From NBC's Ali Weinberg
There wasn't much blood drawn during today's debate between candidates for RNC chairman, much to the chagrin of some candidates for the position, and the surprise of some committee members.
"Isn't that a shame?" asked former Missouri GOP chairwoman Ann Wagner when a reporter remarked on the debate's polite tone. Wagner said she would have preferred "some more honest discussion" about how much money Chairman Michael Steele raised during the 2010 election versus how much made its way back to individual states.
She added that she would have liked to have directed a question towards Steele. "It was going to be why of all the money he said he was going to raise, why only 13 million dollars went out to the states for the state victory programs and what he was going to do to correct that going forward," she said.
Former Bush administration official Maria Cino said the rapid-fire section questions at the end of the debate were too fast to permit candidates to wind up with an attack against Steele or any other candidate.
"It was those lightening rods! You only really got 30 seconds!" Cino exclaimed.
There were at least eleven RNC members in attendance at today's debate - among them, Louis Pope, committeeman from Maryland and RNC Budget Committee chairman. Pope, who voted for Steele in 2009 and endorsed him for re-election, said he was surprised at the civility of the debate.
"I thought some of the other candidates would probably criticize Chairman Steele more and actually I didn’t see any criticism whatsoever," Pope said.
California Republican party chairman Ron Nehring, who is running for RNC treasurer and whose vote will thus remain undeclared, said the positive tone of the debate was "what I think people are looking for; where does the committee go over the next two years and who will lead us there."
Virginia Republican National Committeeman Morton Blackwell said that all candidates "performed reasonably well" in the debate. Blackwell, during the six rounds of the 2009 voting period for chairman, first supported Michigan committeeman and current candidate Saul Anuzis, before Anuzis dropped out over lack of votes and Blackwell gave his vote to former South Carolina GOP chairman Katon Dawson over Steele.
Blackwell said he has not changed his preferences this year.
"I intend to support Saul Anuzis and I have not given any serious thought to whom I would vote for if he dropped out, but as long as he is in the race and until he wins I’ll be voting for him. "
Pope, the Maryland committeeman, also hasn't said whom he would support if Steele loses, but wouldn't say if he was ruling anyone out.
"I follow the 11th commandment of Ronald Reagan," Pope said. (Thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow Republican).


Interesting, Ann Wagner wished there had been "some more honest discussion" yet all five candidates said that Sarah Palin would be a viable candidate for president. Seriously, how can anyone have a "more honest discussion" if none of the five smart people running for Chair of the RNC are willing to state the truth about Sarah Palin. Of course, none of the five smart people are willing to offend any potential presidential candidate; therefore, all five are unwilling to be honest.
Because Sarah'd make a good figurehead. She's got that down-to-earth façade that easily placates stupid people who don't pay any attention outside of what their preferred candidate looks and sounds like. As long as the bleating is consistent in tone and temper, the sheep'll fall in line, and that's what the Republicans are counting on to win 2012.
It's smart of them to play it that way, and par for the course in politics.
I find it hilarous that a person who walked away from her responsibilites in the Missouri GOP to trot off to Luxembourg so she could strengthen her resume for her Senate race, has the audacity to criticize anyone. The Bush butt kissing was too much to even watch, following up that Bush's book was her favorite. A comment so crazy, as to border on insanity. The woman cannot offer one point of why she "should" be Chairman, only that Steele shouldn't be Chairman. The woman has no substance, and is going to walk us right back to the Bush era. If the RNC elects her, I will officially be an independent.
Sadly, I think the majority of Republicans don't care as they're too busy asking, "What's Luxembourg?"
I find it hilarous that a person who walked away from her responsibilites in the Missouri GOP to trot off to Luxembourg so she could strengthen her resume for her Senate race, has the audacity to criticize anyone. The Bush butt kissing was too much to even watch, following up that Bush's book was her favorite. A comment so crazy, as to border on insanity. The woman cannot offer one point of why she "should" be Chairman, only that Steele shouldn't be Chairman. The woman has no substance, and is going to walk us right back to the Bush era. If the RNC elects her, I will officially be an independent.
Yeah, nothing like sitting and listening to answers you know well in advance...
"What's your favorite book?"
"I love Reagan...I love Bush...I love Conservative, blah, blah, blah..."
"What do you think of Obamacare, excuse me, the new Health Care laws?"
"...that Black ***tard is taking over the...oh, sorry Michael I almost forgot you were here.." "As I was saying, that Socialist, Communists, Superfragalistialaexpialdocious is doing everything wrong...we need to save America!!"
If something of substance was achieved yesterday at the debate could someone please enlighten me on what it was...
Thanks.
Ron Nehring wants to loot the RNC Treasury. He'll make Steele look like a penny bandit.
I thought "draw first blood" was like the 11th commandment for political debates? Why the polite tone? I guess it's important to be polite, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't ask the tough questions. Nothing gets accomplished when everyone beats around the bush.