Voter confidence in the president and his party has ticked up slightly in the October monthly average, but is still at lows that historically indicate big gains by the party out of power.
NBC’s Voter Confidence Index is now -36, up from -41 two weeks ago, after the AP-GFK and Pew Research polls were factored in. The data shows the uptick is a result of a steady job approval rating for President Obama and a slight improvement in Americans’ views on the direction of the country.
But the VCI is among the lowest of President Obama’s presidency. Last month, it was -39. Historically, it is worse than 1994 (when Democrats lost 54 seats) and 1982 (when Republicans lost 26 House seats). It is better, however, than 2006, when it was at an all-time low of -65, and Republicans lost 30 House seats.
For more on the VCI, click here: VCI.msnbc.com.


Let's please try to keep comments related to the articles written. We can't always delete comments and moderate, but be mindful of trying to keep it germane.
Mr. Montanaro,
It is going to get uglier and uglier the closer we get to election day...so be forewarned...
You should probably be posting more CoC and Christine O'Donnell stuff as a pacifier...:)
Agree with dangerfield.
Those are the salient issues here at First Read.
Some Sarah Palin stuff wouldn't hurt either...she's a real crowd-pleaser here.
Now, The MSM is trying thier "RopeADope" strategy of "Who, Not Me", in trying to tampdown expectations.
MB & Dangerfield jumped in head 1st!
Umm...Rick.
What part of "big losses" didn't you understand?
They're really tamping down expectations, aren't they?
Your right dangerfield, but I really don't see how you teabaggers can get any uglier or hateful. But by all means give it your best shot.
Mo, it's "you're"....not "your"...
"Every time you think you weaken the nation."
- Moe (HALF SHOT SHOOTERS, 1936)
What part of Huge don't you understand MB?
Will it be 100-50-30-435, do you really know? No you don't, you've just followed the narrative the MSM has putout to date. Now that that narrative is changing daily, you don't wanna beleive the MSM?
Hypocrisy, thy Moniker is named Mixed bag!
In the timespan of less than a year, the MSM has changed(or tryed to)the narrative from tsunami to wave to Big Losses.
Now a Tsunami is a total WipeOut, don't see that narrative.
A wave is something where a few get knocked down from the incoming Rush. The strongest are left standing to fendoff the next wave!
Big Losses is a narrative so vague that either way this election comesout, it leaves the MSM with a narrative of "We Toldya So"!
In the highly Intelligent words of Deferment Dick Cheney:
SO!
Actually, Rick-
I was simply referring to the title and content of the article posted.
Glad we cleared that up.
This has been a year where historical trends have been ignored. I think stories like this serve to demoralize the subject of the story whether its Dem's or Republicans. Predicting bad news and losses serve as fodder to the opponent to influence readers into believing that all hope is lost and it actually suppresses the vote! No one will even bother to come out and vote for a losing cause. I say to everyone ignore the pundits ignore history become more like the Tea Party and ignore the facts. Set your own narrative march to the beat of your own drum. VOTE early, VOTE your conscious, VOTE your choice, whatever you do make sure you VOTE. Do not let anyone stop you this is actually what lets your voice be heard VOTE!
PS Please ignore the comments posted by Todd pollard today do not give him the benefit of an arguement, let's be civil and comment by voting. Glad to see the moderators finally looked at the blog and deleted an inflamatory comment.
I have been v. impressed with Chris Coons and Joe Sestak.
Two very bright candidates. Sometimes it gets lost with all the loud mouthing going on, but these two I think would be great additions to the Senate.
btw, who caused the deficit? The Republicans.
Who brought the deficit down? The Democrats.
Q: Is that socialism?
I've watched Joe Sestak for some time and have also been impressed with this man. In his race against Arlen Specter, Sestak trailed until about the last week. Then he pulled it out. I believe Joe will win, along with Wisconsin's Russ Feingold.
It was wishful thinking that McCain would lose. Reality is now telling me something different.
Brought deficit DOWN? What country are you living in Ron. Yes when Clinton was prez and the repubs had congress the deficit was down and even had surplus...but this Prez has almost doubled the debt. You can either live in denial or go live in de'Nile.
The Portland Press Herald, which is now owned by a rightwinger publisher, came out this weekend and endorsed the supremely unqualified Republican running against incumbant Democrat Pingree for the House, solely for the purpose of giving the House to the Republicans. This is pretty shocking news, given all that Pingree has accomplished for the state and veterans, and given how dim her challenger is. To my mind, "voter confidence" and "corporate power" are two separate indicators, and "voter confidence" may be the one of lesser importance. The corporate forces against the Democratic Party may trump the public's inclination to support the President and the new administration. We'll see. I'm voting for Libby Mitchell and Pingree this time, and I am boycotting (yes, once again) Portland Press Herald and their advertisers.
"Big losses"...?
Thanks for the reality check regarding the "big picture".
No one needs a reality check more than the average First Reader.
Here's my over-under for the election next Tuesday;
Congress; Repubs 45 seats
Senate; Repubs 6 seats
Pretty good call...
I wouldn't be surprised if that's where we end up, or close to it.
Like the man said...big losses.
Roosevelt, Truman, Eisenhower, Johnson, Ford, Clinton ALL had losses in the neighborhood of what dangerfield is predicting. It's just history folks.
What's more important is the amount of legislation our current Administration has successfully passed. Every person may not get everything they hope for but the sheer amout of legislation is historic.
Thank you Mr. President!
...quality over quantity, VermontGirl, thank you very much.
ED-
Waited on you for that one...what took you so long?...
said it before (right here, pushing 6 months ago), -n- I'll say it again:
Dem's keep the house (barely) and keep the Senate by at least 6, more likely 8 (counting DroopyDawgLieberman & Colonel Sanders), ie...when the smoke has cleared, Dems hold 53-54 in the Senate, 220-225 in the house.
And I hope one (and only one) Tea Bagger gets into the Senate. Just keep handin' him/her the microphone, and let 'em spew (not to mention the irony/satisfaction that will come from having listened to them going on ad nauseum about "REVOLUTION", only to end up with the same representaion in the Senate as the Socialist party!)
The 2006 index rating is extremely important because it is much closer in time to 2010 than the other elections. As such, it shows that fewer seats may change over despite a relatively large negative index rating.
Also -36 today might very well be -31 even -28/29 by next Tuesday. The Democrats will push back harder than in previous off-years. Remember the Gingrich takeover was largely the result of the perception that the Democrats had been in power too long and that malaise had set in. The perception this time around is that the Dems have just begun to address the major problems they inherited. I'm not saying either preception was or is true but the perception matters because it influences voter trends.
Heym Fancy? It could also be back at -40, or -45, by next week.
AP GfK has a 'house effect' that favors democrats, so using that in a voter confidence measure will skew your results left. As for Newsweek, well, let's just say it is the one eyed, one toed giant purple people eater of polls. No one takes it seriously.
Well, maybe Obama does. He looks at all those other polls that show him anywhere from one to ten points underwater, and then sees that Newsweek has him at plus for teen, and says "see? They love me! To heck with all those other polls!".
Republicans with fifty house seats, seven to eight Senate seats. And a whole lot of governorships.
Whether there are modest or huge gains for the Republicans in this election, we should all remember that many of the races will be won and lost by narrow margins. This is still a pretty evenly divided country politically --- and no mandate should be read into election results.
You'd think we were on the verge of civil war or sommat...
It seems to me that "conventional wisdom" and predicting outcomes has been off the mark since the start of the 2008 presidential campaign--Hillary Clinton, the inevitable democratic nominee; McCain's campaign is dead in the water. As shown by the rise of the Tea Party candidates, this election may not be what we're used to seeing; it will be far from a traditional and predictable election.
And yet the polling was dead on for the election in 2008
Obama; 52.1 (Projection) 52.9 (actual)
McCain; 45.6 (projection) 44.5 (actual)
Spread 7.6 projected
7.3 Actual
So much for that theory...
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_mccain_vs_obama-225.html
The poll that counts is still a week away. A long time in political terms.
Having gridlock is just failure. Having no changes being implemented is just to fail. Returning to ‘more of the same’ is just totally failing. Only when supporting the continuation of the changes in progress while still pressuring for adjustment and fine tuning is there any hope to realize what we voted for in 2008. Otherwise we will just be returned to having only Special Interests and the select few once more substantially gaining and the majority again being given only apathy, the costs and an abundance of subterfuge.
Whether Tea Party or regular Republican, there are those who strongly, both overtly and covertly, support them with deceptive efforts and substantial money and who intend again, as they did with Bush-Cheney and the Republican Party, to use them as their ‘puppets’ to once more ‘pull their strings’ and insure total concentration on benefit for only Special Interests and the select few. The scripted propaganda, the scare tactics, the deceptive, exaggerated and emotionally charged appeals, the misinformation all being offered without conscience and boldly and arrogantly, sometimes even cutely, always irresponsibly having only a focus on their political ambitions, all being aimed to rationalize and justify a return to ‘more of the same’ that cost us so much and literally caused the problems. The proof is in seeing the end results and in recognizing the costs as under their rule only the few always gain and the majority, including the total middle-class, continually loose.
It really is now up to the voters to see the truth and to reject the deception aimed to emotionally sway and manipulate public opinion for the benefit of just the few. We really can’t relent in putting the pressure on our government to fine tune, adjust and implement the greatly needed changes and we absolutely can’t allow ourselves to be conned into accepting putting the changes aside, going back to ‘more of the same’ that caused the problems and cost us so much and then be so naive as to think those who aggressively fought all change and who would totally benefit from ‘more of the same’ would ever allow meaningful change. It is best to work with what we have instead of ever trusting to start over.
Dear Christian, I need your help…. I am very concern that we are blinded by half truths and deceiving ourselves with standing up for biblical truths. If we are voting for a candidate because they stand for our Christian values such as homosexuality or abortion…. But if we are holding those two biblical truths to say whether a candidate is upholding our Christian values, then we need to check what the bible says about lying, adultery and bearing false witness against our neighbor. We also need to check ourselves when it comes to separating church from government as for a government to hold biblical truths, it must take care of its people meaning health care for all, meaning when my neighbor loses their job the government is to help them… Base of the above statement some candidates does not deserve our support as the bible does not make distinction between one sin over the other.
Just goes to show that despite the national news media (NBC,CBS, ABC,NEWSWEEK,ECT.) being so pro Democrat and liberal that a great many Americans are tired of big government, big deficit spending, socialism, and czars (see Webster for defination of czar).
Would that be 'czar' as in the same jobs being filled by President Obama as were filled by President Bush? Would that be big deficit spending as in President Bush spending more than all of his predecessors combined and thereby doubling the debt and the interest payments that must be made yearly to about $500 BILLION per year? Would that be the big government that grew under Reagan, Bush 41 and Bush 43 but shrunk under Clinton?
Man, come up with something original, germane and fact based. You guys are really getting boring.
You also might want to read the book "What Liberal Media" by Eric Alterman. The media is decidedly not liberal.
Henry
Websters definition of "czar" - see Bush Administration
Clinton ran a surplus -- Bush plunges us back into debt and to the brink of economic collapse. Neither Democrat or Republican could avoid the deficits we're running now.
With all the reports that the senate and some governor races are "tightening" or slipping back to the Dems, I wonder if the same could be happening in some of those marginal house races.
It ain't over til it's over. Yesterday Newsweek reported still more positive news for the President and Democratic enthusiasm. The public may be waking up to the facts that the President and Democrats in congress saved us from a depression with only resistance from the Republicans.
I believe when all is said and done next week the Rep will win the house and have a majority of only a few votes and the Dems will keep the Senate by a few votes. You can tell that both parties are scared and do not know what will happen. Listen to Rush and Hannity and you can tell by what they are saying that they are not sure what will happen, as they were months ago. Rush is now urging Dem voters to stay home or vote Rep so that Hilary can run for the WH is 2012. A commercial is out urging Hispanic voters to stay home and not vote. Has anyone ever heard of such nonsense in the past? Whether you like Obama or not, what has the Rep party done for this country for the past two years? NOTHING. They have fought against EVERYTHING that Obama has tried to do. Rush and Hannity and the others fought against him the day he won the election (let alone after he got sworn in!). What did they do for this country when they had complete control for six of Bush's eight years? Ran up the deficit, got us in a war that has cost thousands of lives, no energy policy, no drilling policy, no health care policy, no immigration policy, no secure borders. The things they are now saying Obama is not doing. All people need to vote this upcoming election. For whomever you think is best and not what a sound bite or thirty second commercial or lie a politician (and they all lie) is going to say to you.
deficits only matter if you are not in power, ask reagan and then ask the republicans about doubling the budget and the deficit under bush
hmmm just how long does the statue of limitations run on blaming bush. Maybe it's time for the boys in office to grow up, look in the mirror and realize they are part of the problem.
If you want to play the 'blame game' this all started in the 40s with Roosevelt. He proved then what we are still paying for, nothing comes free, the tax payer always loses, and that government is a bad return on investment.
Hey Hawkeye when does the statute for limitations run out on the truth? Are you saying you would take crap for someone elses screw up day after day when you had nothing to do with it? What bugs me is how does saving the banking industry, the auto industry (plus the millions of jobs with it) and getting health care for 34 million Americans equate to doing a bad job? I like Americans but my god you can be down right stupid at times. Although you will never let yourself understand it I will point it out anyway. With Bill Clinton (Democrats) you had a surplus and your national debt was shrinking. With Bush (Republicans) you ran up trillions of dollars worth of debt, in what 8 years. Now how in the name of blazes can you expect someone to fix everything in 2 years?? THINK FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!!!
Maybe the Democrats did not listen to the American people? Same reason why MSNBC have such low ratings.
Round 1
Dem 5 Rep 2
Round 2
Dem 4 Rep 3
Round 3
Dem 7 Rep 0
Dem wins by TKO in 4 round