The front page from the New Hampshire Union Leader: “7 contenders keep it civil.” From the story: “The seven candidates for president – U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota used the debate to officially announce her candidacy – continuously attacked the president on health care, spending and taxes, but also continued to avoid any pointed attacks on each other. ‘Any person on this stage would be a better president than President Obama,’ said former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.”
The New Hampshire Union Leader: “GOP debate: Candidates blast Obama, but avoid attacking each other.”
“Given opportunities to critique one another’s stances, the seven competitors repeatedly deflected the questions to attacks on the president,” the Washington Post adds.
The New York Times: “The spotlight was trained squarely on Mitt Romney… But his rivals treaded lightly, and he relentlessly turned the conversation back to Mr. Obama, emerging unscathed from his return to the debate stage four years after losing his first bid for the party’s nomination.”
The Washington Post’s Balz says Romney “easily survived” the debate. “In his first debate of the campaign, the nominal front-runner for the GOP nomination seemed eager for the spotlight. Through two hours of questioning, he delivered a steady performance, made no obvious errors and stuck to his campaign game plan of focusing his message on the president and the economy.”
“Republican White House hopefuls assailed President Barack Obama’s handling of the economy from the opening moments of their first major debate of the campaign season Monday night and pledged emphatically to repeal the administration’s year-old health care law,” the AP writes. “In general, the Republicans on stage steered away of criticizing one another, and even the evident differences among them were expressed in muted terms.”
For viewers who live in New Hampshire, last night’s debate featured many ads highlighting Democratic opposition to Rep. Paul Ryan’s plan to replace Medicare with a voucher system, the liberal-leaning Web site Talking Points Memo writes. In addition to ads already being run by the left-leaning group Protect Your Care, two other groups – the Progressive Change Campaign Committee and Democracy for America – also ran Medicare-themed ads last night.
BACHMANN: Michele Bachmann’s “unpredictable edge was on display during Monday night's GOP presidential debate in New Hampshire when, out of the blue, she announced that she had filed papers to be an official candidate for the Republican nomination,” the AP writes.
The New York Times writes that Michele Bachmann showed herself last night to be not just a proxy for Sarah Palin, but potentially a more preferable candidate than Palin to some Republican voters.
“In a debate also notable for the quietly confident performance of front-runner Mitt Romney and the unwillingness of his rivals to target him with any kind of ferocity, Bachmann electrified the audience with folksy references to her personal history and an unwavering attack on President Obama’s stewardship of the economy and the federal government,” the Washington Post writes.
CAIN: Fact-checking website PolitiFact rated Herman Cain’s denial that he would appoint a Muslim to his cabinet “pants on fire.” Noting that Cain said on the Glen Beck his comments, made to several different organizations were “misconstrued,” Politifact writes, “[C]ontrary to his claim on Beck’s program, Cain did say he would not have Muslims in his Cabinet. Not once or twice, but three times in as many weeks to ThinkProgress.org, Cavuto and Fischer.”
GINGRICH: When asked about his calling Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget plan “radical” on Meet the Press, Newt Gingrich said he supported the plan as a “general proposal” and said his words on the program were “taken totally out of context.” He also, however, “called for his party to have a longer conversation with the voters about Medicare, even if that means they have to ‘slow down’ the pace of action on the Hill,” Politico writes.
The Boston Globe’s Weiss writes of Gingrich’s campaign trail “shock,” that “he hasn’t run for competitive office in more than a decade. He’s been busy working at think tanks, speaking to friendly conservative groups, and making documentaries about Ronald Reagan. [University of New Hampshire professor Dante] Scala said Gingrich reminds him of Rudy Giuliani, who barely visited New Hampshire in 2008, convinced that his aura would carry him through.”
“Missing from Monday night's debate was a discussion regarding the state of Newt Gingrich's campaign,” ABC writes, although Gingrich’s daughters did defend their father’s campaign after the debate. “Newt’s going to run Newt’s campaign. We of all people know him very, very well,” his daughter Kathy Lubbers said. His daughter Jackie Cushman also defended Gingrich’s relationship with his wife Calista and their tendency to make campaign decisions as a couple. “The fact is Newt Gingrich is the candidate. They’re a great couple. He, like many husbands, like mine and I’m sure like my sisters, actually consult with their spouse,” Cushman said.
PAWLENTY: Tim Pawlenty campaign manager Nick Ayers told reporters in the “spin room” after the debate that Pawlenty did not re-use his “Obamneycare” comment because mangers don’t “program in answers on a candidate’s brain,” Politico writes.
PERRY: The New York Times writes that Rick Perry probably benefits most from what was widely seen as a weak performance by Tim Pawlenty who declined to assail Romney’s health care plan or repeat his nickname for it, “Obamneycare,” when the former Massachusetts governor was present. “Given that Mr. Pawlenty is treading water in polls… Republican elites may be wondering whether he will “click” with voters… If Mr. Perry can instead play the role of ‘generic Republican’— only with better hair and more fundraising prowess — their support could shift toward him.”
ROMNEY: The Boston Globe’s top story: “GOP debaters target Obama, not Romney.”
“Romney, the former Massachusetts governor who leads in the early polls and fundraising efforts, had a surprisingly easy two hours Monday night. He looked calm and steady, criticizing President Barack Obama on the economy and health care while rarely being forced on the defensive despite some well-known vulnerabilities of his own,” the AP writes.
In National Journal’s post-debate analysis, Reid Wilson writes that Mitt Romney succeeded last night in “own[ing] it” when it comes to his record. “He stood up for Commonwealth Care, and he even embraced his Detroit bankruptcy op-ed. Everyone knows Romney's the target, but no one has taken aim yet.”
While he didn’t necessarily stand out, the Des Moines Register’s Kathie Obradovich writes, Romney remained “unruffled. In his first televised debate, national poll-leader Mitt Romney had a target on his back. The former Massachusetts governor emerged with nary a hair out of place, even though at least three questions invited other candidates to attack him on health care, his past abortion position and his opposition to the auto industry bailout.”


Ron Paul's position on pulling out of our foreign wars brought up a question in my mind. Perhaps generals are not inclined to ever want to pull out of a war. It might be like asking a coach when to pull his team out of regular season play in order to go back to strictly practicing.
Vanilla, plain Jane, boring. Paul tried to get feisty (sorry red head) but he comes across as very irrelevant. I do think it's scarey to hear Bachmann talk about dismantling the EPA - that way the GOP can go forth and savage every natural resource available and leave a wasteland for future generations. Pawlenty struck me as a weasle that can talk tough behind Romney's back but shakes in his shoes when he's face-to-face.
Every poll I have seen today has Ron Paul winning last night yet he isn't even mentioned in the article. This is why nobody listens to the mainstream media. They purposely try to hide him. Ron Paul 2012!
Brian, that is odd. I did not watch the debate but I have been reading about it this morning on various websites - I didn't know Ron Paul had been there!
There is a reason for that. They don't want you to know he was there. Seen 8 polls now with Ron Paul winning 7 of them. If you goto ronpaul.com they have the links to all the polls. You can see for yourself.
Do you think that site is unbiased?
Ron Paul has always sounds logical during debates. I didn't watch last night, but I suspect he was his normal, fiesty self with clear-cut answers to our current problems.
However, the biggest issue for Ron Paul is that governing a 300+ million person country is not simple. It is complicated. If there is anything that I have learned over the past 4 years is that simple answers are not good solutions for our problems.
I doubt that any problems or issues that we have in our daily lives have extremely simple solutions that can fit on bumper stickers. We all know as adults that its harder and more complicated than that.
For example, lowering taxes to increase jobs is a bumper-sticker , not a real solution. And no, America cannot just get out of its foreign commitments. Our world has gotten more complicated than just following the letter of the Constitution. I certainly believe the COnstitution should be the guide ( and it is ), but not the absolute.
Again Ron Paul, - great talker - solutions that make sense...hmmm... I think that most of us understand that its not that simple and that is why Ron Paul never ends up with a high percentage of the total.
Ursula...The links are to other websites that had a poll. Nice try though.
All I heard was a bunch of garbage from a bunch of garbage the only one on stage was not on stage but was on everybody'
s mind was Obama . They could all critized him but could praise each other I thought this was a debate not a back patting session . no one had answer to any question that was asked . Why do we continue to give the questions to the partispants before the debate so they can plan ahead and work out the answer before the question is asked. If you want to have a debate then asked the question that the partispants never have seen before the night of the debate . You will have a true debate .
as a political observer, and not a pub, ron paul was the only person with true answers and the only person who honored the laws of the constitution, and the only knowledgable person in the debate.
all the rest were falling over each other and attacking the pres instead of elliminating their opponent. nothing but sound bites
and what a stupid answer to the seperation of state and religion. and what a stupid follow up question re faith?
Debate? What debate? An orchestrated attack on the president, with no real arguments between candidates. Even when Ron Paul finally had an independent opinion, namely ending all the wars and spending the money at home, did John King ask anyone else what they thought of the idea? Noooooooooooooooo, just "Coke or Pepsi". The biggest chicken in the room was not Pawlenty, it was CNN.
With seven candidates we aren't going to be able to have a Lincoln-Douglas style of debate, so we need something more free-flowing. How could candidates differentiate themselves as Republicans when they weren't all given the same topic...every time a topic of interest came up, it was quashed after one or two self-serving sound bites: for example, when the writer from NH asked candidates which THREE specific steps they would take to end "Obamacare," not one candidate had one specific step. Toward the end, Newt Gingrich did say that there were things Congress could do, a sort of plea to voters that electing a President alone couldn't change anything and they would have to change the make-up of Congress, too, a clear admission that none of the things any of the candidates said on the stage has any meaning in the real world of governance.
frag - kind of makes you home sick for the good old days of 2008 with clinton and obama going toe to toe. LOL!
Seven potential candidates with less than 2 hours to express their views.
BTW - one doesn't win an election by pointing out only the good points of the opposition.
Damned-dumb Gingrich refered to 'anti-jos' Obama. Now, if the continued loss of jobs is going to cause Obama to LOSE the next elelction, why the hell would he want to be 'anti-jobs'? Why does NO ONE ever challenge these empty talking points for what they are?
What a lot of losers!
It was not a debate . John King you did a sorry job . you belong in the house with John Bohener He is not very good at his job either. As for President Obama being Anti -jobs that is a stupid to even think of such a thing . why would he be anti-jobs if it would cost him his job . Gingrich is about as stupid as they come.
Can you picture Pawlenty giving the order to take out OBL? He couldn't even stand up to Romney!
wasn't pahlenty the one who supported obama on continuing attacks on al quada in yemen?
Well, I'm certain 'Anti-Obama one liners' will creat more jobs than we ever could have imagined. You go, candidates!
This was an introduction of seven fine candidates to the American people.
Way to early to even begin to lay out their platforms. The American voters are beginning to size up their candidates. One of those on that stage will become our President for the next eight years. This was historical for that reason alone.
There was NO DEBATE ..it was a waste of a few hours ...no new ideas ..no job solutions mentioned ..but i did take note the Republicans ... will continue to let their wealthy done'rs get all the tax breaks ! if they dont allow the tax breaks to the wealthy.... they no longer get the bribes !
Is "Idiot Edward" spewing his GOP/RNC "Crazy Conservative Crap??" Again! Seven fine candides?? Where? The "Clown Show" last night was not fine at all. It was a real joke! Listen "Idiot Edward." The constant attacks on the President with no specific facts to back up their attacks. Is just mentally ill Eddy! Think boy! These Clowns were not debating each other at all however, they sure are willing to use their tactics of "distract and attack." Did you hear the GOP Circus Music Eddy?? Maybe you were seeing the GOP Elephants spewing on the big top stage?? Hey! Eddy Boy! There is room for you at the Mental Hospital next to "Nutty Newt." This was not a debate Eddy. It was a Clown Club of no new ideas, no new policies, no new jobs legistation, and more big oil donors. Here is a few topics they should have spewed about. That their party voted to kill Medicare. Their party also voted for even larger tax payer subsidies for big oil. That most of their donors are rich CEO's representing big oil, big insurance companies, and the large Wall Street Bankers. The GOP/RNC are not friends politically or economically to over 95% of Americans. The Koch Brothers I am sure loved this "Clown Show" of political pukes.
As America clearly remembers…..Today marks the unforgettable 1-year anniversary of MSNBC’s continually mindless PSYCHO-TALKING comments.
Yes, it was exactly one year ago today on the Ed Shutlz show when Shultz emphatically demanded that Barack Obama should “RULE THE COUNTRY AS A DICTATOR !”
In Shultz’s attempt to continue the never-ending bias, distortions, and vicious hatred for which MSNBC is quite renowned, Shultz has repeatedly been disciplined for his idiotic, hate-filled rhetoric.
This is not the first time Shultz’s mouth has gotten him in trouble, including being demoted and suspended…… And, America knows…. It won’t be the last, either.
America also realizes that MSNBC has proven to have absolutely no credibility,…..its only purpose is to try to constantly create division and endless hatred…
So, Happy Anniversary to MSNBC and “psycho-talking” Ed Shultz….. America remembers this date….
And, Barack Obama has proven to be well on his way to “RULING AS A DICTATOR”, just as you demanded !