Poll: 88% of Republicans want GOP to consider Tea Party positions

A new Gallup poll out today shows 88% of Republicans say it is important that Republican leaders consider the Tea Party's positions and objectives when addressing national problems.

Interestingly, slightly more than half of Democrats surveyed, 53%, also believe it's important for the GOP to consider the Tea Party's ideas -- even though just 11% of Democrats have a favorable view of the Tea Party.

Also of interest: 43% of Republicans surveyed in the  poll did not take a position on the Tea Party (52% support it, while 5% oppose it).
 
The poll was conducted Jan. 14-16, 2011.

Discuss this post

Hahah. This just in

Healthcare Bill is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. because there is no Severablity Clause the whole bill must be thrown out.

the question is . Why did the Democrats waste all that time on a Bill that is UNCONSTITUIONAL. why did the . SO CALLED constittonall LAWYER in the White HOUSE sign a Bill that userps the Constitutional Rights of Americans.

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 2:56 PM EST

Regardless, it’s still the law. What get’s me is how the right cries because they don’t want to buy insurance. However, these lames would be first in line at the emergency room after a serious accident or sickness. Then they wouldn’t have the money to pay for their services and of course they would the dead beats they claim to hate.

The repeal idea shows how short sighted the right is.

  • 8 votes
#1.1 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:34 PM EST

Steve: re-read. The score is 2 to 2. Two federal courts have agreed, two have disagreed. You hardly speak for all Americans.

  • 8 votes
#1.2 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:10 PM EST

And it goes to the Supreme Court...where everyone knew it would end up anyway.

The clock ticks, people get more attached to the fair insurance practices that are part of the bill, it continues to get more popular...and the GOPTP becomes more intent on snatching that away from the American people.

  • 4 votes
#1.3 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:21 PM EST

Regardless of which side you are on, we really should all be on the side of competence. Severability clauses are a simple matter of routine, inserted in all contracts and agreements.

So does anyone have any explanation as to why the drafters of the bill did not include what is very basic, boiler-plate language? We are talking about a paqragraph or two. It ain't like they ran out of space.

  • 1 vote
#1.4 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:32 PM EST

They intended for it to be an all or nothing proposition. Does SCOTUS really want to aggravate 30 million desperate Americans?

  • 1 vote
#1.5 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:35 PM EST

So far 2 Judges have ruled for and 2 have ruled against the individual mandate plus another 12 cases have been thrown out.

And just why did 25 other states join Florida in that court – couldn’t possibly be that it was their best chance of a positive outcome.

What the GOP/TP fails to remember that other landmark laws were also shot down in the lower courts only to be upheld by SCOTUS.

  • 4 votes
#1.6 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:37 PM EST

job1 - you might want to rethink "it is still the law" The regulators haven't wrote all the regs yet so how is the court system to "judge" if a violation has occurred. Then you have to consider the different dates of implimentation. It will be 2014 for what I am interested in to happen. And many have said that without the mandate it isn't likely going to happen.

  • 1 vote
#1.7 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:43 PM EST

Steve-505729

the question is . Why did the Democrats waste all that time on a Bill that is UNCONSTITUIONAL. why did the . SO CALLED constittonall LAWYER in the White HOUSE sign a Bill that userps the Constitutional Rights of Americans.

Do you have something against question marks????

"It was once said that the moral test of Government is how that Government treats those who are in the dawn of life, the children; those who are in the twilight of life, the elderly; and those who are in the shadows of life, the sick, the needy and the handicapped,"

Hubert H. Humphrey

Still think your funny, Laughing Boy? Get a clue we need to fix this mess we call a health care system not repeal it.

The popping sound you'll being hearing is the sound it makes when your head clears, that is if it ever does. It's probably lodge way up there.

  • 4 votes
#1.8 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:25 PM EST

A few problems with this bill:

It is not reform but mandatory insurance and the bureaucracy grows.

Unions were given an exemption creating favored (unconstitional) status.

Americans resent the way it was crammed down our throats.

  • 2 votes
#1.9 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 8:27 PM EST

Steve my boy. what did you expect a florida judge appointed by Reagen to come up with on a descision. It was last year when GOP got up in the air over a judge making a desicison that knocked down a law they wanted. Thier excact comment then was that the courts shouldnt make the laws, thats the job of law makers. If this judges decision was to hold then in effect a person shouldnt have to pay into SS. I think what your seeing here is the vast lobby money from the insurance groups taking effect. To think that 55 pecent of the people do want the health care law to stand is a joke is off base. Its going to bury the GOP for good if they continue to focus on this health care law. Jobs and such was a big election promise the GOP boys ran on during the election. I dont see them saying or doing anything about the problem. I must say its so easy to sit and tell americans they are going to do all this good for us. They never once have put up solutions to the real problems we face. Only to drag they feet whine like a crying 2 year old that doesnt get its way. I hope the GOP nut jobs just keep up same ol, same ol. Then they we fianailly bury themselves in there own human waste. To think that their platforms serve the American voters needs is a total farse. What have and will do untill they self distruct will to pander to needs of good ol white boys and the rich. I do believe the poor folks and other creeds of races are growing everyday and the balnace of the votes swing there way. It really sucks to watch this go down.

  • 3 votes
#1.10 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 8:40 PM EST
Reply

Like I said earlier -

Whatever is begun in anger ends in shame. - Benjamin Franklin

And you can count me in that 53% - I want to see them demonstrating to 'moderates' what it looks like when you 'main-line' crazy! ;o)

  • 5 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 2:56 PM EST

Fail

    #2.1 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 2:59 PM EST

    Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah.........so stupid.

    • 1 vote
    #2.2 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:02 PM EST

    GO Tea Bag Party! GO GOP, and support them COMPLETELY!! Get those numbers up to 100%!!!

    YES! you CAN!!

    • 2 votes
    #2.3 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:37 PM EST

    Feisty, Yes I just want to know how many times the crazy they are spiking has been cut. The purer the crazy the better! Full on crazy would be eyeopening.

    • 1 vote
    #2.4 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:49 PM EST
    Reply

    Fine; consider their ideas. Then move on to sensible positons.

    • 6 votes
    Reply#3 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:02 PM EST

    Game, set, match...

    • 2 votes
    #3.1 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:03 PM EST

    ron, you do mean bipartisan positions, right?

      #3.2 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:45 PM EST
      Reply

      Favorable view? I'd like to interview a sample of them, to see what is "favorable." That they are standing up for what they believe in? Nothing favorable can be said about the Tea Parties views - not by me.

      11% of Democrats have a favorable view of the Tea Party.

      • 2 votes
      Reply#4 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:05 PM EST

      Just wait till you see what happens when Tea Party candidates get elected and actually put their "ideas" into practice: our new governor, LePage, just appointed a developer to the Environmental Protection Dept and a hospital lobbyist to head Dept of Health and Human Services. His promise to reduce red tape regulations, which sounded like a good idea to me, turned into an opportunity to roll back environmental protections passed with bipartisan support over the past decades. The political climate in Maine has suddenly gone from one of cooperation and civility to divisiveness and anger. Mainers are deeply embarrassed at his insult directed at the NAACP on MLK Day, of all things. The Republicans won the majority in the state legislature, as well as the Governorship, but I think they will lose it for a generation if this keeps up.

      • 7 votes
      Reply#5 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:20 PM EST

      Amy we should totally have a race. I live in California where our state gov is nearly totally controlled by the democrats. In fact the Sierra Club and Wave Rider Foundations control neary all of the enviromental laws - which is why we are so lucky and have a Cap and Trade system in place. It's so stupid, the nut jobs have imposed regulations mandating solar and wind but when they tried to put a giant solar field in the desert outside of San Diego, other enviromentalists sue to prevent the transmission lines from being installed. So no solar.

      Oh and our hospitals are literally overrun with illegals. I could go on with all the upsides and great laws around here, but we all get the news.

      So let's see which of our great states hits the skids first, shall we? I've got California and its crazy assed liberals and enviromentalists and you apparently have whack job repulicans and tea partiers.

      So, who you think is gonna win?

      • 1 vote
      #5.1 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:25 PM EST

      Spanky, it is so hard to get people on the same page isn't it. Here in Iowa we have been installing wind farms about as fast as can be. We can install the transmission lines in Iowa but when we want to sell our excess power to points out of the state, few or none of the states that will benefit from our excess wants to help pay to get the excess.

      Our form of government is great at throwing taxpayer dollars away thru duplication of effort between federal and state agencies but they can't seem to understand what a co-ordinated plan can accomplish or that such a plan would decrease the size of the federal government and the burden on the private sector taxpayers.

      • 2 votes
      #5.2 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:01 PM EST

      Here the plan was totally coordinated at all buracratic levels. Unfortunately, the enviromentalists are at war amongst themselves, over their own plan.

      Good news is the whole thing will end up getting scrapped. Bad news is we have AB32 and our energy costs will "necessarily sky-rocket." But that's going to happen anyway. We need to build nuke plants now, but around here, and even after 10 years of litigation, we can't even build a de-salization plant, because it MIGHT efffect the wet-lands. Never mind we have no water.

        #5.3 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:54 PM EST

        liberals are great at regulating all the jobs away

          #5.4 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 8:36 PM EST
          Reply

          I'm with you, Steve. I can't wait to throw children off the public dole. What have they ever done for this counry? And what's up with people whining about pre-existing conditions. They drew a sucky hand. Get over it.

          • 7 votes
          Reply#6 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:27 PM EST

          And hey, we should end social security and medicare. How dare the government mandate that I pay for my 80 year old mother to live and be healthy. She's done her time, let her take care of herself. Why should I have to pay for her ? Why should the young and healthy have to pay for the old, children or the infirm ? OH, BTW, shut down those air traffic controllers, immediately. They weren't in the constitution, so get rid of 'em. And the EPA, who needs to breath or drink clean water. Also, wipe out the FDA, I happen to like the taste of salmonella in my meat, thank you very much.

          • 7 votes
          #6.1 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:34 PM EST

          dirp101 - you wouldn't have had to concern yourself about paying for your mom if the politicians had left SS as it was originally indended. Haven't met a politician yet who couldn't leave a pile of cash alone or to look only as far as the next re-election date. Same is probably true about medicare when they removed 500 billion in hopes that someone would come along and fix its waste and fraud so the 500 billion wouldn't be missed.

          • 1 vote
          #6.2 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:10 PM EST
          Reply

          The republican party has already said the tea party has lil or no standing .And they the "republicans" will raise the debt ceiling and there is lil or nothing the tea party can do ....They have no way to stop it ! The tea baggers got hood winked ...into voting republican !

          • 4 votes
          Reply#7 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:50 PM EST

          Domenico Montanaro

          You pulled your piece on the public financing law repeal, why?

          • 2 votes
          Reply#8 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:17 PM EST

          Interestingly, slightly more than half of Democrats surveyed, 53%, also believe it's important for the GOP to consider the Tea Party's ideas -- even though just 11% of Democrats have a favorable view of the Tea Party.

          Gee whiz. Now why do you suppose 53% of Democrats would want the GOP to consider the Tea Party's ideas? Well it certainly is because they agree with them! We know that when people start to see the results they will see those crackpots for who they really are! The TP Circus officially arrived in DC on January 1, 2011.

          • 2 votes
          Reply#9 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:48 PM EST

          The Democrats love having the Tea Party as the front and center part of the GOP. There would be nothing better for the Dems than a Palin/Bachman ticket for 2012. Of course the Democrats want the GOP to consider the Tea Party's ideas.

          • 3 votes
          #9.1 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:29 PM EST
          Reply

          Again and again, I see the "Tea Party" referred to as if it really is a separate party -- often it's capitalized.  The simple fact is that there is no separate party by that name.  The people in question are just the more clueless wing of the GOP, and they're already, for the most part, being ignored by those Republicans who haven't completely lost their minds.

          • 3 votes
          Reply#10 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:13 PM EST

          I think the tea perty folks are messing out inviroment with all the bull crap that runs out there mouth

            Reply#11 - Mon Jan 31, 2011 8:54 PM EST

            Sara Palin can be hired in show business, TV hostess, radio show, any CEO if any company wants her, but not in any government official work, not even Congress nor House nor VP/President; she has jilted a paid government official job, Title: a governor.

            Or, she can work for charity as CEO.

              Reply#12 - Tue Feb 1, 2011 1:45 AM EST

              If Hillary can be Secretary of State....anybody can be anything.

                #12.1 - Tue Feb 1, 2011 6:47 AM EST
                Reply

                You drink the tea at your own peril, Republicans. By continuing to marginalize yourselves you are asssuring your doom in 2012.

                • 3 votes
                Reply#13 - Tue Feb 1, 2011 6:30 AM EST

                The Tea Party is like a cheap date.The repubs sweet talked them with hatred and fear and nothing gets old white folks riled up more.The tea party opened their legs and guess what they got @%&#!d.Wonder who they'll vote for in 2012 since they are being backstabbed by the repubs.Maybe they just wont vote and well be done with the uninformed.Or maybe they'll all move to Alaska and succeed and we will never have to here from them again.

                • 2 votes
                Reply#14 - Tue Feb 1, 2011 8:45 AM EST
                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.