Reid up 2 points on Angle in Nevada

Democrats breathed a sigh of relief when conservative (and sometimes gaffe-prone) Tea Party candidate Sharron Angle nabbed the Republican nomination to challenge Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who had been perceived as one of the GOP’s most vulnerable targets.

A new poll shows Reid still maintaining a small lead over his conservative rival. A new Reuters/Ipsos survey out today shows Reid hanging on to only a 2-point lead – within the margin of error – capturing 46 percent of likely voters to Angle’s 44.

From Reuters:

Among registered voters, Reid is seen as better than Angle on a range of qualities, including "understanding the economic issues Nevada faces" and being "the best person to help generate jobs in Nevada."

But the poll also found that Reid is seen as more likely than Angle to be willing to "say anything to win votes."

Despite the closeness of the Senate race, Reid is still faring much better than his son, Rory, who is running for governor of the state. Republican Brian Sandoval’s lead over Reid has grown from 11 points to almost 30 since early August, according to the poll.

The poll of 600 voters has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percent for registered voters and 4.6 percent for likely voters.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

But the poll also found that Reid is seen as more likely than Angle to be willing to "say anything to win votes."

******************

Because Angle is hoping to say absolutely nothing about anything in hopes of getting votes. She makes another peep and that whole foot in mouth thing becomes an issue.

  • 16 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:14 PM EDT

Greg P. I've missed you. Welcome back and stick around. Your thoughts are appreciated.

Do you really think Angle can keep her mouth shut for 6 more weeks. I don't.

  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:52 PM EDT

Yeah, it's been a while... :)

I still read the boards, and bite my tounge quite a bit. But I can always count on those "first thoughts" to be good ones.

Good to see you are still holding down the fort!

  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:04 PM EDT

Are they debating any time soon? Can't wait for that! Beer and popcorn night for sure! I'm in California but enjoy an entertaining political debate as much as anyone. Brown and Whitman debate would bore me.

    #1.3 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:33 PM EDT

    You would think the opposition would put up better candidates than Angle. Amost anyone with a brain could have beat Reid this year.

      #1.4 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:12 PM EDT
      Reply

      This race is tied in all the polls-along with Wisconsin and California. Now that summer is 'officially' over, more likely voters pay attention, more campaign literature and phone calls go out-so we will probably begin to see some movement.

      Still, I think election night is going to be a long one.

      • 6 votes
      Reply#2 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:18 PM EDT

      She is nuts and they are tied?

      How bad a candidate IS Harry Reid?

      • 11 votes
      Reply#3 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:19 PM EDT

      Harry is getting ready to lose to someone that wouldn't be electable against anybody else. I guess that is what happens when you sell your soul.

      Bye Harry!

      • 14 votes
      #3.1 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:21 PM EDT

      You could also ask the voters how idiotic they are? Why on earth would someone want a nutjob like Sharon Angle responsible for their livelihood. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face.

      Last year these same voters were shouting about wanting the government to keep their hands off their medicare. Now they want to vote for someone who wants to get rid of medicare and privatize social security.

      • 10 votes
      #3.2 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:24 PM EDT

      @Dangerfield--

      The better question might be how pathetic is the voting public if an experienced senator and someone described as "nuts" are tied?

      • 3 votes
      #3.3 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:59 PM EDT

      We have a problem. In an effort to kick start his campaign, Reid is saying Congress will try to pass an Illegal Alien Amnesty. They are trying to ramrod this through before elections, thus once again ignoring what the majority of Americans want. Go to www.numbersusa.com for more information.

      Angle may be undesirable, but Reid is a sneaky bast***. Vote your conscious.

      • 2 votes
      #3.4 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:21 PM EDT

      Countries that have privatized ss pay out anywhere from two to five times what we do and they are solvent. If privatization is a "risky scheme" why won't any government employee give up their private plan and move to ss?

      Even Harry Reid was enthusiastic about privatization while Clinton was in office. There is only one reason why they don't do it. If it is your money they can't raid it for their pork and give you an IOU in exchange.

      • 2 votes
      #3.5 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:48 PM EDT

      Uh, exactly what countries are these?? And federal employees get Social Security along with their federal retirement. In fact, everybody gets Social Security except railroad employees, which have their own virtually same social security account. Do your homework before you go blabbing!!

        #3.6 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:09 PM EDT

        Fire... Some school teachers like Texas can not draw state retirement and social security.

        Privatizing at least a part of social security creates wealth building. What is wrong with that?

        Social Security is a racist program. Wait until black folks figure that one out. Just in case you need help here white women live longest and collect most.

        Black men have much shorter life spans and a much higher likelyness to collect nothing. How is that fair?

          #3.7 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 7:26 PM EDT

          Ok, I'm not sure if you intend on humans figuring out how to make lifespans all equal, but how does that indicate a racist vibe? For it to be racist, it would have to actively discriminate against a subset of people. Black men have shorter life spans so a program designed to pay out the rest of your life is racist? But people from Japan tend to live longer than the typical white male, so Social Security is racist against white males. AND women tend to live longer than men, so actually it's sexist too.

          It's not sound logic. I have trouble buying the idea that some person was sitting behind the scenes going "this will be great to discriminate against all those that tend to die earlier."

          I don't know enough to comment on whether privatizing social security would be a benefit or not, but the racist comment has me scratching my head.

            #3.8 - Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:57 AM EDT
            Reply

            Demoocrat= "do unto others..."

            Republican= "ME first!"

            Tea Bagger= "GUNS are our FRIENDS Eeeeber Eeeeeber Yabbble"

            • 6 votes
            Reply#4 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:33 PM EDT
            Comment author avatarWolfhound-1610096Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

            Silly person without a clue..............................Please stay home in November....................Your childrens' future is at stake, and they can't depend on your ignorance.

            • 6 votes
            #4.1 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:46 PM EDT

            sometimes it takes a gun to protect yourself in this country cince the gov. want protect us.

              #4.2 - Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:00 AM EDT
              Reply

              Ramboet

              You are absolutely right. Even if you don't care for Reid, Angle is just plain crazy. Why would anyone want her representing them? I don't get it. There's an old saying....be careful what you wish for, it just might come true.

              • 10 votes
              Reply#5 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:51 PM EDT

              These people don't have a clue. Most of them are a bunch of losers and instead of taking responsibility for their own miserable lives they blame it on someone else. Who better than an African American president or a hard-working latino.

              • 2 votes
              #5.1 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:56 PM EDT

              Dee, you may have answered your own question, Angle is one of them, the crazies!!

                #5.2 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:36 PM EDT
                Reply

                I sure don't understand how anyone in Nevada could consider themselves conservative, not fiscally or morally - after all they live in the original sin city state! Regardless, Angle is just crazy - what is it with these neocons - somebody forgot to take speech class!

                • 5 votes
                Reply#6 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:55 PM EDT

                You might try a more persuasive tack - sterotyping is generally unappreciated and turns the reader off to anything intelligent you might have written. That said, I do believe Angle has some really stupid ideas.

                • 2 votes
                #6.1 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:07 PM EDT

                Ursula - it is not sterotyping, and it is not ment to be offensive, it is what it is - legalized gambling and prostitution, to those of us from the South that is not a conservative state. Which does not bother me one bit, it just makes no sense to me that they would want to go all conservative considering their big industry is gambling. Hope this explains my post. Heck I love Nevada, my one and only husband and I got married in Las Vegas 31 1/2 years ago and we have a great time when we go back to visit - but it is not a conservative place, good thing, I probably would not spend my money there if it was.

                  #6.2 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:18 PM EDT

                  Yes, it's still stereotyping when you say "How can anyone in Nevada consider themselves conservative?" because they live in the same state as Las Vegas. Look up the word stereotype.

                  While there, look up the word conservative. I'm pretty sure it doesn't mean what you think it means.

                  Example of me using a sterotype: "I can't see how you can possibly care about education since you're from the south." That is a baseless claim made because of your geographical location, but I projected on to you a general issue and assume you believe as ex-President Bush about education. It's stereotyping and ignorant.

                  • 2 votes
                  #6.3 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:02 PM EDT

                  Fenix8452 - we seem to disagree, when there are facts to back something up then, well, it is what it is and to say otherwise is ignorant. Also - you did not finish or correct your sentence regarding bush so I do fail to see the point in the reference.

                  If you look up the word liberal it probably does not mean what you think it means either. Acutally the definition of conservative is to conserve, to stand still, to not move forward. Liberal: To liberated, to move forward. Now I realize I may be using a version of Websters that is not on line or you may not have access to but again - it is what it is. Pretty much sums it up, now doesn't it?

                    #6.4 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:15 PM EDT

                    Well, for one our big industry isn't gambling or prostitution. It is mining. Second, prostitution is ILLEGAL in all of the population centers including Las Vegas. There are a lot of blue collar jobs here in Nevada and that is why we usually consider ourselves conservative. Maybe not socially, but definitely fiscally.

                    • 5 votes
                    #6.5 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:19 PM EDT

                    Union Baby, you've summed up the dictionary definition of the terms. The political definitions are not the same, though.

                    • 2 votes
                    #6.6 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:41 PM EDT

                    That is the dictionary as written by liberals. It is heavily slanted with liberal bias. Anyone who has taken a course in propaganda and yellow journalism would easily recognise it.

                    • 2 votes
                    #6.7 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:01 PM EDT

                    Union Baby, you're talking about the services offered. No, those activities don't seem conservative.

                    However, you might want to study the economy of Nevada. Gaming generates "gazillions" of money for the casino owners. They are, quite often, "conservative" regarding money.

                    I agree with the others above; please, don't stereotype people.

                    • 1 vote
                    #6.8 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 6:48 PM EDT

                    Union Baby. Please, use google or something besides a standard english dictionary. So all conservatives want to stand still and all liberals want to move forward? Wow, and here I thought politics was complicated and dealt with actual issues.

                    Your "facts" are that Las Vegas exists. So your logic is Las Vegas exists, so the state and everyone from it is heavily liberal, or as noted before, they are all moving forward. Therefore, in the same vein, President Bush exists and lives in Texas, therefore everyone from Texas is conservative, IE not moving. That is a stereotype, I have family and friends in Texas that are liberal.

                    Stereotypes are standardized and simplified conceptions of groups based on some prior assumptions. You are assuming people are liberal in an entire state because one city meets your obviously bad definition of what it takes to be liberal.

                    And for the record, if you ever claim to be something, you really should have a solid understanding of what you are claiming to be. Here is an excerpt from Wiki. This isn't a definative defintion either, but it's much closer than "conserve, not move":

                    "Conservatism in the United States includes a variety of political ideologies including fiscal conservatism, supply-side economics, social conservatism, libertarian conservatism, bioconservatism and religious conservatism, as well as support for a strong military. (...) US President Abraham Lincoln wrote that conservatism is "the adherence to the old and tried, against the new and untried." US president Ronald Reagan, who was a self-declared conservative, is widely seen as a symbol of American conservatism. In an interview, he said "I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism."

                    And yes, I do know what being a liberal actually is. Some things I'm liberal about, others I'm conservative about.

                      #6.9 - Wed Sep 15, 2010 10:24 AM EDT
                      Reply

                      Sharon: "If we don't get our way--second amendment solution."

                      Average Joe: "What?"

                        Reply#7 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:03 PM EDT

                        Reid has not been seen lately, nor is he sayiong much to the press. I believe he is laying low.

                        • 4 votes
                        Reply#8 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:05 PM EDT

                        Whether or not one appreciates Sen. Reid, he does have a "day job" and spends his time in the Senate. Look for him on C-Span, maybe.

                          #8.1 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:34 PM EDT
                          Reply

                          Reid, don't let it go to your head because we still don't like or trust you.

                          • 8 votes
                          Reply#9 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:10 PM EDT

                          As someone that lives in Nevada, Angle scares the hell out of me. Harry Reid has his moments, however, I do believe that he has done a whole lot for our state. There for a while, every time he opened his mouth, I cringed. I don't particularly like that he's in the Sierra Club's back pocket. Sharron Angle, though, is a nut-job.

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#10 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:18 PM EDT

                          Good to hear the opinion of someone who actually lives there, thanks MThompson. I hope you get Senator Reid back, I for one know what it is like to live without US senate representation.

                          • 1 vote
                          #10.1 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:20 PM EDT

                          MTHOMPSON

                          Nice to hear what you had to say. I don't live in Nevada, but like you, I would look at Reid's accomplishments over the years for the state. Most people don't like him because they don't like the President, not because he's inept. That belongs to Angle.

                          • 1 vote
                          #10.2 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:25 PM EDT

                          Harry Reid should be banned from the senate, he represents the worst of DC. Sharon Angle is a breath of fresh air compared to Reid.

                          • 5 votes
                          #10.3 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:33 PM EDT

                          JMT: Smells more like raw sewage to me, but that might be a good change where your at!

                            #10.4 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:37 PM EDT

                            I think JMT meant to say airhead

                              #10.5 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 6:54 PM EDT
                              Reply

                              when is pelosi up for reelection?

                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#11 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:26 PM EDT

                              I am a Nevada voter and we don't want a wacko representing us. I'm voting for Harry Reid !

                              • 3 votes
                              Reply#12 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:27 PM EDT

                              In all honesty, it seems like you're getting a wacko either way.

                              • 4 votes
                              #12.1 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:17 PM EDT

                              banker you are the wacko if you vote of Reid

                              • 3 votes
                              #12.2 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:58 PM EDT

                              I thought I'd roll on the floor laughing the other day when Harry said he had "nothing" to do with the current financial situation. Harry, you've been in D.C. since the break of dawn. The financial mess is cumulative from bad actions on both sides. And, yes, Harry, you are RESPONSIBLE!

                              • 2 votes
                              #12.3 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 6:53 PM EDT
                              Reply

                              How can Nevadans be so stupid.. Reid is disgusting.

                              • 9 votes
                              Reply#13 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:27 PM EDT

                              For this race to be even this close says a whole lot about Rieds standing in his State. Might be win but look who you might win against be very worried Harry. And if you do win do not pat yourself on the back too hard, there could have been a more legit opponent you would have wet down the tubes big time Harry. I do not blame you for laying low.

                              • 3 votes
                              Reply#14 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:29 PM EDT

                              Angle is just another Mama Grizzly whack job making sure the GOP doesn't get control of Congress. Let her keep talking...Throw Delaware to the Democrats too....and now that the economy is improving, the GOP wants to extend tax cuts for the wealthy, and Democrats are beginning to fight back, Democrats could end up with a 55-45 Senate majority. And 223 in the House.

                              Republicans still haven't figured out what they stand for, only who they stand against.

                              • 2 votes
                              Reply#15 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:31 PM EDT

                              No one has aked me who I am voting for. Just where do these so called polls get their information? Sharon Angle is a shoe in if you really ask the people who they will vote for. Reid has betrayed the American people along with Pelosi and Obama. Reid will take his hefty retirement and free medical, all his perks and live a really nice retirement.

                              • 5 votes
                              Reply#16 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:34 PM EDT

                              voiceinthewind.....This is so true,I still dont understand why these dems that voted for obumacare dont have to use the ins. they pushed on america, they should have to give up thier insurance and actually pay for thier own ins.I also dont understand why amer. has to pay dems and rep, for the rest of thier lives, make them get a job or go on social sec. like the rest of amer. help balance the da&& budget. Just a thought. Also Ried needs to stop talging about saveing energy while he travels around in a fleet of suburbans.

                                #16.1 - Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:19 AM EDT
                                Reply

                                I also live in Nevada -- and Harry Reid does not belong in the Senate.

                                And Union Baby, you may want to think before you write something about a state you've only visited. I've lived here for over thirty years and, yes, Nevada is a relatively conservative state. Just because the cities of Las Vegas and Reno have resorts does not mean that we all live in hotels and commute from Phoenix. We work in normal occupations, raise our children, go to church and live pretty much like everyone else in the country.

                                And I seriously doubt that Harry Reid would get elected anywhere else. He relies on the good ol'boy network and has little to back up his supposed good works for Nevada other than his own press.

                                • 9 votes
                                Reply#17 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:35 PM EDT

                                And you think Angle DOES belong in the Senate? Have you actually listened to any of her speeches? That is, when she's not running away from the press? She refuses to even debate Reid, and no wonder. She's certifiably crazy.....really, she's nuts. You want HER representing you? The GOP had to go out there and smooth all the ruffled feathers she created, along with some main stream talking points so she didn't sound TOO crazy. Didn't work. All she has to do is open her mouth to speak. You have to be just as crazy as she is.

                                • 4 votes
                                #17.1 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:44 PM EDT

                                LinLin, it is not just the resort towns that have the prostitutions and gambling, heck, I've seen slot machines in the bathrooms at the service stations! Which is fine by me, I think gambling and prostitution should be legal and taxed everywhere! Kind of keeps the mob out of it.

                                  #17.2 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:20 PM EDT
                                  Reply

                                  I want Reid back in and in the minority. Payback is hell!!

                                  • 3 votes
                                  Reply#18 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:40 PM EDT

                                  You should know about payback being hell as you have been on the receiving end lately. Hope that payback on the receiving end continues to haunt you for a long, long time.

                                    #18.1 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:21 PM EDT
                                    Reply

                                    Want to buy a BLOCK of houses? Go to Las Vegas area.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#19 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:41 PM EDT

                                    If folks really just want to vote against Reid, they'd be better off writing-in a vote for a grapefruit than voting for a nut like Angle.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    Reply#20 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:45 PM EDT

                                    I'm sure the Angle camp is saving the best for last. Who does Dirty Harry work for Nevada or for Himself?

                                    http://www.opencongress.org/wiki/Harry_Reid

                                    Senator's Sons

                                    In 2003 Reid was embarassed by a Los Angeles Times article on his son and son-in-law lobbying his office. In 2002 Reid introduced a bill, "The Clark County Conservation of Public Land and Natural Resources Act of 2002," which was ostensibly aimed at boundary shifts, land trades and other arcane matters in Nevada. The Times article explains that the bill would provide "a cavalcade of benefits to real estate developers, corporations and local institutions that were paying hundreds of thousands of dollars in lobbying fees to his sons' and son-in-law's firms".[7]

                                    Howard Hughes Corp. paid Reid's son-in-law Scott Barringer's "tiny" law firm $300,000 in lobbying fees and received "a provision allowing the company to acquire 998 acres of federal land ripe for development in the exploding Las Vegas metropolitan area." A Nevada law firm that employs all four of Reid's sons represented a group of real estate developers that received helpful provisions in the Clark County bill.[8]

                                    Reid argued that the bill would help Nevada's economy while protecting the environment. The bill "placed an additional 440,000 acres of federal land under wilderness protection".[9]

                                    Reid's son Key and Barringer have represented almost every industry in Nevada, all of them seek Reid's help on federal matters.[10] Reid initially defended his son's lobbying as perfectly legal and clean, noting that they had to file biannual reports. He later banned family members from lobbying anyone in his office.[11]

                                    Acceptance of boxing tickets

                                    Between 2003 and 2005, Reid accepted free ringside seats at three Nevada boxing matches. The passes were provided by the Nevada Athletic Commission, the official Nevada State Agency that "regulates all contests or exhibitions of boxing, including the licensure and supervision of promoters, boxers, mixed martial artists, karate boxers, seconds, ring officials, managers, and matchmakers." (Source: boxing.nv.gov). Reid accepted the tickets at a time that he was pushing legislation that would diminish the power of the commission. The bill passed the Senate, but stalled in the house. [12]

                                    In December of 2006, the Senate Ethics Committee cleared Reid of any wrong doing in the matter. Reid, however, said that he understood the negative image his actions created and would refrain from acting similarly in the future. [13]

                                    Relationship to Jack Abramoff

                                    According to a February 9, 2006, Associated Press story by John Solomon, Reid wrote letters and had "routine contacts" with lobbying partners and clients of disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff. [14] Reid's actions aided the interests of Abramoff's Native American clients. Reid has acknowledged receiving $61,000 from clients or collegues of Abramoff, much of which was given to Reid by indian tribes after Abramoff was hired. [15] Reid collected donations around the time of each action he took to help Abromoff's clients. Ethics rules require senators to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest in legislative matters regarding campaign donors. While some politicans have returned contributions they received from Abramoff or his clients, Harry Reid has steadfastly refused claiming the Abramoff matter "is a Republican scandal." [16]

                                    Abramoff's lobbying firm has made public billing records and congressional correspondence of more than two dozen contacts, between Abramoff's lobbying team, and Reid's office. Many of the discussions relate to the passage of a Kennedy bill that would slowly raise the minimum wage of the [File:///W:/Northern Mariana Islands Northern Mariana Islands].[17] [18] Publicly, Reid supported an increase in minimum wage there, though some have claimed that privately he was working against it. Both Reid spokesmen Jim Manley and Ron Platt, one of Abramoff's partners involved with the Mariana lobbying, have denied the claim, Platt said "I'm sure he didn't".[19]

                                    In his defense, Reid spokesman Jim Manley said that neither Reid nor his campaign has never received money directly from Abramoff, and Reid said his legislative work was done on behalf of his Nevadan constituents. After contacting Reid's office and other fact checking, Josh Marshall wrote in his Talking Points Memo blog that, "despite the AP story's narrative of lobbyist contacts, there doesn't seem to be any evidence whatsoever that Reid ever took any action on behalf of Abramoff's Marianas clients." [20]

                                    Bush is a "Loser" and other comments

                                    Reid made headlines in May 2005 when he said of George W. Bush, "The man's father is a wonderful human being. I think this guy is a loser." Reid later apologized for these comments. Reid also called Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas an "embarrassment" and referred to Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan as a "partisan hack."[21]

                                    Improper donation from lobbyist

                                    In 1999, Reid received a $3,000 donation from a Texas friend, Ben Barnes, for his legal defense fund during a recount process which followed his 1998 Senate campaign against his present-day colleague, Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.). Congressional ethics rules, however, prohibit lawmakers from accepting legal defense fund donations from registered lobbyists, which Barnes was at the time. The donation went unnoticed until the Center for Public Integrity released a report in August 2005 about a handful of lawmakers, Reid among them, who'd accepted improper lobbyist donations into their legal defense funds.

                                    Reid brought the matter to the Senate Select Committee on Ethics, and repaid the $3,000 to Barnes in October 2005. The Ethics Committee informed him that he should also pay interest for the time he had the donation. Reid had an accountant calculate the exact amount using the statutory rate under Nevada law (prime plus two percent adjusted annually), and sent Barnes a check for $1,611.47 on May 22, 2006 out of his campaign fund.

                                    Reid spokesman Jon Summers stated, "As soon as this came to our attention we resolved this as quickly as possible." [22]

                                    Helps campaign contributor secure government land for development

                                    Reid is a longtime friend of Harvey Whittemore, a multimillionaire lobbyist and land developer from Nevada. From 2002 to 2006, Reid often used his influence in the Senate to help Whittemore attain government land for the purposes of building a massive development in the barren Coyote Springs Valley in Nevada. Reid even pushed for Whittemore to be granted the rights for free; ultimately, he paid the government $10 million.

                                    As the project advanced, Reid received tens of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from Whittemore. The contributions went both to Reid's Senate campaigns and his leadership fund, which helps fund the campaigns of other Senate Democrats.

                                    The relationship between the two goes even deeper. Reid's son, Leif Reid, is Whittemore's personal lawyer and has represented the developer throughout the Coyote Springs project and his negotiations with federal officials.

                                    In response, a spokesman for Reid said, "There is a reason every major Republican and Democratic officeholder in Nevada has fought for Coyote Springs---it will create jobs and make the state an even better place to live and raise a family." [23]

                                    Improper reporting of land deal

                                    In 1998, Reid bought two parcels of land on the outskirts of Las Vegas. He bought one parcel himself, and another jointly with his partner and longtime friend Jay Brown. In 2001, Reid sold the land to a limited liability company created by Brown for an equivalent share of the company. He did not disclose the sale to Congress, however, and continued to list the land as a personal asset. When the land sold for over $1 million dollars in 2004, Reid received $1.1 million and listed the transaction as a personal land sale. Reid's name was not formally attached to Brown's company in any way. Reid claimed that this was because the two men had known each other for 35 years and trusted each other completely. [24]

                                    On October 16, 2006, Reid announced that he was filing a correction to his ethics form that would better represent the actualities of the arrangements surrounding the land deal. He also stated that he would be amending the reports to include two other small holdings that had been previously unreported. [25]

                                    Improper use of campaign funds for Christmas bonuses

                                    From 2002-2005, Reid used money that had been donated to his political campaign fund to contribute to the holiday bonus fund for the staffers of his Ritz-Carlton condominium. Federal law forbids the use of campaign funds for personal matters. Reid claimed that he had consulted his lawyers and been told it was legal as he was thanking them for extra work. Nevertheless, in October 2006, he pledged to personally pay back the money (a total of $3300). [26]

                                    Earmark for a bridge near personal land

                                    In November 2006, the Los Angeles Times reported that Reid had earmarked to a bridge building project near where he held 160 acres of land. The bridge is intended to span the Colorado River between Laughlin, Nevada and Bullhead City, Arizona. Reid's land is several miles from the proposed site of the bridge in Arizona. His office explained that the new bridge was necessary due to the Hoover Dam's closure to truck traffic due to terrorism fears and categorically denied that it had anything to with his landholdings.

                                    In January 2007, Reid's 2002 acquisition of the property came under scrutiny as he only paid a mere $166 an acre for the 160 acre parcel.

                                    Reid's interest in the barren parcel dates back to the period of 1979 through 1982, when he and Clair Haycock bought the 160 acres. Haycock bought a three-eighths interest, equivalent to 60 acres, for $90,000 — $1,500 an acre. Reid, then a Nevada lawyer and political figure, bought the other five-eighths, the equivalent of 100 acres. They did not divide the parcel.

                                    Allegations have been made that Reid introduced legislation on behalf of Haycock, who was a "lubricants dealer" in las Vegas. [27]

                                    • 7 votes
                                    Reply#21 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:48 PM EDT

                                    This is a blog, not wikipedia, write your books elsewhere, idiot!

                                      #21.1 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:43 PM EDT

                                      Thank you for another fine example of compasion and understanding from the Left. When all else fails turn to insults. Maybe if you got some ointment for your Krotch you wouldn't be so crotchety.

                                      • 2 votes
                                      #21.2 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:57 PM EDT
                                      Reply

                                      Oh, give Harry a little more rope and he will do himself in. I figure in about three week he will come out with a whopper.

                                      • 5 votes
                                      Reply#22 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:50 PM EDT

                                      Lin- If Nevada is conservative, then why is Reid in office? Why is his opponent behind in the polls? Why did Obama carry the state 55% in 2008? If you really live in Nevada, then Lin should stop drinking the GIN!

                                      • 1 vote
                                      Reply#23 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:51 PM EDT

                                      Reid is a pathetic excuse for a senator. The last straw for me was his brilliant "The war is lost" moment, but I'll spare the in depth analysis on that point. That said, the republicans are absolute idiots for running Angle against him. In a time when any decent, generally solid conservative would have wiped the floor with Reid, they come up with Angle? Thanks, Nevada republicans (sarcasm does not translate well to the typed word, but trust me, this sentence is dripping with it), for sending Mr. Reid back to Washington.

                                      And to those republicans saying Angle is going to crush Reid - what color exactly is the sky where you live? Are you that blinded by your own ideology to not see you've blown it? Hell, a roadkill armadillo would probably out-poll Reid this year, and you've got a candidate down by two points - yet you still don't get it.

                                      • 6 votes
                                      Reply#24 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:56 PM EDT

                                      Elvoid

                                      You oviously don't like Reid....I respect that. But who you should really be thanking (sarcasm) is all those tea partiers, not necessarily the Republican party. She's a tea party candidate, thru and thru.

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #24.1 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:07 PM EDT

                                      Point taken - but I do blame the republicans for not being able to develop an identity and platform that can overcome - or at least not end up totally hi-jacked - by the more radical elements. The tea party with it's "my way or the highway" stand on almost everything; it's attraction of true fringe elements masquerading as legitimate, viable candidates and thinkers; it's vilification of viable moderate conservatives for not being "conservative enough;" all that will make them implode soon enough. They'll either realize they have to compromise and work with the moderate elements of the republican party, or they'll end up - politically speaking, and along with the republicans - like that roadkill armadillo I mentioned (which I still say could have beaten Reid). The "tea party" is the best friend the democrats have right now.

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #24.2 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:29 PM EDT

                                      Elvoid

                                      You're right on most everything in your post. My opinion is that if/when some of these tea party candidates do get elected and go to DC, the mainstream Republican party will tell them in no uncertain terms "it's our way or the highway". Just look at Delaware. The party is trying everything not to have O"Donnell elected. What are they going to do with her if she beats Castle and Coons?

                                      I believe they'll rope her in as soon as she gets there (IF she does).

                                        #24.3 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:38 PM EDT
                                        Reply

                                        If Nevada elects Reid then that proves that those people are very stupid.

                                        • 7 votes
                                        Reply#25 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:01 PM EDT

                                        You say that, but here's the problem:

                                        Let's say I'm an average voter in Nevada. Nice guy, lean conservative, blah blah blah.

                                        On my scale of 1 to 10, I give Harry, oh, let's say a three. That's it, just three. Therefore, I'm not asking for much to vote for someone else. A four will do the job.

                                        I get a 2.

                                        Now what am I gonna do?

                                          #25.1 - Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:32 PM EDT
                                          Reply
                                          Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.