Here’s our write-up of the latest NBC/WSJ poll: “As negotiators in Congress squabble over the size and scope of spending cuts for the remainder of the fiscal year, Democrats and Republicans outside the Beltway differ dramatically in how they want their leaders to handle the budget stalemate… In a contrast that illustrates why the standoff has pushed the federal government to the verge of a shutdown, the poll finds an overwhelming majority of Democrats wanting the leaders of their party in Congress to compromise, and a majority of Republicans wanting theirs to stand firm.”
The Wall Street Journal’s take: “Republican lawmakers are caught between the demands of their conservative base insisting they hold their ground on deep budget cuts and the wishes of political independents they will need in the 2012 election who are pressing for compromise.”
The New York Times says the budget stalemate is a test for both President Obama and Speaker Boehner. “The outcome will help determine whether Mr. Boehner is leading his party or following the demands of the Tea Party movement. For Mr. Obama, it is the biggest test yet of whether he can reposition himself as a pragmatic leader who can recapture the political center and keep liberals sufficiently energized to help him win re-election.”
Here’s a breakdown of what could be affected if the government shuts down. Your taxes, however, would still be due on time (this year, that’s April 18.)
The Boston Globe’s editorial page: “The elephant in the room in the struggle to avoid a disastrous government shutdown is that there are, in fact, two elephants in the room: Republican congressional leaders, who are seeking meaningful concessions from President Obama, and the Republican Tea Party wing that is trying to use the budget to roll back government.” Its suggestion: Boehner “and other mainstream conservative” should cut a deal. “[I]t’s hard to see how a DC implosion would be a win for House Republicans. It’s clear that they’re the holdouts — the ones proudly refusing to bend — even though they are only one-third of the constitutional law-making process,” the paper writes.
And: [T]he Tea Party wing has instead chosen to chew up valuable time with assaults on tiny line items that offend their anti-government ideology — from birth control to PBS programs to AmeriCorps volunteering. Taken together, these items don’t amount to a single bean, let alone a hill of beans, in a budget of which 88 percent is devoted to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and defense. It’s blatantly false advertising to suggest that discretionary items like Planned Parenthood have anything more than a token bearing on the deficit.”
Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) is circulating a letter indicating he will not take a salary if the government shuts down, something he’s calling a “No Budget, No Pay” pledge. “I will forego my federal salary until we reach an agreement,” he writes. “I will donate my salary to charity or return it to the Treasury until the government works again… The bottom line is this: I can’t imagine that the President, Vice President or any Member of Congress – Republican or Democrat – thinks they should get paid when the government has shut down.”
“Partisan divisions hardened yesterday as Republicans began pushing a $3.5 trillion 2012 federal budget through a House committee, with backers calling it a sobering correction for the nation’s spending binge and critics labeling it an assault on health programs for retirees and the poor,” AP reports.
“Senate Democrats yesterday defeated a Republican effort to ban the Environmental Protection Agency from controlling the gases blamed for global warming,” AP reports.


In light of the twin environmental disasters, the Gulf oil spill and the Japanese nuclear plant emission problem, I want every single voter in America to read this line:
Republicans attack environmental protection laws in defense of corporate interests. In Maine, the Tea Party governor allowed lobbyists for the chemical industry to literally write his proposals for "deregulation," including repealling a ban on BPA (a cancer causing chemical) from children's articles like sippy cups.
What global warming? No doubt the halls of Congress are air-conditioned, and once you're inside the Beltway, do you ever go out again without having to click your heels together three times?
It's always a comfortable 72 degrees in OZ.
The good news is that half the Senate -- including Democrats Joe Manchin (W. Va.), Mary Landrieu (La.), Mark Pryor (Ark.) and Ben Nelson (Neb.) -- have said that the EPA should not be twisting the 1970 Clean Air Act into a vehicle for undemocratically pursuing sweeping energy tax regulations. The only Republican to vote no was Susan Collins (Maine).
Proposed EPA mandates would serve as an unprecedented power grab over much of the U.S. economy and immediately impose costly new regulations leading to massive job losses and making U.S. businesses far less competitive in the world. Congress never gave the EPA the power to pursue these job-killing regulations.
You can bet if all salaries including the Congress were to be held up, they would be settling on a budget that both parties would live with quickly. There is no restrictions on Congress when all this folly is being played out to make a name for themselves. They are playing with the American people now and that is unacceptable.
Good for Senator Manchin. If the government shuts down, NO ONE on Capital Hill should receive a paycheck. I saw some Congressman on the Last Word saying it is in the Constitution for Congress to still get paid (in response to Lawrence O'Donnell's question about the issue). He did not appear to understand the unfair concept of Congress still getting paid while the government shut down and others are not getting paid. He seemed really insulted that the question was even posed because by gosh, it's in the Constitution. No other government workers get paid, but hey, he still has is. Nice. Does this not highlight the Republican doctrine.
These riders have no place in these budget talks and to shut down the government over ideological social policies is abdicating their responsibilities. Furthermore, it shows the Republicans blatant hypocrisy. Less government - yeah right. But government intrusion is okay when Republicans are trying to dictate their morals on society. My way or the highway. And they do it with a straight face. But then again, why am I surprised. According to them, the budget crisis is ALL President Obama's fault. They somehow forget their part in it from 2000 - 2008. How convenient. Must be nice. I hope the Democrats stand their ground and not budge when it comes to the riders.
Should President Obama defer his salary as well? As head of the Democratic Party, he has failed for 2 years to get a budget passed.
Yes, he should. Although, I do not think he would have a problem with it. I was under the impression it was up to Congress to pass a budget. He can cajole until the end of time, but it is still up to Congress to pass the budget. And before you take my head off and say the Democrats did not pass a budget for the last two years, I understand a budget was passed in the House but got hung up in the Senate (with filibusters). I may be wrong, but that is what I understand to have happened.
I am so sick of OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS holding us hostage! You were hired to do a job, the greatest and most important job in America, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE INTERESTS OF THE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES! (Yelling intended.)
We are tired of your self-aggrandizing and your focus on the next election!
Do the work you were sent to do and stop acting like spoiled children! You do not care one whit about the citizens of this country or you would put your self-interests aside and make the tough decisions.
Quit worrying about how this will affect your re-election and get to work, ALL OF YOU!