The Boston Globe: “President Obama will reduce the scope of his legislative ambitions if Republicans seize control of the House today as is widely predicted, jettisoning proposals to control greenhouse gases and overhaul immigration laws in favor of more modest efforts such as improving education and highways, according to lawmakers, former White House officials, and political analysts.” More: “Obama also is expected to engage in negotiations with Republicans on taxes and the federal deficit. As he develops his own 2012 reelection strategy, he will need to be seen as working credibly across the aisle, officials and analysts said.”
“Barack Obama has dipped his presidential toe into pop culture many times this election season, but the latest stop on his media tour reeks of a ratings stunt: the President will be sitting down with Ryan Seacrest,” the New York Daily News reports, adding, “According to the Facebook posting, Obama's interview with ‘On Air with Ryan Seacrest’ will air on Tuesday at 7:15am in Los Angeles, or 10:15am EST. It will also be posted online immediately following the broadcast.”
The president also will participate in radio interview on local Chicago, Las Vegas, and Jacksonville, FL.


"Obama agenda: Where it goes from here"
Hopefully nowhere!
Sometimes gridlock is a good thing.
And this is one of those times.
If you have your way, this is who Obama will be working with next:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a64ZIkmVPv_w
But America is wise. Its takes time to fix a mess that took nearly a decade to create and its clear that those folks (above) did not usher America in a right direction as they took our surplus and prosperous country into serious structural, depression-trending territory.
Your "surplus" never actually existed. It was merely a projection based on the then-current spending models.
9/11 changed all that.
Obama wants to improve education? That is an easy one to fix. Get rid of the Department of Education (Save money), get rid of tenure (hold teachers accountable) and decertify all of the teacher's unions (bring back quality teachers and eliminate obstructionism to reforms). I'm "Waiting for Superman". Michelle Rhee had the right idea but Unions blocked the vote of members.
As long as the Unions and teachers are caked baked and concreted together
AMerican education will always remain inferior to Third World countries. The Dems
will not fix that for they are too embedded with the Unions.
He called me his enemy, so be it.
You accused him of not being born in American, called him a Muslim and a socialist. You want to take back America as though it had been invaded by outside forces (who by the way gave you a tax cut). It's about time he reacted to you.
Wm.-375815
I never questioned his citizenship, faith, or political ideology
yet he called me that also.
So how is that justified?
PS. If public employees can unionize, why do we have to have a Civil Service Commission to protect their jobs? Abolish the Civil Service Commission and save money and let the unions provide the protection for their members.
Civil service prevents political hiring and firing. The union membership to which you refer is at the state and local levels.
How many states actually have true teacher's unions - unions that can strike, unions that can actually enforce contract terms on local school boards? I'll bet you that it is less than half the states. I'll bet you none of the southern/western states have true teacher unions. So this is a lot of hot air.
7 deleted, Sheeple Hearder banned, spamming a petition. Second suspension in a little over a month.