BACHMANN: Michele Bachmann’s adviser Ed Rollins took on Sarah Palin yesterday while appearing on a radio show, saying she has “not been serious over the last couple of years,” The Hill writes. “Bachmann has publicly been gracious toward Palin in public, but Rollins's comments indicate that there could be more sniping between the two Tea Party favorites if both decide to enter the presidential race.”
But Mother Jones finds instances when new Bachmann adviser Ed Rollins criticized his new boss as not a serious candidate. Rollins’ explanation? "That was before she hired me!” he said, in part.
CAIN: Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain said on CNN last night that his biggest problem with President Obama is his "lack of leadership," NBC’s Matt Loffman notes. "Lack of leadership on those critical issues, particularly the economy, is my number one problem with what the president is doing," Cain said.
GINGRICH: Today Newt Gingrich will sign the Strong America Now deficit reduction pledge, a group promoting cutting the deficit by promoting business practices known as the Lean Six Sigma strategy, the New Hampshire Union-Leader reports. “Gingrich will sign the pledge at C&M Machine Products, Inc. in Hudson, which describes itself on its web site as ‘a world class supplier of precision components to Fortune 500 companies, as well as middle and lower tier manufacturers.’”
HUNTSMAN: Huntsman will make his third trip to New Hampshire this Friday, Real Clear Politics reports, for “a total of about eight public events in two days. Add that to the 11 from this past weekend and the 13 he attended three weeks before, and Huntsman will have held an eye-popping 32 Granite State events in less than a month, far outpacing the visits of his competition.”
PALIN: “A Democratic congressman from Oregon is questioning whether it was appropriate for the National Park Service to give special treatment to former Alaska governor Sarah Palin during her recent ‘One Nation’ bus tour to historic sites on the East Coast,” the Washington Post writes. “Representative Earl Blumenauer, an Oregon Democrat who sits on the House Ways and Means and Budget committees, sent a letter yesterday to Park Service director John Jarvis asking for an accounting of whether taxpayer resources were spent to accommodate the Palins.”
PAWLENTY: The New York Times on Pawlenty’s speech in Chicago yesterday: “Former Gov. Tim Pawlenty called on Tuesday for more than $2 trillion in tax cuts for individuals and businesses over the next decade and two to three times as much in federal spending reductions and loophole closings, saying that such policies would drive rapid economic growth."
The AP: “The former Minnesota governor's plan aims for a bullish 5 percent annual growth that would balance the federal budget while forgoing trillions of dollars in tax revenue… His own team acknowledged the assumptions were aggressive. One critic called it ‘patently ridiculous,’” as sustained 5 percent growth for a decade would be unprecedented in modern times.
According to Politico, Conservative group Club for Growth’s president Chris Chocola praised Pawlenty’s speech, writing that Pawlenty was “exactly right in calling for cleaning up the tax code by instituting flatter tax rates and eliminating tax loopholes and giveaways. His support for cutting the corporate tax rate, eliminating the capital gains tax and dividend tax is outstanding.”
ROMNEY: Per NBC’s Loffman, Romney said in a CNN interview that he would not let his religious beliefs influence decisions he would make as president including abortion rights and gay rights -- though he believes that marriage should be between one man and one woman. He refused to be labeled as a "spokesman" for the Mormon Church. "I'm not here in a religious context; I'm here as a candidate for president," he said. "And as a candidate for president, or as a president, I would have to represent the interests of all the people."
According to a new Quinnipiac Poll, “More than a third of U.S. voters have some qualms about a Mormon president, even as Republicans prefer former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney over other presidential candidates,” Bloomberg writes. While 36% of voters say they were “somewhat” or “entirely uncomfortable” with a Mormon presidential candidate, Mitt Romney led the Republican field with 25 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents.
The Boston Globe’s Viser looks at Romney’s more laid-back style this time around: “As he reintroduces himself to Republican voters, Mitt Romney is increasingly trying to highlight a more casual side of himself” that appears designed to make Romney appear more, well, average. But some suggest the updated style runs the risk of making him seem calculating, and willing to change his image if that’s what it takes to become president.”


Choices, choices, choices. Nope, not a single one is qualified to be President. Last man standing is Romney and I don't think this country is ready for a Mormon President.
"Choices, choices, choices. Nope, not a single one is qualified to be President."
The current President was the least qualified in modern times when he was elected, and he still is less qualified after 2 1/2 years of failure in office.
More than half a century after the election of the first Roman Catholic president, I can't believe Romney's religion is this big of a deal. His flip-flops, yes; his religion, no.
Mormonism is viewed with skepticism by many followed only by Scientology. You have to know the the weird things like protective underwear and all the traditional non Christian beliefs are going to up in non sanctioned attack ads and the Christian right is going to try to destroy him.
Gotta hand in to the Democrats. When none of the Republican presidential hopefuls like Mitt Romney or John Whats-his-name could grab one headline from the Sarah Palin and her Catch Me Catch Me Tour, Anthony Weiner came up with a brilliant plan with the Democratic National Committee in an effort to diminish Palin’s rising star.
Read more of our thoughts at "I Mean... What?!?" #ixzz1Oh3BpnVe
Protective underwear? What's up with that. That's as weird as the crown of thorns or whatever torture device it is Opus Dei members wear!
Protective undies? What is the protection offered- makes junk invisible to cameras? What the .....?
Eww! <rubbing hands together> I can't wait to see the new "House Wives of DC" reality show starring Palin and Bachmann. I'm sure it will be just as catty and immature as the brain numbing TV reality series "House Wives".
99% reality TV is mind killing crap that helps turn our citizens into brain dead worker zombies for the oligarchy. Sadly, as a friend of mine and I were saying earlier this morning,
"Who needs reality TV when you have this cycle's Republican candidates or Washington DC in general??"
The phony moonbat mantra:
"Religion doesn't matter, shouldnt be part of the political discussion...pssst...hey religious conservatives, did you know Mormons wear secret underwear?"
Mitt Romney is mockingly put on the cover of liberal Newsweek as a whitesocked Mormon holding a Bible...(Newsweek was apparently tired of running dozens of worshipful Obama cover stories)
Perhaps religion shouldn't matter. However, President Obama was criticized for his attendance at Rev. Wright's church in Chicago, and for the church he chose to attend Easter Sunday. People were worried that he was hearing "un-American" sermons. President Kennedy had to assure people that he wouldn't be taking orders from the Vatican. Because non-Mormon people don't know what kinds of sermons and advice people get inside the temples, they are also worried about rumors. If someone is "evangelical," that essentially means that they don't belong to a regular denomination, but attend where they like the pastor or preacher in charge. If someone is AME or Roman Catholic or Southern Baptist or Congregational or Lutheran, people have a short-hand knowledge of the basic tenets of those religions. If people think that religion or religious messages influence Presidential candidates, there will always be questions about the lesser-known religions. Yet if a candidate said he or she had no religion, that probably wouldn't go down well either.
I can't wait for the real candidates to turn on Palin for her constant upstaging. Mitt is the guy to beat but he has flip flop issues but his ideas are more main stream than the rest of the crowd. One big problem if the GOP really backs this end to social security that would ber too much. Bachmann has issues on cutting vets benefits and push to far to the right will back fire.
Good article. Palin can't make a dent.
Did anyone see the funny story about Palin's tour???