Rally hosts: 'We're proud of the show we did'

Their event attracted scores of journalists, high-profile musical talent, and - if Comedy Central's "unofficial estimate" is in the right ballpark -- well over 200,000 people.

But did Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert accomplish what they wanted?

"We're proud of ourselves. We're proud of the show we did," Stewart told reporters at a press conference after the rally. "For us, the success of it was the execution of the idea and the intention."

The two comedians mostly steered away from questions from the press about the political implications of the event, repeatedly characterizing the afternoon's mixture of comedy, musical performances, and an appeal for political reasonableness as "a show."

"We wanted to do really good show for people who took the time to come out and see us," said Stewart.

The two comedians also batted away questions about their role in American politics, saying that the Beltway mentality of "who's up and who's down" does not apply to their schtick.

"Our currency is not this town's currency," Stewart said. "We're not running for anything. We don't have a constituency. We do television shows for people who like them," he said, jokingly adding that the success of their cable "faux news" shows allows network Comedy Central to "continue to sell beer to young people."

Stewart pointedly declined to urge people to vote. When asked whether or not he should have used the stage to urge people to participate in the midterm elections, he replied, "I think people should do what moves them. That's not my place to make that choice for them. That's theirs."

The "Daily Show" funnyman hinted that he had some regrets about referring to President Barack Obama as "dude" during a Wednesday interview, noting that he always engages in some Monday morning quarterbacking after sitting down with major guests.

"But I also, when King Abdullah of Jordan was on, I called him 'Broseph,'" he joked, "so it's just something I do."

Between the rally, the presidential interview, and the presence of international media at their public appearances, the mantle of political relevance has been newly thrust upon the two comedians -- regardless of how openly they welcome it.

But Stewart argues that he does not use his comedic persona as a shroud or an excuse to shrug off criticism of the content of the shows that he and Colbert produce.

"I'm really proud that I'm a comedian. I think it's hard," he said.

"That's not a dodge. That's pride."

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4

compromise .....lol ....never going to happen...go gop

    Reply#86 - Sun Oct 31, 2010 4:46 AM EDT

    Libs lost deal with it its over .......

      Reply#87 - Sun Oct 31, 2010 4:49 AM EDT

      Kevin, thanks for reaching out. Good luck with your predictions. If they go as you expect, we can hold you responsible for the consequences, right?

      • 2 votes
      Reply#88 - Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:47 AM EDT

      The likes of Kevin will never take responsibility for their beliefs and the votes they cast. If all goes wrong it still will be Obama's fault...it became his when he was selected over Hillary Clinton.

      • 1 vote
      #88.1 - Sun Oct 31, 2010 12:13 PM EDT
      Reply

      Thank God For Sanity!

      I simply give up on making a comment, it keeps disappearing.

      VOTE on November 2, smile on Nov 3rd when Dems

      do better than expected.

      • 4 votes
      Reply#89 - Sun Oct 31, 2010 12:41 PM EDT

      Yes you can hold me resposible for repealing Oboma care .......lower taxes less regulation on buisness so they can create jobs ....stop the spending ... reducing the deficit....doing away with cap & trade another job killer ....... securing our borders so we can stop being invaded ..... and thats just a few of the things off the top of my head you can thank me for ..... have a great Nov 2nd.

        Reply#90 - Sun Oct 31, 2010 1:08 PM EDT

        And how will you repeal our Healthcare Act? Do you understand the workings of our government? Your corporate owners are sitting on 3 trillion in cash and refuse to hire because they want to ship even more jobs off shore. You need to wake up, dude.

        • 1 vote
        #90.1 - Sun Oct 31, 2010 4:03 PM EDT
        Reply

        Oh yeah clean your trash up. Dont leave it like you did after your last rally .....Thanks

          Reply#91 - Sun Oct 31, 2010 1:14 PM EDT

          Stupid Liberals didn't throw down one innocent young girl and stomp on her! What's wrong with you people, "I demand a apology!"

          • 2 votes
          Reply#92 - Sun Oct 31, 2010 2:07 PM EDT

          Kevin has his Teabag/repub spew down! you go dude!

          Let me know when facts are involved, and " I'll have to post that on my website" answer won't do, facts are not just made up hyperbole for talking points okay find some!

          • 1 vote
          Reply#93 - Sun Oct 31, 2010 2:14 PM EDT

          Innocent ....lol .... she was wearing a wig tried to rush the suv and jam her sighn in it . And if you call that a stop you are the little girl.

            Reply#94 - Sun Oct 31, 2010 4:06 PM EDT

            So you think goverment and unions create jobs ... well you better tell Obama he bailed out G.M. and the Teamsters union to the tune os around 50 billion

              Reply#95 - Sun Oct 31, 2010 4:11 PM EDT

              Now let's see what exactly did this SUV do to her again? and this sign didwhat damage? And her free constitutional right to assemble caused a riot because her head got under his boot! Have I got of it right or is rightwing I never keep them straight.

              • 1 vote
              #95.1 - Sun Oct 31, 2010 5:51 PM EDT
              Reply

              I find it very interesting that when Glen Beck held his rally the general media was unable to suppress the video coverage that clearly seemed to prove their attempt to diminish the numbers in attendance. Yet now, as this story suggests an approximate similar number in attendance, they choose not to provide any video. How do you spell deliberate deception?

              • 1 vote
              Reply#96 - Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:22 PM EDT

              Which begs the question, .....really? It's never been easier for us to count the numbers of people at any event accurately. Why suppress something so basic?

              If Homeland security and law enforcement for the Nation's capitol can't tell us, check that...don't have a program which can tell them, how many people are within city limits at any given moment in time, we should cut their budgets by 90%.

                #96.1 - Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:32 PM EDT
                Reply
                Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4
                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.