Arthur the Aardvark (front), Rep. Paul Tonko (D-NY) (left), Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA) outside the Capitol Feb. 16.
From NBC's Shawna Thomas
Arthur the Aardvark didn’t need to say anything at the foot of the Capitol today to make sure the cameras showed up. His mere presence was enough to spark the curiosity of the media. The popular PBS children’s character silently stood outside with a goofy grin, flanked by members of Congress, because the Corporation for Public Broadcasting’s funding is once again on the chopping block by Republicans. (Here's a First Read history of the fight over funding for public media, courtesy of msnbc.com's Carrie Dann.)
This time the funding has been zeroed out in the Republicans’ continuing resolution that’s being debated on the House Floor. Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) and other Democrats announced plans to introduce an amendment to add back funding for the CPB and said that this is an ideological fight.
"Is this a fiscal fight or a cultural fight?" asked one reporter.
Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA) answered, "This is an ideological attack on [the] public broadcasting system. Again, it happened in 1995 as soon as they took over the House the last time. It happened after President Bush was elected. This is just part of a reoccurring habit."
Markey then warned his colleagues that voting against the public broadcasting system would be "at their own political peril." He continued, "There's a razor-sharp edge to this issue back home."
While Markey couldn't give a whip count, he seemed optimistic about the prospects of the amendment. However, Blumenauer seemed worried about the lack of moderate Republicans in the House.
"In the past, we have been successful, because there has been a strong, moderate, thoughtful Republican base of support where we had dozens of people," he said, adding, "There were a number of them that were involved with this and who were upfront, but now there is an undercurrent that is unsettling."
Sunday, CPB released a statement that read: "We understand the challenges to our economy as a result of increasing budget deficits, but the proposed elimination of funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) will not address this challenge in a meaningful way...proposed action would directly result in cuts to the 1,300 public television and radio stations that provide this service. " The CPB supports more than 1,100 "locally-owned-and-operated public television and radio stations nationwide."
Blumenauer's amendment would put $460 million back into the CBP's budget by taking it away from the "percentage-depletion allowance for oil and gas wells.”
However, due to rules governing how appropriations bills can be written, this amendment will most likely be subject to a point-of-order objection, which would invalidate it.
Blumenauer office's complained about the amendment process in an email: "The way that the rules are written, there is no possible way to offer meaningful amendments in the minority. This is an intentional rule-making trap that the new majority uses to shut out the minority from meaningfully contributing to the discussion."


"But, but, it's for the children."
Hey - maybe the teachers' union could pony up some cash. What's that, fat chance?
Yeah, you are probably right.
Or, we could eliminate the TWO wars the Republicans started. Oh, and Medicare Part D (you know, the gift to the GOP drug lords), or we could stop giving tax breaks to billionaires, or hedge fund managers could pay the same rate we normal folks do.
Aardvark's - The latest constituency group for the Democrats.
I can see Katie Couric now: "And in the latest Time/CBS poll, it was shown that Aardvarks favor the Democrats 2-1 over the Republicans. Ask to comment on this significant Aardvark voting gap, Speaker of the House John Boehner said 'We understand that gap, but we think we can make up for it with our legislation that favors the Giraffes' ".
Spanky-
Hey - maybe the teachers' union could pony up some cash. What's that, fat chance?
At least unions fought to get fair wages and benefits. So you need to SU. You'd probably be begging-- Please Master can I have a penny raise-- and can I stop working 60 hours 7 days a week?
Not every the Army will stop the unions.
Mightcan, why is Part D helping grandma afford her medicine bad but Obamacare helping grandma afford her medicine good? No one has yet offered me a logical reason for this.
Nothing wrong with Part D except that it illustrates Conservative Republican hypocrisy two ways;
1) Republican created a massive new entitlement program just to corral some senior votes.
2) The "part of fiscal responsibility" did it with no mechanism for payment...exploding the deficit.
What is the fuss all about? In previous discussions about NPR and in articles in the print media, didn't the NPR even indicated that government funding is but a small portion of their budget? If so, why have a discussion about it, just because any $$$$ may be cut from their program?
Heck, when does Arthur the Aardvark begin to deamonize the GOP?
I don't know about you, but I sure as hell would have no soul if I wantonly killed funding that educated millions of our children through their shows throughout the decades and offered an alternate view on the world we live in everyday. Only a sorry assed scumbag who is so desperate to get elected/re-elected could be so cruel.
Gee, Kevin, don't be shy, tell us what you really think!
But I agree with you - if I had kids, and allowed them "x" number of hours of tv a week, would I rather they spend it watching "Nova" and "American Experience"? Or Donald Trump's "The Apprentice" and "Sarah Palin's Alaska"?
"However, Blumenauer seemed worried about the lack of moderate Republicans in the House.
"In the past, we have been successful, because there has been a strong, moderate, thoughtful Republican base of support where we had dozens of people," he said,"
Emphasis on "thoughtful".....
Those people without souls just posted above you, Kevin.
Honestly.
Seems to me for the $1.39 per YEAR per person we spend on CPB Big Bird, This Old House, Rick Steve's travelogues, and especially Red Green are worth keeping.
NDD, is it true that Red Green isn't popular up your way because a lot of folks don't know it isn't a documentary? (sorry, couldn't resist :) )
Adding to the list: conservatives have no soul because they think that PBS could try to sink or swim on its own.
Ok Anna M, why is PBS so special it gets gov. money? Why not the History channel? How do you decide? How about Animal Planet? How about Spike?
Spanky -
Those are all cable channels. Believe it or not, some of us can't afford cable.
That is just pathetic. Can't afford cable channels? Life is a choice. Some choose premium cable, some choose not to go to college. Some chose to work only 40 hours per week.
Thank goodness cable is not [yet] an entitlement.
re-elected by who? Oh yea...the sorry ass scumbag parents of the poor little kid missing out on that indoctrination..er education by public media.
It is NEVER in the Republicans interest to have anyone reporting news that isn't filtered through a corperate advertisers rightwing bias. That includes MSNBC, CBS, ABC. Liberal media is a myth. At the very least the American people deserve news that is based on REAL journalism and not reporting tilted toward thier rise in the corperate hierarchy or advertisers fear of rightwing hate campaigns.
Anyone who is so far left they thing the media is biased to the right scares me. You and my sister in law should enjoy each other's company, though.
Really? Someone here was bragging yesterday about Fox News mopping the floor with the other cable news networks. Talk radio is probably 90% Conservative. The proprietors of Politico declare "Drudge rules our world."
None of these are "the media"?
Maybe we could fund Elmo and leave Charlie Rose to find his own sponsors.
I don't know- them there aardvarks have been known to put out some pretty socialist, communist propaganda. You know- ants FOR each , according to his appetite, ants TO each, according to the size of his schnozz.
(then, there's all that 'be a good citizen', be a good neighbor' and 'treat others fairly' goddamned garbage)
How about a little cold hard reality? When Bev. and Fiesty were kids... wait that was before tv.
When Drive By was a kid...no that won't work either there was no Sesame Street that long ago.
When I was a kid all there frigging was was Seseme Street, the Electric Co. and PBS crud. But see nowdays the children 1. have a million channels all courtesy of the good old provate sector, 2. shiny new dvds, and 3. most only want to play video and internet only.
Sorry PBS, you, like the post office, travel agents, video stores and the like are just not needed.
Or hey, prove me wrong [it's easy I'm told], pull a Leverne and Shirley - make it on your own.
What about the African-American Aardvarks? Aren't they victims too? What can the Democrats do for them?
Kill all the RED ants with chlordane, and that would only leave the ........ Uh, never mind.
If they're giving spelling lessons, then you're wrong.
New Democratic Win The Future (WTF) campaign slogan: "Amnesty for Aardvarks Now!!"
Catchy. I like it.
Oh JoAnnaSmith1... have you always been such a 'mean girl'?
Lyn, how can you call JoAnna Smith1 a mean girl? Why not look to the keyboard twins for this honor? The continually revert to schoolyard taunts when confronting someone with common sense.
Mr. Rogers, Kermit the Frog and Barney taught me to share...the commie bastards!!!
Look, folks, when times are desperate, the movie money is the first thing to go.
But, tell you what- since all of Hollywood will be up in arms over this, what say THEY pony up?
I, for one, would take their pronouncements a lot more seriously if for once, they put their money where their mouths are.
no joe, no bo, nj
i can't believe what some here are saying, my son was raised watching barney, and author, and thomas the tank, what is wrong with funding programs that are good for children. we don't have a problem spending money on Prisons, war, tax cuts, what the hell is wrong with PBS!!!
i watch PBS all the time, Nova, and american experince are must see TV for me and I'm 48. your never too old to learn new things.
whats going to happen is they will have to find a sponser. if the gun lobby can ask for funding what not PBS!!!!
What's wrong with PBS is what's wrong with a lot of government programs- they are not essential services that must be provided through government funding.
PBS started when there were very few channels available and there was no such thing as VCRs, DVDs, Netflix, cable, any of that. There are a lot of free channels these days- if someone wants to pick up Sesame St, they will and they will fund it privately. Or PBS will fill the other 2 weeks a year with fund raising drives. The world will not end without Antiques Road Show. Ken Burns will sell his documentaries (Excellent by the way, some of them should be required viewing) to the History Channel or Nat Geo and become even more rich so you can hate on him for more taxes. Frankly, nearly every study I've seen recently says TV of any kind turns kids to mush, educational or not, so maybe we'd be doing ourselves a favor if we, say, spent an hour reading books to our kids and grandkids instead of parking them in front of the idiot box for an hour so you can check your email. We need to curtail our spending habit. So which would you rather see, cuts to welfare or cuts to welfare TV?
Democrats using 'children' as human shields...despicable.
OK, then, keep PBS children's programming...but defund the rest of PBS/NPR taxpayer funded leftist propaganda networks...
"Antiques Roadshow" and "Masterpiece Theater" are leftist propaganda?
On the other hand, we gotta get rid of that "In Performance At the White House" show.....I mean, Paul McCartney and Mikhail Baryshnilkov are bad enough, but I hear they had that leftist propaganda U.S. Marine Corps Band on there one time too.....
Especially when they do that Fourth of July Show, you know the one ALL the Armed Forces Bands play at the U.S Capitol, performers from every genre of music, actors, and even on occasion, Jim Henson's Muppets show up... YEAH, THAT COMMIE SHOW!!!
Wait. Wait. if we take Money away from Public TV how are the Libbies going to Teach and Baby Sit their Kids..
I mean after all .. Making them Read a book or spending time with their kids cant be good for them.
We can sit 'em in front of Fox. They still have plenty of children's programming on.
But at least they would be Getting Fact. Unlike the rest of the Junk you let them watch..
Let's compare the literacy rates, the drop-out rates, and the teen pregnancy rates -- just to name a few rates -- in the red states with the rates in the blue states, shall we, Stevie? How's all that home schoolin' working out, anyway? Texas is still 50th, as far as I know.
Sure Anna. Lets do that . but lets Comapre all of the the Innercity Liberal Democrat controlled Big City Areas to the Rural Conservative Areas.. .. I mean Afteralll there is really Not much Liberalism outside of the BIG CITIES...
Chicago, Detroit, LA, NYC, all at or near the top right ANNA?
You are bagging on home schooling? What, not a fan of the Duggars? 19 and counting, and not one of those little bastards are on the dole. Odd, no?
I don't know, Steve - but you could try asking my super-libbie tree-hugger brother and his wife - they limit my nephew's screen time (and that includes tv, DVD's, video games, etc.) to two hours a day, we go to all his baseball games every summer, and the last book he finished reading was 528 pages long. But hey, he's only 9 - I'm sure he'll improve with age......he already knows when to use capital letters and when not to.....
The US Census Bureau's 2005 rankings for percentage of people 25 years and older who have completed high school:
US Average - 84.2%
51. Mississippi - 78.5%
50. Texas - 78.8%
49. Kentucky - 79.0%
48. California - 80.1%
47. Alabama - 80.3%
46. Louisiana - 80.5%
45. Arkansas - 81.0%
43. (tie) Tennessee / West Virginia - 81.2%
42. South Carolina - 81.7%
Oh come on Joanne, let's hear about your wonderful children.
Hey Da Noid, did you happen to catch to total amount of money Cali spends each year to get to 48?
So you think we here in Cali are getting a good deal?
Thanks DN. Looks a lot like the list of states that are net importers of federal funding, doesn't it?
Spanky,,
My Question would be. How do Los Angeles and San Deigo.. and San Francisco. and Sacramento stack up agasint the Rest of the State.. Liberal Bastions of each State compared to the Conservative Bastions .. this is the Real Test............
Spanky -
I know how desperately important it is to you to have the last word in any discussion, so on behalf of my fellow posters, here it is:
Zyzzyva: [ziz-uh-vuh] (-noun) - A genus of tropical American weevil often found in association with palms. It is a snouted beetle. "Zyzzyva" is the last word in many English language dictionaries.
See, it would be a lot faster to type, which will give you that much more time for that spying on your supposed employees' Internet use that you seem to be so proud of doing over there at Do As I Say, Not As I Do, Inc. - and almost as politically edifying as any other comment you make. It also probably gets you a ton of points in Scrabble, especially if you can land it on a triple word score. And it has such a nice ring to it, don't you think?
Zyzzyva! Zyzzyva!! Zyzzyva!!!!
You're welcome - any time!
P.S. I don't have any children - do you?
Last word? Really. Huh, cause I'm pretty sure the fun goes on around here all night and sometimes on Saturdays. But I like the advis. Now what is your advise for Fiesty and Bev.?
And let's get it straight - you get to do what you want when it's your show. My computers, my server, my data storage. Funny thing is many of my associates will one day be on their own, which is a very good thing. Up and out is the motto, but remeber the average first year associate at a top tier firm STARTS at $160,000 plus, so they are usually eager to get out there on their own, where they can earn the "big" bucks.
But sorry I don't play scabble.
I have two kids.
Zyzzyva. Nope, just not nearly as much fun.
Noid? 51?
You Republicans have no heart and soul To hell with classical music. To hell with international reporting of important issues and events. To hell with the PUBLIC part of PBS. This is YOUR network. I am so sick of these Republicans tearing aprt our country.
PBS presents TRUTH and unbiased reporting that is absent on every corporate network in this country. If they were to have to go with more corporate funding it would no longer be what it is today.
Republicans....you are going DOWN in 2012. Keep over reaching, and I can guarantee it!
PBS offers "unbiased" reporting? Give me a break. Look at all the "unbaised" comments made by the openly leftist commentators on PBS. Ask Juan Williams how bias PBS is! Duh!
FuS, care to provide any examples, or is this a "because I said so" statement?
Steve-505729
Wait. Wait. if we take Money away from Public TV how are the Libbies going to Teach and Baby Sit their Kids..
I mean after all .. Making them Read a book or spending time with their kids cant be good for them.
Steve your a complete Idiott, even reagan did not reduce funding for PBS. PBS is a educational engine that i can see your never bothered to watch, your post tells us this.
At the end of the day, we have an invasion of posters who are full of snark and nasty comments.
Really, we all know that GOP/TP support anything that keeps people ignorant and under educated, and less likely when older, these same kids perhaps will fall under the spell of Faux News thereby ensuring another generation of fools to follow the next generation of Limbaughs, Hannitys, Becks, et al.
Why would anyone want to diminish America and all that is good about it?
Another rally cry to bring America down from the fools on the right.
Well said GingerB. You really now how to make then prove a point.
I trust you read what you wrote? Did you by chance see any snark or nasty comments? Or is it really called "Faux" News? And are they all "fools on the right?"
Priceless.
Snap :)
The Democrats are the ones who want to keep people down by keeping them totally dependent on the Governmenthandouts so they can ensure their votes at the ballot box. Democrats do not want people to succeed on their own... then they would not need the Democrats. So which side of the aisle is really trying to keep people poor and ignorant?
OK, that's a thesis, how about some evidence? Otherwise you're just spitting out what you heard on the radio or Fox News.
The poor and ignorant have been consistently sold the premise that Democrats will give them anything and that they represent their interests. I agree that Democrats are very good at championing the most vulnerable poor in our society, but they always just give them just enough to survive and stay on the Government dole. Democrats never challenge minorities to aspire to greater achievements and to raise themselves out of their poverty. (For example, Democrats fought welfare reform which forced people to look for work) God bless the ones who do take a different individual achievement route. When they finally do achieve a better standard of living through work, they usually convert to being Republicans. Then as they reach Social Security age, they return again to being Democrats because they want that Government payback and again live off the Government dole. At least, they have paid into the Social Security fund by then. It is a vicious cycle that is repeated over and over again ... unfortunately. I don't need Fox News to tell me that... I see it daily! The only problem with all this is that none ever cares about the long term debt of our country or wwhat "you can do for this country" along the way! It is a "give me mine" syndrome that is taking over our country... and no one wins if this continues. We need a complete reset of our Nation's values and refocus on individual responsibilities instead of lazy managed existence that seems to be the Democrat's approach and has kept many of them in Congress. We don't inspire people anymore... We just seem to say it is okay to just exist, so many inthis Nation say Vote for Democrats .. They willl give me everything I need and never aspire to be anything more. Okay, enough of this soapbox!
Let Big Bird keep the money and we can stop giving big oil their billions from our tax dollars.
Speaking of reading and education - February - Black History Month
What an honor it must have been for Lawrence O’Donnell to have been at the ceremony with Bill Russell yesterday in the White House, along with the other well deserved recipients of this very prestigous award. Lawrence gave a beautiful tribute to Russell on his program last night. Will we EVER see a statute of him here in Boston? I hope so.
I never forgot when Lawrence invited Bill Russell to be a guest along with author Isabel Wilkerson on The Last Word to talk about her new book "Warmth of Other Suns" which I went and bought and will be reading this weekend. I am so so looking forward to it. It's always a joy for me to see so many authors on PBS & MSNBC & CSPAN talking about books which unfortunately too often slip through the cracks for lack of exposure.
I have just finished a book by Edward Ball, a young man who wrote a fascinating book several years ago about his ancestors in South Carolina who were slave owners/traders. The name of the book is "Slaves In The Family". He told how about how through the years whenever he looked at old photos of his long ago ancestors, he was always curious about the blacks in the photos and wanted to know more about them – their names, where they came from, etc. So he began his research in the 1600’s with the very first Balls coming to America. The very beginning of slavery here in America. We know that there were "relations" in his family back then between white plantation owners, (and their sons) and their slaves, many many of whom became pregnant. And so he traveled all across the country meeting many of these descendents, who he was related to. The older people he met had many many stories that they told him. He as well came with many stories he was able to learn about their ancestors. He visited the sites where nearly two dozen plantations were once in his family, and which after the Civil War, were sold or lost. It was a remarkable book. What struck me most about his story was on the one hand all his cousins were living enriched lives with great educations and lovely families, yet you couldn't help but feel the sadness and in many cases - anger - that they still carry for their long ago ancestors who were slaves. It was a brutal life back then.
And so now I will read Warmth Of Other Suns, which tells the story of the migration up north by blacks in the south early in the 20th Century, after having lived in the south for generations as either slaves or under Jim Crow laws. We talk and read so much about our own white ancestors from Europe. We should pay more attention to blacks and their ancestors and what their lives were like as compared to our ancestors.
I have seen discussions lately about whether or not white people should write about black history. It would be a tragedy if they didn’t. Anyone with the capacity to write well should write about black history, regardless of skin color.
New York Times/Snippet from review of Ms. Wilkerson’s Book Warm Of Other Suns: In the winter of 1916, as Americans read the news of unimaginable slaughter in a distant yet rapidly spreading European war, it was easy to overlook stories like the one in The Chicago Defender reporting that several black families in Selma, Ala., had left the South. A popular African-American weekly, The Defender would publish dozens of such stories in the coming years, heralding the good jobs and friendly neighbors that awaited these migrants in Chicago, even printing train schedules to point the way north. Smuggled into Southern railroad depots by Pullman porters, dropped off by barnstorming black athletes and entertainers, The Defender emerged as both cheerleader and chronicler of an exodus that would lead about six million African-Americans to abandon the states of the Old Confederacy between 1915 and 1970.
_________________
I'm now learning about Boston going back to the end of the Civil War and how freed slaves came north to live here in Boston. Beginning in the 1880's, things started to change for the worse for them. And it's a tragedy.
Education. The most important thing we can give our children. Especially our history. Our ENTIRE history. I have found over and over and over that we will never ever have a complete understanding of our country unless we are open to teaching and being aware of all of it. Don't let a good education go by the wayside. It's what defines us. I can't begin to count the times I have read a book about things in our past and have gone on to tell the story to countless adults who frankly, had no idea - and they feel ashamed for not knowing.
It shouldn't be.
Pat Boston MA
Speaking of reading and education - February - Black History Month
I'm now learning about Boston going back to the end of the Civil War and how freed slaves came north to live here in Boston. Beginning in the 1880's, things started to change for the worse for them. And it's a tragedy.
Education. The most important thing we can give our children. Especially our history. Our ENTIRE history. I have found over and over and over that we will never ever have a complete understanding of our country unless we are open to teaching and being aware of all of it. Don't let a good education go by the wayside. It's what defines us. I can't begin to count the times I have read a book about things in our past and have gone on to tell the story to countless adults who frankly, had no idea - and they feel ashamed for not knowing.
It shouldn't be.
Thank you, Pat
Good to see you back. I hope your time off did you good.
Chris Matthews speaks about the Northerns who fought in the Civil War and he is proud of it. I'm assuming he has linage from the Civil War. Even though Chris talks all over him self I have a lot of respect for and you too. Let's not forget the movie Glory.
My cousin and I have been saying we were going to the Archives in Arkansas to do our Genealogy. It would be very difficult for us to use ancestor. com. I've tried it. Anyhow as luck would have it my cousin was in a library in St. louis skimming through books. low and behold he opened a random book to find that we are related to Booker T Washington.
Anyhow, still I'd like to know since we are Franklins, if we are related to Ben? Oh, my girl friend, in, her late 60's, is the great, great, great great, granddaughter of Thomas Jefferson. I've seen the book , i guess that's what you call from their family reunions. Her mother died at 101. She could have passed for a Caucasian woman; honestly. My girl friend never had kids. so that ends the DNA for her. But, there are lots of other to carry on in her family lineage.
one thing I'd like to say is we really should know about AA history so we an see how we all interconnected. E pluris unum.
Lastly, the Right wing is trying to take AA history away and deny slavery existed. I'm proud of my ancestors because if it wasn't for their endurance I wouldn't be here. Both my maternal and paternal never jumped off the boat that brought them here either. Too me that is special.
You know the stories about the sharks following the slave ships? Some African threw their babies over board, some captured jumped rather that be a slave, and of course the dead were cast overboard.
Anyhow, I 'm here.
One more story when I was NY I took a ferry to the see the Statue of Liberty. When we passed Ellis Island, one lady said on this is so sad; that's where the immigrants had to stay. I thought, ummm, would if they had come over on a slave ship in shackles?
Beverly, what a lovely lovely post. Yes, the right are trying so hard to redefine history and we can't ever ever allow it. They are ignorant, they are liars, and they have no problem with skirting the truth in their favor. But there are so many white authors out there who are willing to tell us exactly what our history is, whether it be slavery, Jim Crow, the Indians, etc. I have attempted to use Ancestry.com and wasn't happy with it at all. Most of my background I have learned through family members, although I do question their assumptions on who we're related to dating back to the 1600's, simply because of our last name.
But I love what you just told me. You should be proud. You have much to be proud of Beverly.
I have spent so many years reading about the Pilgrims/Puritans/Founding Fathers/Revolutionary War (because of where I was brought up) and WWII/the Holocaust, The Cold War and so on. But I found in the past year, that it is Black History that moves me unlike any other subject. It touches me very deeply, because as you said, it shows just how interconnected we all are.
Keith O. has been taking lovely photographs of NYC and it got me to thinking about the city and its founding. I'm on my third book on the founding of New York by the Dutch back in the 1600's, which was then put into English hands, back to the Dutch and then finally given back to the English until the Revolutionary War. It's a great story. One thing I learned and was pretty surprised. John Jacob Astor, the first multi-millionaire in the country. I always assumed he was an early settler of NYC in the 17th Century for some reason. I always pictured him on barren lands living in the lower part of Manhattan. Come to find out he didn't arrive here until after the Revolutionary War, and he was related to one of the Hessians who fought against us in that War.
John Jacob Astor's great grandson(?I think) died on the Titanic.
Life goes on. And in the meantime, teach our children well. It's our responsibility.
Talk to you soon Beverly.
Great cut and paste Bev.......keep producing those interesting liberal comments to educate those of us from a differenct value system. Great job, good comments, boring.
Anything to refute Bev, safecracker, or is your role limited to taking pot shots at people?
Pot shots John B......My role today is to read and comment on Bev and her silly pastes.
How about I contribute this for your pleasure today. No value, no political value other than it is funny, to anyone but an extreme left-wing libbie:
My dog sleeps about 20 hours a day. She has her food prepared for her. She can eat whenever she wants, 24/7/365. Her meals are provided at no cost to her. She visits the Dr. Once a year for her checkup, and again during the year if any medical needs arise. For this she pays nothing, and nothing is required of her. She lives in a nice neighborhood in a house that is much larger than she needs, but she is not required to do any upkeep. If she makes a mess, someone else cleans it up. She has her choice of luxurious places to sleep. She receives these accommodations absolutely free. She is living like a queen, and has absolutely no expenses whatsoever. All of her costs are picked up by others who go out and earn a living every day. I was just thinking about all this, and suddenly it hit me like a brick in the head...
My dog is a Democrat ! She may also be a card-carrying member of the Canine Union!!!
You will not find it funny, but it similarity is there to many of us. And as I said, no real revelence to this.
Just have to love how the GOP proposes a cut and the liberals trot out perhaps the only worthy sliver of programming that may well indeed be worth keeping. Then the posters on this thread come back with statistics trying to prove that liberals or liberal states are "more educated."
This is better than comedy.
Perhaps we should keep the children's programming and scrap the rest. Cut the budget by 95%.
I especially liked the statistics on states high school graduation rates as a symbol of "intelligence." Any person who has worked in public education knows it is the inner city liberal bastions that are by far and away the source of the weakest educational standards. And even where they do manage to obtain a diploma, the literacy rate is, well weak at best. The opposite is generally true in the suburbs, where many states pass laws to redirect the funding to try and improve the inner city literacy. Using this as a symbol of superior liberal educational standards in "Blue States" is absolutely "retarded."
The real problem is fixing the standards in inner city schools. If our energy was focused there instead of public broadcasting, the line of conversation would be productive.
Factually based sources of information will always be under attack by Republicans, because the facts tend not to support their ideology. THis would include news hour and the like on PBS and NPR.
There was a time when Republicans based their decisions off of facts, but that time has long passed. Now its a strict, infallible (according to them) ideology and anyone who does not agree with it, is a muslim/communist/socialist/other form of character assassination etc. etc.
I for one like PBS, I especially miss having Bill Moyers Journal on PBS and my parents regularly donate to their tv station.
If you spend a little time and really think about what conservatives think, they don't make a lick of sense. More and more I have noticed ABC becoming more conservative. The only fair game out there is PBS and NPR.
So true James and Wayne. One of the things that most people don't realize is that the Conservative media, supposed king of the "free market" for information, is financed to the tune of over $100 MILLION per YEAR by the wealthy elites who seek to gain through Conservatism's idolatry of the rich. We're talking about the Koch brothers, Richard Mellon Scaife, Rev. Sun Myung Moon. Adolph Coors was one of the originators of this model. So don't be so sure these programs exist because they have merit beyond some rich guy believing he'll achieve personal profit by promoting the hoped-for American aristocracy.
The Republicans have absolutely nothing to offer the working class, only more grief and fewer jobs. Now, they want to take the many excellent programs on PBS away from us, if they can. What a pack useless ass wipes.
This isn't about Aardvarks or Big Bird. This is about Nova, Frontline and the NewsHour. This is the right trying to stifle what they feel to be left wing programming. Apparently, they don't watch. PBS is as in the middle as you can get. They present both sides. Should have watched the Frontline on the crafting of Healthcare, a real eye opener.
Problem is when you've been fed a steady diet of Beck, Hannity and Limbaugh anything else looks positively communist. If reactionaries feel offended by PBS, maybe they should be. I know there are times when I cringe at how 'liberals' come off at times.
The PBS funding is a minute part of the budget. Cutting will eliminate those precious jobs the reactionaries claim to be so focused on.
If we just rolled back the tax rates on the upper incomes to even Clinton levels, we could go a long way to reducing the deficeit. Raise the SS index and cut benefits to millionares and you get even farther.
Well said, Jon Martz.
Jennifer, you are critical of the wrong party......look inward Jen, look inward.
Safecracker
I bet your dog thinks you are a easy mark, probably would run off with someone who actually let her out for walk once in while but you've bribed her to stick around. Is that what you do with your so called friends? Do you have any friends or do you relate better to your spoiled dog than people? You look inward and try to find the shriveled up human part that is left inside there. I know it must be in there some where.
I am not that concerned about the children's programming. PBS will always find sponsers for the best children's programming in the country, but I am worried about their news programs. They are the only news outlet not beholding to big business. I don't feel comfortable with the idea of almost the entire news media being under the thumb of the mouse or Comcast or other businesses whose first concern is to see to it that their interests are being propagandized for their benefit. Once again, business elites are controlling the message and what Ma and Pa are watching and listening to. PBS and NPR are the only exceptions to this, either on the airwaves on the internet or in print.Â
Typical Republican and Tea party cutting of PBS and NPR funding while at the same time funding for Rep. John Boehner home district - The Republicans continue to take care of their own at the expense of the general public - The Republicans under 13.5 Billion from a program that has reduced crime 40 percent and would layoff 45 percent of one communities police force. The TEA and Republican party want gut the EPA and remove federal regulations from the EPA rendering it nothing. Rep. Boehner wants to cut 450 million and allow 3.7 million people get, suffer and die of HIV and or AIDS. But at the same time - Boehner is doing everything he can for his high-dollar cronies in his district. Boehner and House Republicans appear to have included an earmark-in-all-but-name for the new Speaker’s district in the newly released House Appropriations Continuing Resolution (CR). The CR includes massive cuts to important programs like Head Start and LIHEAP, but one thing it doesn’t cut is $450 million stashed away for the construction of a Joint Strike Fighter engine the Pentagon does not even want. This pulled from national headlines, proof positive there are lives at stake with the Republican Right and the TEA sippers. General Electric and Rolls Royce will benefit tremendously in Boehners district. It now appears that Boehner is funneling money to his own district in an earmark-in-all-but-name may be part of the reason for that. This from the leader trying cut 100 billion from the deficit, but not from his district.
Oh, but let's give BIG OIL their tax breaks instead of public television. They are a needy cause, aren't they? They only were the most profitable companies in the last three years! Let's give tax payer money to Exxon Mobil, who only made 45 BILLION in 2008. What is wrong with Republicans? Do they want the whole country to go after them? Look at what happened to the governor in Wisconsin today! He took away the public unions ability to collective bargain, only to have 30,000 of them in his face today. Shut down the schools! No firemen! No policemen! Keep it up Republicans, because we will go after you with a vengence. And anybody who doesn't stand up for the people in this country, for labor in this country, watch out, because we have been kicked and shoved and pushed around by Big Money and corporations and Republicans way too much! It is time for this to stop!
People don't seem to get the idea that tax breaks and corporate charity are the same thing. Also, many corporations have a world wide ownership, so we are letting our money go overseas. Let's support PBS and NPR which keeps the money in this country.
Hell no!!!!!It is CLEARLY used as a political tool and tax payer funded campaign platform for one party and not the other. Bad move. Your out!!!!! Make it on your own or not. Personally, I hope not.
Nah.... We don't need Leftist Public Funding.... even if it was balanced in perspective, we still don't need to spend our precious tax dollars on anything like this. They can get their own funding from people that want to donate.
OK mike...do I get to choose which parts of the government I want to fund? I'll gladly pick up your $1.39/year as well as my own if I can pull my funding out of corporate welfare.
Tell you what, I don't even need that. You pay for a tax break on the upper income bracket and I'll pay your CPB funding?
It's a pretty sad thought process that brings someone to the conclusion that paying over $.30 out of every dollar (and that's just in federal income tax), is a tax BREAK.
I absolutely agree. Cut all of it.
The right wing mantra: Give the rich tax breaks and cut everything that helps the poor or middle class. Keep the population fat and stupid so that the rich can rule forever.
I may not be religious but I do believe in karma and these right wingers are in for a really bad time when their karmic bill comes due.
When did money that is taxed not belong to the people who earned it? There is no such thing as a tax BREAK. Just the government taking less of your own money away from you.
A true statement that makes not a bit of difference.
The government provides services. Those services need to be paid for. If you reduce taxes below a level that provides adequate funding for those services we run a budget deficit.
That's right, John, it's the IGMFY syndrome. All of these people complaining about the money being taxed 'belonging to them' forget that without this government and the services and protections it provides, they would not have that money in the first place. They forget how much they have benefited from the government services and protections that create the environment for them to make the money. Things like safe food, roads, communication infrastructure, education, police, fire protection, military protection, laws that prevent white collar crime, monetary regulations, market regulations, bank regulations, etc. You know, all of those services that allowed them to make that money.
Well, as far as the government providing services, that's an argument for another time, as I believe that many of the services provided by the federal government are unconstitutional and should be funded at the State level.
However, having moved on from that, the problem with our tax system is that it taxes INCOME, not WEALTH. Here's a bit of irony for you. If Bill Gates (who is now retired), has a bad year in investments, he may actually pay NO income taxes, even though he is the wealthiest man in the world.
If instead, you taxed consumption (i.e. sales tax) on only new items. You would not only keep people like Mr. Gates from paying no income taxes, but also make saving money popular again. What if I told you you could keep your entire paycheck, but then would only pay taxes on that money if you CHOSE to purchase something. You also would not pay taxes on used items, therefore helping many poor people who would probably choose a used car over a new one, a used home over a new one, etc.
It would no longer be a system of loopholes, doughnut holes, or any other holes in which anyone can escape the necessity of tax collection.
There you go, J.T., well said, instead of just criticizing you have actually made a cogent and persuasive argument I can agree with, I even voted for your post. The tax system is very broke when Exxon can not only not pay any taxes for 2009 and still get over $160,000,000 from the government. One of the first things the Republican/TP Inc. party did in the early 2000s was to start 'refunding taxes' to companies that had paid taxes under the AMT rules. Can't provide sources right now but I'm sure you can find some if you look.
Gotta cut everything, folks. Ideally many departments, agencies, whatzits will be zeroed out, the job slots eliminated altogether. The Repubs should kill PBS funding, take the heat, and soon we won't be talking about it anymore. Just kill the funding. The best of PBS will survive. Screw the rest. The Repubs are chicken though. It won't happen. Hope I'm wrong. (It happens now and then.)
Is that stupid My Word program still on? A jobs program for over-educated twits!
Regards....
Safecracker-you add so little to the debate. You think your belittling attitude is unique. You are one reason problems don't get solved. Someones personal history is interesting to me. It helps me better understand how and why we got where we are and how to resolve the ones before us. Let us all know when your curiositiy about something other than your self serving mantra presents itself.