President Obama signed the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 on Monday, calling it "vitally important" to the country. He was joined by the first lady, perhaps the bill's biggest booster
The law reauthorizes child nutrition programs for five years and includes $4.5 billion over 10 years for the programs. It strengthens school meal programs by increasing the number of students who are eligible to get free meals -- adding about 115,000 students to those rolls -- and by improving the quality of the food provided.
Combatting childhood obesity through better nutrition and exercise has been one of the first lady's key initiatives and something she has devoted a great deal of time to through her Let's Move campaign and her White House garden. The new law is aimed at helping reach the goal set she of solving the problem of childhood obesity within a generation.
The first lady noted the groundswell of support from parents, schools, doctors and business and labor leaders, saying the nearly $150 billion spent each year to treat obesity-related illnesses -- conditions like type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure and high cholesterol that are increasingly being seen in the nation's youth -- had an impact on the nation's economy. With a third of American young people overweight or obese, she said the problem was more than a public health issue.
"When more than one in four young people are unqualified for military service because of their weight, they (military leaders) tell us that childhood obesity isn't just a public health issue, they tell is it not just an economic threat, it is a national security threat as well," she told the audience at Harriet Tubman Elementary School.
President Obama also talked about the economic impact of treating obesity-related diseases and he noted that the bill passed with strong support from both parties.
"That hasn't happened as often as we've liked over the last couple of years, but I think it says something about our politics," the president said. "It reminds us that no matter what people may hear about how divided things are in Washington, we can still come together and agree on issues that matter for our children's future and for our future as a nation."
Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Education Secretary Arne Duncan were also on hand for the event, along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Sens. Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) and Tom Harkin (D-IA), Reps. George Miller (D-CA), Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) and Todd Platts (R-PA)
Administration officials touted the bill in a conference call with reporters on Friday, with Vilsack calling it a "historic investment" and said today's signing one of the most significant days in child nutrition since President Harry Truman signed the School Lunch Act in 1946.
More than 31 million students receive school meals, according to the administration. Under the bill, schools will be provided with funds -- through the Department of Agriculture -- to update their nutritional standards for federally subsidized lunches. Vilsack said the 6-cent boost in the rate of reimbursement to schools represented the first real rate increase in over 30 years. The new law also gives the USDA authority to set nutritional standards for all foods sold at schools in vending machines, lunch lines and school stores, sets goals for the amount of physical activity students should get and helps communities establish local farm-to-school networks and create school gardens.
The bill is paid for in part by rolling back a temporary increase in food stamp benefits starting in the fall of 2013 -- something that angered some members of Congress -- and the president said he was committed to working with them to restore those funds in the future.


This bill is incredibly important. The lunches served in schools I have worked have been disgraceful. And so many kids depend on them. I hope more schools build real kitchens where they prepare healthier meals instead of relying on those frozen foods that are worse than McDonald's for kids.
Oh, my, Michelle is out there with those new boots!
A Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010
All we hear about is the rich and the middle class. And how they feel they are being dismissed. Year after year after year it's always about them.
Well, this story is wonderful. Simply wonderful. Our First Lady is lovely. And she worked nonstop on this effort.
Hunger-Free Act.
For children. Makes my day.
Pat ever notice how FAT the first lady is? She needs to start at the White House
The first lady is not FAT!!!! She is a healthy Black Woman ,that means she has curves, a shape.You must be a under weight white republican white woman. should she look like Nancy Regan a sickly Skinny Bobble Head ?
Obamas praise Hunger act.
Then they talk about and focus on childhood obesity, the first lady's key initiative.
Only in American politics is the portrait of childhood hunger an obese kid.
Side note:
Last year there were 4,555 military discharges for violation of weight standards. Big focus has been on passing the repeal of DADT. There were 634 military dischrges for homosexuality. (98% were honorable with full benefits and most were not contested.)
The big thing is that 1/3 of troops in combat arms have stated they will consider leaving if DADT is repealed. Only 20% would be the loss of 250,000 combat troops (the guys that do the fighting)
So what is the real "National Security threat", Michelle?
The answer is the Obama's themselves.
Did the Obamas set the weight standard? Did the Obamas make the final decision to NOT repeal DADT? No. I don't know who set the weight standards but the Repubs are the ones making it hard for a person of sexual orientation to serve our country.
are the weight standards necessary? Wouldn't they start to lose with the training and diets they are put on?
Obamas have pretty well destroyed our security
Fantastic...MORE WELFARE!
Yeah, those kids should get jobs instead of relying on government handouts all the time.
you sound so smart you should go back to school. Tell me in what state that a child under the age of 16 can get a job to pay for a school lunch? If they did have a job they wouldn't buy the nasty school lunch. I pray you never need help from the gov.
Gee take food stamps away from the people so their childern can have lunch at school sounds like another win for the deficit hey if they dont make the sacrafice who will go poor people and they dont need to eat every day thats a myth. What next the middle class giving up their jobs so the wealthy can make a buck. The sacrifice has to come from somewherethanks middle class . The wealthy still lets us call this place America thanks wealthy people and your supporters .
I guess even the health and well being of our children is just not enough cause to even temporarily pause the haters and the selfish and the petty.
Definitely my reaction too. I guess one of the threats to the Great American Family isn't childhood hunger after all - it's those darned liberals!!
Chelling You have a third on those darn liberals spending our money
That 4.5 billion would be better spent elsewhere! And, here's a newsflash for the Obama's...........people don't raise their children with the idea that they should be "fit for the military" when they grow up. But since they are so concerned with making sure children grow up "fit" for the military, how about they just take their daughters to a recruitment center and get them pre-signed so that when they come of age they're all set to report directly.
What an inspired comment, I am sure that Michelle Obama's choice to include that bit about the military was a 100% accurate indication of her intention to groom her children for war, and her opinion that all other Americans should do the same.
Also, I'm genuinely curious to know what this "elsewhere" is, since child hunger isn't important enough.
poop
Amy isn't amazing that school lunches are terrible and the welfare kids will be given worse food at home? Maybe the goverment should quit stealing taxpayers money and giving it to their worthless parents. Give the kids $5 and send them out for a good meal!!!!!!! How does 6 cents transform a system of lousy frozen meals to a nice hot healthy meal????????????????????????
datadon what the hell do you expect a kid to be able to get for $5? Mcdonalds? Unless they go to the store, by a bag of beans and a few veggies and cook it themselves, they can't get a hot healthy meal for $5. What era are you living in? YOu have nothing but bandwagon comments to "contribute" that you get from the crap spewed from the scared media. Shut up.