Just remember one thing;

When you hear all the complaining about the 'liberal media', you hear it on.....

the 'liberal media'!

Hell the three bears never appeared on any other news outlet,except the Hooter's Fox Network.Too scared to being asked the tough questions.So the left had to attack the idiots.

Please. please, don't make Palin come back to alaska! Not many people here really like her very much, she doesn't have hardly ANY support or influence...won't someone else take her, please??

The news media this election cycle has been woefully ignorant of the sentiments of average Americans. Up until about two weeks ago, you would have thought Republicans and the Tea Party didn't have a shot at winning if you watched cable and network news.

Is it not odd that virtually all the double-digit underdogs the mainstream media focused on where Republicans (or former Republicans)? There are about 40 Democrats down in the polls that low but they were rarely mentioned with the exception of Lincoln.

And look at how the media has attacked O'Donnell and Angle. I'm not fans of either of them but as a woman, I've been absolutely shocked and saddened by the vitriol towards these women. I would like to see a study breaking down the positive vs. negative stories of these candidates, especially compared to their opponents. It's been absolutely disgraceful.

Yet you hardly hear about Alan Grayson, who makes both of them look like wordsmiths compared to his unhinged rants and behavior.

MSNBC just this morning had a video from the Today show that bashed Sarah Palin. They attacked her for choosing Miller over Murkowski (isn't she allowed to support who she wants?), attacked her for going after the media for the outrageous bias a local Anchorage news channel showed against Miller and his supporters (yet NBC didn't mention the actual story of why Palin was upset), and that if Miller loses in Alaska today, it's a referendum on Sarah Palin and her political clout.

Oh but MSNBC and NBC has echoed over and over again this week that the impending Democrat losses is not a referendum on President Obama or his policies but rather the public's unhappiness with the economy.

Sure, whatever MSNBC.

Gee, it is just about news space? It does not matter if, say, all of the stories are negative?

Who'd thunk?

I'm not taking up the cause of any one candidate, but today's media would present George Washington in such a poor light, it would take a miracle to get him elected.

Republicans will win some, and Republicans will lose some - some wins may make even those most Republican of the Republicans ask themselves, "what have we done"? Republicans are not going to win as many races as they believed even a month ago, and less than they won during other mid-term elections in recent history. We Democrats fully expected the Re-pubs to win majority in the House, but if we the voters were all as unhappy and mad at leadership as the Republicans would have us think, then I would expect the Republican wins to be greater than they will be. And before you Republicans celebrate too many victories, take an honest look at what you elected.

"I would expect the Republican wins to be greater than they will be." Nice statement, no matter the outcome, outside of Republicans winning every race, it will prove that people aren't really unhappy because you would have expected them to win more than they did. Excellent foundation for the spin to come.

John, if the outrage against the Obama adiminstration were so far reaching, how could Democrats win any seats? The "spin" on the right suggests the whole country, all Americans, are mad as hell, etc., etc. We aren't. Most of us are in the center, and want able representation. I am a Democrat, but I don't believe a Congress filled with Democrats is necessarily a good thing. I have voted for Republicans in the past, before the push to the far right made voting Republican silly. My vote goes to articulate, clear minded candidates who represent the best ideas for this country going forward, It is not a contest to see who can be the farthest to the right or the farthest to the left.

Magnificent - you said "if the outrage against the Obama adiminstration were so far reaching, how could Democrats win any seats?"

Seriously?
The Republicans are predicted to take back more seats in one election than Democrats have in the past 2 decades and more than they have gained since the 1940's.

You can sugar-coat this election any way you want but historically speaking, the Democrats are in for a bloodbath not seen in 3 generations.

My hope is that Republicans don't see this as a rubber-stamp of approval, but rather a chance to actually change the way their party and Washington operates, moving away from special interests and back towards fiscal responsiblity.

Len, the Moutains of Alaska are really beautiful and the wilderness is much more civilized than whatever urban areas most think of as "civilized". It would be really great if Palin could be relocated to anywhere else; it would benefit Alaska, that is a fact. You want her? If she were gone from here, we could return to the wonderful isolation we enjoyed without the "lower 48" paying any attention to us. We will be happy to send her to you so she can screw up your state.

Jim, hard to read your post, but Palin and O'Donnell are very far from being "normal ladies". Do you think so little of women that you think those two are "normal"? You don't get out much, do you. Perhaps 'tis you that "can't handle to truth". Define for me "normal". Is normal telling the whole world "I'm not a witch"? Is normal identifying more with wildlife that eats is own young? Yes, I know, the male grizzlies eat cubs, but so do the females if they sense something is wrong with a cub. Palin for all of her faults is a better mother than that. Do "normal" women quit on their obligations when trusted with positions of significance, like governor of a State? No, I don't believe "normal" women are quitters.

Jim, I know you think of sp and co as stand up "normal women", but like it or not "handle the truth". The reason they got so much media attention, is because their ignorance of the issues is hilarious. And they think they can win. If it makes selling articles easier, they will run with it. Have you not seen or heard them?

No, Jim, it is about who conservatives are hiring. Just like hiring a new employee, you really aren't sure what you are getting until the probationary period is up, maybe even later. And SOMETIMES you find yourself going through the process of firing an employee because of poor performance, even employees that have been with you for a while. Bad employees can be fired with greater ease than duly elected representatives who proved to be bad choices. Conservatives are "hiring" some very bad employees.

Umm last time I checked Pelosi is in no danger of losing her election so she will not be going anywhere. She may lose the Speakership but she will still be in the House.

Just to inform all of those supposed informed righties out there.

It is impossible for Nancy to lose with her liberal district. But she will lose her speaker position to the AstroTurf party.

Wolfman, we aren't all as stupid as you believe.

Will the last progressive leaving the House please turn out the lights? Your party is over.

The Republicians taking over something could be good for President Obama. Because if they do not get somethings done. The independent that crossed over and voted for the Republicians this time will vote for the Dem. for the President in 2014. A lot of us independent are not aganist the president. We do not like the way things are going in Washington. We want to shake up somethings Therefore, the Republicians are going to have to do a lot to keep independent on there side. So just saying NO and doing nothing is not going to work if they take over the House or Senate.

I am a independent and I know how we think.

Ah, yes, Candy. Rainbows. Unicorns. The tooth fairy.

Good night, sweetie. Keep dreaming.