Palin endorses Christine O'Donnell; O'Donnell cites answered prayers


Sarah Palin has apparently endorsed Delaware conservative Christine O'Donnell in the Delware GOP Senate primary on Tuesday. Rep. Mike Castle has been the establishment choice.

The nod came during a radio appearance where Palin was a guest on Sean Hannity's radio program. Hannity's Tweet below:

Thanks @SarahPalinUSA for the last minute call in. Endorsement of Christine O'Donnell was an exclusive. Said she hadn't told Christine yet.

O'Donnell also Tweeted:

"Just got Gov. Palin's endorsement! Thank you for your prayers!"

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

Yes, I'm sure there was divine intervention involved.

Yay, so you got Mama Grizzly's endorsement. "Say Your Prayers" indeed.

  • 6 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 5:18 PM EDT

You're right Da Noid; but, I suspect for the wrong reasons. This just makes her another target for the likes of MSNBC to bash her for any reason.

  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 5:26 PM EDT

And the little 'twit' goes tweet..tweet...tweet...

BTW: Bible Spice is NOT a 'private citizen' she is a 'celebrity' in the same catagory as the Snookie's - Lindsey's & Paris's... everyone of them is a train wreck attention whore by their own making!

  • 9 votes
#1.2 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 5:40 PM EDT

aaaahahahaha!!!! Ain't THAT the truth!!!

  • 3 votes
#1.3 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:31 PM EDT

They may be that Feisty, But they are all Better then what we have in the White House right now.

    #1.4 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 9:03 PM EDT

    Sarah Palin hasn't died from stupidity yet? How long does it take?

    • 1 vote
    #1.5 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 11:10 PM EDT

    Just a little comment concerning the article. OH..........MY.........GAWD! Okay. I feel better now. Seriously though, as an independent, I found it mildly interesting when Palin endorsed Miller in Alaska. You know...odd. But this is really something. I mean, it is starting to look as though she's doing her best to guarantee that no republican gets into office in the upcoming election. Let's face it. O'Donnel appears to be a bona fide flake that can't even handle her own life while her republican primary opponent, Mike Castle, seems to be a very level headed fellow that has served the republican party and, more importantly, the people of his state extremely well for many years. What's up? Has Palin become a secret weapon for the democrats? Really makes you wonder.

    • 2 votes
    #1.6 - Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:01 AM EDT
    Reply

    So many troubles in the world, problems to solve, people without jobs, hungry people, wars, illness and O'Donnell is praying for Palin's endorsement. Hope I read this thread wrong.

    • 13 votes
    Reply#2 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 5:25 PM EDT

    Hope I read this thread wrong.

    Unfortunately, Jody it's true. What a curse.

    • 4 votes
    #2.1 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 5:43 PM EDT

    facepalm.jpg

    • 2 votes
    #2.2 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:03 PM EDT

    So many problems in the world, problems to solve , no jobs, hungry people, wars, illnesses and Big Mama and President and family went on a holiday spree and vacation. Tell Zerobama he lost. The road is set. The resutls are in. Come Nov. would be a permanent holiday for some your establishment candidates. You can't defeat the Tea Party. Because its not like the Dems and Repubs party. We can always find candidates from among WE THE PEOPLE.

    • 2 votes
    #2.3 - Fri Sep 10, 2010 8:58 AM EDT
    Reply

    oh brother

    • 3 votes
    Reply#3 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 5:26 PM EDT

    STS. Nothing to see here.

    • 4 votes
    Reply#4 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 5:35 PM EDT

    Sarah Palin is a private citizen, yet her endorsements have been influential in a number of republican primary contests this season.

    President Obama is the PRESIDENT and his endorsements have been influential in a number of democratic primaries.

    Which of the two endorsers do you think has been more successful in influencing the electorate thus far, the private citizen with the facebook page or the PRESIDENT with his "bully Pulpit"?

    It SHOULD be the president, right?

    • 4 votes
    Reply#5 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 5:38 PM EDT

    dangerfield

    Sarah Palin is a private citizen, yet her endorsements have been influential in a number of republican primary contests this season.

    Sarah Palin is a private citizen a political hack, celebrity, gold digger, a half-wit, a quitter, a representative of toxic front groups and eye candy for old Gray White men. Sarah Palin is endorsed with lots of money from repugnant front groups like Dick Armey and Koch Brothers.

    Do you you prefer money from the Koch Brothers endoresement of:

    The Koch family organized not only the Tea Party movement, but much of the modern right-wing infrastructure. The brothers David and Charles Koch, heirs to the oil and chemical conglomerate Koch Industries, have founded or funded dozens of conservative or libertarian publications, think tanks, and attack groups. Their father, Fred Koch, similarly fueled the paranoid right-wing movements of the fifties and sixties through his financing of the bigoted John Birch Society.

    At Rep. ding bat Michele Bachmann’s (R-MN) “House Call” rally, ThinkProgress produced a video report exposing Koch for paying for dozens of buses for anti-health reform activists to reach DC. We also captured the picture of a large banner comparing health reform to the Holocaust.

    Koch Industries’ has reliance on high-carbon Canadian crude would become less profitable if similar laws like AB 32 are enacted around the country.

    The Koch family and its political deputies not only helped overturn nearly a hundred years in campaign finance law in the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling, but also is lobbying aggressively against the DISCLOSE Act, which would provide transparency into the campaign spending for plutocrats like the Koch family.

    While David Koch has been “casting himself as a champion in the fight against cancer, Koch Industries has been lobbying to prevent the E.P.A. from classifying formaldehyde, which the company produces in great quantities, as a ‘known carcinogen’ in humans.

    http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/23/david-charles-koch/

    Any how, I prefer unpolluted influence.



    • 7 votes
    #5.1 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:02 PM EDT

    see, Bev-

    This one would have been way too long...

    WHAT exactly was my question?

    Oh right, who has been more successful in their endorsements? Now that's inflammatory!

    • 3 votes
    #5.2 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:19 PM EDT
    Reply

    Slant head Sean Hannity and Your Royal Highness , the Frozen Tundra Queen, Sarah Palin are not representative of Christian values. Methinks Christine O'Donnell is welcoming evil spirits.

    • 7 votes
    Reply#6 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 5:40 PM EDT

    What is the median age here, 15? Sometimes seems like it...

    It's like a contest to see who can squeeze the most insulting name-calling into their posts.

    Bev, I have translated your post into "civil-speak" I think you'll agree that neither the sentiment nor your point are altered;

    Sean Hannity and Sarah Palin, in my opinion, are not representative of Christian values. Methinks Christine O'Donnell would be better off without their endorsements.

    (Not singling you out, just that a short post was easier for this lazy guy...)

    It only diminishes whatever point you're trying to make when you resort to offensive characterizations.

    There are intelligent people here who constantly make fools of themselves with their overheated and inflammatory rhetoric.

    President Obama

    Minority Leader Boehner

    Senator whoever

    If you want the other side (whichever one you're on) to show your guys the respect you feel they deserve, how about trying a little common-courtesy?

    • 3 votes
    #6.1 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:04 PM EDT

    But, dangerfield,

    I never attack any poster here personally. I've read your post as well as responded to quite a few. You side calls the President every thing under the sun except a child of God. Your side talks about the President like he is a "dog". As much as I and others rejected Bush, President Obama has been more maligned than any President I can remember in my adult live.

    I even asked a very, very, old, White man in the Jewel-Osco supermarket has he ever seen this type of maligning? He said no. He also said it's wrong.

    • 7 votes
    #6.2 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:15 PM EDT

    Unfortunately dangerfield, many people are either disinterested in making relevant points or get baited in to harsh rhetoric. I hope people like you can make the boards more about debate between different viewpoints than about which party is good, which is evil, and who is and is not stupid. I have my doubts though. This is the internet, where logic is often as follows: I'm right, because f*ck you.

    P.S. Sorry for the post hijacking Bev. As dangerfield said, it's not about singling any one person out. Ther are certainly a thousand more inflammatory posts put on these boards today alone. I have no love for Palin or Hannity either.

    *EDIT* Bev, while people may choose to affiliate themselves with a party, that doesn't mean they're a part of one "side" of an issue. That's not to say that there aren't plenty of mindless zombies voting for either party (or to blame either "side"), but there are literally infinite ways to approach a problem. By dividing an issue in to an us-vs-them battle, you and your fellow debaters become more argumentative and defensive.

    • 3 votes
    #6.3 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:20 PM EDT

    Bev-

    You don't seem to know what side I'm on because you are so far from the center. This joint is SO polarized that today I was attacked by those on the left AND on the right, and frankly to me that means that I am finally being understood by some.

    I am the guy who came here and called for common courtesy. You won't find much in the way of overheated rhetoric from me about republicans or democrats. The battle cry "your side is worse, or your side is just as bad" still doesn't justify the almost comically nasty stuff you write.

    Why would you expect anyone here to show respect for the president (as to him being the most maligned, have you ever taken political science? George Washington, the "Father of our Country" was hung in effigy outside his window and quit what would have been a position for life because he didn't think any mortal man should be subjected to more than 8 years of the abuse) when you show such malignant contempt for your opponents in your rhetoric?

    If you really believe that liberals are "better' people than conservatives or even us (you really wanna talk MALIGNED?) moderates, why not show it in the generosity of your prose?

    • 2 votes
    #6.4 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:35 PM EDT

    Anon Monster!

    *EDIT* Bev, while people may choose to affiliate themselves with a party, that doesn't mean they're a part of one "side" of an issue. That's not to say that there aren't plenty of mindless zombies voting for either party (or to blame either "side"), but there are literally infinite ways to approach a problem. By dividing an issue in to an us-vs-them battle, you and your fellow debaters become more argumentative and defensive.

    Aon Monster, you are one of few.

    • 2 votes
    #6.5 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:36 PM EDT

    Anon Monster!

    Wishing you the best of luck, a warped sense of humor and a thick skin. There are few places where you can be attacked for advocating civility and respect for each other, and this is one of them...

    Really intelligent post and a pretty cool name too...

    • 1 vote
    #6.6 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:51 PM EDT

    Much appreciated, both of you two.

    About the name - I was originally intending to post random, snarky comments as a way to pass time at work, like the Jaws of First Read. Turns out I have a penchant for diplomacy and am rather good at understanding others' views. Not so ironically, I take forever and a day to make decisions. =)

    • 2 votes
    #6.7 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 7:03 PM EDT

    dangerfield writes:

    I am the guy who came here and called for common courtesy. You won't find much in the way of overheated rhetoric from me about republicans or democrats. The battle cry "your side is worse, or your side is just as bad" still doesn't justify the almost comically nasty stuff you write.

    but previously he wrote:

    What is the median age here, 15?

    and:

    Forgive me but in your desire to "win" your "debates" you exhibit the unfortunate habit of misquoting and mischaracterizing other's words to a point that even attempting a rational response becomes an exercise in futility.

    and:

    (poor) Mo-

    Whub, whub, whub!...:)

    Yeah right, dangerfield, real diplomacy on display there.

    • 4 votes
    #6.8 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 7:27 PM EDT

    Matthew, Houston, TX

    Don't know you and you REALLY don't know me...but you will...:) I have gotten used to being asked "who do you think you are?' by those who have run roughshod here and like to think they own the joint, but not by someone who has never exchanged posts with me. There is a certain inherent creepiness when a stranger like you jumps in for no apparent reason, but nothing surprises me when it comes to this little island of sweetness and light...

    Do you know the definition of "Hatchet Job" cause if you don't-your post is a poor example of one.
    Posting partial comments and replies to fit your, what? defense of attack?

    Damning stuff for sure...

    translating bev's rant into something less offensve...

    Responding to a confused post from someone who attacked me for something someone else said
    and MO?

    Mo stalked my posts. 'nuff said.

    I am the guy who called eric out on day one here...it didn't take a month before there was a "moderator" for the board. Maybe one thing had something to do with the other. The COMMUNITY seems happy with Tyler now, but this blog was here for years without one...

    Moderates and common courtesy are anathema here...

    BTW-There is a new feature called "ignore author"
    just click on the exclamation point in the box on the right hand side of the reply blurb...

    • 2 votes
    #6.9 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 8:15 PM EDT

    You are just such a diplomat, dangerfield - a shining example to all. <end snark>

    I am not the self proclaimed 'diplomat' but you, sir, are and thus you expose your hypocrisy for what it is: a thin veneer of self-righteousness.

    • 4 votes
    #6.10 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 11:19 PM EDT
    Reply

    And you and your ilk represent Christian values with your name calling?

    • 1 vote
    Reply#7 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 5:47 PM EDT

    This report may shed some light on what is going on with the dopes of nope and the half term Gov.

    Myths and misconceptions of the GOBP Exposed

    Misconceptions about REPUBLICANS go back many years. In the 1830s, the geographer Zeigler of Strasbourg proposed the theory that the republicans fell out of the sky during stormy weather (also featured in the folklore of the Inupiat/Yupik at Norton Sound), and then died suddenly after the November elections.[5] This myth was refuted by the natural historian Ole Worm, who accepted that the republicans could fall out of the sky but that they had been brought over by the wind rather than created by generation during the spring primary. It was Worm who first published dissections of a republican, which showed that they are anatomically similar to most other rodents, and the work of Carl Linnaeus proved that they had a natural origin.[6][7]

    Republicans became notorious in popular culture because of a myth that they commit mass suicide when they loose elections. Driven by strong biological urges, some species of republicans may migrate in large groups when democratic voter density becomes too great. Republicans can swim and may choose to cross a body of water in search of a new precinct/district. In such cases, many may drown if the body of water is so wide as to stretch their physical/mental capability to the limit. This fact combined with the unexplained fluctuations in the population of Southern republicans gave rise to the development of the myth. [8]

    The myth of republican "mass suicide" is long-standing and has been popularized by a number of factors. In 1955, Disney Studio illustrator Carl Barks drew an Uncle Scrooge adventure comic with the title "The Republicans with the Locket". This comic, which was inspired by a 1954 American Mercury article, showed massive numbers of republicans jumping over Hudson river cliffs.[9][10] Even more influential was the 1958 Disney film White Wilderness, which won an Academy Award for Documentary Feature, in which staged footage was shown with republicans jumping into sure death after faked scenes of mass election losses.[11] A Canadian Broadcasting Corporation documentary, Cruel Camera, found that the republicans used for White Wilderness were flown from the west coast to the east coast, where they did not jump off the cliff, but in fact were launched off the cliff using a turntable by other tea party republicans.[12]

    Because of their association with this odd behavior, republican election losses are frequently used metaphor in reference to people who go along unquestioningly with unpopular opinion, with potentially dangerous or fatal election consequences.

    See wikipedia for some source/research material

    • 6 votes
    Reply#8 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 5:55 PM EDT

    Excellent post!

    • 2 votes
    #8.1 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:05 PM EDT

    jomama72

    Funny once is funny...once

    Either get new material or I will be compelled to re post my own pre-labor day attempt at satire...:)

    See, I'm looking out for you too...:)

    • 2 votes
    #8.2 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:08 PM EDT

    STFU, who do you think you are? It's a joke, if you don't like it don't read it.

    • 5 votes
    #8.3 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:15 PM EDT

    I think I am someone so creative that I don't need to post my clever little joke until someone calls on me to retire it and come up with something new.

    I also am sure that I am someone who would never have to descend to stuff like "who do you think you are" and the obscene acronym you felt appropriate as a reply to what was pretty obviously meant to be a gentle jibe that even included reference to our previous, I thought civil communication.

    My mistake and despite your lack of manners, my apologies...

    • 3 votes
    #8.4 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:46 PM EDT

    good try kid..lol

    • 5 votes
    #8.5 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:48 PM EDT

    I accept your apology...

    • 3 votes
    #8.6 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:53 PM EDT

    Easy there Jommama, you're stealing dangerfields thunder. Don't know what his real issue is but today it looks like he needs a back rub or maybe some baby talk to soothe whatever it was that hurt him so bad.

    • 1 vote
    #8.7 - Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:41 AM EDT
    Reply

    Any one this hillbilly weirdo endorses you know will be just as weird as she is !

    • 8 votes
    Reply#9 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 5:58 PM EDT

    I don't consider Sarah Palin a whore or a hillbilly. I realize her knowledge is lacking and don't give her much thought. Unfortunately many people do. People like Sarah light fires like the mosque controversy and then we have a preacher threatening to burn qurans. Our words have consequences. Sarah Palin lives to create controversy and for this I dislike her as a human being. She has nothing of value to offer society.

    • 7 votes
    Reply#10 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:08 PM EDT

    AnaBanana-

    Sarah Palin lives to create controversy and for this I dislike her as a human being. She has nothing of value to offer society.

    Thank you AnaBanana-

    Even Megan McCain, John McCain's daughter spoke about his in her book "Dirty Sexy Politics".

    http://dailycaller.com/2010/08/31/meghan-mccain-breaks-silence-on-sarah-palin/


    Sarah Palin, writing in a new book that Palin brought "drama, stress, complications, panic and loads of uncertainty" to the losing campaign.

    • 5 votes
    #10.1 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:31 PM EDT

    Did anyone know that McDonnell lied to a Conservative talk show host when he questioned her on her last attempt to be Senator. She stated she tied Joe Biden in 2 districts, but was actually beaten soundly on the matter, which by the way, she still denies. She broke and using donation to pay off her debt from the prior election. Also if no caught this on Maddow yesterday, she believes that masturbation is a sin against God. Lets here from our Repub friend here and get their take on this. Because we know their all sinning when they see Sister Sarah on the television.

    • 7 votes
    #10.2 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 7:03 PM EDT

    This comment is repulive. As a Christian and Conservative I am SICK of being labeled a hypocrite/racist every time I turn around. I don't know this lady, but if she said she believes that "masturbation is a sin against God" it is her right to believe that, many devout Catholics follow this belief. Not all forms of Christianity follow that belief. I find it very offensive that you have decided that if any person who calls themselves a Christian were to engage in that activitiy they would be a hypocrite. Part of being a Christian is to TRY to live up to the beliefs found in one's religion, just because one fails to achieve that goal does not make one a hypocrite. You ask God for forgiveness and strive even harder not to make the same mistake. It is ridiculous that because a politician declares that they are a Christian, that some people in the media make a decision to follow that person around, wait for them to make a bad decision and then pounce on them as hypocrites.

      #10.3 - Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:13 AM EDT

      Janet-489369

      How does being a "Christian" have anything to do w/ this woman's views on chasity? I'm just stating facts about this woman and you go Holy Roller on me. The fact is see said this, and our Repub and CONServative friends like the eye candy they see when Sarah Palin is on television. I don't have anything against your religious beliefs, and I should be allowe to have or not have whatever beliefs I believe in. You may not approve, but thats for you to deal with not me. Christine McDonnell has made these claims and now she will have to explain them if she has to debate Castle, the GOP candidate of choice.

      • 1 vote
      #10.4 - Fri Sep 10, 2010 2:25 PM EDT
      Reply

      From MMFA, These are some real Americans, when will people spit the hooks out?

      Beck, Palin to restore honor to 9/11 by cashing in with $225 "meet and greet"

      September 08, 2010 2:33 pm ET by Will Bunch

      September 11 is a very important day for Glenn Beck. For one thing, the king of all right-wing media talks about it all the time -- more on that in a second. What's more, the horrors of Sept. 11, 2001, are pretty much what made the Fox News Channel host into the national lightning rod that he is today. It was the vehicle that caused him to complete his journey from a Morning Zoo "rodeo clown" to a political guy who suddenly was replacing the so-9/10 Laura Schlessinger on radio outlets coast to coast and then leading a series of transparently self-serving honoring-the-troops rallies for Clear Channel.

      But Beck has talked a lot about 9/11 over nine years -- and with the highly notable exception of https://staging.mematt.org/mmtv/200509090003">his bizarre September 2005 attack on the family members of victims of the terrorist attack, the emphasis has been on extreme reverence for that day in American history. When he was getting off the ground on FNC, he used the images of 9/11 to launch project he claimed would bring Americans back together.

      As recounted in my new book https://staging.mematt.org/rd?to=http://www.amazon.com/Backlash-Right-Wing-Radicals-High-Def-Hucksters/dp/0061991716/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1280840717&sr=8-1">The Backlash, he said of the attacks on his now infamous March 13, 2009, "We Surround Them" program:

      "[t]he skies were filled with black clouds and our hearts were full of terror and fear. We realized -- for the first time -- how fragile we really were." As Beck addressed his coast-to-coast audience, viewers saw images of anguished, tearful women, head in hands, mouths agape, staring at the hellish fires of the World Trade Center, then a mother racing down a Manhattan byway pushing two children in a stroller, away from the deadly dust.

      https://staging.mematt.org/rd?to=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/will-bunch/glenn-becks-warped-hikack_b_217294.html">The 9/12 Project, which devolved in a matter of days into an anti-Barack Obama backlash movement, was described by Beck as aimed:

      to bring us all back to the place we were on September 12, 2001. The day after America was attacked we were not obsessed with Red States, Blue States or political parties. We were united as Americans, standing together to protect the values and the principles of the greatest nation ever created.

      In fact, Beck even told his much ballyhooed Restoring Honor rally in D.C. last month that https://staging.mematt.org/mmtv/201008280017">9/11 was a sign from the Almighty, presumably to turn Americans away from things like greed and back to the things that really matter:

      BECK: He has been sending us wake-up calls, and you can send two kinds of wake-up calls. One through fear, like 9/11. Nine-eleven woke us up, and we stood shoulder-to-shoulder for a very short period of time. Politics didn't matter. Color didn't matter. It didn't matter if you were poor or if you were rich. We were Americans together. Beyond that, we were God's human creation standing together.

      So, with that all as a backdrop, what matters the most to Glenn Beck on September 11, 2010, the ninth anniversary of the day that terrorists slaughtered nearly 3,000 innocent Americans and ripped apart the lives of their families and friends?

      Cashing in, apparently.

      In Palinland, of all places.

      The spiritual guru of the 9-12 Project http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20015814-503544.html">will be marking the anniversay of 9-11 along with his new best friend Sarah Palin with a high-priced (and as far as the actual program goes, somewhat mysterious) event at the Dena'ina Center in Anchorage, Alaska. The potential event has been rumored and discussed under the radar for days, possibly even as the launch of a Palin 2012 presidential bid.

      But apparently, in the immortal words of Steve Martin in "The Jerk," it's yet another "profit deal" for the two leading high-def hucksters of the right wing. According to https://staging.mematt.org/rd?to=http://www.ticketmaster.com/event/0F0044E6DDB96945?majorcatid=10005&artistid=967718&minorcatid=104&tm_link=tm_notix_Change_Search_Request">the Ticketmaster page, tickets for this solemn 9-11 commemoration run from a low of $73 to a top price of $130, and that's not all. There's also $225 for a special meet-and-greet with Beck (and possibly with Palin), so that die-hard (and not economically struggling) Beck fans can wish him a happy 9-11 in person.

      If there's a contradiction or some sort of irony in cashing in over 9-11, that seems to have eluded the hosts. http://www.facebook.com/notes/sarah-palin/glenn-beck-visits-alaska-on-911/427473918434">Palin wrote this week on her Facebook page: "We can count on Glenn to make the night interesting and inspiring, and I can think of no better way to commemorate 9/11 than to gather with patriots who will 'never forget.' "

      Visa and MasterCard accepted.

      Truth be told, outrageous as Beck's latest scheme is, it's almost hard to work up the outrage at this point because to those of us who aren't drinking the David Barton-fueled Kool-Aid, this is simply who Beck is: One of the most shameless businesspeople in America, who happens to be in the business of entertainment and warping some minds politically in the process. Beck has millions of fans -- and to him they are all walking ATM machines. He thinks nothing of selling the people who admire him https://staging.mematt.org/rd?to=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/19/anthony-weiner-glenn-beck_n_581563.html">overpriced gold coins or https://staging.mematt.org/blog/201009010011">surivial seed banks and "Food Insurance" kits, none of which they need, and almost every Beck event not named "Restoring Honor" is designed around maximizing ticket prices.

      That's why Glenn Beck made $32 million last year and Sarah Palin made $12 million in a matter of months.

      The only difference is that this time it's 9/11.

      And Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin are open for business 365 days a year.

      • 6 votes
      Reply#11 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:35 PM EDT

      The burning is off. Here's to Americans all across our nation for not looking the other way. And here's to President Obama and Hillary Clinton for speaking up. What a shame it would have been if no one said anything and just let this pastor have "his" freedom, while trying to take away someone else's.

      I'm sure religions from all across the world were looking to President Obama to speak about this. Imagine if he hadn't said anything and this burning occurred? What would the world think of us then? We had to make it perfectly clear that this pastor did not represent us as a country, whether he went through with it or not. President Obama is attempting to build bridges in real life. Most of the pundits are just trying to make a buck.

      Whoever advised the president was correct. 100% correct. It's time to stop looking the other way. We did that prior to 9/11 and we did it prior to the economic crash.

      OneNation.

      “A leader is one who knows the way, goes the way, and shows the way.”

      • 6 votes
      Reply#12 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:43 PM EDT

      The pastor in Florida is a nut job, but he has as much a right to burn the Koran, as the developers do to build as Mosque in NYC. Both have the right, but neither is a wise move. I agree with Larry O'Donnell who appeared on Morning Joe this morning who said (loosely quoting) when did we begin to allow our fear of what a terrorist might do, keep us from enforcing our Constitution. I think this was a very wise statement, this pastor can't burn the Koran (even though its his first amendment right) because we are afraid that more soldiers will be killed in Iraq and Afganistan, oh and their might be riots in those same countries. The other day on CNN the Iman in charge of the Mosque said, the Mosque can't be moved from Ground Zero because Muslims all over the world would protest and commit acts of violence. So now we can't move the Mosque? Why are we letting one of the most intolerant religions of the world determine how we enforce our Constitutional rights?

        #12.1 - Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:32 AM EDT
        Reply

        Hi Fiesty, Bev, Da Noid, KeepN it Real, you to dangerfield thanx for "keeping it real" until faced with the adverse. Then you respond. I like that. I am the Watcher and from what I've observed over the last year or so the ones you make effort to educate can never be. I wonder sometimes why you make effort. Then I understand that it is about responsibility. Then I'm baffled as to why the uneducated won't make effort to educate themselves. Again I'm reminded of hetrosuggestion. That is if you keep reminding them, keep planting the subliminal seed, maybe they will eventually get it. But sometimes you must also relent because in a collective, resistense is futile.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#13 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:46 PM EDT

        Robert;

        Sadly...these days the subliminal 'seed' with the stuck on stupid crowd only grow if you water it with a hefty helping of HATE-OR-AID!

        Thanks for the kind words... and keep up the good fight! ;0)

        • 5 votes
        #13.1 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 7:03 PM EDT

        Feisty, do you think Robert has picked up on our little acronym? It would appear that it has become a universal understanding, for some! ha

        Happy Friday, My friend!

          #13.2 - Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:46 AM EDT
          Reply

          Think Progress
          Former Bush Secretary of State Gen. Colin Powell gave a strong endorsement of the proposed Islamic community center near Ground Zero in New York City today, saying, “If you believe in our system…then you can’t make a distinction between two, three, five, and ten block” away from the site of the 9/11 terror attacks. Appearing on ABC’s The View, Powll said “politicians” have stoked the emotional debate, and noted that the opposition to the mosque is part of a wave of “Islamophobia across the country,” citing the opposition to proposed mosques in Tennessee and California--

          POWELL: I think eventually it will. … And I’m saying to myself, what is wrong with this? and does it make a difference whether it’s two, three, four, five or 10 blocks away? And the answer is, if you believe in our system and if you understand why we can do it at the Pentagon and Walter Reed, then you can’t make a distinction between two, three, five and 10 blocks. I think it should go forward. [...]

          General Petraeus is right. There are a billion Muslims who are watching this mosque issue and they’re watching what’s going on in Florida and they’re wondering, has America changed? Is America different? … So I think we’ve got a problem. We’ve got to take a deep breath. And politicians are using this for all kinds of purposes.

          ___________

          Muslims are in difficult position. They are being made to convince us that they do not share the beliefs of the 9/11 terrorists. Seems like we may have the same problem. We as a nation do not share the same beliefs as this pastor and every other hateful bigot in this country. And we have to keep saying it. Over and over and over.

          • 6 votes
          Reply#14 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 6:51 PM EDT

          dangerfield

          I am the guy who came here and called for common courtesy. You won't find much in the way of overheated rhetoric from me about republicans or democrats. The battle cry "your side is worse, or your side is just as bad" still doesn't justify the almost comically nasty stuff you write.

          Forgive me i didn't know you had been appointed moderator for First Read or the "ONE" who decides how the law of "cause and effect" is distributed through out the universe.

          Why would you expect anyone here to show respect for the president (as to him being the most maligned, have you ever taken political science? George Washington, the "Father of our Country" was hung in effigy outside his window and quit what would have been a position for life because he didn't think any mortal man should be subjected to more than 8 years of the abuse) when you show such malignant contempt for your opponents in your rhetoric?

          Dangerfield,

          I said in "my lifetime" of the United States; not from millenniums ago of America's colonial history way, way, way, before my time.

          • 5 votes
          Reply#15 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 7:02 PM EDT

          Forgive me i didn't know you had been appointed moderator for First read or the "ONE" who decides how the law of cause and effect is distributed through out the universe.

          Thanks for pointing that out Bev... is anyone else as tired as I am of Dangerfield the rest of the 'Gangs' superiority complex?

          *yawn*

          • 5 votes
          #15.1 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 7:05 PM EDT

          But, dangerfield,

          I never attack any poster here personally.

          and not 20 minutes later...

          Forgive me i didn't know you had been appointed moderator for First Read or the "ONE" who decides how the law of "cause and effect" is distributed through out the universe.


          so much for that...

          Oh and Feisty,

          Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL

          Well isn't this brilliant? Can't attack the message - so ATTACK the messengers...

          ... lmao!

          HOISTED ON YOUR OWN PETARD...lol and pass the popcorn

          (you are one of the worst offenders and help set the tone here. I can see where you would be tired of those who want people to act like adults.)


          • 3 votes
          #15.2 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 7:19 PM EDT

          Fiesty,

          Thanks for pointing that out Bev... is anyone else as tired as I am of Dangerfield the rest of the 'Gangs' superiority complex?

          I so am. What kills me is how they try to mask it. They can condescend all they want I'm not a quitter like failin Sarah Pain LOL I'll say what it is necessary; with their permissions.

          • 3 votes
          #15.3 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 7:23 PM EDT

          Bev-

          It was meant to be indicative of the fact that being maligned is as much part and parcel of the office of president as "hail to the chief" and air force one. As to whatever constitutes "Your lifetime", Were you alive when President Clinton was in office? President Ford? President Johnson? President Nixon? Some would argue that president Obama has a long way to go to be able to swap "war stories" with those four relatively recent occupants of the White House.

          There is a nastiness that pervades even the most innocuous exchanges here.

          Beverly in Chicago

          Fiesty,

          Thanks for pointing that out Bev... is anyone else as tired as I am of Dangerfield the rest of the 'Gangs' superiority complex?

          I so am.

          Haha...then prepare to be exhausted...:)


          • 3 votes
          #15.4 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 7:31 PM EDT

          But, dangerfield,

          I never attack any poster here personally.

          and not 20 minutes later...

          Forgive me i didn't know you had been appointed moderator for First Read or the "ONE" who decides how the law of "cause and effect" is distributed through out the universe.


          so much for that...

          Oh and Feisty,

          Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL

          Well isn't this brilliant? Can't attack the message - so ATTACK the messengers...

          dangerfield,

          Please allow me to correct my self, not 20 minutes latter here, now and forever.

          I meant...

          I'll say what it is necessary; without your permission(s).




          • 2 votes
          #15.5 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 7:33 PM EDT

          I am in no position to grant or deny permission to you or anyone else, but I will continue to point out that you and those who post in your "style", say many things that are unkind, uncouth, uncivil, unworthy of anyone with a modicum of decency and yes, unnecessary.

          I think you are capable of better things...sorry that even that is a cause for rancor...

          • 4 votes
          #15.6 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 8:23 PM EDT

          But WAIT... Dangerfield... not once but twice today you thought enough of one of my previous posts to 'repost' it... I must be doin something right! Still lmao!

          I got the Achilles heel and you my friend are out of ammo...

          Play it to your base my friend... because the rest of us are SOOO over the tactics of 2000...

          • 2 votes
          #15.7 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 9:31 PM EDT

          Well ain't Dangerfield 'special'? lmao

          Talk about the pot calling the kettle black....? Thanks for the laugh D... it's been awhile since I've doubled over with laughter!

          And like I said previously... not a ONE of you could come up with an original thought if YOUR lives depended on it... ;0))))))

          • 2 votes
          #15.8 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 9:40 PM EDT
          Reply

          Bev never attacks any poster and feisty disdains "shooting the "messenger"...I hope that's clear now to everyone.

          Have a great night!

          • 2 votes
          Reply#16 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 7:23 PM EDT

          September 9, 2010 posted from Political Animal site, this is in regards to our favorite Mourn.Joe political idiot. Thought some of you might enjoy, I did. Goodnight Danger

          HALPERIN'S DEEPLY FLAWED ADVICE....Mark Halperin latest item in Time starts off pretty well. He notes that White House officials, including President Obama, "have betrayed visible annoyance" at the Republican response to their latest tax proposals, including "tax incentives for companies to make capital expenditures and do more R&D."

          Halperin doesn't blame the president and his team for being annoyed, since Obama "is calling for some of the same provisions that the GOP and its business-lobby allies have touted for years." Halperin even acknowledges that Republicans are only fighting the administration's ideas because they want to deny the president a pre-election victory -- putting political considerations ahead of the economy.

          So, what's the problem? Halperin's suggestion to Obama about the road ahead.

          What most ails the economy right now is the uncertainty in the business sector about what Washington will do next. Wariness and doubt inhibit investment and hiring. The President's new proposals address those obstacles head-on. But sooner or later the President is going to need Republican votes and the backing of business to get this and other measures passed. Treating his opponents as unprincipled chuckleheads makes it less likely that Obama will get what he wants and more likely that voters will be turned off by contemptuous rhetoric.

          That sort of gambit is likely to prove unhelpful for either the long-term good of the economy or the President.

          Two things. First, uncertainty is not what ails the economy most right now. Republicans say this every day, and they're wrong.

          Second, Halperin's advice is badly flawed. Halperin concedes Republicans are opposing ideas they should support, concedes Republicans aren't approaching the debate in good faith, and concedes that their position is entirely unprincipled. But he nevertheless concludes that the president shouldn't show any public frustration about this -- or, heaven forbid, actually call out the GOP for their indefensible antics -- because it might hurt Republicans' feelings, making bipartisan cooperation less likely.

          This is pretty astounding for a media figure who helps dictate the conventional wisdom -- Republicans are misbehaving, but if Obama acknowledges their misbehavior, Republicans are likely to keep misbehaving.

          How, then, does Halperin suggest the president, who's already prepared to endorse policies the GOP says they want, move the policy forward? Send Republicans flowers? Invite them to the movies? Praise them for their obstinacy? Keep repeating "thank you, sir, may I have another" until Republicans are prepared to let the political system function?

          As for Halperin's concern about "contemptuous rhetoric," I think Republicans characterizing the president as an illegitimate, authoritarian Communist with Hitler-like tendencies and no birth certificate have cornered the market on this front.

          • 2 votes
          Reply#17 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 7:26 PM EDT

          I understand you see Palin as a diamond in the rough ....i see her as a turd in the punch bowl !

          • 3 votes
          Reply#18 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 7:58 PM EDT

          Republicans for Tootsie Rolls!

          • 2 votes
          #18.1 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 9:33 PM EDT
          Reply

          From Crooks and Liars(not you Dangerfield) It looks like the dopes of nope GOBP armour may have a chink Begining..lol.

          Home » Blogs » karoli's blog

          September 09, 2010 03:00 PM

          Voinovich Breaks Ranks, Says Small Biz Bill Must Pass

          By karoli

          Retiring Ohio Senator George Voinovich has given a strong signal to the White House that he will play ball with them on the Small Business bill as well as the $50 billion infrastructure stimulus spending bill. It appears that he will want to add an amendment pulling the 1099 reporting requirement that was included in the Affordable Care Act as his only quid pro quo.

          Voinovich's support for the measures really exposes the bankruptcy of the current Republican strategy, otherwise known as "No."

          Via Washington Post:

          In an interview, Voinovich said he could no longer support efforts by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to delay the measure in hopes of winning the right to offer additional GOP amendments. Most of the proposed amendments "didn't have anything to do with the bill" anyway, Voinovich said, and amounted merely to partisan "messaging."

          "We don't have time for messaging. We don't have time anymore. This country is really hurting," Voinovich said.

          Voinovich highlighted the difficulties small business owners face:

          The package of tax breaks and other incentives includes a new loan fund that would encourage community banks to provide up to $30 billion to small businesses, improving access to credit - a problem hurting small businesses in Ohio, Voinovich said. He cited the case of a constituent whose business was turned down for a loan by 42 banks.

          "We don't have time anymore to play games," Voinovich said. "I happen to believe these small-business people can't get money to save their souls."

          Voinovich was also a no-show for the Affordable Care Act vote on the first round, an absence I viewed at the time as his way of not opposing the bill while not overtly challenging party leadership. Now that he's close to retirement, it seems he's willing to put the good of his constituents ahead of party loyalty. It's good to see, and gives political cover to the Maine twins and Scott Brown to follow suit.

          • 4 votes
          Reply#19 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 8:01 PM EDT

          Don't think for one minute voinovich isn't about to get Mitch slapped for his rank breaking.

          They are combing the photo archives now for something to hold over him. But he's retiring and HEY, what the heck - what does he REALLY have to lose now?

          Thank you, V. A stand up way to approach it.

            #19.1 - Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:50 AM EDT

            Clara KCMO

            Voinovich could care less what McConnell does now, he's retiring. It seems that only when they are going to retire do any of these Senators decide to do whats best for the American people. Otherwise its lockstep w/ Party damn the People.

              #19.2 - Fri Sep 10, 2010 2:33 PM EDT
              Reply

              President Obama and former President Bill Clinton are capable of making the November election a huge victory

              for the Democrats. So far, President Obama is really doing a good job in the campaign trail and

              just need to be joined by Bill Clinton who is a very good campaigner.

                Reply#20 - Thu Sep 9, 2010 11:07 PM EDT

                Dangerfield, et al:

                I would be the first person to advocate elevation of the political discourse on this blog and elsewhere. But far too often the dialog gets hijacked by inanity, misinformation, outright lies and demagoguery by the GOP and their Bagger Klan. An agreement to commence the dialog with facts has proved challenging for them in this environment but it would be a great start. Otherwise, in order to win this war, the rest of us have had to adopt Agent Anderson's approach in Mississippi Burning: "these people are crawling out of the sewer! Maybe the gutter's where we outta be!"

                • 1 vote
                Reply#23 - Fri Sep 10, 2010 8:53 AM EDT

                Beverly, you seem to know a lot about where Palin got here support from. Which I think is a lot of baloney. But tell me where did Zerobama got his trillions from to run and support his campaign? Don't tell me you don't know where you Annointed One got his. Let me give you a hint. Saudi Arabia? Possibly from........ Be careful what you say or it might come back and haunt you. But after he leaves the presidency the American people will eventually know everything.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#24 - Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:05 AM EDT

                Saudi Arabia Juevenile?!? Freakin' Saudi Arabia? You have proof? Next you gonna tell us he's really Osama! Which delusional drugs are you on? I'd recommend a return visit to your psychiatrist 'cause something's contraindicating. Bagga, puh-lease!

                • 1 vote
                #24.1 - Fri Sep 10, 2010 10:12 AM EDT

                Mad in CT

                '...bagga, puh-lease!'

                caused me to spray my diet dr. pepper all over. good one.

                  #24.2 - Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:52 AM EDT
                  Reply

                  Everybody is running from Zerobama. Millions of Americans are turning to Palin and the Tea Party.

                    Reply#25 - Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:48 AM EDT

                    Uh, please Juvenile! That's your "Simple Sarah" wet dream talking. Get up an go wash yourself!

                      #25.1 - Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:55 AM EDT

                      I guess with Republican math it could be millions. But more likely, not so much.

                        #25.2 - Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:53 AM EDT
                        Reply

                        Quotables of the day........Palin endorses candidate without telling her...LOL.

                        "Thanks @SarahPalinUSA for the last minute call in. Endorsement of Christine O'Donnell was an exclusive. Said she hadn't told Christine yet." Sean Hannity from Sarah Palin

                        "I am just a man who is trying to do what God has told us to do." Rev. Terry Jones

                        "Just drink the Kool Aid." Rev. Jim Jones

                        "Burn the Qurans and all the books of God, including the Bible. You Right Wing Conservative bigots don't listen to me anyway." Jesus

                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#26 - Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:50 AM EDT

                        Next, Sarah Palin will probably admit that endorsed Levi Johnson wearing a condom while sleeping with her daughter in the Alaska governor's mansion. She just forgot to tell him......

                        And, if she becomes our next President, she can endorse tax cuts for the wealthy, more corporate bailouts and corporate welfare, and more attacks on third world countries....as long as she forgets to tell someone...

                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#27 - Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:55 AM EDT
                        Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.