GOP watch: I pledge allegiance…

AP

An aide with the House Republican Conference unfurls flags for the "Pledge to America" announcement today.

"House Republicans vowed to dramatically cut federal spending, end 'job-killing tax hikes' and repeal the health care law in a campaign manifesto they hope will lead them to victory in November's elections," the New York Daily News writes. "The 'Pledge to America,' according to a draft obtained Wednesday, also proposes banning federal funding of abortion and trying suspected terrorists in military courts."

But Roll Call notes the pledge "includes little that hasn’t already appeared in numerous Republican leadership talking points over the past two years." And: "[T]he document shies away from bolder items advocated by conservatives, such as a specific pledge to eliminate the budget deficit or prohibit earmarks."

The New York Times: "The blueprint was also clearly intended to provide fresh ideas to answer allegations by Mr. Obama and Democrats that Republicans simply want to return to the policies of the Bush administration. Still, many of the proposals represent classic Republican ideals of small government and low taxes pursued for generations by George W. Bush and other party leaders."


The Chicago Tribune: "The GOP plan ignited a debate within conservative circles. Establishment Republicans embraced the agenda, but activists complained that it did not go far enough and omitted some of their key demands, such as a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution. The plan treads lightly on hot-button social issues such as marriage and abortion that have been mainstays of past GOP agendas but are less likely than economic questions to motivate independent voters this fall. The pledge contains no mention of proposals by leading conservatives and several GOP candidates to restructure Social Security and Medicare by using personal savings accounts, nor of other measures that voters have resisted."

Conservative Matt Lewis, writing on Politics Daily, notes: "When it comes to the GOP's new "Pledge to America," which will be unveiled officially Thursday morning, the venerable National Review and the popular conservative blog RedState don't quite see eye to eye. ... It will be interesting to see how this impacts the coverage Thursday. The pledge hasn't even officially been unveiled, but already conservatives are divided over it. ... So what else is new?"

The DNC has a Web video saying the Pledge is the “same old agenda.”

The Hill: "The word 'spending' is stated 47 times in the document, but 'earmarks' -- an issue that divides Republicans -- is not mentioned. ... Bush, who signed TARP into law, is referenced in passing only twice."

A moratorium on earmarks, in fact, is what Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC), a conservative/Tea Party kingmaker, said in an interview with NBC News that should be Republicans' top legislative priority next Congress.

Discuss this post

Here is a link to the draft of the “Pledge to America”. It is unimpressive with no substantive details. It is basically a wordy outline – not a real plan.

http://www.politico.com/static/PPM152_100922_gop_agenda.html

  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:08 AM EDT

...kind of like John Boehner's "alternative budget".

  • 4 votes
#1.1 - Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:09 AM EDT

Does it contain issues like teleprompters, Muslims, birth certificate or socialists? Or, does it contain references to REAL issues that they will do absolutely nothing about if they regain power?

  • 5 votes
#1.2 - Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:24 AM EDT

It's the ten-word answer...just long enough to say what you want to do but so short there's no danger that you'll have to try and say how you're going to do it.

  • 5 votes
#1.3 - Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:27 AM EDT

why, if Republicans are so against "socialist" programs like universal health care, parental leave, social security, etc., do they enable our allies around the world to continue those practices by maintaining a defense budget to police the world? If the Republicans truly only care about defending the US, why not close all the military bases abroad, end all treaties demanding our engagement on behalf of allies, stop all medium-range missile programs, etc.

  • 1 vote
#1.4 - Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:01 PM EDT
Reply

...because the "Contract With America" worked SOOOOOOOOO well.

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:08 AM EDT

Same old plan with a twist:

1) Cut taxes. How much lower can they go?

2) Cut spending back to 2008 levels. As I recall the 2008 budget deficit was huge.

3) Repeal Health Care. Let us allow health insurance companies to discriminate against sick children, sick adults, and above all never hinder their profits.

4) Ban Federal dollars for abortion. It is banned except for rape and incest but apparently women and young girls must be forced by the evil government to have the rapist or family member's baby--Government stay out of our lives except for abortion and religion, we demand everyone be a Christian. The Republican Tea Party at its finest.

  • 6 votes
Reply#3 - Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:27 AM EDT
Brown DogDeleted

Cutting spending will be the tough. Any attempts will be attacked. Yet this is exactly with Great Britain and Germany are doing today.

    Reply#7 - Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:34 PM EDT

    As for those 99er's who pledge to sit out the November elections...do so and allow the Republicans to take

    control of the House and/or Senate and you'll be known as the 99,000'ers..."BELIEVE THAT!" I feel for you

    folks, but do you truly believe the Republicans do? If so, then [do] stay and home and see for yourselves.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#9 - Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:47 PM EDT

    yeah well it seems like they want to pledge nothing new why is that they want to have our vote tell me what they are going to do to make me say Yeah what we need Industry in Religion Out Government out Of my life Don't tell me what i can do and can't do we have laws for that Oh wait they can chooses what laws they want to enforce.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#10 - Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:52 PM EDT

    Denis 505729: I'm sure you understand ENGLISH, or know how to read. You say taxes will go up, no matter which way they vote on the Tax 10 yr tax break put into law. Here's what is said about the tax break. "they will allow the tax break "stay as is" for anyone who make less than 250K, therefore, being I make 50K, means I will not get a tax increase. Anyone who makes more than 250K the tax will not stay the same, it expires, meaning it will not exist....does that make since? Then if any part expires, that particular part "anyone making 250K, their taxes will go back before the tax break went into law" The middle person will still have a tax break. Please 505729, if you disagree and still believe that about taxes, then you believe we have a full moon ever 10 days. Nice try.

      Reply#11 - Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:23 AM EDT
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.