the failings of Obama. They are all around you- you choose not to see it, and are enraged when I post about it, as it tears a hole in the tissue of the magical world where he is a success.
I say again- the flagrant disregard of the Code of Honor by members of your group with NO repercussions may have been the proverbial straw for whoever decided to do this document dump. I do not pretend to have any inside information on that- merely surmise.
You have a private chat room, where you can all extoll the virtues of Obama. Why do you need to turn a public forum into the same?
Provide evidence of collusion between any poster here at First Read and the moderators and/or reporters in an effort to silence opposing viewpoints. That is the claim you made.
Prove it or admit you were "mistaken" *wink,wink*.
That is the only relevent point. That is the lie you told. You can run, but you cannot hide.
Edited to add: If you cannot make your point without lying, then you don't have a point. What you did here this week at First Read is called libel. The only problem I have ever had with you no joe is that you are an unrepentent liar. Other than that, you seem like a fine person.
c. a formal written declaration or statement, as one containing the allegations of a plaintiff or the grounds of a charge.
2. anything that is defamatory or that maliciously or damagingly misrepresents.
That is what you did . . . you made wild and unsubstantiated claims. You miscontrued the situation. On purpose. To create a controversy. That is just sad.
Nash, and to the lies about collusion, there is the matter of lying that we were/are being paid by MSNBC and that our trip is in some ways financed by MSNBC/NBC. Nothing could be more wrong.
It is bad enough that our private conversations were STOLEN and BROADCAST, many of them were taken out of context or surmised to be what they are not.
This faux outrage and continous whining is classic nojo, and if she likes to consort with thieves and other disgruntled characters and do their dirty work for them, it says more about her than anything else.
Did you complain to the moderators about Feisty's remark? I do not recall your ever objecting to it. I think Feisty's friends were more disapproving of her remark than you were!
No, instead, some other right winger decided to use it, not out of defending you or protecting this board, but as a weapon to hurt a whole group of liberal friends. If the problem is Feisty's big mouth, than you could have collapsed her. If you think she should be banned, than you should take it up with Newsvine. But that, apparently, is not your real beef, because you and the other right wingers decided to forgo addressing Feisty's comment, and instead launch a smear campaign against the journalists, and Libs R Us. No matter how many times he has refuted your claim, you continue to repeat your charge that Mr. Murray has anything to do with banning or collapsing people. You ignore the facts in front of you. Nobody gets banned for being controversial, disagreeable or right wing. They don't even get banned for insulting fellow posters! The people who have been banned, whose posts I have seen, used bad language and relentlessly posted inflammatory comments empty of content. They
don't even form arguments, just post dirty stuff. As bad as Feisty's remark was, most of the time she is promoting an argument, not just attacking people. If she upset you, you should have said something!
Notmworking, Nash. Too manympeople read what was published before it got deleted.
Want to blame somebody?
Blame whatever member of your group did the document dump.
The collusion is PATENTLY obvious to anyone and everyone on this board.
First, by the continued presence of those guilty of Code violations- yourself included, now.
Second, by the "missing"- newbie writers who just "poof!"- vanished, after running afoul of members of your group. Ira Levin ring any bells? What did he post that violated the code? Merely a rebuttal of a vile cutting and pasting of a page from the American Nazi website.
Was his account suspended?
Is it not true that the "Mark"- a "friend" of Fiesty's, is, in fact, the Chief Technology Officer of news vine? Cause, I sent him an email last night- and I accessed HIS news vine page through HERS.
That explains VOLUMES to me about why none of your group is subject to the Code.
The "proof" you are looking for is on this very site- it just took one fed up member of your group to publish it.
The more you seek to discredit me, the more you discredit yourself.
Have you even stopped to think how this looks to those who read, but do not post?
I have to tell you, anybody rational reading this is probably stunned that you would even go where you are going.
First of all, Amy, when so many people started posting about it, I DID unignore the post. I flagged it as inflammatory- and it is hard for me to believe that those who tooknher to task did not do the same.
It's still up.
Apparently, you have to be a member of the club to collapse a club member.
Second, I did copy it and send it to the moderators.
Twice.
To date, I have not gotten a response.
It seems to pay to have the right "friends" on this board.
don't even form arguments, just post dirty stuff. As bad as Feisty's remark was, most of the time she is promoting an argument, not just attacking people. If she upset you, you should have said something
Amy,
According to the NJNB - she has me on ignore *wink wink*
Just add it to the LONG list of other lies NJNB has been busted for!
you will simply redouble your efforts to broadcast the lie, attempt to ask me a different question to change the subject, or just ignore what I said and write another one of your grandiose accusatory posts.
Only a sick mind would conclude that because a poster stops posting here, it is the result of a devious plot to silence them. Only a sick mind would conclude that everyone is out to get them to stop them from publishing throw away comments on a political blog. It is reflection of sheer madness and a need for sunshine and fresh air. Seriously.
Keep spinning, Nash. EVERYONE on the board has seen the truth.
Too bad.
I'm sure you'll get a lot of "attagirls" and "great jobs" and "you sure told hers" from your friends in the new tree house.
Those not in the new tree house? Not so much.
You MIGHT want to consider how much judgment is displayed in the club, however.
Members keep clapping Navy on the back for calling republicans Nazis- and, I have to tell you, that particular meme ain't playing well in Peoria- so, please, continue to encourage him to keep it up!
We can use all the help from democrats we can get- even with Obama providing such gems as the future of manufacturing turning in military strength, indestructible diapers.
Oh, and the spending and the debt and his complete and utter failure on the economy.
So, sorry Nash- only your fellow club members think you are succeeding. I can sum up your success in two words-
Try and DEFEND all of it when KO as in Keith Olbermann gets his hands on it.
YOU DISCREDITED YOURSELVES. By ganging up on ANYONE with different viewpoint than the 38.
YOU HAVE BEEN DISMISSED OK, for the lying, disengenious bunch that you are.
I think Current TV and Keith can make a whole lot of money out of this. And he won't have to manufacture outrage. WHAT WAS TOLERATED HERE IS OUTRAGEOUS.
I guess it pays to be friends with MARK COT OF NEWSVINE.
Amazing: We have a group of people that seem to think stealing private conversations is a virtue. These are the same types of people who defend a mugger who beat up a grandma on her way back from a ATM. The defense: it was grandma's fault she should not have been on the street.
This is why I do not like the New GOP/TP agenda or anything they represent - they continue to lie, edit material to make a point, claim things that are not in fact or were outright dismissed as lies. They will not take any ownership for what they do as they believe the "End justifies the Means" and they do not care if the means are legal or not, if people get hurt (or worse) or not, if this country goes into the toilet or not - they just care about themselves only. Nothing new here and we are seeing that being played our again.
Mark was very clear in his posts about MSNBC and posters on this board and yet they continue the same bold face lies.
He even invited the right to make their own meeting and invite him and he would make every attempt to attend. He has always said that. That does not sound like anybody trying to hide anything, but the GOP/TP is mad because we did just that. Oh and guess what - this is a "private affair" and yous are not invited. Mark said if you have any questions to contact him. But instead you try and tarnish his reputation with your lies and threaten him. Let me know how that worked out for you all.
Nobody has a right to dictate anything to anybody, not as long as we remain a "free society" but then again that idea sticks in your throat does it not.
If this is all you got and what we have to look forward to the next year and a half I pity you folks. I cannot think of a more weaker platform to run on than intimidation. The American people are wise to this Karl Rove tactic and they are not standing for it any longer, they are marching in the streets and it is just a matter of time. Things will be set right.
Some do not like the tone or what is discussed in a "Private Chat Room". Got news for you all.
What do you think the GOP or the DEMS talks about in their behind the door meetings? What about the Koch Brothers, Karl Rove and the US Chamber of Commerce - what do you think they talk about? Do you think they talk about the other party, or what strategy to use in a debate and how best to make their points. Your fake indignation is transparent.
This is still the US of A, and Freedom of Speech is guaranteed by the Constitution until the SCOTUS is paid off by the GOP/TP power brokers to repeal the First Amendment.
A thief stole or stuff and you know it, you have it in your dirty little hands and are using it knowing full well it was stolen without permission - this makes you every bit as culpable as the crooks who stole from us.
No strategy needed for the likes of you. You are an old time liar. You say things that aren't true, and when called on it, you just repeat it again. No thought required to deal with you.
Newsvine is actually pretty transparent about the whole banning thing. There is even a column where someone prints a monthly list of who is banned and why. There were 165 bannings in May. Ira Lapin was not one of them. And why would he be. He never used bad language.
Reading the posts that people get banned for is pretty illuminating. Sounds like most of them had been banned, or warned before. None of the posts sound like someone went over the top in an argument. Newsvine is clearly tolerant of heated speech. They also have their hands full kicking off the destructive types.
When someone is banned, they print an explanation right there, on the post. "i am here" was banned a short time ago and the reason given was "weird trolling of Murray and Domenici." Obviously, not very legalistic, but to the point. He was also a reincarnation of Safecracker, according to the comment, under whose name he had been banned before.
From your comments today it sounds like your issue is with Feisty, and your inability to get her banned. You assume that friends of yours were banned for less egregous offenses.. You are spinning allegations of preferencial treatment. As you can see, Newsvine doesn't ban people who happen say some jerky things. Mr. i am here got banned for targeting the journalists and being a re-registered banned user. None of this equates to anything Feisty said or her treatment by the moderators.
navy; Amazing: We have a group of people that seem to think stealing private conversations is a virtue. These are the same types of people who defend a mugger who beat up a grandma on her way back from a ATM. The defense: it was grandma's fault she should not have been on the street.
No, actually what we have are a band of idiots who outed themselves as clique of nattering ninnies gossiping in private about who they didn't like and how to gang up on them on the public site, including having a designated monitor badgering the moderators to get their way.
You were NOT hacked so stop lying. You, the one nervous nellie, whose big worry was about what you may have been caught saying! (And now I know why you were so worried, and frankly, I don't blame you lol...:)
we weren't actually hacked, bev. it appears to be a function of naivete on my part. I think compromised is the better word. but those in possession of our conversations don't seem to have any qualms about using it, even though they've been informed we believed it was private.
And you CONSPIRED to delete posts by flagging them as advertising. And I do mean YOU...
Dennis, Columbus, Ohio (Jun 19, 10:44 AM): >Feisty,I reported a couple days ago that for some reason banned user's home pages are not always being deleted. C U Farley's home page is still there but unused since last Dec which implies that he/they can no longer log in under that name.As far as Newsvine doing nothing what I have noticed is that most all reports I make over the weekend nothing gets done. It appears to be most effective M-F when Sally & Tyler are on the job.I suggested using the advertising flag because it will get a comment deleted rather than collapsed. The improper use of the advertising flag can get you suspended of banned.
US Navy Disabled Veteran - Retired (Jun 19, 10:59 AM): Dennis: Consider it done. Will take a few minutes.
"Dennis consider it done" ...how compliant...
Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL (Jun 19, 9:26 AM): Nice work gang - it's been deleted - now we can only hope it wasn't saved somewhere...
Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL (Jun 19, 3:15 PM): He's back - already flagged for advertising...
Amy B. Portland, ME (Jun 19, 2:24 PM): I just flagged that one as advertising as well. This guy was obviously banned at some point and now he's going after Feisty as revenge. His posting conversations from this group is totally off topic, to say the least, not to mention a seriouse breach of code.
So while you may dispute and BS Murray may deny being a co-conspirator, (and one would like to believe that an adult with a real job wouldn't be in league with a rag-tag gang of sycophants and cheerleaders.) every other petty, nasty, junior -high, mean girl act of this band of "friends" can be documented via your own words.
You are a liar and a cheat; you tried to game the system with your private group, were outed because of your own stupidity and now you are continuing to lie about being hacked.
John Edwards and John Ensign, both being liars and cheats, would both fit right in to your new group, as despite your BS, lying and cheating know no party affiliation.
The accusation that was made was that there was a conspiracy between the moderators/reporters at First Read and the members of our group.
That allegation is not supported with the links you have posted. What those links show is folks using the tools available to all posters to highlight posts they found inappropriate or offensive, as is their right.
In the absence of the actual posts being discussed, there is no way to back up your claim that these tools were used inapproriately.
I know you are excited that you got to peep into our windows and listen to our discussions. But no matter how many times you post those same coversations, it does not prove collusion between moderators and posters.
I know you are excited that you got to peep into our windows and listen to our discussions.
lol-What are you now, a mind reader? Reading those posts would make any normal person sick and want to wash their hands. That's how I feel, disgusted, and just a little amused at the junior-high gossip...
You don't know jack, you just cherry-picked the one thing that is he-said/she-said, which may or may not be true. You can't PROVE it isn't true, can you? So unless YOU have proof that there was no collusion, it's still an OPEN QUESTION
That is just ONE item on the list of things you and yours are party to.
That allegation is not supported with the links you have posted. What those links show is folks using the tools available to all posters to highlight posts they found inappropriate or offensive, as is their right.
In the absence of the actual posts being discussed, there is no way to back up your claim that these tools were used inapproriately.
Flagging posts as advertising to get them deleted is inappropriate, wrong and most of all, petty and you were caught red-handed doing it, so stop with the BS. And you conspired off site to coordinate to do it, as the posts above document and prove beyond the shadow of a doubt.
and conspiring OFF site with others to do so is collusion, whether or not BS Murray was actually involved, or KNEW about your actions.
You can't bull@!$%# the facts here. They are your own words.
Everyone who cares, and most really don't, will have the chance to decide for themselves exactly what the posts prove or don't prove, and as I know you agree that "sunlight is the best disinfectant", so the best way to handle this is to publish every nasty little action, every single disgusting, filthy, page.
When this was said;
What's the matter NJNB - hubby out of town AGAIN? I would be more worried about WHAT was UPwith that then spreading you your HATRED every chance you get? Do YOU think the hubby wants to get it on with a BITTER OLD BROAD that couldn't day something NICE if they had a GUN to their head?
and this;
You GO get them you miserable OLD BAT M'Kay? PS: Thought you had me on ignore? Nothing more than further PROOF you're a LIAR & and FRAUD... DO YOU know where your hubby is? LMAO! Other than with someone WHO is WARM?
in response to this post;
How about next week we get a story on the Issa hearings? You really do not want to miss that boat- looks like it will cost Holder his job. How about a story on the secret fundraisers held in the Blue Room at the White House in March? Seems the DNC organized it, and Obama met with long term Wall Street donors. Of course, no money changed hands. Nosirree- that would be illegal. They just wanted to chat. In secret. How about one on Boeing and the NLRB- and the thousands of jobs the Obama administration is squelching? You missed the boat on Cree Industries- could have been a good story. See, they took stimulus funds, and used them- to build a plant in China. Well, I provided the leads. I guess you will get right to work- on a bunch of Palin stories.
Disgusting, inappropriate, intentionally cruel insinuations about a person's PERSONAL life in response to a POLITICAL post; Where is there anything here that merited an attack on a person's home and family life?
SHOW ME!
There is no justification for that PERSONAL HATE-FILLED diatribe that any decent person could find. So maybe YOU can tell me what made you condone it?
Hate-Speech that any DECENT person would have condemned, YOU gleefully ENDORSED. Endorsing the utterly vile and obviously inappropriate rantings of an emotionally disturbed person, responding to political questions with a fusillade of spittle spewing insulting personal HATE, YOU said;
P.S. To all the folks who got their fee fees hurt by Feisty's comment . . . newsflash . . . other folks have feelings too. You reap what ya sow, like it or not.
Well, P.P.S.
That newsflash is about to come back and bite you in the FANNY.
There is simply nothing more priceless than the Selective Ethics crowd. Let me put this in simple terms that even df and MB can understand (I am now convinced nojo will NEVER understand anything but her own spite):
First Read is like a neighborhood. I went and left my bicycle in the driveway. Safecracker came along and took it (no doubt using an alias or his own band of buddies). Then he basically 'loaned it' to nojo, dangerfield, groucho, MB - and anyone else who happened to come along and want to take it for a ride. As they rode MY bicycle back and forth in front of my house they yelled taunts to me about how stupid I was for leaving my bicycle out. Sadly, in the bicycle basket was my journal. They decided to photocopy that and distribute it, too. All the while mocking ME for leaving it out. At no point do they feel ANY shame or remorse. Further, their inability to READ for comprehension has led them to make scurrilous and false accusations against the Neighborhood Association and it's officers. And they want to nitpick about a Code of Honor. While they display none? I have explained that we used the tools available when we thought we had been HACKED. Apparently in their Crystal Pure homes,...there is never a reason to fire a shotgun during an invasion?
I find it more than a little disingenous that THEY keep DEMANDING that Feisty get banned for violating a Code of Honor when they've blatantly exhibited a complete LACK of honor and integrity in their own handling of this situation. Phony Outrage is their trademark.
Well, Clara, at least you, (unlike Nash), are not denying the documents exist.
And, no, you are NOT the "neighborhood watch". You are simply a group of people who spend all of their time tearing down anybody who does not march in lockstep with the Obama idolators. You are so committed to your cause that you cannot denounce the most egregious violations when committed by members of your own group- rather, you applaud them!
Navy seems to think that there are people marching in the streets over this. I must say, those are some pretty serious delusions.
Allow me to clarify something I said in an earlier post: when I emailed the moderators with Fiesty's post, I did NOT suggest she be banned- only that the comments be deleted.
That they are still up speaks volumes about the cozy relationship your group enjoys with the management of this board.
I HAVE opined that anyone else making those kind of remarks, (and this is not the first such instance, only the most recent), would have been banned.
You do not like my political views. Sorry for you.
I am sorrier for my country.
I have said before, and will say again, that we would have been far better off under either McCain or Hillary Clinton. I would have disagreed with many policies advanced by either at the helm- but we would not, now, be facing the disasters caused by Obama's incompetence.
Is Sarah Palin an idiot? Perhaps on any issue that does not involve making money. Sadly, this country put the idiot on TOP of the ticket, and we are all paying for that.
I notice that your vitriol toward me increases as Obama's approval number sink, his policies fail, and his election chances fade.
You don't really hold me personally responsible for that, do you?
Cause, I have to tell you, most people cannot help but notice climbing unemployment, and FOUR TRILLION dollars in additional debt- in two years, no less.
That your group is with Obama, who said on Friday night that he"could not be prouder" of his record as president only proves that you are incapable of recognizing glaring truths.
Truths that I will continue to post, whether you like it or not.
By the way, Clara- you keep accusing safecracker of linking your documents to google. Do you have proof of this? If so, you have certainly not made it public.
How and why was safecracker banned? I find it difficult to believe that he/she ever posted anything that topped Fiesty.
Who got "now I'm here" banned, and why?
Why are you so certain Groucho Marx and Ira Levin are the same person?
Do you have actual information, or are you just making accusations?
no jo
I did some research. Safecracker was banned for posting under another name while suspended. Using multiple Newsvine accounts will get you banned.
Tyler banned i am here and stated it was for "weird trolling of Murrary and Domenici." He also said it was because i am here was a re-registration a person who had been previously banned for posting while suspended, i.e. Safecracker.
I have always just assumed Groucho and Ira were the same person, just because their "voice" is the same. I don't know that for a fact.
Those of us who spend alot of time on Newsvine recognize there are only two individuals who patrol all these articles and blogs, "Sally" and "Tyler." They rarely delete any post, they occasionally restore innocuous posts that the community has deleted, but only after those deleted posters appeal to them, and they generally only ban people who post under new names while suspended. Suspensions most often come after calling other posters "imbeciles" "morons" and/or using racial or sexual epithetes.
As you can see, Newsvine is hardly in the business of deleting posts on the basis of politics or personal animosity. Suspensions seem pretty
random, and outright bans are mostly for posting while suspended. Sally and Tyler are probably two kids working their way through dental
hygeine school, as near as I can tell, they aren't lawyers or pschiatrists.
It is up to us, in the end, to build a democratic and functioning community, without relying on the "cops" to sort it out. Kind of scary isn't it? The Golden Rule, however is, as always, the best yardstick, " do unto others...."
Why are you so certain Groucho Marx and Ira Levin are the same person?
Oooops!... that was ME who is certain there NJNB!
Guess I'm NOT on ignore after all like you claim...
Nash is 100% spot on - you are a LIAR!
Then again... WE'VE all known that for years and so does anyone else who reads this board on a semi-regular basis!
PS: You and all your delusions of grandeur about us 'plotting' against you, can I ask why your still here if we had the ability your SO paranoid about?
Which makes you head of the "homogenous" block association, who was only trying to keep "them" in their place, no?
The hysterical "mugging grandma"analogy was funnier...
As one of the 'gang" so aptly stated..."Get over it"...
After all KCMO, it seems the group and the "get together" was your "vision", and you have already started a new site for your 'insiders" (and I'm sure this time you won't let your "innocent friendly conversations" ever see the light of day again.) so you should proudly stand behind every word, instead of acting like every other "group" leader who's innocent/nefarious agenda has been exposed by a ..."grandma mugger"? "bicycle thief"?
"The term you've all been searching for to impugn whoever it was who first uncovered your dirty laundry, is...
Well, Amy, thank you for providing more proof of the collusion between the management of this board and your gang.
If posters can get banned for calling other posters "morons or imbeciles"- and, I do not doubt you on that; my reading of the Code of Honor suggests that repeated violations like that can get someone banned-
Please explain why certain members of your gang are exempt from those same rules?
I understand that you and your cohorts truly believe that this should be Obama Central- see Friday's story on Perry actually using the name of someone that sounds like another name- but NO story on Obama believing that a serviceman who was killed in battle, receiving a Medal for service above and beyond, was actually alive to receive it.
There were a few stories posted yesterday, including the usual Palin story- but no story on Obama stating at a fundraisers that he "could not be prouder" of his record as president.
There is SO much to be proud of, isn't there? Rising unemployment, crushing debt- to which he has added almost four trillion in two years- a debt crisis,
And, oh, by the way, a Washington Post story-today- about the weird coincidence of companies with owners who contributed large amounts of money to the Obama '08 campaign, and those same companies receiving hundreds of millions of stimulus dollars.
Bet you will not read that in any story on this blog.
You will read it tomorrow. I intend to post about it.
I tried to provide you with the facts as I know them, and you twisted them around for your own purposes.
I have seen posters suspended, not banned, for calling people "morons." The posters I have seen banned, such as Safecracker, got caught posting under new names while their original screen name was suspended.
There is no collusion between the moderators and Libs R US. Tyler and Sally don't intervene consistently because they are not the police. They don't suspend every over the top poster, right or leftwing, every time a poster uses the word "dumb," for example, because they are not omniscent gods, as you seem to think. The moderators pretty much stay out of exchanges, and only randomly drop in to remind people to keep it civil.
It should be apparent to thinking adults, if you enjoy this blog and robust debate, you treat others as you yourself would like to be treated. You do yourself a disservice if you look to a couple of kiddos like Tyler and Sally to supervise this playground. The real "rules" are the ones each individual lives by.
This is the day that the Lord had made and I am rejoicing in it!
dangerfield and no joe:
There has been no evidence provided of collusion between the powers that be at NBC and posters here at First Read. Anyone who continues to allege such is a liar.
The comments that I made to those who had their "fee fees" hurt by Feisty's initial comments to no joe Friday before last still stand . . . everyone has feelings, not just you folks. For the record, if you look at the time I made that comment and the time the comments that you continue to repost were made, you will notice that I made my comment BEFORE the rest of the exchange occured. Not that it matters, but for the truly petty, I thought I would you throw you that lil' bone.
In closing, I have said everything I have to say about this. The information is out there, and everyone is free to interpret it as they see fit.
I will not respond to any additional threats or lies. Those looking for may take on the matter can refer to my posts from this week.
On the Palin thread, I had additional comments for Groucho that stand for the two of you as well. Enough of the "spy games". Onward and upward folks.
P.S. Somewhere, someone asked why my comment history was no longer available on my page. It is still there, just moved to a different block. Sorry to make you have to work a little harder to peek in my window, but I assure you it is still there . . . I will wave at you next time!
"It should be apparent to thinking adults, if you enjoy this blog and robust debate, you treat others as you yourself would like to be treated. You do yourself a disservice if you look to a couple of kiddos like Tyler and Sally to supervise this playground."
As a "thinking adult", I couldn't agree more. But the truth is, not only were you looking to a "couple of kiddos", You had your own "monitor"...Dennis, to "assist" and influence that supervision with his (daily? weekly?) "reports".
Dennis, Columbus, Ohio (Jun 19, 10:44 AM): "As far as Newsvine doing nothing what I have noticed is that most all reports I make over the weekend nothing gets done. It appears to be most effective M-F when Sally & Tyler are on the job."
"...most all reports"? Geez how many were you all making? Sounds like a regular thing. I bet they're a hoot to read too...Just a group of friends aiding "democracy" and the "golden rule" behind the scenes..
38 of a gang, trying to silence any an all opposing viewpoints.
I wonder where Pietro is? I guess he doesn't want to get called out for his biggoted post yesterday where he called me a "shim" just a little offense to certain "communities"
FIesty is guilty of at best, CYBER BULLYING. YOU BY DEFENDING HER are guilty of the same thing.
Tolerating posts from the US Nazi page (posted by Bev) to the atrocious items posted above make it clear that there is ONE rule for some and NOT for everyone else.
Maybe if THE REST OF THE GANG GREW A BACKBONE and called the Wicked Witch O Illinios (misspelling intentional) out on her bs, everyone else here would actually see a redeeming quality in the rest of you. At least then people could say; well at least they don't tolerate it when it comes from their own side?
Somehow, though I doubt that. Intellectual dishonesty appears to rule your lil group. Also why Obama is losing ALL THE MODERATE DEMS AND INDIES, oh yes it is.
You people would make any moderate cringe with your bs. At least when reps on conservatives here post they usually have something to back it up, other than fairy tales.
See when I was a kid, my older brother DID leave his bike outside and it DID get stolen. My parents reminded him IT WAS HIS FAULT FOR LEAVING HIS BIKE OUTSIDE.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO Try some personal responsibility NIT WITS.
"The comments that I made to those who had their "fee fees" hurt by Feisty's initial comments to no joe Friday before last still stand . . . everyone has feelings, not just you folks. For the record, if you look at the time I made that comment and the time the comments that you continue to repost were made, you will notice that I made my comment BEFORE the rest of the exchange occured. Not that it matters, but for the truly petty, I thought I would you throw you that lil' bone."
If everyone has feelings, why do you only care about your friend's? What was the justification for a personal attack based on a political post. I call BS BS and hypocrisy hypocrisy. Oh, and I call weasel words WEASEL words...
NF;
"For the record, if you look at the time I made that comment and the time the comments that you continue to repost were made, you will notice that I made my comment BEFORE the rest of the exchange occured."
What do you usually call it when someone says something that isn't exactly true?...
It's been a hell of a week . . . round of drinks on me! :o)
Happy Father's Day to all the dads and MOMS doing double duty . . . I had one of those!
P.S. To all the folks who got their fee fees hurt by Feisty's comment . . . newsflash . . . other folks have feelings too. You reap what ya sow, like it or not.
Thanks, dangerfield, for continuing to fight the falsehoods.
Seems they have selected certain members of the gang to come out here to defend their actions by pretending that there was nothing at all unusual about their activities.
Bunk.
Take "Mark"- one of the "friends" on Fiesty's news vine page. Know who he is?
The CTO of news vine, that's who. I sent him an email- accessed HIS news vine page through HERS.
Nah. Nothing unusual about her getting away with the kind of posts that would have gotten anyone else thrown off this board- well, except for another of the gang members.
Jon Stewart at least attempts to undercut the belief in him as a font of truth by consistently reminding people that he is, at heart, a comedian.
One wonders why the management of this site would expect to get any respect as a news organization, given their response to this.
I am twisting nothing at all. The facts are what they are- it is you, and other members of your gang, who are now attempting to twist them into something innocuous.
The facts are that members of your gang- including you, by your own admission- are guilty of flagrant violations of the code of honor.
That you had designated contacts with the moderators.
That at least one of you, (Fiesty), has the CTO of news vine as a "friend"- which, to me, makes the connection between the management of the board, and your gang, pretty obvious- again, given the flagrant violations of the code of honor by more than one member of your gang, collusion is patently obvious.
Despite what Murray says, there is nothing open or above-board about his appearance at your little get together in St. Louis. He admitted that NBC is paying his way- he is, therefore, appearing there in his official capacity.
Had this not been exposed, this would have taken place in secret- as unprofessional as conduct can get. We'll see what the station's ombudsman has to say about it- as well as the ombudsmen of ABC, CBS, Fox, and CNN.
I decided not to keep this in house.
After all, if there is nothing at all wrong with the Deputy Political Director of NBC meeting clandestinely with a group whose stated purpose for the meeting is "dealing with" voices that do not sing from the same hymnal, he, and you, should be proud to have it known throughout the news world.
Deal with this- I am not going anywhere- at least until Obama is out of office. Even then, I may just stick around.
See, I have NEVER 100% agreed with any president from either party.
I imagine if a republican gets elected, and I post my disagreement with policies of that administration, I will a lot of hallelujahs and amend- particularly from your gang.
In other words your son the 'attorney' who slunk through law school told Mommy there's NO grounds for a lawsuit on the basis of not 'doing victim well'! lol
I'll make sure I TIVO CBS - ABC & CNN for the breaking news...
Your heartless comment was hours later, at 6:12 PM EDT
And your statement also speaks for itself as condoning a personal attack as a response to a purely political post.
Do you still condone personal attacks (only by one of your gang, of course) in response to political posts?
Do you really want to continue to pretend you don't understand the point?
The pattern is one of denial...and it is your own.
You have been hoisted on your own petard...
Or is your defense that you didn't endorse the worst of the attacks? Good luck selling that...
Personal attacks in response to political posts should be condemned by "all thinking people" and I am sorry that you do not see the TRUTH in that statement.
If you want to talk about bias, conflict of interest, or clandestine meetings you can start with justice on the Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas, accepting millions of dollars in gifts from a real estate tycoon with business that comes before his bench.
Somehow, an MSNBC journalist agreeing to have lunch with a group of enthusiastic fans of political reporting (there can't be many of us in America) hardly rises to the level of scandal.
It must make you happy to know you and your friends' vandalism caused many regular posters here a great deal of heartache. That seems to have been your aim. Sad, I say. Just sad. And, ironically, you've just reinforced the right wings' reputation for dirty tricks and swiftboating.
I will not respond to any additional threats or lies. Those looking for may take on the matter can refer to my posts from this week.
Sun Jun 26, 2011 11:07 AM EDT
Then what are we to make of your subsequent comments? If you aren't going to respond to lies, you by your own admission must be responding to...you know, that other one, right?...:)
Everyone has said their piece freely on this topic.
That is a beautiful thing . . . easy like a Sunday morning. :o)
I find this all strangely cleansing . . . like a revelation . . . a recalibration . . . a breakthrough.
I am free and at peace with all that has come before and all that is to come.
There really isn't much more to say than that . . . heading back to Tennessee now . . . see ya'll tomorrow!
P.S. Dangerfield . . . are you in love with me? Have I hurt you personally in some way? If so, I am sorry. I am posting comments as I see fit, as I have always done. Does this now require prior approval? You guys need a hobby . . . or maybe a private chat group . . . I know a great place to start one!
Don't flatter yourself. Neither. Read the above and my meaning is very clear;
Condoning personal attacks to political posts is inappropriate behavior.Period.
No amount of obfuscation, deflection or attempts to put it on a personal level like your buddy does daily will change what everyone can read in black and white for themselves.
As to that other odious suggestion;
I sent the club a wire stating,
PLEASE ACCEPT MY RESIGNATION.
I DON'T WANT TO BELONG TO ANY CLUB
THAT WILL ACCEPT ME AS A MEMBER.
Actually Nash you should know by now this isn't really about you. Its about your support for someone who consistently violates the COH and attacks people's families. Right down to their grand children.
I have to wonder ARE YOU NASH AFRAID OF FEISTY? Because honestly, I cannot understand why you and some others soil yourselves with her atrocious attacks? Really I don't. I don't not understand how you can attack someone's grandchild, all because they disagree with you politically.
And I'm sure you are a "grown a$$ woman" so let hear you SPEAK FOR YOURSELF DO YOU CONDONE FEISTY'S ATTACKS OR DON'T YOU??
As a "weekend warrior" here at First Read, I just have to ask - Mark Murray, after al this, are you really still going to this gathering?
I would seem that discretion is the better part of valor.
Regardless of who is right or wrong, the smart play seems to be to just walk away, especially for your, given your position.
To simply say you will meet with who ever, when ever, at this point just will not cut it, at least for me, as someone who has borne the burnt of a personal attack by Feisty, NewDayDawing and others on the "list."
This will not, and cannot end well if you directly participate. I think you understand that although unfortunate, that's just the way it is. Politics.
"I hope this answers your questions. If you have any others, please let me know."
Mark Murray, 6-23-2011
Actually Mr. Murray, I have questions, so does Groucho, and possibly others as well. You responded to Groucho, but you didn't specifically answer any of the questions he posed.
According to MSNBC, "Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com."
MSNBC's parent is NBC.
So...
When you suggest that neither you nor Domenico Montanaro moderate First Read any more, aren't you being a bit disengenuous?
You state that you're "happy to relay" messages to the Newsvine moderators, so it should be relatively easy for you to tell us what you're going to do about the repeated, unaddressed violations of the Newsvine Code Of Honor at First Read and the inappropriate use of Newsvine rules to delete the comments of some bloggers, and to have the accounts of others closed...especially considering that this has been the behavior of a group of liberal/progressive First Read bloggers with whom you've developed a relationship, and even plan to actually meet with next month in St. Louis.
If you, in your capacity as the Deputy Political Director of NBC News, suggest to the Newsvine moderators that they stop allowing the sort of abuses that Libs R Us has engaged in (apparently with impunity) it's perfectly reasonable to expect that they'll comply with your wishes, is it not?
Do you want a level playing field for everyone blogging here at First Read, or not, Mr. Murray?
If you put on a similar gathering, I'd also be happy to address your group. Yes, my superiors signed off on my attendance. In fact, they are thrilled there are folks -- whether they're liberals, conservatives, or independents -- who have made these bonds on our blog and who consider this their home.
It's what makes this such a great blog. And we appreciate all of you who read and post.
Have a nice weekend Mixed, try cleaning out the conspiracy theory cobwebs because if this wasn't a level playing field and we evil liberals had the power to control it--you wouldn't be able to log on in the first place.
Did you run your attendance at this private meeting by NBC's ombudsman? What you are proposing seems to be a pretty clear violation of the canon; and
In light of the subject matter, (what to "do" about me, and other posters), will you have a live feed of the roundtable discussion linked to this site?
I'd kind of like to know what advice you give on dealing with me. I seem to be pretty high on the list of topics to be discussed.
Your contention that this is a normal course of business strikes me as odd, at best. I have been in attendance at many "private" meetings at which a member of the press was a speaker- I believe I mentioned in the past that, at one such, Chris Matthews was a featured speaker- we spoke about what he termed his favorite book, Kennedy Vs. Nixon.
I have shared a podium with Mike Wallace, and enjoyed the wit and wisdom of David Brinkley, before his passing, among numerous others.
The difference is that at EACH and EVERY one of these "private" gatherings- other press was present. In fact, there was coverage of each of these gatherings- some local, some national.
It strikes me that if you are going to gather together, the meeting should be made available to those interested.
In my case, as a topic of conversation, I am definitely interested.
You know, what never ceases to amaze me is how someone who is a GUEST on a blog is trying to dictate to MSNBC and their employees on what they should do.
My question is this - WHY DO YOU CARE what Mark Murray's bosses are doing with him? Surely they are in positions of decision making that works for THEIR best interest. Mark Murray has posted already that his bosses are THRILLED there are people who are using this blog as their 'home'. mark Murray works for THEM, NOT YOU.
So if Mark Murray is Ok with it, and his BOSSES are OK with it, why does ANYONE CARE what you think? Why does ANYONE CARE of Mark's bosses went through an ombudsman or not?
Looks pretty clear to me that everyone of any importance approved this deal. Of course you didn't approve because you are just you, and we all know that you have NO importance whatsoever.
Well, too bad for you.
If you want to meet Mark Murray, he has already given you and your compadres - and anyone who has a group - an open invitation that if you invite him as a group, he would come and visit.
So why don't you quit yer bitchin' and take the man up on his offer?
It is interesting that you have such a problem with Mark Murray visiting people that are NOT like you. Looks to me that you and Halo need to get a room together because both of you are control freaks that are barking up the wrong tree. MSNBC doesn't have to do SQUAT because you say they do or should do.
So, get up off your butt and put together a group of like minded individuals and go meet Mark Murray. If you don't it is because you are too lazy or too inept to do so, and it is your own fault.
When First Read became a blog in 2006, my colleagues and I manually approved of every single comment, which was quite the task since the majority of my responsibilities with NBC News have nothing to do with the blog. That's why the comments were usually limited to 50 per post, and why comments got posted slowly.
Then Newsvine was purchased to host all of the blogs on MSNBC.com. One of the great features of that transfer was that Domenico and I no longer had to manually approve of the comments; they were done automatically. I now spend probably 1% of my day reading the comments, although that has increased since yesterday.
I've got to admit: I have much more important things to do at work than care about the Code of Honor, or whatever. But since I'm pretty easy to reach, if someone ever has an issue, I'm happy to ask my colleagues at MSNBC.com to relay a message to Newsvine that's something is wrong. It's a three-degrees-of-separation event. I don't even know Tyler and the other Newsvine folks.
There's nothing unreasonable about expecting a level playing field at First Read...particularly when Mr. Murray insists that's exactly what he wants as well, eh?
People do not like to be lied to, nor do they like thieves that go stalking in the night stealing from unsuspecting people, and then telling them that they did it for you.
Oops that sounds kinda like the GOP/TP proposals we are seeing. My bad
Instead of pissing and moaning why don't you guys get a meeting together and inviite Mark. He said he would be happy to come. GO for it instead of whinning like little children.
There's nothing unreasonable about expecting a level playing field at First Read...particularly when Mr. Murray insists that's exactly what he wants as well, eh?
Do you agree with him, Pietro?
What I am seeing with people like you, Mixed bag, is that you are all about the bitchin' and complainin' but short on rolling up your sleeves to do something.
So while you whine and whine - incessently, I might add - Mark Murray has to AGAIN tell you that he has better things to do than worry about YOUR comfort on the blog. He has stated more than once that he is willing to take what concerns you have and pass them on to newsvine to handle, since that is what they were purchased to do.
And yet you CONTINUE to bitch and moan about a 'level playing field'.
I have one thing to say - this whole situation has surely uncovered one thing - You, No Joe and some of the others in the 'chattering class' are the laziest, whiniest people on this blog.
So roll up your sleeves, put together a group and invite Mark Murray to visit.
Question, Why is Feisty still here after this attack on nojo last week? Nothing, not even a slap on the wrist.
Again, Feisty at her finest - (Fri- attack on nojo, sick)
1. Still got the battery acid running through your veins eh NJNB?
We would like to believe that after you recent near heartbreak, you would of re-assessed the amount of hatred you carry in your heart...
We should of known better....
2.You GO get them you miserable OLD BAT M'Kay?
PS: Thought you had me on ignore?
Nothing more than further PROOF you're a LIAR & and FRAUD...
DO YOU know where your hubby is? LMAO!
3. And therein lies the title you've so succesfully earned as the seond biggest LIAR on this blog right behind JS1!
YOU are a PHONY, FRAUD & a unsuccesul LIAR!
You have been PROVEN repeatedly to soak up EVERY comment like the right wind sponge YOU are!
Notice to NJNB -there were MORE people defending my comments then those that came to your rescue!
That little princess of yours has my deepest sympathies with a HATE riddled Grama like yourself!
Just keepon hating on... one day you will get yours! ;o)
Every dog has her day and it won't take long before YOU get yours...
4 .What's the matter NJNB - hubby out of town AGAIN? I would be more worried about WHAT was UPwith that then spreading you your HATRED every chance you get?
Do YOU think the hubby wants to get it on with a BITTER OLD BROAD that couldn't day something NICE if they had a GUN to their head
Thanks again for prioving YOU are a certifiable LIAR there GF!?
I have slogged through the threads for the last three days, reading every one. It is over in my mind. The horse died like Fiesty and other said. But if some of you want to continue go ahead. Here is my suggestion: Email the FR guys, tell them you want your own show and thread:
THE REAL HOUSEWIVES OF MSNBC.
It will be a great hit and all you can make money, and the same arguments, and outrage can continue. NNJ would make a great Danielle, Spanky, a great Tamara; Bev a great Alex and best of all Feisty a new Betheny. Remember though, that one goes on to have her own show and makes million.
If this same topic shows up on Monday, it must be the reunion show!!
Now I am going to the Dew Drop Inn and quench my thirst.
Of what canon are you talking about? My job is covering, writing, and talking about politics. And talking about politics is what I'll be doing in St. Louis. I imagine the questions will be: 1) Which Republican has the best chance of winning the nomination? 2) How vulnerable is Obama in 2012? 3) What are going to be the issues at play? Etc.
I they ask me a question about certain posters, and want them removed, here will be my answer: I think we should always err on the side of free speech, and those posters have as much of right to post as they do.
As far as coverage of the event, the gathering is not mine; I'm the guest. You'll need to ask the organizers. But if you're dying to know what I was asked, you can always drop me a line.
And I'm happy to speak to you and any group you organize. Glad you had the opportunity to hear from Chris. It must have been an enjoyable experience.
Well - we're now into day five of this, and all totas has proven is she has nothing to offer other than a copied & pasted post she's REPOSTED about a hundred time NOW? lol
WOW - color me impressed! ;o)
Why...these look like Newsvine Code Of Honor violations!
Oh so - now according to bag boy Mark is suppose to go back and go through all posts bag boy finds offensive?
Now I got it!
If people were suspended based on COH violation this place would be a freakin GHOST TOWN!
As for the totas - I'm sure Mark more than likely saw that post say, when she re-posted it for the hundredth time?
Tell us what you think of Feisty post and how it doesn't violate the TOS of newsvine. Are you going to be suggesting to the Moderators that she be BANNED for this type if Attack. You seem to be reading these boards alot more Now. So The Question is Will you point it out how out of line she is. or will you just let it go.
It WAS a great conversation with Chris. It was more than a few years ago, and A & E had just optioned the book- don't know what ever happened to the miniseries.
By the way, if you want to ask him about it- as I say, it was more than a few years ago, (Clinton was president), you can mention Boca Raton, and see if he remembers the meeting.
In the interest of full disclosure- I am having both com cast and your ombudsman contacted, with an outline of my concerns. These include my own rights, and the rights of others that have been abridged to date, and that are called into question by this meeting.
It is far easier for the right to complain than actually do anything, like have their own get together and invite Mark. They do not like the truth as they want a full blown conspiracy which does not exist other than in their little minds. They continue to try and find a fight where there is none. That is what happens when you have no new ideas and ones you do have do not work.
Mark is probably getting tired of answering the same question over and over, several times now. Now he knows a little bit how we feel in debunking the same lies over and over.
And NoJo, our meeting is none of your business, I was invited but cannot go. I would love to meet Mark. Go have your own get together and invite Mark or who ever. Mark is waiting for an invite, so take him up on it. We do not answer to you so get off your high horse before you fall off and hurt yourself.
Sorry, Navy, but as a "topic" of your business, as in, how to "deal" with me, (and others, but my name was first on the list), it IS my business.
Now, rahther than wasting your time trying to convince me that I have no right to defend my rights, why don't you expend your energies figuring out WHO among your merry little band exposed yup?
Has it or will it be passes to Newsvine moderators?
Thanks for your help and have a great weekend.
Mark
This is a political blog, a forum and indeed you need a thick skin.
As for private chat rooms, glad to see so many people getting involved in politics. That is, indeed a very good thing.
The problem is not so simplistic though as this group is not that benign.
I have the entire 489 page transcript copied from the internet and would be more than happy to send it to you. I'm sure many others have it also.
This group, LIBSRUS, per their transcript, intentionally targeted people that disagreed with their political agenda and had their accounts suspended, posts collapsed either by flagging them as advertising (which is a deletion rather than collapse) or simply flagging them as inflammatory or no value. This is constant and persistent. The names of the targets are on each page and, in fact, their complaint was that MSNBC had not complied fast enough. Apparently, that was going to be a talking point with you at your scheduled round table discussion.
If you read the transcript, Sally and Tyler, were their "in" and they promptly complied with the group emails and requests. I don't use the word promptly, loosely. Almost daily contact. Accounts deleted at the groups request. Appears, that several memos were sent directly to you on the topic of quicker deletions of "suspended accounts". That is, in many cases, accounts the group requested be closed.
They brag about it, job well done, good job, etc. The practice continues.
First, if this isn't a violation of the COH, nothing is and I would appreciate an explanation.
Second, NoJoNoBo was personally attacked last week by Feisty and some members of the group, in a pile on that surprised many. You don't personally attack a poster, the woman's granddaughter, and her husband, accusing him of sleeping around and needing to have a gun put to his head cause "she's a cold heartless bitch". This personal attack is a blatant violation of the COH, yet she seems immune to punishment. Why is this sort of dialogue countenanced and a simple cuss word not?
As to yesterday, every single post by "now i'm here" was deleted. Every one. If it wasn't by Sally and Tyler who did it and why? Again a COH violation code.
There is no appearance of impropriety, there is a systemic incidence of impropriety and some of us newer folks want to know why that is.
It we don't have the freedom to post knowing this "gang", not group, has the ability to take down our comments or have accounts deleted, then why bother posting here.
One of the members continually compares the GOP to the Nazi's. What they don't quite get is they've become the Nazi's as they want to and have become the arbiters of free speech on this site.
Their censorship, and the willing compliance of Tyler and Sally, makes this all suspect.
Thetotas- I scoured you post above, but coudn't find the reference to 'ass-pimple'. Did you mean to leave that out, or am I not looking closely enough?
By the way- I also missed quotes you put up by a Chuck-U-Farley, too. I seem to remember some doozies, yet HE never got suspended either. Selective outrage, much, Thetotas?
The Bottom line wiht this is that Mark Murray knows what is Occuring and it is Obvious by who he chooses to associate himself with that he doesnt Care what they Say . My guess is he probably Agrees with how they are posting..
Associations say alot about a person . And this one says alot about Mark Murray..
Thanks for the Reply.. But i must say. still no comment on Feistys Remarks and how they violate the TOS of Newsvine . I am asking you will you pass them on to the Moderator and ask that she be Banned for the things she has posted?
Selective outrage? That must be a new talking point. No its not selective, and the fact that you can read Feisty comments and not be outrage says a lot about you.
If you are trying to compare any of my comments to Feisty's go for it. I have nothing to hide unlike Feisty and her crew. No more access to their history, why is that?
The pimple or Chuck thing, those are not my comments.
As I've said, my personal opinion is that we should err on the side of free speech, unless there is R-rated language or physical threats of violence. As a journalist, I have pretty thick skin. And I'd recommend that any poster on this blog have the same thick skin.
If we banned people because their hurt someone's feelings -- or said something they didn't agree with -- there would be VERY few of you posting.
Mark again. I said i am asking that you pass Feistys Remarks on to Newsvine Moderators. for the purpose of Banning ,, In early postings you said if we had problems with someones Post to Email you. I find it much Easier to Ask you here. . So Will you pass them on as a Violation of the TOS .
Steve got his account Banned and you know this how Feisty. So are the moderators giving you information that is private? This should be an interesting Explaination...
we understand that you will try and get people Banned for calling people names but when you do it you expect the moderators to ignore it. and you say their is no concerted effort to get people banned............... or any type of collusion between you and the moderators. We get it. its all just innocent. .
So what do you say about this Mark. Feisty wanting people Banned do you agree with her?
For starters - all anyone has to do give go to your homepage and see you only opened this your account on June 16th. Right about the time old stevie was banned...
In your third post of the day - you couldn't help yourself and went off on your infamous racist angel.
Then there's the FACT that you're spelling & grammar suck as bad as the 'old' stevie...
It ain't rocket science my friend...
Amazing thing is anyone can find that info out WITHOUT stealing confidential information...
See, we don't need to stoop to the right wing GUTTER LEVEL!
The Question Still remains. How is it that Feisty Redhead knows whos Accounts are being Banned. Are the moderators giving her private information? Because i warned someone about using terms that others would accuse them of being Racist is far from a Racist Rant or Angle...
Steviam, theremis a Code of Honor, the first line of which goes something like 'first, respect your fellow posters'.
It goes on to explain that name-calling, vulgarities, and ad hominem attacks will be dealt with by deleting the post, and the poster can face suspension or outright banning.
It only applies to some, not to others.
Members of the 38 are in this exempt group- the rest of us are not. Therefore, FRH can, and does, say whatever to whomever she likes.
I have her on ignore; unfortunately, when people respond to her remarks, I get a pretty good sense of what she has said to and about me.
Some have posted her remarks to me last week. It makes me I'll to think a person can have that much venom toward a person, based purely on their political views.
I expect things to get much, much worse. Things have rolled merrily downhill since the mid- terms, (which is when I put Fiesty and others on ignore, by the way)- as Obama's polls continue to decline, and his re election chances continue to sink, ypu are going to need a flak jacket to come on here if yup are a fiscally conservative, socially libertarian poster.
And when he loses? I think I will take a vacation. I am not faint of heart, but life is too short for what will be coming at us then.
I so look foward to November of 2012 when Obama gets Voted out. I will not post here for a few days after he loses. but i will come here to Read the remarks of the posters here just to read their daily whines................. but what a glorious day it will be. I can only imagine the Venom that will be spewing from their fingers after he is Defeated. The name calling will be Endless here at Newsvine..
Keep us posted on your interactions with Comcast and NBC on the Mark Murray and the concerted effort to silence people on these boards I look foward to their response to you..
Dont worry about me and like I said before you are welcome to my history. What about your history, do you have something to hide. Why are you blocking it now?
Now the ever so powerful NJNB & her 'attorney' *air quotes* son are goingt bring down MSNBC in one fell swoop because poor NJNB doesn't do victim all that well'! LMAO
From NJNS's own admission, her son barely squeaked through law school, is there any doubt he has plenty of spare time on his hands to help out his mother - the self-proclaimed martyr!
and ask yourself HOW YOU WOULD FEEL if someone posted it about you.
You are a lying, disengenious, coward hiding behind a keyboard. And apparently above the COH. So your lil friend MARK COT OF NEWSVINE and you have this all worked out pretty cushy huh?
Again, YOUR SELECTIVE OUTRAGE is NOT working. And sweetie, you should remember TO HIT PRIVATE if you don't want stuff published on google.
NJNB can do what they want and use whatever resources they see fit. I AM TAKING THIS TO CURRENT TV. Ole Keith still has an axe to grind.
Good luck baby doll I think your going to need a flack jacket for the rest of your "life" on this board. YOU AND YOUR MOB OF 38 have been outted.
With vicious and nasty attacks. A flack jacket THE LURKERS WILL NOT BE HAPPY UNTIL YOU ARE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR WHAT YOU HAVE SAID HERE. Nice try on the spin, dear heart NO SALE>
Mock all you want sweetie pie I OWN YOU NOW.
You as the admin (LOL) left the page open. And now you have problem a BIG problem. YOUR CUSH RELATIONSHIP WITH THE MODERATORS AND MARK HAS BEEN OUTTED.
It's my understanding that you expect to query Mark Murray regarding his "thoughts on how...to best deal with the Bobs and NoJos."
Really, Ron?
Do you really believe that it's appropriate to ask the Deputy Political Director of NBC News about that, and have him tell you how best to "deal with" annoying conservative First Read bloggers?
You expect Mr. Murray to be eager to help you with that, do you?
Come on now Mixed - you see their capabilities to respond to counter arguments here everyday. Everyday they flat out fail. In a word - they are clueless and simply incabable of doing anything than reciting the arguments from ThinkProgress and the like.
If they need help from Murray all the better. It won't make a difference - you know old dogs and all.
I just hope our man Ron takes "Accounting for Dummies" or a basic math book for group review. Hell I will personally overnight a copy, no problem.
I will say this - in light of this I think there is a good chance our man Murray will have to cancel, unexpectedly.
I'm wondering when one of FR's moderators will come on here and explain to us just what kind of relationship they have with some of the liberal posters. Now that we know the reason for sure how some people like Feisty Redhead have managed to stay unbanned, it would be most interesting to hear just how "close" her relationship is with the moderators.
I'm of course not suggesting there is any hanky-panky going on. That would get my account suspended and Feisty is most likely just as unattractive physically as she is on the inside, but still, I think there is no doubt at all that the moderators were part of the off-board whine-fest.
It means just what it says. My grandmother always told me that a person is only beautiful if they are so on the inside, no matter what they look like on the outside. Since Feisty Redhead is obviously a very, um unattractive person on the inside (based on some of her quotes I've been reading), it doesn't matter how unattractive her physical looks are.
Gingerbread Mama is still a little embarrassed about being exposed trying to figure out how to ban Spanky for demolishing the liberals on a daily basis. "Daddy, daddy!" waaaaaaahhhh waaaaaahhhh LOL
How true my friend. After all that is their goal now, is it not? Stall. We now know who the real driving culprits are and I put some of them on ignore along with a few others we know. As far as I am concerned they are no longer relevant and it is easier to move around on the sites.
I think everyone's problem is that they are here almost 24/7. For Pete's sakes - get a life people. It's summer - time to get outside, spend time with family and friends.
After reading some of these posts, I visualize little moles in dark rooms with a monitor flashing. We are all human beings with different outlooks of what we want for our country. If like minded people want to discuss more on the topics - why can't we?? After all that is why we are here in the first place. Free country and all that jazz!
Spanky - I am truly shocked that you are employed. Would have to be self-employed - right? Well good for you that you can be on this site all day and collect a paycheck. And you talk about Democrats being lazy.
For anybody that is going to St.Louis for any reason and likes Italian food there is a an old Italian neighborhood where Yogi Bera and Joe Garagiola grew up called "The Hill" you can not get a bad meal in that neighborhood.
My favorite is your milk of human kindness overflowing...
Pietro, Columbus, Ohio (May 27, 12:45 PM):No Joe - I see that no Joe's granddaughter is gravely ill. Although I will support and send my prayers for the Granddaughter, i will not publicly do that for No Joe. She is too mean and bitter. maybe this is the universe talking to No Joe and is telling her to stop with the mean pettyness and use that energy to enjoy life and people. Let's hope that No Joe gets a clue.
My favorite is your milk of human kindness overflowing...
Pietro, Columbus, Ohio (May 27, 12:45 PM):No Joe - I see that no Joe's granddaughter is gravely ill. Although I will support and send my prayers for the Granddaughter, i will not publicly do that for No Joe. She is too mean and bitter. maybe this is the universe talking to No Joe and is telling her to stop with the mean pettyness and use that energy to enjoy life and people. Let's hope that No Joe gets a clue.
Where have I seen almost those exact same words?
Dangerfield - that's right - I posted that and I stand by every word.
What is douche-baggish, Spanky, is that Dangerfield posted it thinking that he was going to get something out of it. What is even more douche-baggish, Spanky, is your so-called 'witty' repartee about it.
Don't get me started about St. Louis...I lived there for several years and absolutely LOVED the food. The Hill is fantastic. I also loved Bandana's Barbecue. And for dessert, frozen custard at Ted Dru's. Gotta get some toasted ravioli there as well.
Clara, it sounds like a plan, anything that Yogi or Joe like is ok with me. I would love some good Italian food. I'm with you and Pietro. Gelato m-m-mm Yum
Thank you, Joe and Yogi grew up there as kids you will see pictures of them from childhood to their heydays with the Yankees in some of the bakeries, delis, and restaurants, it is just an old Italian neighborhood where most of the establishments have been in the family for several generations now. The prices are generally quite reasonable, the food everywhere is delicious, and the portions will wreck a diet if you are on one. My wife Lotta, Lotta Grump has ties in the area, maybe some of you who lived in the area knew her, her maiden name was Balonie, did anybody know Lotta Balonie, I married her, Lotta Balonie is now my wife Lotta Grump, HA. Have a good time folks!
St. Louis is my home town and I can vouch for the Hill restaurants, Ted Drewes, the Cardinals (not so much this year) and freedom of speech as long as it is not defamatory.
Let us all raise a glass tonight and toast Halo. He is a hero. I know how much you liberals like whistle blowers and how much respect you have for them. So I'm sure you all will join me in my tribute to Halo and/or whomever got into that silly chat room. Can't wait to read it all this weekend! Whoohoo!
On the Ron Paul thread last weekend his minions were out in force working up a real "call and response". The rebuttals were coming fast and furious. Pneuma,RP poster at about 10pm said,
I'm just fed up with the attacks, flagrant COH violations, and collapse a thons of posts the gang o 38 do not agree with.
Thanks for your support. TRUTH is what I care about. Not spin, not personal attacks, not FEISTY prepping a response to Pres speech so she can command real estate on the boards.
And let's be honest here, if they gang of 38 could actually debate a valid point, they wouldn't have to work out a collective stategy in their secret treehouse.
Sad, but then again I don't expect any better here now. I will STAY on this board and a burr in the saddle to those trying to silence any opinion that they do not agree with.
To quote NIH who as banned at their request this week "It's on like Donkey Kong"
Thanks for your support. TRUTH is what I care about.
These are the words from HALO, our resident thief. So tell me , Halo, how can a THIEF like yourself care about the TRUTH?
Ever hear the saying, "scratch a lie, find a thief"?
Looks like we have found our thief - and he is not shy about bragging about being one, either.
So since Halo is so PROUD of being the thief that he is, are we REALLY supposed to believe that he is after the TRUTH?
You delude yourself, Halo.
Have fun trying to pawn that transcript off on Keith Olberman. If you think that I am excouriating you enough now, wait until Keith finishes what's left of you when I am done. Look what Keith did and said about President Bush and HIS lies... and you think you are going to find traction in peddling YOUR lies?
Although I know you are not rocket scientists, however THIS IS NOT ABOUT POLITICS THIS IS ABOUT A RIGGED SITE WHERE 38 PEOPLE CAN AMUCK WITH THE COMPLICITNESS OF THE MODERATORS AND REPORTS.
I love the "blame bush" tactic to typical OF MOB MENTALITY.
What makes you think that KO woudn't looooovvvveeeee this after the shameful way he was forced out of MNSBC. You keep trying to ellude to my politics, but since you know nothing about them, assume all you want.
YOUR GANG brought this on themselves. After Feisty's vicious attacks your gange should have been prepared.
WHAT WAS POSTED WAS NOT LIES, they were DIRECT TRANSCIPTS from the MOB.
And oh YEAH IT AIN'T STEALING IF ITS PUBLISHED ON GOOGLE.
Although I know you are not rocket scientists, however THIS IS NOT ABOUT POLITICS THIS IS ABOUT A RIGGED SITE WHERE 38 PEOPLE CAN AMUCK WITH THE COMPLICITNESS OF THE MODERATORS AND REPORTS.
OK, is it just me, but can ANYONE decipher what our resident thief is really trying to say here?
Just like in the Wizard of Oz. THe curtain is pulled back.
It's ugly, but reality always is. Just ask Obama. Talk is cheap, actions have consequences. Looks like the Libs r us are finding that out. Like Weiner - who also cried out about being "hacked." That did not turn out so well for him, either.
Another blogger here who can't actually respond. Good work Pietro, I think we all know now your posts are all just "group think" from the gang.
MT1, funny isn't how they all claim about "whining" and they blame Obama's lack of support on the "haters". Typical of again the "group think" strategy.
It's funny because I was a Hil supporter. WAS being the operative word here. As a female, it sickens me the way the "media" (lol) treats women in general. You had "cold witch Clinton" and "Nailin Palin"
The 38 call the challengers "housewives" now I've never pollutted my eyes with that trash but I will say that line "I wouldn't spit on you if you were on fire" is appropriate for the gang members.
And just another case to point out how WOMEN in general get treated like cr!p. And yet female libs the "party of women" seem to be ok with it. It simply boggles the mind.
Well, almost beer thirty. Too bad I have to hop on the ol' mower for a couple of hours. It'd be fun to stick around and watch all the petty, cry-baby dumb-asses continue to make even bigger fools of themselves than they claim the Libs R Us folks have done.
So much for "get smarter here"..this whole thread should be collasped as no value... I've only been a member on Newsvine since April and I have made some friends and joined a few groups that interest me. I have also outed a few banned and suspended re-regs and , trust me, it is not difficult to find them-they "out' themselves quite easily...If a comment is "off topic" or an attempt to derail, then do yourself a favor and flag it as "no value". If you feel a comment is a personal attack then flag it as inflammatory.If you are so inclined to agree with a comment, than vote it up. I haven't always expressed myself quite as eloquently or precisely as I would like but I sure appreciate those who can and do make that effort. I don't see any conspiracy theories, just a group that has the same interests and are like minded about our political climate. So, get over it and grow up already.
No Joe should feel so flattered that she was at the top of ANYONE's list! She's obviously effective at getting under people's skin--I know she bugs the heck out of me with her snarky retorts and constant Obama-bashing (he can do no right in her eyes), so I mostly skip over her posts. Anyway, they're not gospel, nor are any of the posts from the "gang of 38". The BEST thing that might come out of this flap is that this board actually might become more like it used to be--more of a lively, civil debate. I sure hope so.
Actually, I would add that I have started to ignore posters like NJ and Feisty, who often write comments in which they mock people personally or call names. Don't give them so much power, people! Ignore them or skip over their posts (admittedly, that's a lot of the page). If we can stay on topic and actually discuss the articles and issues, we might "get our board back".
I have a hard enough time reading any of the posts on First Read-the page is always jumping up and down. I can barely scroll to read anything let alone vote or comment...
I don't personally know anyone on any of these blogs. I have some on my Newsvine watch list because I believe in their political view and any facts they may provide me. I read all the comments on each article that interests me-even those collapsed by the community. Everyone has something to add to any discussion or debate so I don't have an ignore list-we already have enough people that have been ignored or forgotten in this country....that's the sad part of it all.
Oh Happy Days... this means it's almost quitting time on Friday afternoon!
In the spirit of Governor Hairspray's gaffe...
Once again, 'mucho gracious' to our fine hosts/moderators you've given us another fine week here @ FR!
I hear Clara's bringing some frajitas & Gingerbread Mamma's supplying us with her delicous guacamole, salsa & chips tonight over at the Dew Drop Inn!
I think I'll bring some pulled chicken soft taco's to add to the feast!
Of course DBO - is gonna be in charge of the Jose Cuervo (Anejo) of course!
Nothing but the best for this group!
Cheers!
tell me about the meat loaf recipe, please.
Thanks to our First Read hosts for providing lots to talk about this week--the best place for politics!
That menu sounds terrific, Feisty. I'm headed over to the DDI to help toast Governor Insensitive with some Jose Cuervo Anejo.
Have a great weekend.
All it (the recipe) says is: "Don't let your meatloaf". You can handle that, Kirby- I have faith in you.
Feisty- if I get there, and the Cuervo jug is already empty, you guys aren't gonna go in the back room and plot against me, are you? (tee-Hee, *snicker*)
Yes DBO - I surely can. And yours, I trust, can be "handled" also.
Thanks Kirby. Haven't been feeling myself lately.
DBO, your humor never fails to make me smile!
Feisty,
I'm shocked that you work or can hold down a job by all the "support the Lazy" and "Steal from the rich" comments that you make on here. LOL
Drive-by -
If you and Kirby are done with your meat loaf jokes, can you get the the old beat box/quarter machine cranked up? I'd like to send out a little dedication to a few of our new/old/new name/same-old/same-old friends who worked so hard this week - you got any Johnny Rivers' "Secret Agent Man"?
Well, I don't know about DBO, but I am actually probably going to have nightmares about the whole thing. How about something by Meatloaf?
If you're serious kirby - I'll e-mail you the recipe!
It's the wine & cheese that makes it OH SO GOOD!
Commin' right up, JoAnne! A good choice to be sure!
Hell, in keeping with the 'everything has humor in it if you look hard enough' category, I'm gonna toss in a copy of 'Wipeout", too! I'd say it's certainly been that kind of week (for the Repubs and Eric Cantor. You didn't think I meant anything else, did you??)
DBO, I have a great pitcher of mojitos. "Secret recipe" from my communist friend Maria , the Mojito Queen. When your song is over, you can put on the song I brought" Quateque Campesino" by the Buena Vista Social Club.
Now the dancing can start.
"How about something by Meatloaf?"
Oohhhh, HELL yeah! (as long as he's not been fired...)
" When your song is over, you can put on the song I brought" Quateque Campesino" by the Buena Vista Social Club."
I'd LOVE to, but I don't acutally bring a record-player. See, the tunes are in the DDI jukebox. BUT- if you know someone that could break into it, I could slip the ol' wax on there, and the dancing could start. But keep the faith- I think there are several break-in artists nearby that might be able to help!
Feisty,
With everyone excited to toast adios to Governor Hairspray I know it's going to be a good time.
Mark, Dominico, Ali & FR Crew thanks for all you do. I'll see you guys in a little while. Northstar- I love dancing.
Feisty -
Absolutely I would like the recipe. I haven't been able to make the mac & cheese balls because my deep frier went to heaven, but even though I live alone I like to cook.
So, how do we do the email thing?
I say if it's Meatloaf, in honor of NoJo we go with Bat (sic, sh!t crazy) Out of Hell.
anyone?
Keep it up Clara,
You see all of the pages are going to none other than KEITH OLBERMANN.
The more you guys lie and spin, the deeper you are making the hole. You see I figure KO still has a huge axe tp grind, and I am more than happy to give him the fodder.
Lol what a great week it has been on this board for Indies and Reps alike. NO MORE LIBERAL MOB collapse a thons, no more flagging as adverts (as you guys were trying to do to ME all day yesterday)
Its a little like this. You are attempting to justify something THAT CANNOT BE JUSTIFIED.
Trying to SILENCE FREE SPEECH FROM OTHER WHO DIFFER FROM YOUR POLITICAL VIEW WILL NOT BE TOLERATED.
I'm NOT GOING ANYWHERE.
I simply cannot wait for Keith's call. As a huge fan and supporter of his free clinics, I am sure we will have MUCH to talk about.
I am QUITE certain he will be thrilled at my sports knowledge, too. Thanks for making all my dreams come true.
When recently asked if I could have dinner with anyone I wanted, who would it be? My response was Keith. I just CANNOT thank you enough!
PS. I don't want you to go anywhere. Every village needs one and you're now my very special friend! Thanks again. I am not aware that anyone tried to collapse you yesterday. Is your paranoia showing?
LOL I remember that Clara & something about a basement? ;o)))
Ahhh Good Times indeed!
I said I'd let him up for air,...wink!
Oh, I remember GF.... I remember!
I think if I check closely I'll find remnants of Diet Coke somewhere on my monitor... LMAO!
It won't be funny when someone runs it as a news story.
Mock mock mock. And yet, somehow when it hits the fan it won't be that funny anymore.
A news story? That average Americans with common interests found each other and like to talk politics and life?
halo is truly a legend in his own mind.
This should be an interesting thread...
Count on it.
I am going to have to disagree. By now, they have adopted a common front- it was all a lot of nothing, boy are you guys easily fooled, we have nothing to hide.
Remember, they think there is nothing left to see. They also probably have the moderators ready to delete anything, or anybody, who refers to the most egregious admissions.
So be it.
It will be interesting to see if Comcast has any input. As a named "target", I am having my son the lawyer make the contact.
Seems he knows people, too.
HAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHHAHAHHAAHHAHHAHHHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHAH!
Make it STOP!
No one loves a good round of "fun and games" as much as me, and I love having you around Nojo, but really the remedy for you, or anyone here that doesn't like what's going on is to simply leave.
If you don't like what's happening all you need to do is go somewhere else. There are a bajillion other sites, many that are very good.
Me, I think it just makes it all the funner. And that is a real word, I don't care what anyone says.
A target for what, (more) ridicule? Hey, counsellor- can y' help us out here?
Feisty- if I get hit on the way to the DDI, I'm gonna have 'my Mother, the car', look into remedies for me!
And that's what I am talking about. Just look at Feisty. She cannot help herself.
I don't know why or how, but NoJo you have a special power over Feisty. Whatever you say she has to respond, and usually in a totally stupid, but very entertaining way.
Nojo - you own Feisty. It is just so terribly obvious. :)
I'm obviously with the counsellor today. Mo Funna, Mo Betta.
Oh, but Spanky, if I leave, think of all the fun you miss!
That, by the way, is the reason for the contact- I have no intention of allowing them to keep me off this board.
Know what's funny? It was getting boring.
Now, I will just keep on keeping on- I will have this iPad with me in the grave, if needs be.
Look at all the material Obama is handing out- the future in manufacturing, it seems, is in military strength diapers.
We have been Poised for Progress for at least six months, by my count. I guess it comes more slowly when you are Leading From Behind. Ah, WTF. He still thinks people will give him time to Finish the Job.
Now that is the truth Nojo - it was getting really boring.
No longer an issue. Plus for me all the "good stuff" is coming up - debt ceiling, the dems acting like tea party members and cutting stuff, and hopefully and end to all these damn wars.
Besides, as unemployment contunues to rise, and the real estate markets continue to tank, Obama and his loyal minions here just get more desperate and more shrill.
Good times, right Nojo?
Besides I'd miss my good buddy Drive By. And I know he'd miss me, right DBO?
Spanky -
Drive By is busy trying to come up with more Meatloaf stories right now. He would miss you terribly, though, no doubt.
I kind of miss Havasu. I have a sister that l;ives there with a big old boat.
NoJo All Blow
It will be interesting to see if Comcast has any input. As a named "target", I am having my son the lawyer make the contact.
Seems he knows people, too.
Dazzling! See how productive hate is; huh?
My cousin is a lawyer and his wife is a sitting Judge. I'm sure they can sort it all out. I got people too. See?
So sit yourself down and think about it.
drive-by-observer
Can you put "If You Think You're Lonely Now" by Bobby Womack So we can dedicate it to NoJo All Blow? It looks like NJ has a bad case of the blues.
If only she listens to the words maybe; she 'll reconsider her suit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbbZ_k1Z8gU&feature=related
Oh and that special power you got Nojo - it works on our gal Bev. also.
"so sit yourself down and think about it."
Another instant classic Bevism.
"... He would miss you terribly, though, no doubt"
Hey, who wouldn't?
"leading from behind'? I keep seeing this. Is it some kind of reference to....you know....butt-honking?
So it's back to the gay thing, eh Drive By?
So predictable. So sad.
Hey Drive - you have a good weekend and don't let those peas get the better of you.
Now, drive by, I do not expect you to read the New Yorker, but an account of the interview that became the article was on this very site.
The highly educated, erudite reporter got a quote from the White House- something to the effect of 'Obama being adept at leading from behind',(please note the single quote marks- this is not an exact quote), and the besotted reported used it in his article. Seems that both he and his editor were in full swoon and never evaluated how outright STUPID that remark was- and how it would be used against him.
It became the headline of a First Read thread. I'm sure you can find it if you want to read it.
Today, Obama told us that the future of manufacturing was in military strength, indestructible diapers. I suppose that is why his polls are dropping so precipitously
http://people-press.org/files/legacy-questionnaires/Econ%20topline%20for%20release.pdf
He says people chuckle about his plans. Those who do are laughing at him. Not with him.
The rest simply do not have a laugh left.
Well I was going to celebrate my return to First Read after taking some time off to take care of some personal problems by coming up with stem-winder full of references to the Dew Drop Inn and all to close out the week. But I see that something else has come up. Then I was going to come up with a post all full of high minded appeal about God, Mother and Country and Freedom of Speech and such like. Naw Lets keep this simple and to the point.
I’ve got a relationship with a group of posters on F.R. Most cases it goes back years (before they brought in Newsvine) and we added personal messages to our posts. Newsvine changed that a little bit and we could form a group and keep the personal over there and focus a bit more on the Political. If you will look at it you’ll find it was one of the first groups formed under the new format. We thought it was private. Turns out due to one glitch or the other it wasn’t.
I make no apology for simply being friends. Some of you’ll ought to try it sometime. Course I understand for some of you’ll it’s kind of hard because you have to put a little something into it. For me politics is best when you put a little into it. Personal relationships mean a lot and it goes beyond simply taking a position on something. F.R. is a way to understand what these positions mean and how they affect folks all over the country. But that’s just me.
I guess by now some of you have figured out that I don’t like you very much. Heck I thought that I’d already cleared that up. But you see you don’t have to agree with me politically to be a friend. You do however have to put something into the relationship besides hate and negativity. All my friends at Libs R Us have and I have gotten more out of it than you can ever imagine.
Now I think all accusations of collusion and influence and who’s hoodooing who out of what have been pretty well covered by the members and Mr. Murray. Some of you’ll are going to believe there is a vast conspiracy and not be satisfied with the answers that you get no matter what they are as long as they don’t fit in with your narrow range. That’s a shame but been my experience that folks are folks and there just ain’t much you can do about some of them.
So now we’re at this point. Come Monday morning if I have time I’m going to put up a post. If you care to respond to it by all means do so. If you disagree with it put it out there. If I simply drive you nuts by by simply existing simply put me on ignore. Come next Friday you will find me right here being somewhat irreverent on T.W.A. Some of you are going to like what I do and some of you aren’t. Life’s a funny old dog that way. But for God’s sake you don’t have to go to all the trouble of printing or hacking my account. Heck nothing I got is that d@mn important.
BTW
Mixed, Groucho, Nojo and some others while I think that you are carrying this thing way to far I do think that is your right. Don’t particularly like it but it is what it is.
Now I’m Here or doublea or whatever your posting under today is a different story. Most of what he’s put up is at best a lie and at worst a deliberate misconstruction. You have threatened both me and my friends with lawsuits and everything else.
I’ve got a better idea. I’m going to be in St. Louis the 8th. Be there or be square.
And that’s not a threat. That’s a promise.
Nothing like some pearls of wisdom from IR to end the week. Well said, friend. See you at the DDI.
Agreed Jody - how I've missed IR's pearls of wisdom to wrap up the week!
All the best to you & Miss Ellie!
See you in St. Louis!
IR: Great post. I'll be there on the 8th right beside you. I really do want to know if you sound the way you write. (smile) Take care my friend.
Will stop by the DDI and toast Frank as he deserves a drink on the house.
See you all at the DDI - We can plot our next moves for World Conquest - snark
Hello IR, only you can put into words the way most of us feel. Thank you.
I, too, am looking forward to seeing you in St Louis and sharing some laughs, it will be great fun.
I must say, I am really flattered that some misguided posters here think we are worthy to be discussed on the Daily Show or any other media outlet they have thought about sending the Libs r us link to, too funny. You can post anything you like, I would say the same things to y'all and talk about the same dull topics if you were here right in front of me, nothing to hide, never been paid for any line or post, but thank you for the compliment in thinking it was worthy of paid work. I must look into that as a career sometime.
My friends and I will be back here next week and every week thereafter so get used to it. To our great hosts Mark, Dominec, and Ali and all the other contributors to FR. Thank you for an interesting week, life is never too dull in politics.
See you over at the DDI, can taste those margaritas already.
IR - Hugs to you and especially to your lovely lady. It wouldn't be The Week Ahead without you.
Navy - Excellent idea! I've always wanted to go to New Zealand; can we start there?
Independent Redneck said.....You do however have to put something into the relationship besides hate and negativity. All my friends at Libs R Us have and I have gotten more out of it than you can ever imagine.".......
Right. And if you don't apply that to BOTH sides of the aisle, you're a hypocrite. The moderators here are definitely guilty of that. One standard for Republicans and a different standard for liberals. That's what the manin beef is here. I repeat: if you don't apply that to BOTH sides of the aisle, you're a hypocrite.
Oh well! Could be worse; you could have a stick in your eye! LOL
US NAVY Disabled: "(quivering) "what quotes did they use of mine????"" LOL!!!!!!!!!!
Damage123 - if you HATE it so much at First Read, then why are you still here? if you don't like the moderators, then do something about it instead of continually bitchin' and moanin' about it.
Mark Murray has graciously said - more than once - that if there are any concerns, contact him and he will forward them on to Newsvine to get these issues resolved.
So what are you waiting for? Are you too lazy to get up off your butt and e-mail mark Murray or the moderators directly to get your concerns resolved?
Damage 123--well done, thanks for proving exactly what IR said is true--hate and negativity throughout the whole thing. Some double standard since yours is still here. Have a nice weekend.
Damage I've got a pretty good working relationship with folks on both sides of the aisle. I have a tendency to stay away from the some of the ones that are pretty out there on the theory that talking to them just encourges them to fall down whatever rabbit hole they're going down but other than that most of the time I can have a decent discusion when I have the time and inclination
IR-
I’ve got a relationship with a group of posters on F.R.-
so you are in the "group"
I make no apology for simply being friends.-
and no one has a problem with "being friends" so a little disingenuous, no? But there is a big difference between "friends" and a private group with designs on controlling the discourse on a public message board, and that is the issue here and you durn well know it.
All my friends at Libs R Us have and I have gotten more out of it than you can ever imagine.-
Out of friendship? Or do you mean things like getting folks "you don't like" banned? badgering the moderators to do your collective bidding? , or the practice of "ganging up" on those you disagree with? Those are all topics of "friendly" discussion within the group.
Now I think all accusations of collusion and influence and who’s hoodooing who out of what have been pretty well covered by the members and Mr. Murray. Some of you’ll are going to believe there is a vast conspiracy and not be satisfied with the answers that you get no matter what they are as long as they don’t fit in with your narrow range. That’s a shame but been my experience that folks are folks and there just ain’t much you can do about some of them.
You are incorrect-MB and other "outsiders" have asked questions about journalistic ethics, violations of the so-called COH, and collaborating to delete posts that have been met thus far with "crickets". It is true that some folks may not be satisfied with the answers, but this is a case where there are still many unanswered questions.
I too have been here a while and have a very different perspective on your friends and your group's actions on this blog. Our views are different because our vantage points are likewise. A group of "insiders" creates a group of outsiders simply by it's existence and folks within naturally begin to develop an "us vs them" mentality whether they see it or not. It is also natural to defend your friends, even when their actions are ones you would probably not condone in others, so I do understand. I just have a different perspective.
I look forward to your reply, if any, and of course to your continued participation in our lively discussions of all things political...
Feisty - please take a lot of pics of you guys in St. Louis and place on facebook or send me an email. Need names to go with faces!!
And yes Pietro - they are that lazy!!
Will do Elise
OMG - did you say Facebook? You mean we're friends someplace other than FR? NOW YOU DID IT! :o))
BTW - I didn't get a chance tp respond back to you under FT's - glad to hear things are well with you!
@Northstar - I'm liking that Bethany Frankle thingy! ;o) Care for a drink?
Danger...................Friends as in social friends most of the conversations we had related to that.Course you knew that. Didn't you.......As far as having anybody banned as far as I can tell I can't or even collude to. That relates to a Newsvine function.............As far as me and my friends colluding to "control" the discusion you flatter me but as far as I can tell the discusion goes on for pages and pages on some threads so I hardly see where we could control anything.........As far as the questions that you are presenting Mr. Murray seems to me he's done a pretty good job of answering them. but hey thats just me I'm not as demanding as you are
All this shows me is that certain posters like no jo and Groucho are exactly what I believed them to be. People without character. You could leave your JOURNAL in front of me, and I would not touch it. To deny that you contribute daily to the tone of FR defies credulity. You are bullies, and this has become ugly, and I have decided that it is no longer worth it to me. That you use an innocent group of friends to berate a host is beyond the pale.
So you win. I have done nothing wrong, and yet you have bullied me off this board. Good for you. But, what is the prize?
I will go for once last drink with my friends at the Dew Drop Inn, which I think had sniffer dogs go through it to make sure it didn't have bugs, and then I am off to do things with people that have some honor.
In closing: I would like to paraphrase Dante: I am much to lazy to look it up, I like fine literature, and should be pretty accurate. But since I know it will over your heads anyway, I will use what I remember, changing one word (yeah, I know, who rewrites Dante, right?) because the other word will just not work.
"....as is the wont, the blame will fall upon the injured party in the common cry. But justice (my word) which the truth demands will witness to the truth. Still, I would not have thee hate thy neighbor...."
Love to my friends, and to the few honest foes.
Nice post, dangerfield.
Kinda civil, though...
I tried the skinny girl marg mix [yes Ms. Spanky is a big fan of all things Housewife] and it's only just ok.
But it is like twice as expensive and only slightly less fattening than regular Cuervo mix.
Just great marketing. Frankel made, what, $126 million of it. Brilliant.
Character is demonstrated, in part, with how one behaves when they think no one is watching, newday.
How did you behave when you believed no one was watching, newday?
I am routinely chided and ridiculed (see friendly transcripts) over my civility, and have been tempted to get "feisty" on more than one occasion, but the site has a very strict code of honor...
IR-
Thanks for the reply.
You mean like the time you physically threated to knock Houstons! teeth down his throat, dangerfield?
Is that the time your referring to?
Oh MY - you sure can get 'feisty' can't you?
"...the site has a very strict code of honor..."
Now THAT'S funny...!
Hi IR
Meant to holla at you earlier; been a little busy. Good to see your pearls of wisdom infused with humor again.
For the last time. I would never be like you Feisty, only you would deride a person's home life. I used a quote from Groucho...Marx that is and have posted it several times. You on the other hand have been an insult-fest and bully here from day one. I put you in your place a long time ago and was done with you, but you still stalk my posts and repeat ad infinitum, ad nauseum, the one and only negative comment, and one you know to be a quote that you have intentionally misconstrued..
again and for the last time
What number is this, anyway?' Rosten, 'Crestview 829.' Voice, 'Aha, so you admit it! Why, if you were a man you'd come over and knock my teeth out.' Rosten 'I -' Voice, 'And if you were half a man you'd knock half my teeth out.' Rosten, 'Who -?' 'And if you were a woman we could dance the night away in wild abandon.'
http://www.anecdotage.com/index.php?aid=13485
Here are a few of the gems you toss out daily;
the alcoholic college drop out
'The idiot from Albany'
that POS
What's the matter NJNB - hubby out of town AGAIN? I would be more worried about WHAT was UPwith that then spreading you your HATRED every chance you get?
Do YOU think the hubby wants to get it on with a BITTER OLD BROAD that couldn't day something NICE if they had a GUN to their head?
And therein lies the title you've so succesfully earned as the seond biggest LIAR on this blog right behind JS1!
and this sad commentary that sums up your personality...
Notice to NJNB - there were MORE people defending my comments then those that came to your rescue!
Dismissed!
No walking it back dangerfield - that was NOT the context of your comment.
You got your a@@ handed to you in a debate and reverted to a PHYSICAL threat of violence against Houston!
Then again, why would anyone expect you to start telling the truth now!
Again - your POUTRAGE is not only laughable but ever SO transparent!
PS: Like you and the rest of the Chewowa Gang are so fond of saying - it is what it is my friend!
I wonder why YOU can't put on your 'man pants' like WE have and OWNED it!
Mixed Bag, dangerfield, (whatever happened to exodite dragon, anyway? They get him?)-
I am beginning to get a sense, just a hint of one, that they do not like us.
Think I'm being paranoid?
Well well well... will you look at what I found?
Followed by his Bravdo! lol
Like I said - pull up your MAN pants for once in your life!
Oh and - you're dismissed!
Exodite and I shared some posting back and forth. He was great. I don't know where he went. I took some time off this blog because of the absolute hatred that comes from both sides, but decided to put that aside and just play in the mud a little. Most of the time it is fun, sometimes, not so much.
Independent Redneck:
Thanks for your post . . . it took the bad taste out of my mouth . . . you're the real deal.
newday:
We'll leave the light on for ya . . . you will be missed! :o)
First Read Reporters and Moderators:
Thanks for taking the time to fight the lies and clear our names . . . I am truly grateful that you care enough to set the record straight and listen to our comments . . . you all are gems!
I'm out! :o)
Not sure what "lies" you refer to, Nash, or what name clearing. . .
You, obviously, never needed any special privileges- we have gone toe to toe, but I do not remember your ever going over the line.
Not true of some others.
Hard to believe you would have participated in collapse a thons- or flagging posts as advertising that were NOT.
Of course, Amy surprised me too,
But I digress.
This was about YOUR group trying to get certain posters, ( myself included) off the boards, so you could have, what, a public chartroom?
Your private chartroom was not good enough?
Divergent voices force people to think- go back into my news vine page, and see my exchange with Mark, (Yellowdog), regarding Perry. I respect him- he gives me food for thought.
I thought that was the actual purpose of this site.
Lies like this no joe:
and this
You made a statements of fact that were untrue. That is called a lie.
I won't hold my breath for an apology.
No Jo, as someone who reads this site every day, in order to keep my mind alive at work, and because I care about my country, and, yes, I support President Obama, I acknowledge spending too much time being irritated by right wing trolls, and discussing how much they irritate me, in a private chat room. Guilty of wasting my time on that.
But getting people banned for disagreeing with me? Hardly. Flagging posts that published our private chat room? Yes, I sure did that.
Perhaps you might ask yourself why a group of intelligent, social people are freaking out about having their privacy invaded. Perhaps you could try putting yourself in their position. Perhaps you might realize they discussed their personal histories and relationships in a room they thought was private. Perhaps you might realize they were building friendships, which require trust to grow. Perhaps you might realize this blog, and that group, was an important part of these people's day. Perhaps, then, you would realize, the attack on this group wasn't a matter of exposing schemes and strategy, but of destroying the home away from home of a group of friendly people. I would hope you could recognize that, at least.
For some reason, my post disappeared.
Nash, yup are under the mistaken impression that the pages that,prove these allegations are gone. Disappeared. Poof.
Not so.
Your little group engaged in all the activities I described. My name was top of the list of discussion topics for your roundtable with Murray- how to "deal with the bobs and nojoes" was the quote, I believe.
Amy admitted flagging posts that were not advertising as advertising.
The proof that members of your group are NOT subject to the CoH was provided by fiesty, last week, with her venomous attack on me. An attack that was saved, and reposted, by many.
Her clearing her news vine page has not stopped people from having access, it seems.
So, keep your "special relationship" with the COI of news vine, Tyler, Sally, and Mark Murray. It seems you have someone in your group who has had enough, and it MIGHT have been Fiesty's over the top attack on me that precipitated this "outing".
You can keep trying to discredit me, but it is your merry little band of cohorts who have been discredited.
Ad hominem attacks, pretzel logic, and all.
NDD - This ones for you GF!
You just call out my name - and you know where ever I am... I'll come running... to see you again...
You've got a friend!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHlcW_lKPl4
Please provide evidence to support your claim that I or anyone else has coordinated with the moderators of this board or other NBC personnel in any effort, let alone efforts centered around you.
Your delusions of grandeur are simultaneously sad/amusing. You simply don't have enough game for that level of effort.
You keep saying that you have proof of these allegations. But no such proof of collusion or a "special relationship" has been provided.
Only proof that what is said about you in a private chat group was not to your liking. Oh well.
So, in closing, if you continue to make that claim and are unable to back it up, that would be textbook lying. I only point that out because you asked, not because I expect you to acknowledge it.
After years of attempting to interact with you, I could pretty much write your posts myself at this point. . . you will simply redouble your efforts to broadcast the lie, attempt to ask me a different question to change the subject, or just ignore what I said and write another one of your grandiose accusatory posts.
It's all good . . . I thank you for the entertainment you have provided me this week . . . life as a nefarious co-conspirator was pretty exciting for a while . . . alas . . . all great stories have an ending.
Back to reality . . . see you Monday! :o)
The most common strategy for "dealing with the nojos and bobs," as discussed in our private chat room, was putting said posters on "ignore! " The second strategy was venting about them in our private chat room. The third strategy was validating each other's attempts to argue back, as in " you sure told him! " Not sure what Ron meant when he wrote of asking Mark about "dealing" with you, and I'm not going to speculate, but what in the world are you imagining, that Newsvine would ban you for being right wing? Have you read the First Read blog? Nobody gets banned for being disagreeable, controversial, or argumentative, and you know that. As you well know, the only people who have been deleted were people who used this board to deliberatly attack fellow posters. (and its not against code to insult people in private chat rooms.)
Nash, the proof has been up, and read, by many on these boards- and Murray, himself, has admitted that he is joining you for your little roundtable, the first topic of discussion of which is, apparently, "how to deal with the bobs and nojoes".
Please.
Amy admitted flagging posts as advertising when they were not. So did a few others.
I could not possibly care less how you feel about me, or my posting about the failings of Obama. They are all around you- you choose not to see it, and are enraged when I post about it, as it tears a hole in the tissue of the magical world where he is a success.
I say again- the flagrant disregard of the Code of Honor by members of your group with NO repercussions may have been the proverbial straw for whoever decided to do this document dump. I do not pretend to have any inside information on that- merely surmise.
You have a private chat room, where you can all extoll the virtues of Obama. Why do you need to turn a public forum into the same?
Really, Amy? People get banned for attacking other posters? That so?
Explain, then, after the vicious attack on me by Fiesty, just last week, how that works.
more proof that members of your group are not subject to the same rules as everyone else.
Thanks for providing the back up.
no joe:
Provide evidence of collusion between any poster here at First Read and the moderators and/or reporters in an effort to silence opposing viewpoints. That is the claim you made.
Prove it or admit you were "mistaken" *wink,wink*.
That is the only relevent point. That is the lie you told. You can run, but you cannot hide.
The proof has been published. The collusion is obvious. I will not be drawn in to a circular argument with you.
You continually seek to discredit me- sorry, but it is your entire group that has been discredited.
By a member of your own group, as well.
My, my, my- howmthe wheels do turn!
No the proof has not been published.
There is no proof because there is no collusion.
You are a liar.
Sad, but true.
Put up, or shut up no joe. You claim to have evidence, yet you can't post it. You claim it's been posted, but you can't find it.
Liar. Liar. Liar.
But then, I already knew that.
I never said that I could not find it- merely pointed put that, for the last several days, proof has been published.
Oh- calling me a liar is actually a breach of the CoH.
Must be nice to exist above the rules, I guess.
no joe:
You lie!
Edited to add: If you cannot make your point without lying, then you don't have a point. What you did here this week at First Read is called libel. The only problem I have ever had with you no joe is that you are an unrepentent liar. Other than that, you seem like a fine person.
no joe:
This is how you back up what you say:
That is what you did . . . you made wild and unsubstantiated claims. You miscontrued the situation. On purpose. To create a controversy. That is just sad.
Nash, and to the lies about collusion, there is the matter of lying that we were/are being paid by MSNBC and that our trip is in some ways financed by MSNBC/NBC. Nothing could be more wrong.
It is bad enough that our private conversations were STOLEN and BROADCAST, many of them were taken out of context or surmised to be what they are not.
This faux outrage and continous whining is classic nojo, and if she likes to consort with thieves and other disgruntled characters and do their dirty work for them, it says more about her than anything else.
no jo
Did you complain to the moderators about Feisty's remark? I do not recall your ever objecting to it. I think Feisty's friends were more disapproving of her remark than you were!
No, instead, some other right winger decided to use it, not out of defending you or protecting this board, but as a weapon to hurt a whole group of liberal friends. If the problem is Feisty's big mouth, than you could have collapsed her. If you think she should be banned, than you should take it up with Newsvine. But that, apparently, is not your real beef, because you and the other right wingers decided to forgo addressing Feisty's comment, and instead launch a smear campaign against the journalists, and Libs R Us. No matter how many times he has refuted your claim, you continue to repeat your charge that Mr. Murray has anything to do with banning or collapsing people. You ignore the facts in front of you. Nobody gets banned for being controversial, disagreeable or right wing. They don't even get banned for insulting fellow posters! The people who have been banned, whose posts I have seen, used bad language and relentlessly posted inflammatory comments empty of content. They
don't even form arguments, just post dirty stuff. As bad as Feisty's remark was, most of the time she is promoting an argument, not just attacking people. If she upset you, you should have said something!
Notmworking, Nash. Too manympeople read what was published before it got deleted.
Want to blame somebody?
Blame whatever member of your group did the document dump.
The collusion is PATENTLY obvious to anyone and everyone on this board.
First, by the continued presence of those guilty of Code violations- yourself included, now.
Second, by the "missing"- newbie writers who just "poof!"- vanished, after running afoul of members of your group. Ira Levin ring any bells? What did he post that violated the code? Merely a rebuttal of a vile cutting and pasting of a page from the American Nazi website.
Was his account suspended?
Is it not true that the "Mark"- a "friend" of Fiesty's, is, in fact, the Chief Technology Officer of news vine? Cause, I sent him an email last night- and I accessed HIS news vine page through HERS.
That explains VOLUMES to me about why none of your group is subject to the Code.
The "proof" you are looking for is on this very site- it just took one fed up member of your group to publish it.
The more you seek to discredit me, the more you discredit yourself.
Have you even stopped to think how this looks to those who read, but do not post?
I have to tell you, anybody rational reading this is probably stunned that you would even go where you are going.
First of all, Amy, when so many people started posting about it, I DID unignore the post. I flagged it as inflammatory- and it is hard for me to believe that those who tooknher to task did not do the same.
It's still up.
Apparently, you have to be a member of the club to collapse a club member.
Second, I did copy it and send it to the moderators.
Twice.
To date, I have not gotten a response.
It seems to pay to have the right "friends" on this board.
Amy,
According to the NJNB - she has me on ignore *wink wink*
Just add it to the LONG list of other lies NJNB has been busted for!
GF can you call it or WHAT?
no joe:
I am not attempting to discredit you.
I am asking you to back up the lies you have told about me and others here at First Read.
Not only are you unable to do that, you continue to post additional lies and innuendo.
And the cherry on top?
You attempt to set yourself up as some arbiter of what honor is. What journalism is.
Puh-leese.
You can't back up the crap you said.
You wrote a check your butt couldn't cash.
And you aren't woman enough to say "I was wrong". . . but I never expected you to.
I just wanted YOU to know that I know that you are a liar. And that now, instead of just lying about the President, you are lying about ME.
And I don't appreciate it.
YOU are dismissed.
Only a sick mind would conclude that because a poster stops posting here, it is the result of a devious plot to silence them. Only a sick mind would conclude that everyone is out to get them to stop them from publishing throw away comments on a political blog. It is reflection of sheer madness and a need for sunshine and fresh air. Seriously.
Keep spinning, Nash. EVERYONE on the board has seen the truth.
Too bad.
I'm sure you'll get a lot of "attagirls" and "great jobs" and "you sure told hers" from your friends in the new tree house.
Those not in the new tree house? Not so much.
You MIGHT want to consider how much judgment is displayed in the club, however.
Members keep clapping Navy on the back for calling republicans Nazis- and, I have to tell you, that particular meme ain't playing well in Peoria- so, please, continue to encourage him to keep it up!
We can use all the help from democrats we can get- even with Obama providing such gems as the future of manufacturing turning in military strength, indestructible diapers.
Oh, and the spending and the debt and his complete and utter failure on the economy.
So, sorry Nash- only your fellow club members think you are succeeding. I can sum up your success in two words-
Epic Fail.
And I can sum up your success in one word:
Liar.
Try and DEFEND all of it when KO as in Keith Olbermann gets his hands on it.
YOU DISCREDITED YOURSELVES. By ganging up on ANYONE with different viewpoint than the 38.
YOU HAVE BEEN DISMISSED OK, for the lying, disengenious bunch that you are.
I think Current TV and Keith can make a whole lot of money out of this. And he won't have to manufacture outrage. WHAT WAS TOLERATED HERE IS OUTRAGEOUS.
I guess it pays to be friends with MARK COT OF NEWSVINE.
lol
And reinforcements have been called in . . . strangely the proof of the lies is still absent.
Prove the lies.
Don't talk about proving it.
Prove it.
Don't change the subject to another matter.
Prove it.
Don't whine because life ain't fair.
Prove the lies you told. Present evidence of collusion to silence comments on a political blog.
I double dog dare you to prove it.
But you can't, because it didn't happen.
Liars one and all.
Amazing: We have a group of people that seem to think stealing private conversations is a virtue. These are the same types of people who defend a mugger who beat up a grandma on her way back from a ATM. The defense: it was grandma's fault she should not have been on the street.
This is why I do not like the New GOP/TP agenda or anything they represent - they continue to lie, edit material to make a point, claim things that are not in fact or were outright dismissed as lies. They will not take any ownership for what they do as they believe the "End justifies the Means" and they do not care if the means are legal or not, if people get hurt (or worse) or not, if this country goes into the toilet or not - they just care about themselves only. Nothing new here and we are seeing that being played our again.
Mark was very clear in his posts about MSNBC and posters on this board and yet they continue the same bold face lies.
He even invited the right to make their own meeting and invite him and he would make every attempt to attend. He has always said that. That does not sound like anybody trying to hide anything, but the GOP/TP is mad because we did just that. Oh and guess what - this is a "private affair" and yous are not invited. Mark said if you have any questions to contact him. But instead you try and tarnish his reputation with your lies and threaten him. Let me know how that worked out for you all.
Nobody has a right to dictate anything to anybody, not as long as we remain a "free society" but then again that idea sticks in your throat does it not.
If this is all you got and what we have to look forward to the next year and a half I pity you folks. I cannot think of a more weaker platform to run on than intimidation. The American people are wise to this Karl Rove tactic and they are not standing for it any longer, they are marching in the streets and it is just a matter of time. Things will be set right.
Some do not like the tone or what is discussed in a "Private Chat Room". Got news for you all.
What do you think the GOP or the DEMS talks about in their behind the door meetings? What about the Koch Brothers, Karl Rove and the US Chamber of Commerce - what do you think they talk about? Do you think they talk about the other party, or what strategy to use in a debate and how best to make their points. Your fake indignation is transparent.
This is still the US of A, and Freedom of Speech is guaranteed by the Constitution until the SCOTUS is paid off by the GOP/TP power brokers to repeal the First Amendment.
A thief stole or stuff and you know it, you have it in your dirty little hands and are using it knowing full well it was stolen without permission - this makes you every bit as culpable as the crooks who stole from us.
I would not trust a thief and I do not trust you.
Hey, Nash?
Read Navy's post.
He just,provided the "proof" you were looking for.
You should thank him.
Those of us on it are still pretty interested in "the list" for Murray.
Good luck with the "strategy".
Ahh yes - poor dear Ira!
I believe his demise was to due the fact his departed this earth on, 11.12.07!
Is it a ccoincidence that his best known work was the 'Rosemary's Baby'?
Regrettably for Ira, he was not allowed to rest in peace very long before he was resurrected as one Groucho Marx!
Who I'm happy to report, is as much of a charlatan as his counterpart!
no joe:
No strategy needed for the likes of you. You are an old time liar. You say things that aren't true, and when called on it, you just repeat it again. No thought required to deal with you.
No Jo
Newsvine is actually pretty transparent about the whole banning thing. There is even a column where someone prints a monthly list of who is banned and why. There were 165 bannings in May. Ira Lapin was not one of them. And why would he be. He never used bad language.
Reading the posts that people get banned for is pretty illuminating. Sounds like most of them had been banned, or warned before. None of the posts sound like someone went over the top in an argument. Newsvine is clearly tolerant of heated speech. They also have their hands full kicking off the destructive types.
When someone is banned, they print an explanation right there, on the post. "i am here" was banned a short time ago and the reason given was "weird trolling of Murray and Domenici." Obviously, not very legalistic, but to the point. He was also a reincarnation of Safecracker, according to the comment, under whose name he had been banned before.
From your comments today it sounds like your issue is with Feisty, and your inability to get her banned. You assume that friends of yours were banned for less egregous offenses.. You are spinning allegations of preferencial treatment. As you can see, Newsvine doesn't ban people who happen say some jerky things. Mr. i am here got banned for targeting the journalists and being a re-registered banned user. None of this equates to anything Feisty said or her treatment by the moderators.
navy;
Amazing: We have a group of people that seem to think stealing private conversations is a virtue. These are the same types of people who defend a mugger who beat up a grandma on her way back from a ATM. The defense: it was grandma's fault she should not have been on the street.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
No, actually what we have are a band of idiots who outed themselves as clique of nattering ninnies gossiping in private about who they didn't like and how to gang up on them on the public site, including having a designated monitor badgering the moderators to get their way.
You were NOT hacked so stop lying. You, the one nervous nellie, whose big worry was about what you may have been caught saying! (And now I know why you were so worried, and frankly, I don't blame you lol...:)
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Clara KCMO
we weren't actually hacked, bev. it appears to be a function of naivete on my part. I think compromised is the better word. but those in possession of our conversations don't seem to have any qualms about using it, even though they've been informed we believed it was private.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
But it wasn't by KCMO's own admission...
And you CONSPIRED to delete posts by flagging them as advertising. And I do mean YOU...
Dennis, Columbus, Ohio (Jun 19, 10:44 AM): >Feisty,I reported a couple days ago that for some reason banned user's home pages are not always being deleted. C U Farley's home page is still there but unused since last Dec which implies that he/they can no longer log in under that name.As far as Newsvine doing nothing what I have noticed is that most all reports I make over the weekend nothing gets done. It appears to be most effective M-F when Sally & Tyler are on the job.I suggested using the advertising flag because it will get a comment deleted rather than collapsed. The improper use of the advertising flag can get you suspended of banned.
US Navy Disabled Veteran - Retired (Jun 19, 10:59 AM): Dennis: Consider it done. Will take a few minutes.
"Dennis consider it done" ...how compliant...
Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL (Jun 19, 9:26 AM): Nice work gang - it's been deleted - now we can only hope it wasn't saved somewhere...
Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL (Jun 19, 3:15 PM): He's back - already flagged for advertising...
Amy B. Portland, ME (Jun 19, 2:24 PM): I just flagged that one as advertising as well. This guy was obviously banned at some point and now he's going after Feisty as revenge. His posting conversations from this group is totally off topic, to say the least, not to mention a seriouse breach of code.
indeed...
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
So while you may dispute and BS Murray may deny being a co-conspirator, (and one would like to believe that an adult with a real job wouldn't be in league with a rag-tag gang of sycophants and cheerleaders.) every other petty, nasty, junior -high, mean girl act of this band of "friends" can be documented via your own words.
You are a liar and a cheat; you tried to game the system with your private group, were outed because of your own stupidity and now you are continuing to lie about being hacked.
John Edwards and John Ensign, both being liars and cheats, would both fit right in to your new group, as despite your BS, lying and cheating know no party affiliation.
Good one Dangerfield. And yes, they would both fit right in.
dangerfield:
The accusation that was made was that there was a conspiracy between the moderators/reporters at First Read and the members of our group.
That allegation is not supported with the links you have posted. What those links show is folks using the tools available to all posters to highlight posts they found inappropriate or offensive, as is their right.
In the absence of the actual posts being discussed, there is no way to back up your claim that these tools were used inapproriately.
I know you are excited that you got to peep into our windows and listen to our discussions. But no matter how many times you post those same coversations, it does not prove collusion between moderators and posters.
So that claim remains a lie.
I know you are excited that you got to peep into our windows and listen to our discussions.
lol-What are you now, a mind reader? Reading those posts would make any normal person sick and want to wash their hands. That's how I feel, disgusted, and just a little amused at the junior-high gossip...
You don't know jack, you just cherry-picked the one thing that is he-said/she-said, which may or may not be true. You can't PROVE it isn't true, can you? So unless YOU have proof that there was no collusion, it's still an OPEN QUESTION
That is just ONE item on the list of things you and yours are party to.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
That allegation is not supported with the links you have posted. What those links show is folks using the tools available to all posters to highlight posts they found inappropriate or offensive, as is their right.
In the absence of the actual posts being discussed, there is no way to back up your claim that these tools were used inapproriately.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Flagging posts as advertising to get them deleted is inappropriate, wrong and most of all, petty and you were caught red-handed doing it, so stop with the BS. And you conspired off site to coordinate to do it, as the posts above document and prove beyond the shadow of a doubt.
and conspiring OFF site with others to do so is collusion, whether or not BS Murray was actually involved, or KNEW about your actions.
You can't bull@!$%# the facts here. They are your own words.
Everyone who cares, and most really don't, will have the chance to decide for themselves exactly what the posts prove or don't prove, and as I know you agree that "sunlight is the best disinfectant", so the best way to handle this is to publish every nasty little action, every single disgusting, filthy, page.
When this was said;
What's the matter NJNB - hubby out of town AGAIN? I would be more worried about WHAT was UPwith that then spreading you your HATRED every chance you get?
Do YOU think the hubby wants to get it on with a BITTER OLD BROAD that couldn't day something NICE if they had a GUN to their head?
and this;
You GO get them you miserable OLD BAT M'Kay?
PS: Thought you had me on ignore?
Nothing more than further PROOF you're a LIAR & and FRAUD...
DO YOU know where your hubby is? LMAO!
Other than with someone WHO is WARM?
in response to this post;
How about next week we get a story on the Issa hearings? You really do not want to miss that boat- looks like it will cost Holder his job.
How about a story on the secret fundraisers held in the Blue Room at the White House in March? Seems the DNC organized it, and Obama met with long term Wall Street donors. Of course, no money changed hands. Nosirree- that would be illegal.
They just wanted to chat. In secret.
How about one on Boeing and the NLRB- and the thousands of jobs the Obama administration is squelching?
You missed the boat on Cree Industries- could have been a good story. See, they took stimulus funds, and used them- to build a plant in China.
Well, I provided the leads. I guess you will get right to work- on a bunch of Palin stories.
Disgusting, inappropriate, intentionally cruel insinuations about a person's PERSONAL life in response to a POLITICAL post; Where is there anything here that merited an attack on a person's home and family life?
SHOW ME!
There is no justification for that PERSONAL HATE-FILLED diatribe that any decent person could find. So maybe YOU can tell me what made you condone it?
Hate-Speech that any DECENT person would have condemned, YOU gleefully ENDORSED. Endorsing the utterly vile and obviously inappropriate rantings of an emotionally disturbed person, responding to political questions with a fusillade of spittle spewing insulting personal HATE, YOU said;
P.S. To all the folks who got their fee fees hurt by Feisty's comment . . . newsflash . . . other folks have feelings too. You reap what ya sow, like it or not.
Well, P.P.S.
That newsflash is about to come back and bite you in the FANNY.
Outstanding, dangerfield...wish I'd said it.
Actually, you might have more Mike Wallace in you than I do.
Thanks again.
OMG, seriously?
There is simply nothing more priceless than the Selective Ethics crowd. Let me put this in simple terms that even df and MB can understand (I am now convinced nojo will NEVER understand anything but her own spite):
First Read is like a neighborhood. I went and left my bicycle in the driveway. Safecracker came along and took it (no doubt using an alias or his own band of buddies). Then he basically 'loaned it' to nojo, dangerfield, groucho, MB - and anyone else who happened to come along and want to take it for a ride. As they rode MY bicycle back and forth in front of my house they yelled taunts to me about how stupid I was for leaving my bicycle out. Sadly, in the bicycle basket was my journal. They decided to photocopy that and distribute it, too. All the while mocking ME for leaving it out. At no point do they feel ANY shame or remorse. Further, their inability to READ for comprehension has led them to make scurrilous and false accusations against the Neighborhood Association and it's officers. And they want to nitpick about a Code of Honor. While they display none? I have explained that we used the tools available when we thought we had been HACKED. Apparently in their Crystal Pure homes,...there is never a reason to fire a shotgun during an invasion?
I find it more than a little disingenous that THEY keep DEMANDING that Feisty get banned for violating a Code of Honor when they've blatantly exhibited a complete LACK of honor and integrity in their own handling of this situation. Phony Outrage is their trademark.
Priceless,...just priceless.
Well, Clara, at least you, (unlike Nash), are not denying the documents exist.
And, no, you are NOT the "neighborhood watch". You are simply a group of people who spend all of their time tearing down anybody who does not march in lockstep with the Obama idolators. You are so committed to your cause that you cannot denounce the most egregious violations when committed by members of your own group- rather, you applaud them!
Navy seems to think that there are people marching in the streets over this. I must say, those are some pretty serious delusions.
Allow me to clarify something I said in an earlier post: when I emailed the moderators with Fiesty's post, I did NOT suggest she be banned- only that the comments be deleted.
That they are still up speaks volumes about the cozy relationship your group enjoys with the management of this board.
I HAVE opined that anyone else making those kind of remarks, (and this is not the first such instance, only the most recent), would have been banned.
You do not like my political views. Sorry for you.
I am sorrier for my country.
I have said before, and will say again, that we would have been far better off under either McCain or Hillary Clinton. I would have disagreed with many policies advanced by either at the helm- but we would not, now, be facing the disasters caused by Obama's incompetence.
Is Sarah Palin an idiot? Perhaps on any issue that does not involve making money. Sadly, this country put the idiot on TOP of the ticket, and we are all paying for that.
I notice that your vitriol toward me increases as Obama's approval number sink, his policies fail, and his election chances fade.
You don't really hold me personally responsible for that, do you?
Cause, I have to tell you, most people cannot help but notice climbing unemployment, and FOUR TRILLION dollars in additional debt- in two years, no less.
That your group is with Obama, who said on Friday night that he"could not be prouder" of his record as president only proves that you are incapable of recognizing glaring truths.
Truths that I will continue to post, whether you like it or not.
By the way, Clara- you keep accusing safecracker of linking your documents to google. Do you have proof of this? If so, you have certainly not made it public.
How and why was safecracker banned? I find it difficult to believe that he/she ever posted anything that topped Fiesty.
Who got "now I'm here" banned, and why?
Why are you so certain Groucho Marx and Ira Levin are the same person?
Do you have actual information, or are you just making accusations?
no jo
I did some research. Safecracker was banned for posting under another name while suspended. Using multiple Newsvine accounts will get you banned.
Tyler banned i am here and stated it was for "weird trolling of Murrary and Domenici." He also said it was because i am here was a re-registration a person who had been previously banned for posting while suspended, i.e. Safecracker.
I have always just assumed Groucho and Ira were the same person, just because their "voice" is the same. I don't know that for a fact.
Those of us who spend alot of time on Newsvine recognize there are only two individuals who patrol all these articles and blogs, "Sally" and "Tyler." They rarely delete any post, they occasionally restore innocuous posts that the community has deleted, but only after those deleted posters appeal to them, and they generally only ban people who post under new names while suspended. Suspensions most often come after calling other posters "imbeciles" "morons" and/or using racial or sexual epithetes.
As you can see, Newsvine is hardly in the business of deleting posts on the basis of politics or personal animosity. Suspensions seem pretty
random, and outright bans are mostly for posting while suspended. Sally and Tyler are probably two kids working their way through dental
hygeine school, as near as I can tell, they aren't lawyers or pschiatrists.
It is up to us, in the end, to build a democratic and functioning community, without relying on the "cops" to sort it out. Kind of scary isn't it? The Golden Rule, however is, as always, the best yardstick, " do unto others...."
Oooops!... that was ME who is certain there NJNB!
Guess I'm NOT on ignore after all like you claim...
Nash is 100% spot on - you are a LIAR!
Then again... WE'VE all known that for years and so does anyone else who reads this board on a semi-regular basis!
PS: You and all your delusions of grandeur about us 'plotting' against you, can I ask why your still here if we had the ability your SO paranoid about?
KCMO-
First read is like a neighborhood...lol
Which makes you head of the "homogenous" block association, who was only trying to keep "them" in their place, no?
The hysterical "mugging grandma"analogy was funnier...
As one of the 'gang" so aptly stated..."Get over it"...
After all KCMO, it seems the group and the "get together" was your "vision", and you have already started a new site for your 'insiders" (and I'm sure this time you won't let your "innocent friendly conversations" ever see the light of day again.) so you should proudly stand behind every word, instead of acting like every other "group" leader who's innocent/nefarious agenda has been exposed by a ..."grandma mugger"? "bicycle thief"?
"The term you've all been searching for to impugn whoever it was who first uncovered your dirty laundry, is...
whistle-blower
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Whistleblowing.pdf&page=1
How you can defend that hate-speech, and accuse anyone else of Selective Ethics????
OMG is right...
Well, Amy, thank you for providing more proof of the collusion between the management of this board and your gang.
If posters can get banned for calling other posters "morons or imbeciles"- and, I do not doubt you on that; my reading of the Code of Honor suggests that repeated violations like that can get someone banned-
Please explain why certain members of your gang are exempt from those same rules?
I understand that you and your cohorts truly believe that this should be Obama Central- see Friday's story on Perry actually using the name of someone that sounds like another name- but NO story on Obama believing that a serviceman who was killed in battle, receiving a Medal for service above and beyond, was actually alive to receive it.
There were a few stories posted yesterday, including the usual Palin story- but no story on Obama stating at a fundraisers that he "could not be prouder" of his record as president.
There is SO much to be proud of, isn't there? Rising unemployment, crushing debt- to which he has added almost four trillion in two years- a debt crisis,
And, oh, by the way, a Washington Post story-today- about the weird coincidence of companies with owners who contributed large amounts of money to the Obama '08 campaign, and those same companies receiving hundreds of millions of stimulus dollars.
Bet you will not read that in any story on this blog.
You will read it tomorrow. I intend to post about it.
no jo
I tried to provide you with the facts as I know them, and you twisted them around for your own purposes.
I have seen posters suspended, not banned, for calling people "morons." The posters I have seen banned, such as Safecracker, got caught posting under new names while their original screen name was suspended.
There is no collusion between the moderators and Libs R US. Tyler and Sally don't intervene consistently because they are not the police. They don't suspend every over the top poster, right or leftwing, every time a poster uses the word "dumb," for example, because they are not omniscent gods, as you seem to think. The moderators pretty much stay out of exchanges, and only randomly drop in to remind people to keep it civil.
It should be apparent to thinking adults, if you enjoy this blog and robust debate, you treat others as you yourself would like to be treated. You do yourself a disservice if you look to a couple of kiddos like Tyler and Sally to supervise this playground. The real "rules" are the ones each individual lives by.
This is the day that the Lord had made and I am rejoicing in it!
dangerfield and no joe:
There has been no evidence provided of collusion between the powers that be at NBC and posters here at First Read. Anyone who continues to allege such is a liar.
The comments that I made to those who had their "fee fees" hurt by Feisty's initial comments to no joe Friday before last still stand . . . everyone has feelings, not just you folks. For the record, if you look at the time I made that comment and the time the comments that you continue to repost were made, you will notice that I made my comment BEFORE the rest of the exchange occured. Not that it matters, but for the truly petty, I thought I would you throw you that lil' bone.
In closing, I have said everything I have to say about this. The information is out there, and everyone is free to interpret it as they see fit.
I will not respond to any additional threats or lies. Those looking for may take on the matter can refer to my posts from this week.
On the Palin thread, I had additional comments for Groucho that stand for the two of you as well. Enough of the "spy games". Onward and upward folks.
P.S. Somewhere, someone asked why my comment history was no longer available on my page. It is still there, just moved to a different block. Sorry to make you have to work a little harder to peek in my window, but I assure you it is still there . . . I will wave at you next time!
"It should be apparent to thinking adults, if you enjoy this blog and robust debate, you treat others as you yourself would like to be treated. You do yourself a disservice if you look to a couple of kiddos like Tyler and Sally to supervise this playground."
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
As a "thinking adult", I couldn't agree more. But the truth is, not only were you looking to a "couple of kiddos", You had your own "monitor"...Dennis, to "assist" and influence that supervision with his (daily? weekly?) "reports".
Dennis, Columbus, Ohio (Jun 19, 10:44 AM):
"As far as Newsvine doing nothing what I have noticed is that most all reports I make over the weekend nothing gets done. It appears to be most effective M-F when Sally & Tyler are on the job."
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
"...most all reports"? Geez how many were you all making? Sounds like a regular thing. I bet they're a hoot to read too...Just a group of friends aiding "democracy" and the "golden rule" behind the scenes..
38 of a gang, trying to silence any an all opposing viewpoints.
I wonder where Pietro is? I guess he doesn't want to get called out for his biggoted post yesterday where he called me a "shim" just a little offense to certain "communities"
FIesty is guilty of at best, CYBER BULLYING. YOU BY DEFENDING HER are guilty of the same thing.
Tolerating posts from the US Nazi page (posted by Bev) to the atrocious items posted above make it clear that there is ONE rule for some and NOT for everyone else.
Maybe if THE REST OF THE GANG GREW A BACKBONE and called the Wicked Witch O Illinios (misspelling intentional) out on her bs, everyone else here would actually see a redeeming quality in the rest of you. At least then people could say; well at least they don't tolerate it when it comes from their own side?
Somehow, though I doubt that. Intellectual dishonesty appears to rule your lil group. Also why Obama is losing ALL THE MODERATE DEMS AND INDIES, oh yes it is.
You people would make any moderate cringe with your bs. At least when reps on conservatives here post they usually have something to back it up, other than fairy tales.
See when I was a kid, my older brother DID leave his bike outside and it DID get stolen. My parents reminded him IT WAS HIS FAULT FOR LEAVING HIS BIKE OUTSIDE.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO Try some personal responsibility NIT WITS.
"The comments that I made to those who had their "fee fees" hurt by Feisty's initial comments to no joe Friday before last still stand . . . everyone has feelings, not just you folks. For the record, if you look at the time I made that comment and the time the comments that you continue to repost were made, you will notice that I made my comment BEFORE the rest of the exchange occured. Not that it matters, but for the truly petty, I thought I would you throw you that lil' bone."
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
If everyone has feelings, why do you only care about your friend's? What was the justification for a personal attack based on a political post. I call BS BS and hypocrisy hypocrisy. Oh, and I call weasel words WEASEL words...
NF;
"For the record, if you look at the time I made that comment and the time the comments that you continue to repost were made, you will notice that I made my comment BEFORE the rest of the exchange occured."
What do you usually call it when someone says something that isn't exactly true?...
Note the TIME on the following;
Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL
Still got the battery acid running through your veins eh NJNB?
We would like to believe that after you recent near heartbreak, you would of re-assessed the amount of hatred you carry in your heart...
We should of known better....
#7.1 - Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:09 PM EDT
Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL Ignoring author
I'm a cruel mean person to go there? Seriously?
We've put up with her HATRED for 3+ years - hate is the ONLY thing that keeps her going!
I know that if I was in HER predicament I sure as hell would re-evaluate what's REALLY important to me!
Don't stick yourself in the middle of something you KNOW NOTHING about! K?
#7.3 - Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:16 PM EDT
Nashville_fan
It's been a hell of a week . . . round of drinks on me! :o)
Happy Father's Day to all the dads and MOMS doing double duty . . . I had one of those!
P.S. To all the folks who got their fee fees hurt by Feisty's comment . . . newsflash . . . other folks have feelings too. You reap what ya sow, like it or not.
#13 - Fri Jun 17, 2011 6:12 PM EDT
I hate lies too...
A personal attack responding to a political post is wrong no matter who does it...and condoning it is worse.
Thanks, dangerfield, for continuing to fight the falsehoods.
Seems they have selected certain members of the gang to come out here to defend their actions by pretending that there was nothing at all unusual about their activities.
Bunk.
Take "Mark"- one of the "friends" on Fiesty's news vine page. Know who he is?
The CTO of news vine, that's who. I sent him an email- accessed HIS news vine page through HERS.
Nah. Nothing unusual about her getting away with the kind of posts that would have gotten anyone else thrown off this board- well, except for another of the gang members.
Jon Stewart at least attempts to undercut the belief in him as a font of truth by consistently reminding people that he is, at heart, a comedian.
One wonders why the management of this site would expect to get any respect as a news organization, given their response to this.
Or lack thereof.
Oh, and Amy-
I am twisting nothing at all. The facts are what they are- it is you, and other members of your gang, who are now attempting to twist them into something innocuous.
The facts are that members of your gang- including you, by your own admission- are guilty of flagrant violations of the code of honor.
That you had designated contacts with the moderators.
That at least one of you, (Fiesty), has the CTO of news vine as a "friend"- which, to me, makes the connection between the management of the board, and your gang, pretty obvious- again, given the flagrant violations of the code of honor by more than one member of your gang, collusion is patently obvious.
Despite what Murray says, there is nothing open or above-board about his appearance at your little get together in St. Louis. He admitted that NBC is paying his way- he is, therefore, appearing there in his official capacity.
Had this not been exposed, this would have taken place in secret- as unprofessional as conduct can get. We'll see what the station's ombudsman has to say about it- as well as the ombudsmen of ABC, CBS, Fox, and CNN.
I decided not to keep this in house.
After all, if there is nothing at all wrong with the Deputy Political Director of NBC meeting clandestinely with a group whose stated purpose for the meeting is "dealing with" voices that do not sing from the same hymnal, he, and you, should be proud to have it known throughout the news world.
Deal with this- I am not going anywhere- at least until Obama is out of office. Even then, I may just stick around.
See, I have NEVER 100% agreed with any president from either party.
I imagine if a republican gets elected, and I post my disagreement with policies of that administration, I will a lot of hallelujahs and amend- particularly from your gang.
I will take them for what they are worth.
dangerfield:
This is the comment that I read from Feisty before I wrote my reply. I wrote my comment as a stand alone one, not a part of the thread in question:
This is the time stamp from my one and only comment on that thread.
#13 - Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:12 PM CDT
The time stamp speaks for itself. Once again you have made an accusation that you cannot back up. I see a pattern.
In other words your son the 'attorney' who slunk through law school told Mommy there's NO grounds for a lawsuit on the basis of not 'doing victim well'! lol
I'll make sure I TIVO CBS - ABC & CNN for the breaking news...
More weasel words and threadbare excuses...
Your one and only comment was enough to damn you. It was made HOURS after the personal attacks began.
The time stamps PROVE that you were aware of the nature of the attacks you were endorsing.
Is this personal?:
Note the TIME on the following;
Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL
Still got the battery acid running through your veins eh NJNB?
We would like to believe that after you recent near heartbreak, you would of re-assessed the amount of hatred you carry in your heart...
We should of known better....
#7.1 - Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:09 PM EDT
This was PERSONAL and posted at 4:09pm
Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL Ignoring author
I'm a cruel mean person to go there? Seriously?
We've put up with her HATRED for 3+ years - hate is the ONLY thing that keeps her going!
I know that if I was in HER predicament I sure as hell would re-evaluate what's REALLY important to me!
Don't stick yourself in the middle of something you KNOW NOTHING about! K?
#7.3 - Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:16 PM EDT
This was at 4:16pm
Your heartless comment was hours later, at 6:12 PM EDT
And your statement also speaks for itself as condoning a personal attack as a response to a purely political post.
Do you still condone personal attacks (only by one of your gang, of course) in response to political posts?
Do you really want to continue to pretend you don't understand the point?
The pattern is one of denial...and it is your own.
You have been hoisted on your own petard...
Or is your defense that you didn't endorse the worst of the attacks? Good luck selling that...
Personal attacks in response to political posts should be condemned by "all thinking people" and I am sorry that you do not see the TRUTH in that statement.
No jo
If you want to talk about bias, conflict of interest, or clandestine meetings you can start with justice on the Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas, accepting millions of dollars in gifts from a real estate tycoon with business that comes before his bench.
Somehow, an MSNBC journalist agreeing to have lunch with a group of enthusiastic fans of political reporting (there can't be many of us in America) hardly rises to the level of scandal.
It must make you happy to know you and your friends' vandalism caused many regular posters here a great deal of heartache. That seems to have been your aim. Sad, I say. Just sad. And, ironically, you've just reinforced the right wings' reputation for dirty tricks and swiftboating.
Fail, Amy.
And you know it.
Judging from what I read, you are actually smarter than you portray yourself here.
Lil witch you posted it, YOU OWN IT.
And a case can def be made by any attorney for CYBER BULLYING.
Cut myself oof, again.
You, Amy, ere the one who discovered that the door was unlocked.
Smart girl.
The real dummy was the one who left it opened- and invited the mole in, too.
And we ALL know who that was.
Directed at Fiesty FYI
NF-
I will not respond to any additional threats or lies. Those looking for may take on the matter can refer to my posts from this week.
Sun Jun 26, 2011 11:07 AM EDT
Then what are we to make of your subsequent comments? If you aren't going to respond to lies, you by your own admission must be responding to...you know, that other one, right?...:)
I condone free speech in America.
Yes I do.
Everyone has said their piece freely on this topic.
That is a beautiful thing . . . easy like a Sunday morning. :o)
I find this all strangely cleansing . . . like a revelation . . . a recalibration . . . a breakthrough.
I am free and at peace with all that has come before and all that is to come.
There really isn't much more to say than that . . . heading back to Tennessee now . . . see ya'll tomorrow!
P.S. Dangerfield . . . are you in love with me? Have I hurt you personally in some way? If so, I am sorry. I am posting comments as I see fit, as I have always done. Does this now require prior approval? You guys need a hobby . . . or maybe a private chat group . . . I know a great place to start one!
Don't flatter yourself. Neither. Read the above and my meaning is very clear;
Condoning personal attacks to political posts is inappropriate behavior.Period.
No amount of obfuscation, deflection or attempts to put it on a personal level like your buddy does daily will change what everyone can read in black and white for themselves.
As to that other odious suggestion;
Groucho Marx
Say it with me kids....( i saw the movies too :-)
KA CHING!!!!!
ROFL
Actually Nash you should know by now this isn't really about you. Its about your support for someone who consistently violates the COH and attacks people's families. Right down to their grand children.
I have to wonder ARE YOU NASH AFRAID OF FEISTY?
Because honestly, I cannot understand why you and some others soil yourselves with her atrocious attacks? Really I don't. I don't not understand how you can attack someone's grandchild, all because they disagree with you politically.
And I'm sure you are a "grown a$$ woman" so let hear you SPEAK FOR YOURSELF
DO YOU CONDONE FEISTY'S ATTACKS OR DON'T YOU??
Halo:
I decide who I support, not you.
I stand 100% behind Feisty's right to say what she wants, how she wants, to who she wants. That is how we roll in the U. S. of A.
I also support your right to either drop a set or purchase some big girl panties.
Hope that is clear enough for ya.
P.S. Actually Halo, you should know by now that you ain't running this . . . mmmmkay. You name dropper you . . . tell K.O. I said what's up.
As a "weekend warrior" here at First Read, I just have to ask - Mark Murray, after al this, are you really still going to this gathering?
I would seem that discretion is the better part of valor.
Regardless of who is right or wrong, the smart play seems to be to just walk away, especially for your, given your position.
To simply say you will meet with who ever, when ever, at this point just will not cut it, at least for me, as someone who has borne the burnt of a personal attack by Feisty, NewDayDawing and others on the "list."
This will not, and cannot end well if you directly participate. I think you understand that although unfortunate, that's just the way it is. Politics.
Are you really threatening our hosts? And that seems like a SMART thing to do?
MF1
"discretion is the better part of valor"
Could not have said it better myself.
"Delusions of granduer dancing in their heads"
Ya'll think a grown man in America is going to change his life path because some unidentfied yahoos on the interwebs feel uncomfortable?
Time to get a life.
"I hope this answers your questions. If you have any others, please let me know."
Mark Murray, 6-23-2011
Actually Mr. Murray, I have questions, so does Groucho, and possibly others as well. You responded to Groucho, but you didn't specifically answer any of the questions he posed.
According to MSNBC, "Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com."
MSNBC's parent is NBC.
So...
When you suggest that neither you nor Domenico Montanaro moderate First Read any more, aren't you being a bit disengenuous?
You state that you're "happy to relay" messages to the Newsvine moderators, so it should be relatively easy for you to tell us what you're going to do about the repeated, unaddressed violations of the Newsvine Code Of Honor at First Read and the inappropriate use of Newsvine rules to delete the comments of some bloggers, and to have the accounts of others closed...especially considering that this has been the behavior of a group of liberal/progressive First Read bloggers with whom you've developed a relationship, and even plan to actually meet with next month in St. Louis.
If you, in your capacity as the Deputy Political Director of NBC News, suggest to the Newsvine moderators that they stop allowing the sort of abuses that Libs R Us has engaged in (apparently with impunity) it's perfectly reasonable to expect that they'll comply with your wishes, is it not?
Do you want a level playing field for everyone blogging here at First Read, or not, Mr. Murray?
So you got your "answer"...
dangerfield-
Pretty sure you're dead on about that.
Just want to see it written down for all to see, friend.
Man - this one trick pony passed away earlier this morning...
Leave it to bag boy to continue to flog a dead horse! LMAO
No surpise when you have NOTHING else...
#2.51 - Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:11 PM CDT
Have a nice weekend Mixed, try cleaning out the conspiracy theory cobwebs because if this wasn't a level playing field and we evil liberals had the power to control it--you wouldn't be able to log on in the first place.
Allow me to add two questions of my own-
Did you run your attendance at this private meeting by NBC's ombudsman? What you are proposing seems to be a pretty clear violation of the canon; and
In light of the subject matter, (what to "do" about me, and other posters), will you have a live feed of the roundtable discussion linked to this site?
I'd kind of like to know what advice you give on dealing with me. I seem to be pretty high on the list of topics to be discussed.
Your contention that this is a normal course of business strikes me as odd, at best. I have been in attendance at many "private" meetings at which a member of the press was a speaker- I believe I mentioned in the past that, at one such, Chris Matthews was a featured speaker- we spoke about what he termed his favorite book, Kennedy Vs. Nixon.
I have shared a podium with Mike Wallace, and enjoyed the wit and wisdom of David Brinkley, before his passing, among numerous others.
The difference is that at EACH and EVERY one of these "private" gatherings- other press was present. In fact, there was coverage of each of these gatherings- some local, some national.
It strikes me that if you are going to gather together, the meeting should be made available to those interested.
In my case, as a topic of conversation, I am definitely interested.
They sure do have an extreme sense of self worth if you ask me?
It must be tough going through life as nothing more than a inconsequencial internet troll & THIEF to boot!
If they represent the BEST Teapublicans have to offer can you say: Welcome to your second term President Obama!
I don't care what side of side of the aisle you sit on - anyone with a fully functioning moral compass will not condone THEFT!
You know, what never ceases to amaze me is how someone who is a GUEST on a blog is trying to dictate to MSNBC and their employees on what they should do.
My question is this - WHY DO YOU CARE what Mark Murray's bosses are doing with him? Surely they are in positions of decision making that works for THEIR best interest. Mark Murray has posted already that his bosses are THRILLED there are people who are using this blog as their 'home'. mark Murray works for THEM, NOT YOU.
So if Mark Murray is Ok with it, and his BOSSES are OK with it, why does ANYONE CARE what you think? Why does ANYONE CARE of Mark's bosses went through an ombudsman or not?
Looks pretty clear to me that everyone of any importance approved this deal. Of course you didn't approve because you are just you, and we all know that you have NO importance whatsoever.
Well, too bad for you.
If you want to meet Mark Murray, he has already given you and your compadres - and anyone who has a group - an open invitation that if you invite him as a group, he would come and visit.
So why don't you quit yer bitchin' and take the man up on his offer?
It is interesting that you have such a problem with Mark Murray visiting people that are NOT like you. Looks to me that you and Halo need to get a room together because both of you are control freaks that are barking up the wrong tree. MSNBC doesn't have to do SQUAT because you say they do or should do.
So, get up off your butt and put together a group of like minded individuals and go meet Mark Murray. If you don't it is because you are too lazy or too inept to do so, and it is your own fault.
So, what's keeping you?
Yes, they do Feisty, and they're jealous, too. Well said, Pietro!
Mixed --
When First Read became a blog in 2006, my colleagues and I manually approved of every single comment, which was quite the task since the majority of my responsibilities with NBC News have nothing to do with the blog. That's why the comments were usually limited to 50 per post, and why comments got posted slowly.
Then Newsvine was purchased to host all of the blogs on MSNBC.com. One of the great features of that transfer was that Domenico and I no longer had to manually approve of the comments; they were done automatically. I now spend probably 1% of my day reading the comments, although that has increased since yesterday.
I've got to admit: I have much more important things to do at work than care about the Code of Honor, or whatever. But since I'm pretty easy to reach, if someone ever has an issue, I'm happy to ask my colleagues at MSNBC.com to relay a message to Newsvine that's something is wrong. It's a three-degrees-of-separation event. I don't even know Tyler and the other Newsvine folks.
So, no, I'm not being disingenuous.
Relax, Pietro...cool your jets.
There's nothing unreasonable about expecting a level playing field at First Read...particularly when Mr. Murray insists that's exactly what he wants as well, eh?
Do you agree with him, Pietro?
"I'd kind of like to know what advice you give on dealing with me."
I know I'm not them, but if it was me, I'd throw you out a f**ing window.
Now- call a cop, whiner.
"Every news organization has only its credibility and reputation to rely on".
Tony Burman, former editor in chief of CBS News division.
Mark Murray might want to remember that on the ninth, as he helps you figure out ways to "deal" with me and others.
Unless he wants to go for transparency, and link it to this site.
Mr. Murray-
You're not sensing that some of the First Read bloggers feel there might be an issue here...and that just maybe it's time to "relay" that message?
Like I said last night - nothing Mark Murray or anyone else says is going to satisfy the paranoid 'posse'!
They're armed with torches and pitch forks & want his JOB!
Too bad for them that not only is that NOT going to happen but his bosses are THRILLED that FR loyal readers reached out to MSNBC!
Did I mention thrilled? lol
So, MRk Murray, will you link the roundtable, or not?
People do not like to be lied to, nor do they like thieves that go stalking in the night stealing from unsuspecting people, and then telling them that they did it for you.
Oops that sounds kinda like the GOP/TP proposals we are seeing. My bad
Instead of pissing and moaning why don't you guys get a meeting together and inviite Mark. He said he would be happy to come. GO for it instead of whinning like little children.
Silly you NJNB - we're the ones hosting the event remember?
And the answer is NO!
What I am seeing with people like you, Mixed bag, is that you are all about the bitchin' and complainin' but short on rolling up your sleeves to do something.
So while you whine and whine - incessently, I might add - Mark Murray has to AGAIN tell you that he has better things to do than worry about YOUR comfort on the blog. He has stated more than once that he is willing to take what concerns you have and pass them on to newsvine to handle, since that is what they were purchased to do.
And yet you CONTINUE to bitch and moan about a 'level playing field'.
I have one thing to say - this whole situation has surely uncovered one thing - You, No Joe and some of the others in the 'chattering class' are the laziest, whiniest people on this blog.
So roll up your sleeves, put together a group and invite Mark Murray to visit.
Is that REALLY so hard for you to do?
Question, Why is Feisty still here after this attack on nojo last week? Nothing, not even a slap on the wrist.
Again, Feisty at her finest - (Fri- attack on nojo, sick)
1. Still got the battery acid running through your veins eh NJNB?
We would like to believe that after you recent near heartbreak, you would of re-assessed the amount of hatred you carry in your heart...
We should of known better....
2.You GO get them you miserable OLD BAT M'Kay?
PS: Thought you had me on ignore?
Nothing more than further PROOF you're a LIAR & and FRAUD...
DO YOU know where your hubby is? LMAO!
3. And therein lies the title you've so succesfully earned as the seond biggest LIAR on this blog right behind JS1!
YOU are a PHONY, FRAUD & a unsuccesul LIAR!
You have been PROVEN repeatedly to soak up EVERY comment like the right wind sponge YOU are!
Notice to NJNB - there were MORE people defending my comments then those that came to your rescue!
That little princess of yours has my deepest sympathies with a HATE riddled Grama like yourself!
Just keepon hating on... one day you will get yours! ;o)
Every dog has her day and it won't take long before YOU get yours...
4 .What's the matter NJNB - hubby out of town AGAIN? I would be more worried about WHAT was UPwith that then spreading you your HATRED every chance you get?
Do YOU think the hubby wants to get it on with a BITTER OLD BROAD that couldn't day something NICE if they had a GUN to their head
Thanks again for prioving YOU are a certifiable LIAR there GF!?
Anyone else would have had the account suspended.
I have slogged through the threads for the last three days, reading every one. It is over in my mind. The horse died like Fiesty and other said. But if some of you want to continue go ahead. Here is my suggestion: Email the FR guys, tell them you want your own show and thread:
THE REAL HOUSEWIVES OF MSNBC.
It will be a great hit and all you can make money, and the same arguments, and outrage can continue. NNJ would make a great Danielle, Spanky, a great Tamara; Bev a great Alex and best of all Feisty a new Betheny. Remember though, that one goes on to have her own show and makes million.
If this same topic shows up on Monday, it must be the reunion show!!
Now I am going to the Dew Drop Inn and quench my thirst.
No Jo --
Of what canon are you talking about? My job is covering, writing, and talking about politics. And talking about politics is what I'll be doing in St. Louis. I imagine the questions will be: 1) Which Republican has the best chance of winning the nomination? 2) How vulnerable is Obama in 2012? 3) What are going to be the issues at play? Etc.
I they ask me a question about certain posters, and want them removed, here will be my answer: I think we should always err on the side of free speech, and those posters have as much of right to post as they do.
As far as coverage of the event, the gathering is not mine; I'm the guest. You'll need to ask the organizers. But if you're dying to know what I was asked, you can always drop me a line.
And I'm happy to speak to you and any group you organize. Glad you had the opportunity to hear from Chris. It must have been an enjoyable experience.
thetotas-
Why...these look like Newsvine Code Of Honor violations!
Just in time...maybe Mr. Murray will see this.
He doesn't know anything about any of this, apparently.
Northstar. Can't say I blame you, the Dew Drop Inn is open!
Don't forget about Ron, Mr. Murray.
He's going to want to know what to do about No Jo.
Well - we're now into day five of this, and all totas has proven is she has nothing to offer other than a copied & pasted post she's REPOSTED about a hundred time NOW? lol
WOW - color me impressed! ;o)
Oh so - now according to bag boy Mark is suppose to go back and go through all posts bag boy finds offensive?
Now I got it!
If people were suspended based on COH violation this place would be a freakin GHOST TOWN!
As for the totas - I'm sure Mark more than likely saw that post say, when she re-posted it for the hundredth time?
"...I'm sure Mark more than likely saw that post say, when she re-posted it for the hundredth time?"
Ya think, Feisty?
Yeah I think, Bag Boy!
What part of Mark is not a moniter don't you get?
He's only relayed that information to YOU and the rest of the paranoid posse about a dozen times!
Come on Mark,
Tell us what you think of Feisty post and how it doesn't violate the TOS of newsvine. Are you going to be suggesting to the Moderators that she be BANNED for this type if Attack. You seem to be reading these boards alot more Now. So The Question is Will you point it out how out of line she is. or will you just let it go.
It WAS a great conversation with Chris. It was more than a few years ago, and A & E had just optioned the book- don't know what ever happened to the miniseries.
By the way, if you want to ask him about it- as I say, it was more than a few years ago, (Clinton was president), you can mention Boca Raton, and see if he remembers the meeting.
In the interest of full disclosure- I am having both com cast and your ombudsman contacted, with an outline of my concerns. These include my own rights, and the rights of others that have been abridged to date, and that are called into question by this meeting.
Sorry, but I do not do "victim" all that well.
Pietro:
It is far easier for the right to complain than actually do anything, like have their own get together and invite Mark. They do not like the truth as they want a full blown conspiracy which does not exist other than in their little minds. They continue to try and find a fight where there is none. That is what happens when you have no new ideas and ones you do have do not work.
Mark is probably getting tired of answering the same question over and over, several times now. Now he knows a little bit how we feel in debunking the same lies over and over.
And NoJo, our meeting is none of your business, I was invited but cannot go. I would love to meet Mark. Go have your own get together and invite Mark or who ever. Mark is waiting for an invite, so take him up on it. We do not answer to you so get off your high horse before you fall off and hurt yourself.
Sorry, Navy, but as a "topic" of your business, as in, how to "deal" with me, (and others, but my name was first on the list), it IS my business.
Now, rahther than wasting your time trying to convince me that I have no right to defend my rights, why don't you expend your energies figuring out WHO among your merry little band exposed yup?
Seems you have a mole.
No Joe --
I'm sure they'll greatly appreciate it. Have a great weekend!
Mark:
I sent the message below to you this morning.
Has it or will it be passes to Newsvine moderators?
Thanks for your help and have a great weekend.
Mark
This is a political blog, a forum and indeed you need a thick skin.
As for private chat rooms, glad to see so many people getting involved in politics. That is, indeed a very good thing.
The problem is not so simplistic though as this group is not that benign.
I have the entire 489 page transcript copied from the internet and would be more than happy to send it to you. I'm sure many others have it also.
This group, LIBSRUS, per their transcript, intentionally targeted people that disagreed with their political agenda and had their accounts suspended, posts collapsed either by flagging them as advertising (which is a deletion rather than collapse) or simply flagging them as inflammatory or no value. This is constant and persistent. The names of the targets are on each page and, in fact, their complaint was that MSNBC had not complied fast enough. Apparently, that was going to be a talking point with you at your scheduled round table discussion.
If you read the transcript, Sally and Tyler, were their "in" and they promptly complied with the group emails and requests. I don't use the word promptly, loosely. Almost daily contact. Accounts deleted at the groups request. Appears, that several memos were sent directly to you on the topic of quicker deletions of "suspended accounts". That is, in many cases, accounts the group requested be closed.
They brag about it, job well done, good job, etc. The practice continues.
First, if this isn't a violation of the COH, nothing is and I would appreciate an explanation.
Second, NoJoNoBo was personally attacked last week by Feisty and some members of the group, in a pile on that surprised many. You don't personally attack a poster, the woman's granddaughter, and her husband, accusing him of sleeping around and needing to have a gun put to his head cause "she's a cold heartless bitch". This personal attack is a blatant violation of the COH, yet she seems immune to punishment. Why is this sort of dialogue countenanced and a simple cuss word not?
As to yesterday, every single post by "now i'm here" was deleted. Every one. If it wasn't by Sally and Tyler who did it and why? Again a COH violation code.
There is no appearance of impropriety, there is a systemic incidence of impropriety and some of us newer folks want to know why that is.
It we don't have the freedom to post knowing this "gang", not group, has the ability to take down our comments or have accounts deleted, then why bother posting here.
One of the members continually compares the GOP to the Nazi's. What they don't quite get is they've become the Nazi's as they want to and have become the arbiters of free speech on this site.
Their censorship, and the willing compliance of Tyler and Sally, makes this all suspect.
Your comments please.
Thank you.
Thetotas- I scoured you post above, but coudn't find the reference to 'ass-pimple'. Did you mean to leave that out, or am I not looking closely enough?
By the way- I also missed quotes you put up by a Chuck-U-Farley, too. I seem to remember some doozies, yet HE never got suspended either. Selective outrage, much, Thetotas?
The Bottom line wiht this is that Mark Murray knows what is Occuring and it is Obvious by who he chooses to associate himself with that he doesnt Care what they Say . My guess is he probably Agrees with how they are posting..
Associations say alot about a person . And this one says alot about Mark Murray..
Mixed Bag,
Would you go fly to St Louis to meet a bunch of strangers without looking into the type of people you would meet?
He knows what he is walking into, and that's what is so surprising.
Stevie -- happy to associate with you. Name the time and place, as long as it's with good intentions.
Now back to my day job, in which I associate with Democrats and Republicans all day long.
Mark,,
Thanks for the Reply.. But i must say. still no comment on Feistys Remarks and how they violate the TOS of Newsvine . I am asking you will you pass them on to the Moderator and ask that she be Banned for the things she has posted?
Mark - no offense bud, but it's like I often advise my clients - sometimes you just gotta stop talking.
I know you are trying to be helpful and god knows you are patient, but you are not helping.
Call it a night and let the natives fight their wars.
drive by,
Selective outrage? That must be a new talking point. No its not selective, and the fact that you can read Feisty comments and not be outrage says a lot about you.
If you are trying to compare any of my comments to Feisty's go for it. I have nothing to hide unlike Feisty and her crew. No more access to their history, why is that?
The pimple or Chuck thing, those are not my comments.
Stevie --
As I've said, my personal opinion is that we should err on the side of free speech, unless there is R-rated language or physical threats of violence. As a journalist, I have pretty thick skin. And I'd recommend that any poster on this blog have the same thick skin.
If we banned people because their hurt someone's feelings -- or said something they didn't agree with -- there would be VERY few of you posting.
Good advice, Spanky. Enjoy your weekend....
Mark again. I said i am asking that you pass Feistys Remarks on to Newsvine Moderators. for the purpose of Banning ,, In early postings you said if we had problems with someones Post to Email you. I find it much Easier to Ask you here. . So Will you pass them on as a Violation of the TOS .
Thanks.........
Best. Thread. EVAH!
Mark,
unless there is R-rated language or physical threats of violence.
Looks like you didn't read Feisty's attack on nojo last Friday.
Speaking of Tyler & Sally - they might want to review old steveiam's account...
It's not like those who have been banned don't try to sneak back in!
Sounds to me an awful lot like old Steve #'s - who consistantly trolled Beverly in Chgo and called her all sorts of racist & obsene names...
Just a thought!
Honey - like I said above - how could anyone have missed it?
You've only re-posted it a hundred or so times! lol
While Tyler & Sally are at it - they should also take a peek at some of the vile things YOU'VE said to other posters...
People in glass houses and all!
So.
Steve got his account Banned and you know this how Feisty. So are the moderators giving you information that is private? This should be an interesting Explaination...
we understand that you will try and get people Banned for calling people names but when you do it you expect the moderators to ignore it. and you say their is no concerted effort to get people banned............... or any type of collusion between you and the moderators. We get it. its all just innocent. .
So what do you say about this Mark. Feisty wanting people Banned do you agree with her?
For starters - all anyone has to do give go to your homepage and see you only opened this your account on June 16th. Right about the time old stevie was banned...
In your third post of the day - you couldn't help yourself and went off on your infamous racist angel.
Then there's the FACT that you're spelling & grammar suck as bad as the 'old' stevie...
It ain't rocket science my friend...
Amazing thing is anyone can find that info out WITHOUT stealing confidential information...
See, we don't need to stoop to the right wing GUTTER LEVEL!
The Question Still remains. How is it that Feisty Redhead knows whos Accounts are being Banned. Are the moderators giving her private information? Because i warned someone about using terms that others would accuse them of being Racist is far from a Racist Rant or Angle...
Pssst... Mr Paranoid!
There's a list on Newsvine - get off your lazy butt and look it up!
Steviam, theremis a Code of Honor, the first line of which goes something like 'first, respect your fellow posters'.
It goes on to explain that name-calling, vulgarities, and ad hominem attacks will be dealt with by deleting the post, and the poster can face suspension or outright banning.
It only applies to some, not to others.
Members of the 38 are in this exempt group- the rest of us are not. Therefore, FRH can, and does, say whatever to whomever she likes.
I have her on ignore; unfortunately, when people respond to her remarks, I get a pretty good sense of what she has said to and about me.
Some have posted her remarks to me last week. It makes me I'll to think a person can have that much venom toward a person, based purely on their political views.
I expect things to get much, much worse. Things have rolled merrily downhill since the mid- terms, (which is when I put Fiesty and others on ignore, by the way)- as Obama's polls continue to decline, and his re election chances continue to sink, ypu are going to need a flak jacket to come on here if yup are a fiscally conservative, socially libertarian poster.
And when he loses? I think I will take a vacation. I am not faint of heart, but life is too short for what will be coming at us then.
No Jo.
I so look foward to November of 2012 when Obama gets Voted out. I will not post here for a few days after he loses. but i will come here to Read the remarks of the posters here just to read their daily whines................. but what a glorious day it will be. I can only imagine the Venom that will be spewing from their fingers after he is Defeated. The name calling will be Endless here at Newsvine..
Keep us posted on your interactions with Comcast and NBC on the Mark Murray and the concerted effort to silence people on these boards I look foward to their response to you..
Feisty,
Dont worry about me and like I said before you are welcome to my history. What about your history, do you have something to hide. Why are you blocking it now?
Now the ever so powerful NJNB & her 'attorney' *air quotes* son are goingt bring down MSNBC in one fell swoop because poor NJNB doesn't do victim all that well'! LMAO
From NJNS's own admission, her son barely squeaked through law school, is there any doubt he has plenty of spare time on his hands to help out his mother - the self-proclaimed martyr!
Feisty
I shouldn't even bother with this
TAKE A GOOD LOOK AT WHAT YOU POSTED LAST FRIDAY
and ask yourself HOW YOU WOULD FEEL if someone posted it about you.
You are a lying, disengenious, coward hiding behind a keyboard. And apparently above the COH. So your lil friend MARK COT OF NEWSVINE and you have this all worked out pretty cushy huh?
Again, YOUR SELECTIVE OUTRAGE is NOT working. And sweetie, you should remember TO HIT PRIVATE if you don't want stuff published on google.
NJNB can do what they want and use whatever resources they see fit. I AM TAKING THIS TO CURRENT TV. Ole Keith still has an axe to grind.
Good luck baby doll I think your going to need a flack jacket for the rest of your "life" on this board. YOU AND YOUR MOB OF 38 have been outted.
It's on
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
And I'll huff and I'll puff until I blow your house down! LMFAO!
If I remember right the big bad wolf doesn't fare so well!
Thanks for playing!
OMG! Flack Jacket? Wouldn't that be construed as a threat of violence? Hit me with your best shot! k? LMAO@U little man!
YOU BROUGHT THIS ON YOURSELF
With vicious and nasty attacks. A flack jacket THE LURKERS WILL NOT BE HAPPY UNTIL YOU ARE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR WHAT YOU HAVE SAID HERE. Nice try on the spin, dear heart NO SALE>
Mock all you want sweetie pie I OWN YOU NOW.
You as the admin (LOL) left the page open. And now you have problem a BIG problem. YOUR CUSH RELATIONSHIP WITH THE MODERATORS AND MARK HAS BEEN OUTTED.
The BIG WINNER IS ANYONE NOT IN THE GANG OF 38
Keep flagging me as "adverts" I love it.
Remember Feisty CYBER BULLYING IS A CRIME
And what you have done to NJNB, Bob numbers, and others definitley fits the bill.
Wow- there are some pretty dense mo fo's on here, aren't here?
(and did I mention cry-babies, to boot??)
DBO:
Looks like the real tea baggers were identified today. That makes it a good day.
You got it DBO and Ron, it was a good day.
Hi, Ron-
Just curious:
It's my understanding that you expect to query Mark Murray regarding his "thoughts on how...to best deal with the Bobs and NoJos."
Really, Ron?
Do you really believe that it's appropriate to ask the Deputy Political Director of NBC News about that, and have him tell you how best to "deal with" annoying conservative First Read bloggers?
You expect Mr. Murray to be eager to help you with that, do you?
Why is that?
Come on now Mixed - you see their capabilities to respond to counter arguments here everyday. Everyday they flat out fail. In a word - they are clueless and simply incabable of doing anything than reciting the arguments from ThinkProgress and the like.
If they need help from Murray all the better. It won't make a difference - you know old dogs and all.
I just hope our man Ron takes "Accounting for Dummies" or a basic math book for group review. Hell I will personally overnight a copy, no problem.
I will say this - in light of this I think there is a good chance our man Murray will have to cancel, unexpectedly.
I'm wondering when one of FR's moderators will come on here and explain to us just what kind of relationship they have with some of the liberal posters. Now that we know the reason for sure how some people like Feisty Redhead have managed to stay unbanned, it would be most interesting to hear just how "close" her relationship is with the moderators.
I'm of course not suggesting there is any hanky-panky going on. That would get my account suspended and Feisty is most likely just as unattractive physically as she is on the inside, but still, I think there is no doubt at all that the moderators were part of the off-board whine-fest.
"Everyday they flat out fail."
Your yardstick being....?
Describe 'fail' here as you've used it. And, as they used to say in grade school: Please show your work.
".... Feisty is most likely just as unattractive physically as she is on the inside.."
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Can anyone explain this one?
Mark has already come out and made their position very clear. Can't you read.
Mr. "drive-by-observer"...
It means just what it says. My grandmother always told me that a person is only beautiful if they are so on the inside, no matter what they look like on the outside. Since Feisty Redhead is obviously a very, um unattractive person on the inside (based on some of her quotes I've been reading), it doesn't matter how unattractive her physical looks are.
DBO.... you are cracking me up. These people are dense. What part of private do they not understand? Do they think they own Mark or anyone at MSNBC?
Give it a rest nojo, otherwise you are just confirming what we already have said about you and pesky others.
I'd guess they can read (most of 'em, anyway) alright. It's just more fun to act this goddamned stupid over and over and over and over.
Or is it?
It HAS kept the discussion away from Cantor, Paul Ryan, et.al, hasn't it, Navy?
"Do they think they own Mark or anyone at MSNBC?"
It appears the correct answer would be 'Yes'.
Gingerbread Mama is still a little embarrassed about being exposed trying to figure out how to ban Spanky for demolishing the liberals on a daily basis. "Daddy, daddy!" waaaaaaahhhh waaaaaahhhh LOL
DBO:
How true my friend. After all that is their goal now, is it not? Stall. We now know who the real driving culprits are and I put some of them on ignore along with a few others we know. As far as I am concerned they are no longer relevant and it is easier to move around on the sites.
I think everyone's problem is that they are here almost 24/7. For Pete's sakes - get a life people. It's summer - time to get outside, spend time with family and friends.
After reading some of these posts, I visualize little moles in dark rooms with a monitor flashing. We are all human beings with different outlooks of what we want for our country. If like minded people want to discuss more on the topics - why can't we?? After all that is why we are here in the first place. Free country and all that jazz!
But, but this is my life.
Plus it looks like I am working hard. So there is that.
Although my secretary was asking about that "get ripped in 10 days" ad. Not the type of ad they typically have on legal research sites. :(
Spanky - I am truly shocked that you are employed. Would have to be self-employed - right? Well good for you that you can be on this site all day and collect a paycheck. And you talk about Democrats being lazy.
Elise, so precious - when you are self employed you do not, under any circumstances "collect a paycheck."
That's what you wage slaves do - you know working for the man and all.
It's just the basics Elise. Try to get some knowledge, it is power don't you know?
For anybody that is going to St.Louis for any reason and likes Italian food there is a an old Italian neighborhood where Yogi Bera and Joe Garagiola grew up called "The Hill" you can not get a bad meal in that neighborhood.
Forrest- Can you get maps to the secret treehouse? Transcripts of nefarious plots??
If not, I guess some veal piccatta would be nice. Thanks for sharing!
My favourite is quatro formaggio... can we order our food in Italian? And if they have Gelato, i am there!!
My favorite is your milk of human kindness overflowing...
Pietro, Columbus, Ohio (May 27, 12:45 PM):No Joe - I see that no Joe's granddaughter is gravely ill. Although I will support and send my prayers for the Granddaughter, i will not publicly do that for No Joe. She is too mean and bitter. maybe this is the universe talking to No Joe and is telling her to stop with the mean pettyness and use that energy to enjoy life and people. Let's hope that No Joe gets a clue.
Where have I seen almost those exact same words?
Pietro should get together with Ron.
He will be asking Mr. Murray for help with No Jo, dangerfield.
Dangerfield - that's right - I posted that and I stand by every word.
So what?
I don't know. Give me a hint: Do I care? I don't ? Never mind.
Oh my that does suck Pietro.
Very douche-baggish of you.
Brings to mind, the whole "universe talking" crap that little saying about Karma.
Hope everything is going, and continues to go, well for you buddy, in spite of that asinine comment.
What is douche-baggish, Spanky, is that Dangerfield posted it thinking that he was going to get something out of it. What is even more douche-baggish, Spanky, is your so-called 'witty' repartee about it.
I posted it. So what?
Don't get me started about St. Louis...I lived there for several years and absolutely LOVED the food. The Hill is fantastic. I also loved Bandana's Barbecue. And for dessert, frozen custard at Ted Dru's. Gotta get some toasted ravioli there as well.
Hey brother [Pietro] it is your life.
Post away. Own it. Live it. Rock it.
Still make you look like a douche bag, but I suspect that you know that.
That's what.
Now ask me if I care what I look to you or anyone else on here that is posting stolen information?
Yeah, I thought so.
Carry on.
Pietro,
I haven't made reservations for dinner Saturday night; but The Hill is only five miles from the hotel,...
Thanks Forrest I will check them out, hope you are well. Have a wonderful weekend and I do enjoy your posts and your view on life. Peace.
Clara, it sounds like a plan, anything that Yogi or Joe like is ok with me. I would love some good Italian food. I'm with you and Pietro. Gelato m-m-mm Yum
Thank you, Joe and Yogi grew up there as kids you will see pictures of them from childhood to their heydays with the Yankees in some of the bakeries, delis, and restaurants, it is just an old Italian neighborhood where most of the establishments have been in the family for several generations now. The prices are generally quite reasonable, the food everywhere is delicious, and the portions will wreck a diet if you are on one. My wife Lotta, Lotta Grump has ties in the area, maybe some of you who lived in the area knew her, her maiden name was Balonie, did anybody know Lotta Balonie, I married her, Lotta Balonie is now my wife Lotta Grump, HA. Have a good time folks!
St. Louis is my home town and I can vouch for the Hill restaurants, Ted Drewes, the Cardinals (not so much this year) and freedom of speech as long as it is not defamatory.
Let us all raise a glass tonight and toast Halo. He is a hero. I know how much you liberals like whistle blowers and how much respect you have for them. So I'm sure you all will join me in my tribute to Halo and/or whomever got into that silly chat room. Can't wait to read it all this weekend! Whoohoo!
" Can't wait to read it all this weekend! Whoohoo!"
God, and I thought MY life was lacking excitement. Here's to you, D123.
Here's to you.
Damage123 - knock yourself out.
Have fun.
Best post of the WEEK
On the Ron Paul thread last weekend his minions were out in force working up a real "call and response". The rebuttals were coming fast and furious. Pneuma,RP poster at about 10pm said,
"MAN THESE POSTS ARE GETTING LONG.:)
Have a great weekend everyone!!!
AWW thanks Damage.
I'm just fed up with the attacks, flagrant COH violations, and collapse a thons of posts the gang o 38 do not agree with.
Thanks for your support. TRUTH is what I care about. Not spin, not personal attacks, not FEISTY prepping a response to Pres speech so she can command real estate on the boards.
And let's be honest here, if they gang of 38 could actually debate a valid point, they wouldn't have to work out a collective stategy in their secret treehouse.
Sad, but then again I don't expect any better here now. I will STAY on this board and a burr in the saddle to those trying to silence any opinion that they do not agree with.
To quote NIH who as banned at their request this week "It's on like Donkey Kong"
These are the words from HALO, our resident thief. So tell me , Halo, how can a THIEF like yourself care about the TRUTH?
Ever hear the saying, "scratch a lie, find a thief"?
Looks like we have found our thief - and he is not shy about bragging about being one, either.
So since Halo is so PROUD of being the thief that he is, are we REALLY supposed to believe that he is after the TRUTH?
You delude yourself, Halo.
Have fun trying to pawn that transcript off on Keith Olberman. If you think that I am excouriating you enough now, wait until Keith finishes what's left of you when I am done. Look what Keith did and said about President Bush and HIS lies... and you think you are going to find traction in peddling YOUR lies?
So go AHEAD, Halo - I double dog DARE ya.
YOU LEFT THE SITE OPEN NIT WITS.
Although I know you are not rocket scientists, however THIS IS NOT ABOUT POLITICS THIS IS ABOUT A RIGGED SITE WHERE 38 PEOPLE CAN AMUCK WITH THE COMPLICITNESS OF THE MODERATORS AND REPORTS.
I love the "blame bush" tactic to typical OF MOB MENTALITY.
What makes you think that KO woudn't looooovvvveeeee this after the shameful way he was forced out of MNSBC. You keep trying to ellude to my politics, but since you know nothing about them, assume all you want.
YOUR GANG brought this on themselves. After Feisty's vicious attacks your gange should have been prepared.
WHAT WAS POSTED WAS NOT LIES, they were DIRECT TRANSCIPTS from the MOB.
And oh YEAH IT AIN'T STEALING IF ITS PUBLISHED ON GOOGLE.
Duh
OK, is it just me, but can ANYONE decipher what our resident thief is really trying to say here?
** Shakes Head **
Wow, so much for "excoriating me", do you even know what that means??
How about this, 38 people are allowed TO BREAK THE COH AND AGAIN.
Have people's accounts banned by bombarding the "moderators".
One person is allowed to threaten and mock someone's home life,
Are you really that dumb Pietro????
So halo--you here to whine or talk politics?
Information is power, right?
THis is the way these people conduct themselves.
Just like in the Wizard of Oz. THe curtain is pulled back.
It's ugly, but reality always is. Just ask Obama. Talk is cheap, actions have consequences. Looks like the Libs r us are finding that out. Like Weiner - who also cried out about being "hacked." That did not turn out so well for him, either.
mt1, we aren't public figures...not one of us...we're just average Americans participating on a message board...and you're threatening.
The last few days have really shown the true colors of the Conservatives here at FR.
Another blogger here who can't actually respond. Good work Pietro, I think we all know now your posts are all just "group think" from the gang.
MT1, funny isn't how they all claim about "whining" and they blame Obama's lack of support on the "haters". Typical of again the "group think" strategy.
It's funny because I was a Hil supporter. WAS being the operative word here. As a female, it sickens me the way the "media" (lol) treats women in general. You had "cold witch Clinton" and "Nailin Palin"
The 38 call the challengers "housewives" now I've never pollutted my eyes with that trash but I will say that line "I wouldn't spit on you if you were on fire" is appropriate for the gang members.
And just another case to point out how WOMEN in general get treated like cr!p. And yet female libs the "party of women" seem to be ok with it. It simply boggles the mind.
Well, almost beer thirty. Too bad I have to hop on the ol' mower for a couple of hours. It'd be fun to stick around and watch all the petty, cry-baby dumb-asses continue to make even bigger fools of themselves than they claim the Libs R Us folks have done.
My God- What a cast.
A true melodrama from both sides. And the cast is made up of the usual suspects, a good movie by the way.
Somehow, the world did not end today.
Let me be clear, I do NOT authorize the movie rights.
Clara, you just cracked me up. Good for you for keeping your sense of humor amidst all this hoopla.
Clara only if we have say over who will play each of us, and I have a few suggestions which we can discuss over the weekend, right?
.
So much for "get smarter here"..this whole thread should be collasped as no value... I've only been a member on Newsvine since April and I have made some friends and joined a few groups that interest me. I have also outed a few banned and suspended re-regs and , trust me, it is not difficult to find them-they "out' themselves quite easily...If a comment is "off topic" or an attempt to derail, then do yourself a favor and flag it as "no value". If you feel a comment is a personal attack then flag it as inflammatory.If you are so inclined to agree with a comment, than vote it up. I haven't always expressed myself quite as eloquently or precisely as I would like but I sure appreciate those who can and do make that effort. I don't see any conspiracy theories, just a group that has the same interests and are like minded about our political climate. So, get over it and grow up already.
Back to to the old "third person strategy" eh?
SMDH
CP, there hasn't been a lot of sense posted here over the last few days--your comment is just about the most sensible from ANY day, however.
CP gave it away with "get over it"
Seems to be the designated line from the "cool kid lunch table"
And John, you really ought to know this about the people who sit on their hands and do not call people out when they attack someone's grandchild.
It would serve you well to think about that they next time Feisty spews the hate. And maybe, just maybe you won't tell her "good post"
Or use your in's with the moderators to get the post collapsed? Here's to hoping...
I don't know Cynthia's Point.
And you're no longer worth my time.
Goodbye.
Amen, Cynthia! "Much ado about nothing. . ."
No Joe should feel so flattered that she was at the top of ANYONE's list! She's obviously effective at getting under people's skin--I know she bugs the heck out of me with her snarky retorts and constant Obama-bashing (he can do no right in her eyes), so I mostly skip over her posts. Anyway, they're not gospel, nor are any of the posts from the "gang of 38". The BEST thing that might come out of this flap is that this board actually might become more like it used to be--more of a lively, civil debate. I sure hope so.
Actually, I would add that I have started to ignore posters like NJ and Feisty, who often write comments in which they mock people personally or call names. Don't give them so much power, people! Ignore them or skip over their posts (admittedly, that's a lot of the page). If we can stay on topic and actually discuss the articles and issues, we might "get our board back".
I have a hard enough time reading any of the posts on First Read-the page is always jumping up and down. I can barely scroll to read anything let alone vote or comment...
I don't personally know anyone on any of these blogs. I have some on my Newsvine watch list because I believe in their political view and any facts they may provide me. I read all the comments on each article that interests me-even those collapsed by the community. Everyone has something to add to any discussion or debate so I don't have an ignore list-we already have enough people that have been ignored or forgotten in this country....that's the sad part of it all.