From Jim Miklaszewski
Opponents of the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy are celebrating today's Senate vote to dismantle the ban on gays and lesbians serving openly in the military, but the actual repeal of the law could take up to a year to go into full effect.
In its present form, the bill states that repeal will not take effect until 60 days after Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen and President Barack Obama "certify" that the U.S. military is prepared for implementation.
Secretary Gates has predicted that the process of certification could take up to a year.
So what happens next?
Under the expected procedure, the Defense Department will conduct servicewide training and education for all active duty, reserve and national guard forces, and make whatever adjustments in procedures and facilities are necessary. Only then would Gates and Mullen certify the military is prepared to implement the repeal.
During that process, the Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel would also issue a servicewide memo instructing any gay or lesbian servicemembers not to openly declare their sexual orientation because they could potentially be subject to separation from the military.
The reality is, however, that under the more stringent guidelines for enforcement of the law implemented in October, there have been no servicemembers discharged from the military. So it would be unlikely that anyone would be forced out of the military during the certification process.
Msnbc.com's Carrie Dann contributed.


I'm just glad I'm getting out of the military. Of the thousands of soldiers I know; not one is in favor of this bill.
I'm glad your getting out too.
Count me in and make that ME three! lol
Just frakkin great. I'll say what needs to be said: If one gay person so happens to stare at me, touch me, or even insinuate any homosexual tendency toward me...that person will regret it. Something I dont need is some fairy totin' lefty in a foxhole next to me crying about why he is in a combat unit and also a conscientious objector. This is the absolute worse thing for service members because it singles out gays...oh, but a victory for all the gay activist citizens...being too gay will get your people hurt.
Yeah, I can see it now...what a great world-view the US military will have now. Now everyone will associate a person in uniform as possibly being gay. Zero tolerance means they werent in service...it meant they kept their mouth shut in fear of reprisal.
Who cares.....we shouldn't even be fighting in that stupid war anyway. Whomever wants to sign up to kill themselves go right on ahead. The Military is a crock anyway, and anytime a "soldier" passes me in "fatigues" I get creeped out.
If gays want to serve, let them serve. If you can't handle a gay dude talking about his sexuality openly there is something way wrong with you. You can sit around and talk with the boys about banging "pussy" but you can't handle hearing one of the boys banging some butthole? Laugh it off, roll your eyes, puke, do whatever but it isn't going away....learn to adjust. This isn't 1863. Happy Holidays!
Hey big mouth, put it on a button, pin it on your chest. Wear it outside. Call people pukes, to their face.
The Military is a crock anyway, and anytime a "soldier" passes me in "fatigues" I get creeped out.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm sure the feeling is mutual. The only thing that pi$$es me off as much as homophobic racists whining about civil rights is sanctimonious a$$holes like you whining about folks who care enough about their country to put their lives on the line.
I guess you're right....straight people should be the only ones to put their lives on the line for this country.
I implore President Obama to overcome Gates/military chiefs backdoor passive aggressive resistance to the new repeal, by ordering that the certification process, take no more than 30 days!
This will result in the deaths of men on the battlefield. This was also cost close to a billion dollars to implement. Every single service member will have to be indoctrinated.
The new military slogan- Christians need not apply!
Good statement...Christians stay home..you cause a lot of trouble and misery for a lot of people
Gary,
The Christians are staying home and look at what is happening to the world.
It's going down the toilet.
Because we disengaged from the world and went to our little corner and didn't bother anyone.
BUT NO LONGER!
I implore President Obama, to overcome the passive aggressive/backdoor resistance to the new repeal by Gates/military chiefs, by ordering that certification must occur within 30 days, and no more.
So now we have to call a "time-out" in Afghanistan and ask Kim Jong-Il, President Ahmajinedad, the Somali Pirates, Yemeni Al-Qaeda, and all the little terrorists cells throughout the world to take a break from violence and committing harmful acts against humanity so we can reset our forces and teach them to accept a group of people who care more about themselves than humanity.
Their's is a cause of humanity, but only the type that doesn't reproduce naturally in the rapidly developing progressive human world. There is no doubt this movement will also force a change in nature which allows other animals in similar states of mind to develop progressively enough to mate amongst the same sex to reproduce. Their cause is so strong! Now let them move on to things like the economy, or the development of cures to dangerous diseases, food shortages or defeating the improvised explosive device.
Since we are moving to adjust the Constitution to better serve our modern purpose, since for the last 235 years it hasn't really provided enough to allow the nation to be the world leader, let's put the new military in charge of homeland security. Create and place new gay/happy battalions of open men and women on the front lines of our southern borders to defeat the traffickers since the redneck militias led by Rush Limbaugh's hot air are helpless to stop anything. But there many not be enough of them, I think the last estimate was 13,500 out of 1 million? Did we really just change a whole culture so that 13,500 can wear a dress after work?
We need Ronald Reagan and John Wayne back, even if they were gay, nobody would know.
More hate rhetoric. Why don't you try to bring back Jim Crowe as well? Wait, don't stop there. Bring back slavery. Did we really just change a whole culture so that 12% of the population can actually live life as equal human beings?
Civil rights are for people who are discriminated on the color of their skin. It has NOTHING to do with sexual orientation.
I am not discriminated based on the color of my skin. Does this mean I do not have civil rights?
No, it means you have them and they have never been violated.
I was born a woman. I have civil rights. If I have a sex change, I am no longer a woman, but since I wasn't born a man, I'm not a man. So, then which box would I chose on the job application?
Sexual orientation is supposed to be male and female. That's how Almighty God set it up. Satan came along and stirred things up and now we have gay, lesbian, transgender and bi-sexual. That is not the way Almighty God set it up and they will never get what Adam and Eve were given.
Last I checked, gays and lesbians have been around since the beginning. And yes, they were also procreating in the process.
countrygirl, you've won the prize for the most ignorant statement in this blog (of which there are many): "Civil rights are for people who are discriminated on the color of their skin."
If we had a DADT policy for idiots on this blog, your comments would have been blocked and you would have been booted from registration.
I am so ashamed to wear the uniform with openly gay service homosexuals, i see a decline in volunteer recruits , i know i will feel uncomfortable sharing the same shower with them are they going to act flamboyant and wear high heals i am so angry dont ask dont tell worked fine i wont ask you so keep your sexual preference to yourself. I am a special forces paratrooper and i know for sure i will not reup.
Good
Oh Lord....if you feel ashamed, then go...just go. As a straight male who serves, I'm ashamed to be fighting on the same side with you.
HYPOCRITES HYPOCRITES HIPPOCRATES
It is not the responsibility of Government to sanction sexuality. The same people who complain complain complain about "BIG" government intruding in our lives are the same people who suggest that it should be used to intrude in Americans personal lives.
Read the Constitution. This is America not Iran.
Serving marines and former marines, e-mail Genneral Amos and thank him, he upheld the highest traditions of the corps, trying to talke care of his troops, knowing that the inept lying quasi socilaist in the white hoiuse will find a way to get rid of him.
I have a son who is a marine corps captain, we have a beacj house that is available to all of his friends.
I deal with 15 to 25 young marine officers, almost on a daily basis.
Their conversation is interesting, especially after a few brews, looks like about 60% of them will put their papers in tommorrow.
Odd isn't it?
According to Gates and the white house, no one cares.
Anecdotal, I know, but seems odd.
It seems the junior officers have been playing with the numbers coming out of the corps, also, expect to lose a boy 72% of them.
The draft it is coming, this will be a lot of fun, watching the libs and homos, rioting in the streets.
So what are they waiting for? Why haven't they put their papers in? Why haven't they quit their posts? Did you ever ask them why it would be so easy for them not to continue to defend their country? Will they also give up their U.S. citizenship? You would think that if something so vile forces you to give up your dream career which ultimately defends this very nation would also compel you to give up your citizenship and move to Canada.
After desegregation in the south, I do believe whites saw fit to sit on the same bus, drink from the same fountains, and eat in the same restaurants as blacks. They didn't abandon their dixie states or move to another country. Sensibility and intelligence won out over hate and ignorance. I think the U.S. Armed Forces will be just fine.
Hey, if men and women of the armed forces are small minded that they would just as soon leave the military then work beside an openly gay person...let them goooooooooo, infact if they have an issue with it period. Kick them OUT!!!!!
Works for me Gary, pass the bill, let them out.
Restart the draft, draft a bunch of the homos who are so hot to serve,
why are you so against gay people...what is it the bothers you so bad about it?
When you have to pay for the first military sex change with your taxes let us know how you feel. Which set of uniforms should be issued, male or female? What if your now open gay airman wants to march in a military formation wearing a skirt, do you allow him to? What about good order and discipline?
Hey John1000006, the homos are already serving! Thousands of homos already served but were booted out because of DADT. No need to start the draft.
Hey Lilyputik, military orders are military orders. Right now it says men will wear a mens government issued uniform. Gay soldiers know how to follow orders as do straights. Those that don't face discipline. My tax dollars currently go to pay for all the STD treatment of all the straight guys in the military. The DADT policy had nothing to do with sex changes and who wants to wear what uniforms. Therefore, repeal of DADT hs nothing to do with sex changes and who wants to wear what uniforms.
**Why do you disrespect the opinion and wishes of the troops that have devoted themselves to serving the country - the ones that actually do the fighting and dying, Pat.**
Because the troops don't have a say in policy, planning, or implementation of anything. Their job is to follow orders and obey the chain of command. The military is not a democracy for decision making.
As for who is doing the actual fighting, gays and straights both! They are both currently fighting side by side in combat! To suggest that a straight person could not adequately perform his combat duties because he is aware that a member or two on his team were gay is complete hogwash. Gay guys fight everyday in stressful combat situations in Iraq and Afghanistan knowing full well that their team members are straight and yet they still successfully carry out their missions.
I dare any straight soldier to lay his weapon down, leave the front line, and declare that he is unfit for combat duty because he knows that his teammate is gay. I dare any straight soldier to declare that he will compromise his mission or his team's safety just because he knows a member of his team is gay. I dare any straight soldier to refuse any and all military benefits due him and to accept a full prison sentence for his disgraceful desertion.
That's right, if any individual feels so strongly about being in combat with gay soldiers, then please let him leave the military immediately and let those considering enlistment to abandon such notions. This great nation has many powerful enemies and we need the best and strongest of our nation to serve in the military to defend it. The U.S. military has no room for spineless deserters who are ready to just give up when things don't their way.
As for the question, What's the rush to get DADT repealed in a lame duck congress?... Why put off what should have been eliminated at its inception 17 years ago? If you remove the DADT policy, what is there really to implement? No new offices or positions need to be created; no new paperwork or processes need to be implemented. Repeal it and move on.
So how does fratricide fit in your logic Indie? If only one member of my team is gay and open, then why should all the rest of the team give up military benefits. The solution is simple in a kinetic combat zone.
Nope the straights ill do their job, until the bill that allows them to leave with out prejudice is passed,, Then they will leave the military.
Shorly thereafter the draft will be restarted and all of the little libbies that were so happy about this, will have a military obligation.
Ooops
lilyputik, I think you missed my point. I'm not trying to say that soldiers SHOULD give up their military benefits. I'm saying that if a soldier can't perform the combat job that he was ordered to do, then by all means he can choose to leave the military and endure the appropriate consequences. Personally, I believe that any capable man or woman soldier in uniform can and will effectively carry out their orders regardless if a member of their team is gay, straight, black, white, etc. When bullets are flying and bombs are falling, race and sexuality become irrelevant. Courage, skill, quick thinking, and proven ability to carry out orders in combat are all that matters.
No one in government from any of the political parties will ever support a "free pass" to leave the military without prejudice. It's simply wishful thinking on your part. It's terribly shameful that you'd like to see our military just fall apart when DADT Repeal is implemented. I have more faith in our men and women in uniform. Those without true character will obviously opt out of their duty and face the consequences whereas the majority of those bound to duty will continue to serve flawlessly.
to vote
I will be retiring from the US Navy on 01 April 2011 after 20 years of service. I will be long gone before this is fully implemented in the US Military. I have been stationed on small and big ships during my time in the service. The vast majority of you Arm Chair Quarterbacks have no idea what it is like to be in the Military. Berthing compartments are made up of 60 - 120 people. You sleep in a 3 tier rack (bunk bed) and 3 feet to the side of you is another 3 tier rack. The heads (Bathroom) usaully have 3 - 6 toliets, 2 - 4 showers, and 3 - 6 sinks. It is common to change clothes, take showers, or see people walk around in the briefest of clothing, or in the shower area, completely balls out naked. When I say that their is no privacy on a Navy ship, that is an understatement. I have been station on ships that are "co-ed" and although people are forbidden to show sexual affection on the ship (holding hands, hugging, kissing, sex) it still happens. If caught, these people are punished (fined, reduction in pay grade, etc...) and if it continues to be a problem, one of the two are tranferred off the ship or kicked out of the service. If guys and girls are doing it, Its wouldn't surprise me that gay servicemen are also having close relationships onboard. I have served with gay personnel, although never blantantly or flammingly in my face (because this is against Don't ask, Don't Tell). As a front line supervisor, I see as a disaplinary (sp) problem. I believe their will be instances of people taking their dislike of openly gay people into their own hands. Or their will be people that will be disscrimated against...ie...more problems for unit cohesian/disapline. In the short term their are going to be problems. Some people may choose not to serve or get out due to their dislike for gays. In the long run, just like Blacks and Women these should be smoothed over. The military is just a snap shot of the civilian world. Will gay serving openly in the military will not be the end for the military, but I do think in the short term their will be problems. As a supervisor, I'm not overly enfavor of the repeal, but I can live with it (before I retire that is).
Thanks, that's all they are asking for is for people to deal with it and civil about it
Thank you for serving your country.
Alan Smithee, thank your years of service in defending this country. You served faithfully and effectively and you did so shoulder to shoulder with gays. You just didn't know it. And as true to your upstanding character as one could be, you would have still served faithfully and effectively even if you did know members your ship in close quarters, were gay. That's the beauty of leadership and character. You can still perform under pressure and duress without ever coming undone.
As for disciplinary issues, could we expect that it would it be any different than the past? I mean, there will always be those soldiers that act up and get disciplined for an unending number of reasons. This will never change regardless of DADT or its repeal.
Gary----------They are disgusting life forms and we can only hope they die out.
Republicans? These so-called Conservatives? Evangelicals? We can gather all of these into one single group and call them "those who espouse and institutionalize hate". Ye, I agree, maybe we can only hope they die out.
I'm for an all lesbian military.....they could find Bin-Laden.
LOL so true
Here we go again! The moronic idiots on the extreme right spearheaded by dumba## McCain. Did you know, we are the only, the only, the ONLY country in the free world who discriminates against gays and lesbians. Those of you with such narrow-mindedness don't know what you are saying either. Do your homework on the subject before you spill your spew! For Gays and Lesbians, it is inborn not a choice. Their genetic makeup has been altered before birth. So before you put down this mighty group of people, think before you make a disgusting comment you know nothing about. This is not a Democrat or Republican issue, it is a human issue. For once in your life, have a heart. Stop listening to FoxTrap lies!
Debra Pilla
Inconclusive argument Debra. Inborn is only a theory. Your homework is about as fact based as the bible.
Deborah,
Can you please tell me where you got the information on "thier gentic makeup"? I have yet to read this in any scientific journal. Please pass this along for the rest of us how thier genetics were altered before birth and exactly what was altered.
Thank You,
Hmm. If there is a single determinant sociological, emotional, environmental, or any other "-al" cause for homosexuality that is proven beyond mere theory for every homosexual or bisexual man or woman, I have yet to find it in any book. You would think that there would be a common thread that causes homosexuality other than genetics. But all we get are unproven theories about "daddy issues" and the like.
Why are some people so afraid of others that follow a different sexual proclivity?! Who cares how a person expresses their sexuality, we don't allow hetrosexuals to be openly sexual, gays and lesbians won't be allowed any more expression then the rest of the service people. However by passing a repeal of "don't ask, don't tell" we are allowing the people that serve our country in the military to be who they are. There were gay men in the Marine Corps and Navy in the 60's, they didn't bother anyone but they did live in some fear of being outed. If you want to be angry about something, be angry about the people that show up at military funerals using the cover of their god to celebrate the loss of a soldier's life as "god's punishing America for harboring gays. They are the boil on the butt of this country, freedom of speech, give me a break!!! Congratulations to our congree for standing up and doing the right thing, and for those of you that voted against the repeal; you should be ashamed.
So what will a sailor do? There is a long line to take a shower because the ship is on water hours. (the ship cannot make enough water for the demand or equipment problems) with the head ( bathroom) full of guys there are only 4,5 shower stalls and maybe ten sinks. Most have towels around them or shorts. But you need to take that off before going in the 3 ft by 3ft shower stall. Somebody is going to get a free shot. Its going to happen.
In Berthing the same thing you sleep right on top of each other. Someone is going to get a free shot.
It will take longer than a year.
So how many personnel will get discharged (kicked out) for harassing gays?
I am glad congress worked on a Saturday now they will vote for their pay raise.
I missed the part where that's Congress' problem. If you violate the UCMJ that's on you.
how many gays will get kicked out for harassing straights is the question. All of them. Sexual harassment cases will run rampant as a means to force out gays. This will lead to case overload and the real criminals will be free to act with impunity. All for the sake of allowing gays to be open and satisfy the minority when nothing was wrong. Look at me funny homo and I will charge you with harassment.
Someone earlier said it, lets let the military take a vote. No polls set up to ensure someones agenda is met. Lets require every soldier, in all services, to vote yes or no. Then we will see what the military members think about it.
As with the earlier post I was never allowed a vote in anything while in the military but I'd like to see the results of this vote.
At the end of the day soldiers will do what they are ordered to do. Thats the way it is. I did things I was ordered to do which I fundamentally questioned but understood to be for the greater good (no I would not kill children or hang religious groups if told). The same will happen when this is implemented. I just dont see the need... With this happening where will it end???
This is a social agenda and is based on no scientific data. Someone please show me any study with verifiable results showing that homosexuality has anything to do with biology. It doesnt exist and is no different then pedophilia. Being a homosexual or bi-sexual is a choice, not backed by so much as a known gene in science. I realize that homosexuals have no more choice at being atracted to members of thier own sex as I do to Brunettes with dark eyes. I dont know why I'm attracted to this type of woman but I am. The same applies to pedophiles, they are attracted to young children for reasons unknown to science so should they also be granted entry?? Am I comparing homosexuality to pedophilia, yes I am. Whats the difference. Neither have any basis in biology, sex at its root is based on procreation, homosexuals have no more chance of procreating than pedophiles have of procreating with a young child. Having no meaning in the scientific or biological world that makes it a choice. Right or wrong isnt based in nature but by societies willingness to accept a behavior. Society hasnt accepted homosexuality on a broad enough basis or we wouldnt be having this conversation. Pedophiles are imprisoned because society deems it to be deviant behavior. While I think society doesnt feel that homosexuality is as deviant as it used to we are far from being acceptive of it. Until the majority in society accept homosexuality there will be struggles for its members. The US military represents society however we are unwilling to truly take them to task to understand how they feel. We'll use polls and opinions as they are easily manipulated.
Lets take a vote...
Blah blah blah. Who cares about a military vote anyway. Their vote is worthless when it comes to military policy. Who cares what you believe homosexuality is. The fact is, DADT singles out someone based on their sexuality and ends their military career. If you think that's in any way fair, that's fine. Perhaps we should have allowed the military long ago to take a vote on whether idiots should be allowed to serve. I'm sure 99.9% of them will vote against allowing idiots in the military. This would have effectively ended your military career. Consequently, you would have been pushing your Idiot agenda against the "DADT for Idiots" policy and also fighting for Idiot Rights.
My question is! How are they going to split up Boot Camp now? Will gay men be put into women's companies/divisions and gay women into men's?
They keep men's and women's Boot Camps separate so their isn't any fooling around between the sexes. Now the only way to avoid that issue is to put gay men with the women and gay women with the men. You can't put gay men with gay men and gay women with gay women. So it would also have to be one gay man or woman per company/division. You can't have a company/division of all gays or the problem would be 10 fold. This is going to cause a massive major problem for the military. Unless; 24hr video surveillance of all spaces is monitored. Massive, massive, massive head ache for the military.
My question is why do you think repeal of DADT is going to lead to gays running around in boot camp trying to have sex with each other. Anyone who does isn't going to be around very long. Problem solved.
I didn't say they will. I stated that the sexes are kept separate to avoid fooling around. What do you do to keep the issue a non-issue?
Myself being a vet and having a gay brother can literally see this being a major problem for the military.
Sara- Do you actually think? Gays have fought in every war we've ever had. You just didnt know about it! There have never been unit cohesion breakdowns due to gays in the military. McCain's comment at last minute debate, was all show, and no substance! He's a mean old fool, and you need to educate yourself on the issue. To think I used to have more respect for him...
hard to beleive how racist and bigotted conservatives are, we live in a racist country these comments here prove that, and coward conservatives im not making that up , just read comments here, that is if youcan read, i know one person isnt here to read that would be sarah:"thequitter,edithbunker"palin
I am a straight man, and I have not a problem in the world with gays serving openly. Were not serving to just sit around and talk about who we bang. I've caught MANY married soldiers, and higher officials checking me out in the shower, in the latrine, and on the Navy cots at night. So what. I'm comfortable enough in my own sexuality to be a real man & take it as a compliment. So, for all of you who say, "You don't know what it's like to serve...", Well, I do, and it don't bother me in the least. Show some love for your fellow man, not hate.