Gregg: I could have worked for Clinton

AP

Obama's administration is too idealogical for Judd Gregg.

From NBC's Ken Strickland:

Republican Sen. Judd Gregg, who withdrew as President Barack Obama's nominee for commerce secretary in early 2009, told NBC News that he “could have worked for the Clinton administration” but could “never be comfortable” with the Obama administration’s agenda.

Gregg says Clinton and his politics were "centrist." But after 18 months of interaction with the Obama administration, Gregg said that the current president’s brain trust has “an ideological purpose."

“If I had worked for this administration I would have been totally out of sync very quickly, because this administration has a very ideological purpose,” he said. “I respect that; it's their view. But I could never be comfortable with it and agree with it.”

(It’s worth noting that Gregg has not always spoken highly of the 42nd president. In a 1993 interview with New Hampshire’s Union Leader newspaper, for example, Gregg said Clinton’s economic plan would “reestablish government as the dominant force in the economy and in social policy,” labeled his tax program “class warfare,” and groused that the president “made no attempt to involve any Republicans” in its formulation. He also voted “guilty” during President Clinton’s impeachment trial in 1999.)

Asked what advice he would offer colleagues who considering working for an administration of the opposite party, Gregg noted that some cabinet jobs are less prone to partisan politics than others.

“There are certain jobs which it doesn't matter what your ideological issues are. Most of the foreign policy issues are not,” he said.

“You could put a real hard-core conservative -- as this president has, theoretically, in [Afghan war commander David] Petraeus and [Defense Secretary Robert] Gates - in positions that have nothing to do with politics, which are national defense or international issues,” Gregg added.

Read the whole transcript of Gregg’s conversation with NBC News here.

NBC's Ken Strickland sat down with nine senators departing the upper chamber this year. He asked Evan Bayh, Robert Bennett, Sam Brownback, Kit Bond, Jim Bunning, Chris Dodd, Byron Dorgan, Judd Gregg, and George Voinovich the same eight questions and a wildcard query. This excerpt was taken from the transcript of that interview. Additional reporting can be found on politics.msnbc.com.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

H Stowell,

 

YOU ARE WEAK!

Your argument sucks! 

  • 1 vote
Reply#26 - Wed Sep 15, 2010 4:12 AM EDT

Gregg was pinched in the ass by Mitch McConnell, he still rubbing his but.

    Reply#27 - Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:42 AM EDT

    Hey "Stonehead" Stowell--

    Don't know why you are being collapsed. In fact, I would argue that your idiotic rant should remain open as an example of how ignorance and stupidity have become mainstream in your feeble-minded ranks. Bill Ayers? Marxist? Communist? School records release? Really? What is this? Guilt by association week? Okay, me too can play that game.

    Where's Simple Sarah's school records? You know, the one showing she obtained a degree after attending several colleges between beauty pageants? Do you really believe Obama could fake graduation from two of the top schools in the country and nothing would have been uncovered by now?

    We know Cheney was a friend of Enron's convicted CEO. In fact, the CEO played a role shaping the US's energy policy in the early Bush II years. So by your twisted, inane logic, Cheney's hobnobbing with felons makes him a felon. He may be a felon for other reasons but that simpleton logic doesn't wash.

    And can you even define the terms Marxist, Socialist? Or do you have any idea which of our current entitlements that you have probably benefited from (before the "black boogey-man president" came onto the scene) is based on Marxist, Socialist ideology?

    I could go on but I will not waste any more brain matter on your stupidity. And while this discourse should refrain from using ad hominem remarks it is hard not to comment on an inescapable fact: you people, yes, "you people" have got to be the dumbest, most ignorant, low-IQ morons that have ever been afforded the right to vote. Sheep could bleat better responses than the drivel s**t that passes for discourse in your ranks. Bagga' please!

    • 1 vote
    Reply#28 - Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:51 AM EDT

    He chose to be a douche. Mission accomplished, douche-bag.

      Reply#29 - Wed Sep 15, 2010 2:30 PM EDT
      Jump to discussion page: 1 2
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.