Team Pawlenty’s got to be happy about this one.
The libertarian Cato Institute published its 2010 fiscal policy “report card” of America’s governors Thursday, giving Minnesota chief executive and presumed 2012 presidential contender Tim Pawlenty one of the four “A” grades it doled out.
The report -- which uses data on spending, revenue, and tax rates to compute a grade based on each governor’s “success at restraining taxes and spending since 2008,” -- praised the folksy Midwesterner for vetoing a gas tax as well as several income tax rate hikes, and for proposing a constitutional amendment to limit the growth of spending.
Pawlenty outperformed two other current governors whose names have been frequently mentioned in the 2012 Republican shortlist: Gov. Mitch Daniels of Indiana and Gov. Haley Barbour of Mississippi.
Other governors receiving the top grade: Mark Sanford of South Carolina, Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, and Democratic Senate contender Joe Manchin of West Virginia.
Daniels, often described as a potential dark horse contender in part because of his reputation for proposing slashes to federal programs as President George W. Bush’s budget director, scored a B. “Governor Daniels is a fiscal conservative, but he seems to focus more on balancing the state budget than shrinking the size of government,” the Institute wrote.
Barbour, the GOP fundraising powerhouse who chairs the Republican Governors Association, earned a C grade. The Institute noted Barbour’s tax increases on hospitals and cigarettes in its argument that Barbour’s “conservative reputation” isn’t reflected in his record on taxes and spending.
Other presidential hopefuls have been graded in previous years. Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachussetts – who, as some of us noted this morning, is the GOP frontrunner for the nomination -- received a C in the group’s 2006 study. Gov. Mike Huckabee was given a grade of “D” in the institute’s evaluation of his governorship in 2006 – mostly due to tax increases he proposed in his second term.
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin was not graded in the Cato Institute’s previous studies. The study does not include Alaska in its biennial report card, explains author Chris Edwards, because much of the state’s revenue comes from oil, making it difficult to compare to other states.
Governors who have not been in office for the length of two annual budget cycles are also not graded, Edwards adds. That means that fans of New Jersey Republican Gov. Chris Christie will also have to wait another two years to see how he matches up.


Because Cato supports him is all the more reason NOT to support T Paw. We don't need extremists in top offices.
Please define "extremist" for me.
Trub is an example. Emmer is even more so. there's a 6 billion dollar defecit trainwreck Trub is walking away from, and he's (!) happy to see it. that's an extremist. his way or the highway.
Who the hell is Trub and Emmer?
Do you mean like the extreme socialist that is running the country now?
Nice. Tim stood out early to me. I also greatly respect Cato. Win-win for me. I love Cato's Commentary.
http://www.cato.org/
http://www.cato.org/pubarchives/index.php?type=opeds
Ladies and gentlemen, this is classical liberalism (as opposed to the modern version). [Note no quotation marks around those terms].
The Cato Institute, please.
Good catch w bush, thanks!
OK hotshots, what are some of Cato's beliefs?
No restrictions on immigration for one. Completely free trade for another.
I once heard a Cato expert state in an interview that he thought unemployment could be solved by having everyone that was laid off go back to their former employers and offer to do the same job at 50% of the former salary.
Jon, You lie!
Actually I don't Cal. The immigration and free trade are standard libertarian principles and are discussed on Cato's website. I heard the expert from Cato interviewed on NPR a few weeks ago and that is exactly what he said.
Cato has other beliefs as well, such as small government, but Rob just asked for some so I listed some.
Tim Pawlenty is a sanctimonious little creep.
Amy you must be a rock with arms.... Tim P is the only reason Minnesota is not in the tank like other Liberal (Communist States) Michigan, California, etc...
Arizona is in the tank and way on the bottom. We are FAR from liberal. How does that square up with you comment?
How would Cato have a ranked a governor who reduced spending by firing half the state police and teachers, closing all the state parks, and deferring all highway maintenance? I suspect they have a narrow-minded focus on pure fiscal issues and do not consider the overall health and safety and well being of the citizenry. Fiscal is merely one element of good governance. If MS's economy under Barbour is more vibrant than MN's under Pawlenty, doesn't that suggest Barbour's a better governor?
Beware simple-mindedness.
As the article points out, they graded A for those who "stand" for tax reductions. Daniels only got a B for actually trying to balance the budget. Seems to me the balanced budget should have a higher standing than simply cutting taxes.
As for "What are Catos beliefs" simply google "Koch brothers" and you'll see. Mostly they stand for the John Birch Society and the like. No government = good government (anarchy under the guise of Libertarianism). And NO taxes. If you look at the Wikipedia entries, their history of undermeasuring oil shipments, particularly those from federal lands, is of particular note.
Putting Pawlenty in the same sentence as Think Tank is a contradiction. He has never thought about the working men and women in Minnesota. His eyes have always been on higher politcal office.
and that sets him apart from other politicians? Come on...
jc, People often put libertarianism and anarchy together. Yet, this is a misconception. One of the founding principles of our society is private property (Reference John Locke (1632-1704)). To provide for the protection of private property we need the Rule of Law, to maintian the Rule of Law we need a civil government. The libertarian approach is simply what government we need to provide for the Rule of Law and to provide for the protection of people and property. We believe this should be as little as possible. Right now our government (Fed/local) is over 20% of GDP. We believe this number should be between 12-17% of GDP. The key issue is liberty over despotism. Too much government we have despotism, too little we have anarchy, just the right amount we have liberty with people free to do as they wish as long as they don't harm others. One of the key tenets of liberty is that we respect each other and each others rights. Too often government supplants these virtues. Remember, if you take a right from someone else you are really taking a right from yourself.
Regards
The only reason why anyone on this forum could reject Cato outright is because Cato does believe in laizze-faire, and does believe in strengthening the private sector. Yet here are some of Cato's other beliefs. i). legalize marijuana, ii). support for gay rights ('equal protection clause'). iii). opposed the Iraq war, iv). deeply concerned about civlil rights and privacy issues with The Partiot Act.
I live in MN and Pawlenty is the reason MN is doing well in these hard times. He is not afraid to make the hard decisions and do what is right for the people of MN.
No doubt little Timmy looks good to the Cato Institute. He does not look good to MN. Our schools in outstate MN are going to 4 day weeks to try to afford to educate kids, since Timmy has dropped the ball on funding. Property taxes are up, because Local Government Aid has been cut to the bone. My favorite example of an attempted cut by good Christian Timmy was the dental service program to the poor and disabled. There is one dentist up in this area that serves the disadvantaged and they almost wound up closing due to that "compassionate conservative" Timmy. We have new stadiums for sports teams, and the rich have done pretty well under Timmy. It is laughable that he thinks he has any reasonable chance for the Presidency. He is boring as all get out, cannot get through a speech without looking like he is angry (or has a wedgie, I've never been able to decide which it is.) The American people will have enough of Timmy very quickly. Why was he elected her? Had two other candidates that split the vote. That is the only reason.
And, newday, why should the people in Zumbrota pay for aid to Minneapolis and St. Paul the two cities who get the largest amount of LGA? The problem with LGA is that the towns, cities and counties used this money as a base for their budget and did not contstrain spending becaue they thought the money would always be there.
A little over 37% of the state budget for Minnesota is for K-12 education. Add to that another 9% for higher education and the state is spending almost half of the budget on education. In addition to education, the health and human services budget is over 29%. In total, this is over 75% of the state budget.
You can't tell me there isn't enough money in this spending to continue operations. There are, more than likely, local levies that increase the spending for education.
Tim Pawlenty is the firt Governor to actually reduce spending in many, many years at the state level. The problem most people who want government to reduce are OK with reductions so long as it doesn't touch their pet budget item. The federal, state, and local governments need to stop with the wants and really look at the needs.
"You can't tell me there isn't enough money in this spending to continue operations". Really? I am telling you exactly that. If what you say is true, why are our schools cutting back on their services and their week to save money? Timmy has been a disaster, and only the truly uninformed think otherwise.
Are you questioning my numbers because I took them from the states 2010-2011 biennium budget. In the 2004-2005 biennium, K-12 education had a state budget of 12.2 billion. In the 2010-2011 biennium, the budget is 13.3 billion or an increase of 1.1 billion in four biennial cycles.
At the same time the budget has increased 1.1 billion, the enrollment has remained relatively stagnant (and dropped in several years) from 2002 to present with just under 840,000 students. While during some of this period, the average daily enrollment actually dropped below 820,000.
So, if there is more money and either the same or fewer students, why would schools need to shut down one day a week? Is it because of contracts with the unions? We always hear that it is "for the children" except when it comes to contract time. At that time, either the school board capitulates or the teachers will strike. If it was truly for the children, the teachers would continue to teach under their current contract and wait for the issues to be resolved. But, since the districts are basically held hostage, they need to give in completely.
What I am saying Danno, is that you don't have any idea what you are talking about. This from WDAY News reporter Kevin WAllevand, Local Banks Step In to Keep High School Library Open: about a school district, Moorhead, that has a high school that is SO good I am breathless in admiration of it. "it is certainly a reflection of what is perhaps to come. With deficit spending on the horizon and no promise from the State of MN for adequate funding, local businesses are stepping in...". This from Pelican Rapids School District Information on the web about the Referendum that it needs to pass "state school funding has not kept up with the cost of providing a basic education" This one of the school districts that has gone to a four day week. And finally one of the best articles I have seen about the problems that MN faces. The Conservative Elected Officials Quandry 9/23/2010, Jeff Von Whychem, author.
So, because I presented you with the actual spending from the state and that there is now MORE money than there was (by 1.1 BILLION) seven years ago, it is the states fault that schools have budget crises? Do you work in schools or have children in the school? If you do, you would definately see the waste...not in the classroom so much but definately in the administration. Why does each school need a full time social worker? Why are there multiple principles at the high school level. Much of this is in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area, but they are the ones getting the bulk of the funding. So, if there is waste throughout the entire system, it affects each school.
Tell me then, where is the money going? There are 75 districts in the state that will be asking for more money this year. When will there be enough spent on schools? Will it be enough when 75% of the federal, state and local taxes go towards education?
The evidence is clear that the schools do not have the money to provide education to the children, especially here. You can be in denial all you want about it, but the facts are clear. Where did you get the idea that each school has a full time social worker? None of the schools here do, but it would be nice if they did. In fact, in the school my kids attended there was one counselor who has responsibility for 2 elementary, one junior high, and one high school. One of my kids was applying to the Elite colleges, and this counselor had absolutely no time to help her, and all the other seniors too. I realize, that to the righties, it is fun to play with scenario and not fact, but you are really reaching.
Funny. Last I checked, getting an "A" from the CATO Institute is like getting a seal of approval from La Cosa Nostra. Somebody likes you. If only it were someone else. Good luck with that endorsement "Tee Pee"!
What a joke. All he did was leave us in Minnesota with a $4 billion dollar shortfall for the next administration to deal with and is turning this state into Mississippi (with appologies to progressive Mississippians).
Amen, Chuck W, I can't believe ANYONE takes Timmy seriously.
If it would have been left to the Dems you would be 10 billion in the hole.
Really, Cal? What source do you have to support that other than your own partisan rancour?
Last summer when all the legislators adjourned without a budget, T Paw saved the day and cut spending on his own. Or weren't you paying attention?
From 1960 to 2002, state spending in Minnesota increased by an average of 21 percent every two years. As governor, Pawlenty has held the growth of spending to just over 2 percent annually. Last year, he cut state spending in real terms -- the first time that has happened in 150 years. "We cut everything except public safety and K through 12 education," he says. "We changed the entitlement structure." All while moving Minnesota off the list of the top 10 most heavily taxed states.
Read more: http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/05/07/tim-pawlentys-budget-problem/#ixzz113VNLU4S
Where on earth do you get this nonsense Cal? What Timmy did was move all the burden to the local government all of whom are swimming in red ink and trying to raise money any way they can. He went from taxing to "fees" which is Timmylanguage meaning "I am going to tax you more, but not call it that so that you don't notice." Our schools are desperately trying to stay afloat. And don't list some blog as fact. I live in MN, I know what has happened. But, we do have nice new stadiums. Timmy is pretty good to his rich friends.
Lots of Communists in here ranting tonight. I would think they would all be getting a good nights rest so they can get up tomorrow and go get thier hand outs.
Brad, you're right, we are all getting up early to go to work looking for a decent wage, only to receive a mere handout. Communist? Have anything new to push? Probably not.
Being from Minnesota can only say that he is a good Republican. Didn't raise taxes and left the next governor with a horrible deficit to get under control. Just like George Bush enter with a reasonable deficit and leave with a record setting deficit.
One more thing Cal: It is absolute NONSENSE that Timmy did not cut public safety or school funding. That is a lie of such magnitude, I don't know how they get by with it. Our schools in out state MN have lost money every year. They have been forced to cut programs, and some of them have now cut a day out of their week because they cannot afford to transport students. No one knows how that will affect outcomes. Timmy also dragged some right wing nut in from Florida of the worst kind to be in charge of education...until outrage from parents and the legislator forced her out. She had EVERY intention of turning our highly rated schools into the mess that Texas that is in. What is MN happy about? That Timmy has delusions of grandeur and he thinks ANYONE will vote for him for President. It keeps him out of the state. But, mark my words, we in MN will make sure that the nation knows what an incompetent agenda driven boob Timmy is. Though, I doubt we will have to. People will not be able to stay awake when he speaks.