Department of unfortunate metaphors

The AP writes:

A Republican candidate for Wisconsin governor has begun running ads in which he dons boxing gloves and vows to "go the distance" against the likely Democratic nominee, who was viciously beaten outside a fairground last year and left with serious injuries.

Scott Walker's campaign said Tuesday that it didn't intend to make reference to the August 2009 attack outside the Wisconsin State Fair that left Tom Barrett, Milwaukee's mayor, with injuries to his head, mouth, face and hand. Barrett tried to help a screaming woman struggling to protect her 1-year-old granddaughter from being taken by her drunk, belligerent father.

The attacker, who was sentenced in July to 12 years in prison, beat Barrett with a metal object. The mayor has had three surgeries on his hand, which doctors say may never fully recover.

Here's the TV ad:

Discuss this post

If you believe the GOP candidate on this explanation,you'll also believe the GOP has the Working Mans best interest at heart.

I believe neither is TRUE, I'ma DemoCrat !

You Betcha!

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 1:11 PM EDT

hail Hail the working man, a working man like me....

Thank you Merle.

I'd like to put on a pair of gloves, and bloddy this weasle's lip for him. Look at those round shoulders, that pair of vacant eyes.....

    #1.1 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:55 PM EDT

    Scott Walker - Douche Bag

      #1.2 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 5:45 PM EDT
      Reply

      Let’s have a physical fight

      Let’s invoke our second amendment rights

      Let’s secede

      Informed voters especially Independents love that kind of talk.

      • 2 votes
      Reply#2 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 1:15 PM EDT

      "Let's secede" That sounds good to me. The conservatives, tea baggers, etc can have the midwest and Alaska, we'll take the coasts.

      ;) LOL

      • 2 votes
      #2.1 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:20 PM EDT

      Lets see here.. Midwest for the Tea Party and the Righties, the left gets the coasts..

      SO basically the righties get the bread basket, aka the majority of the food producing states, and you get the worst ran, and in the red states/cities in the nation. Sounds good to me.

      • 7 votes
      #2.2 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:29 PM EDT

      No, Rook they can't have the midwest--I live in Iowa; they could have right-wing extremist Rep Steve King's corner, though.

      • 1 vote
      #2.3 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:30 PM EDT

      They can't have Missouri either Rook, just give them the South that's where the majority live anyway.

      • 3 votes
      #2.4 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:37 PM EDT

      Hey, as long as Alaska can get Alaska's natural resources...

      • 2 votes
      #2.5 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:22 PM EDT

      Well, I'm movin' the heck outa the Southeast then...! It's tolerable here for an independent mostly but if all of the other extremist conservatives move here it will be insane.

      I find that the extremist conservative people are always a hair away from destroying each other. Just a couple of layers away from viewing each other with suspicion and then attacking each other for imagined conspiracies.

      Think about it...

      First the low hanging fruit...Those damn fags, Mexicans, cross dressers, atheists, Muslims and Jews... Then it's those damn liberals! Then it's those who were liberal sympathisers! Then it's those damn independents because they might as well be liberals! They're not like us! They never were.

      Once the lib's and inde's are gone it's those damn liberal conservatives...Then it's those damn centrist conservatives! Then it's those conservatives who don't believe in the bible as the word of god! Then it's those conservatives who look down on politicians who frequent lezbian sex clubs...!

      I can totally see it.

      • 1 vote
      #2.6 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:39 PM EDT

      They don't want Missouri- Missouri just outlawed nude dancing. Nothing narrow minded about the 'show me'. It uses to be called the "you show me yours, and I'll show you mine" state, but then they all got religion and what-not.

        #2.7 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:58 PM EDT

        You should step back and read the stupid crap you all just posted. It's no wonder the left is facing Armageddon Nov. 2................

        • 2 votes
        #2.8 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:05 PM EDT

        Drive By,

        We didn't ALL get religion, so go ahead, show me yours and see what happens! tee hee (I couldn't resist!)

          #2.9 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:25 PM EDT
          Reply

          One candidate is all talk about "fighting to go the distance." The other candidate has a proven track record for bravely defending a helpless woman against a criminal attack. One candidate walks the walk while the other talks the talk.

          • 12 votes
          Reply#3 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 1:20 PM EDT

          Oh lordy. Funny how the perception changes when you don't live here. Yes, Mayor Barret was viscously attacked by an a-hole with a tire iron as he tried to call for help in the middle of a DV situation. The attack didn't happen because he was the mayor or anything else, he was a citizen doing the right thing and because of what happened even more citizens are afraid to do the right thing for their fellow man. There's a winner of a situation

          Yes, perhaps it's unfortunate that Walker opted for an iconic piece of imagery in America because of the idiots who will claim it was done because he's an insensitive ass taunting Barret. If he was swinging a tire iron in the ad, I'd be right there with you saying poor taste, but he's not. He's using a phrase and a prop that have made their way into our culture. Frankly it wouldn't surprise me in the least if it's Walker's republican opponent who dropped the story to the media. Walker's been among the rare breed of politicians who's NOT run attack ads thus far in his campaign.

          When it comes to walking the walk, since he was elected in 2002, Walker has returned over $300,000 of his salary to the county, backing up his beliefs that county workers salaries are out of line. Walker's budget proposals for 8 years (since taking office) have frozen property taxes, reduced the government work force and created surpluses for the county. He's refused ARRA funds because of the burden on tax payers. I still don't exactly understand how, in the socialist mecca that is Milwaukee, he got elected, but he's actually taken a line and stuck to it successfully. I can only hope my fellow Wisconsinites are wise enough to vote for him in November to try and stem the tide of spending that's come out of Madison thanks to the current administration.

          • 2 votes
          #3.1 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:54 PM EDT

          "Yes, Mayor Barret was viscously attacked by an a-hole with a tire iron as he tried to call for help in the middle of a DV situation. The attack didn't happen because he was the mayor or anything else, he was a citizen doing the right thing and because of what happened even more citizens are afraid to do the right thing for their fellow man."

          Wow, what spin! Mayor Barret herorically put his @$$ on the line and you imply that as a result fewer people will do the right thing in the future? The fact that he did this not as mayor but as an ordinary private citizen who happened to be at the scene speaks volume of his character. While I will give his opponent the benefit of the doubt that his latest ad was done out of stupidity rather than malice, Barret has passed the character test with flying colors. As my Republican friends like to remind me, character counts.

          • 1 vote
          #3.2 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:01 PM EDT

          You're right, Al, character does count. Scott Walker has displayed similar strength of character in both his personal life and political careers. Barrett may pass the smell test on one but I'm not so sure about the other. When it comes to who is going to occupy the governors office I would prefer the one who passes the political smell test. Some may not like Walker's record or plans for our state moving forward but he is one of the few political types I've ever seen with my own two eyes who has actually turn the promise into policy. If your only basis for voting for someone is "he seems to be such a nice boy" I'd rather you stay home on election day.

            #3.3 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:51 PM EDT
            Reply
            Comment author avatarBeverly in ChicagoExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

            Unbelivable, republicans have no compassion.

              Reply#4 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 1:20 PM EDT

              All those who don't vote like you do have no compassion? Really? You need to get out more or let go of some of the hatred and stereotyping. That's how racism, sexism, etc start.

              • 3 votes
              #4.1 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:36 PM EDT

              No Allen it has nothing to do with voting. It has to do with the compassion of your posts, of which there is none. You teabagger republicans want to make every statement political.

                #4.2 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:42 PM EDT

                Beverly made the statement political when she specified a political party. Of course, the whole topic is political already. That's why it's in the Politics section of MSNBC.

                • 1 vote
                #4.3 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:24 PM EDT
                Reply

                A little tid bit for the dopes of nope to chew on, the media are underestimating the Dem responce come Nov. at the GOBP peril. From the Daily Kos.

                The NEWSWEEK poll over the weekend tries to lighten the mood, with mixed results.

                As Democrats prepare for considerable losses in the November elections, there’s reason to believe the party in power may not be headed for the bloodbath it might expect. According to a new NEWSWEEK Poll, President Obama’s approval rating—47 percent—indicates that the party is better off this year than Republicans were in 2006, when the GOP lost 30 House seats, and than the Democrats were in 1994, when they lost 52 House seats.

                This isn't the final word on polling by any means, but there are some good points made about current affairs. For example, it's common to talk about Obama's "plummeting" numbers, but sans Rasmussen, they aren't plummeting. (When he gets to the 30's like Carter or George W. Bush, call me):

                Obama’s approval has fallen 1 percentage point since the last NEWSWEEK survey in June, but the White House has gained ground on several specific issues, specifically his handling of the economy, which has risen to 40 percent (from 38 percent) over the past two months. Voters also generally approve of Obama’s response to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, as well as the administration’s handling of the war in Iraq, which Obama is expected to address next week from the Oval Office.

                Here's the reason Republicans still have to work to make gains in November:

                Still, Democrats’ perceived weakness may not be so simple for the GOP to capitalize on this fall. Republican leaders still must deal with the Bush legacy, which 38 percent fault for today’s economic problems (compared with 19 percent who fault Obama’s policies). The public also strongly opposes extending the Bush tax cuts by a spread of 52 percent who think the cuts should expire at the end of this year, and 38 percent who would like them to be extended.

                As I have said early and often, dislike for current conditions does not automatically translate into love of Republicans. Far from it. This and other polling recognizes that the public knows that Bush got us into this mess.

                The issue for Democrats is who the public wants to get us out of the mess. For example, in this poll 52% want the Bush tax cuts to expire while 38% don't. Republicans can't run on both tax cuts for the rich and deficit reduction; the two are incompatible.

                Can Democrats make that case? On that, stay tuned.

                • 5 votes
                Reply#5 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 1:32 PM EDT

                jomama72

                Repeat the following word three times and then go weep. Jobs!

                  #5.1 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:19 PM EDT

                  The Republicans will fall short because rather than running candidates that have a new approach to dealing with the issues and will work across party lines to help us out of this recession, they are running a bunch of Michelle Bachman clones. Leave it to the Pugs to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

                  • 4 votes
                  #5.2 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:28 PM EDT

                  Jomama--

                  As Democrats prepare for considerable losses in the November elections, there’s reason to believe the party in power may not be headed for the bloodbath it might expect. According to a new NEWSWEEK Poll, President Obama’s approval rating—47 percent—indicates that the party is better off this year than Republicans were in 2006, when the GOP lost 30 House seats, and than the Democrats were in 1994, when they lost 52 House seats.

                  Now break that poll down to how many people think he is on the right track, and how many people like him personally.

                  Obamas always been well liked personally ( like any of us really know him to make an honest opinion but thats beside the point) but the direction he is taking the country, and his policies are very much disliked.

                  If you break the two apart he is in the mid 30s approval raiting.

                  • 1 vote
                  #5.3 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:32 PM EDT

                  rather than running candidates that have a new approach to dealing with the issues and will work across party lines to help us out of this recession

                  Obama, Pelosi, and Reid aren't reaching across party lines either. They just slap together bills on their own, start calling Republicans names, then whine that they had 59 Dem votes and the guys they just slammed into the dirt and made fun of won't vote with them. If they'd actually let representatives of millions of constituents be involved in deciding what's in the bill, they might have a reason to want it to pass. It's childish to think otherwise.

                  • 4 votes
                  #5.4 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:43 PM EDT

                  Good information, thanks Jomama.

                  I'm waiting for someone on the right to answer this question. How many jobs have the republicans created? What have they done to fix the economy? Daily the GOP on FR and in Congress are quick to complain about jobs but have done nothing to help fix the problem.

                  What are their ideas? This is what I hear: extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest 2% of the population, raise the retirement age to 70, privatize social security, eliminate medicare and medicaid, eliminate the Dept of Education--these things create exactly how many jobs? None. If anything, their plans eliminate jobs.

                  • 5 votes
                  #5.5 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:47 PM EDT

                  Jeremy, quit making things up and lying, his poll numbers aren't in the mid 30's gee-sh man. That's why you teabagging republicans are going to lose seats in November, America sees through your lies.

                  • 1 vote
                  #5.6 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:48 PM EDT

                  Mo-1852032
                  Jeremy, quit making things up and lying, his poll numbers aren't in the mid 30's gee-sh man. That's why you teabagging republicans are going to lose seats in November, America sees through your lies.

                  I am not a member of the Tea Party OR the Republican party, so try again..

                  I get my information from many different sources. Obamas approval numbers ARE in the 30s for his policies.. Dont think so, google it and prove me wrong, I know im right.

                  When you add in if he is a " liked president " his raitings are in the 40s... People need to learn to put aside if you like they man and how he is doing his job. Cause he is failing at doing his job.

                  • 2 votes
                  #5.7 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:26 PM EDT

                  Jody, when the Republicans have the power to make any changes again, you'll see what they'll do. Until then, you can't blame the party out of power for not making changes. People call the Republicans the Party of No, but any party out of power is necessarily the Party of No for as long as the party in power is unwilling to deal.

                  • 2 votes
                  #5.8 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:29 PM EDT

                  Wrong, cs!

                  They are the party of No because they refuse to cooperate and compromise even when the bill in play is one they would have supported before Obama. Simply to see America suffer.

                  They know that the party in power will suffer losses in the mid-terms and those losses will be greater if America is hurting. So the goal is to make the pain worse.

                  The Dems caught America as it was falling into an economic abyss and are still pulling it out. The repubs are throwing stones and making the effort harder simply to gain a bit more political power.

                  unwilling to deal, cs? hardly. One simply has to look at all that was given away in HCR trying in vain to get just a few r votes. No single payer, no public option, millions left uninsured... what did the reicht wing say? give me more; we lost, but it has to be our way.

                  they are just crying, whiney babies being spoiled by Americans who don't see them for waht they are.

                  • 5 votes
                  #5.9 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:50 PM EDT

                  What brave republican defender will stand here and now, and tell us all the greatt hings they accompished durng 6 of the 8 years they were in power? All the great healthcare ideas? ALl the great economic strides? All the great energy independence (and increased security it brings) legislation? All the great things that allowed the middle class to stand up and say how much better their lives were than before 2001?

                  Stand, all ye- and be proud to DELIVER the GOOD NEWS!

                  (Jeez- Am I becoming Glennie Beck the Nervous Wreck??)

                  • 1 vote
                  #5.10 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 5:04 PM EDT

                  Jeremy-960164

                  Jeremy, you need to learn about the difference between favorability ratings and job approval ratings. Favorability ratings are about whether voters like Obama as a person. Job approval ratings are about, as the term suggests, how they think he is doing his job.

                  You're right that Obama is better liked as a person than for the job he's doing, but your numbers are way off. At the moment, Obama's favorables are at around 50%, and his job approval numbers are still in the mid-40s

                  http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/fav-obama.php

                  http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/jobapproval-obama.php

                  Your other argument, that "Obamas approval numbers ARE in the 30s for his policies," is factually incorrect as well. When voters are asked separately about how they think he is doing his job on the economy, health, and foreign policy, the polls are currently showing approval ratings in those fields at around 39%, 43% and 46%, respectively.

                  http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/jobapproval-presobama-economy.php

                  http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/jobapproval-presobama-health.php

                  http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/-jobapproval-presobama-foreignpolicy.php

                    #5.11 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:34 PM EDT
                    Reply

                    This all seems so terribly juvenile.

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#6 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 1:44 PM EDT

                    This Walker sounds like he is training with tea bags instead of the heavy bag. I'll take the Mayor that personaly stepped in to help the woman any day of the week and twice on Sunday, his actions speak more to his character than anything his opponent can say.

                    • 4 votes
                    Reply#7 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:02 PM EDT

                    Wow, are these people just icky or what?  So much for love and compassion -- it is all about nastiness and hate from these people.  I just cannot figure, for the life of me, what Bible these people are reading.  Pathetic.

                    • 6 votes
                    Reply#8 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:05 PM EDT

                    The same could be said for the left. Calling entire groups of those who don't vote for your guy or agree with you every nasty name in the book isn't exactly morally acceptable values or love & compassion. Throwing in Christian bashing in the name of "religions are evil" every chance you get while defending the Muslim religion isn't either.

                    • 8 votes
                    #8.1 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:47 PM EDT

                    Careful Allen, your racism is starting to show.

                      #8.2 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:50 PM EDT

                      when christians in this country actually start acting like the jesus they worship...hell will freeze over

                      • 2 votes
                      #8.3 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:05 PM EDT

                      Everysome, whenever Christians in this country start acting like the Jesus we worship (which happens quite frequently), we get a pass by the news. Let's face it, most of the news doesn't care about caring or good deeds. When was the last time you saw a news item about a church operating a food pantry, or a homeless shelter, or an addiction recovery program?

                      • 4 votes
                      #8.4 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:31 PM EDT

                      But, CSmith, operating a food pantry or a homeless shelter is very nice, but if at the same time you are cutting the Social Security benefits for millions of people who have no other income in order to pay for tax cuts so that billionaires can keep a few dollars more of their money, isn't that still hypocrisy? Why do you suppose Jesus said it is harder for a rich man to enter the gates of heaven than for a camel to go through the eye of a needle? If I recall correctly, Jesus advocated that those who have, share with those who don't so that everyone has something. The attitude that I see among many conservatives is that if you have less, you probably deserve less, so why should I share what I have. I really don't think that's what Jesus had in mind.

                      • 1 vote
                      #8.5 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:53 PM EDT
                      Reply

                      It's kind of funny only because you know Walker didn't intend to make light of Barret's injuries.

                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#9 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:13 PM EDT

                      No Media Coverage?

                      Media is To Busy Trashing The Dems & Pushing Republicans As 2010 Winners……………

                      Yet………………. Won’t Discuss This Why?:

                      Republicans In Disarry: Losing Candidates Increasingly Unwilling To Unite Behind GOP/Republican Nominees

                      For months, a civil war has raged between Tea Party activists and the GOP establishment for the heart of the Republican Party.

                      While House Republicans have tried to co-opt the movement by creating a Tea Party Caucus,

                      corporate Tea Party leaders like Dick Armey and Matt Kibbe scoff at the idea, declaring instead, “The movement is not seeking a junior partnership with the Republican Party.

                      It is aiming for a hostile takeover.”

                      Meanwhile, despite public overtures, the Republican establishment has spent millions fending off Tea Party primary challenges.

                      It is no surprise, then, that in a multitude of races where Tea Party candidates have faced off against establishment Republicans in a GOP primary, the losing candidate is rejecting customary practice by refusing to endorse the winner.

                      For a party that is supposed to have a “Media Predicted “Banner Year,

                      immense disunity could spell trouble for the Republican Party.

                      Here is a list of races this cycle — most of which pitted an establishment candidate against a Tea Party candidate

                      where the losing candidate has refused to officially endorse:

                      AZ-SEN: Sen. John McCain soundly trumped former Rep. J.D. Hayworth in the August 24 primary. Afterward, McCain never received a congratulatory phone call and Hayworth, who has not endorsed McCain, never received an invitation to a GOP unity event.

                      WA-SEN: Sarah Palin-endorsed Tea Partier Clint Didier was trounced by establishment candidate Dino Rossi on August 17. Didier has since withheld his endorsement until certain policy demands are met; Rossi isn’t budging. Didier’s spokeswoman responded, “So is Dino saying, ‘F*** you’ to those people [who supported Didier]? ‘F*** you,’ I don’t need your votes?”

                      MO-SEN: On August 3, Rep. Roy Blunt secured the GOP nomination over Tea Party candidate Chuck Purgason. Four weeks later, Purgason still has not officially endorsed Blunt.

                      FL-GOV: Rick Scott defeated Bill McCollum on August 24 in one of the most bitter primaries of the year. McCollum has since refused to endorse Scott, saying instead that “I still have serious questions…about issues with his character, his integrity, his honesty.”

                      CA-GOV: The bad blood didn’t end after Meg Whitman trounced Steve Poizner on June 8. Whitman continued to attack Poizner on the radio, leading the latter to declare that Whitman “apparently hasn’t gotten the memo that the primary is over” because she is “still misrepresenting my track record.”

                      NV-GOV: Brian Sandoval toppled Gov. Jim Gibbons on June 8. Sandoval spokesman Mary Sarah confirmed to ThinkProgress that Gibbons has not endorsed Sandoval following the primary.

                      IA-GOV: Bob Vander Plaats lost a contentious campaign to former Gov. Terry Branstad on June 8. Then, after Vander Plaat’s supporters fell just short of usurping the lieutenant governor slot against Branstad’s wishes, Vander Plaat himself said that he will not endorse Branstad for governor.

                      SC-GOV: After Nikki Haley secured the GOP nomination on June 22, one of her primary opponents, Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer, pointedly refused to show up for a unity rally.

                      NY-23: After Doug Hoffman drove RNC-endorsed Dede Scozzafava out of the 2009 special election because she wasn’t sufficiently conservative. Scozzafava proceeded not only to withhold an endorsement from Hoffman, but went even further and threw her support instead to Democrat Bill Owens.

                      SC-04: On June 22, Tea Party challenger Trey Gowdy defeated Rep. Bob Inglis 71 percent to 29 percent. Price Atkinson, a spokesman Inglis, confirmed to ThinkProgress that Inglis has not endorsed Gowdy following the primary.

                      WA-03: Esta

                      blishment candidate Jaime Herrera topped Tea Party candidate David Castillo on August 17. Afterward, Castillo would not endorse Herrera in the general election.

                      PA-04: On May 18, Tea Partier Keith Rothfus beat out GOP favorite Mary Beth Buchanan. ThinkProgress called Rothfus’s campaign, where a press contact who declined to give her name confirmed that Buchanan has not given an official endorsement.

                      IN-04: Todd Rokita defeated Brandt Hershman on May 4. Since then, Zach Zagar from the Rokita campaign confirmed to ThinkProgress that they “haven’t had any contact with Mr. Hershman’s campaign since the primary.”

                      KS-04: Mike Pompeo emerged out of a crowded field on August 3 but embittered himself with his primary rivals in the process. None of his three GOP opponents have endorsed his campaign.

                      FL-08: Daniel Webster emerged from a crowded GOP field on August 24. However, one of his top primary opponents, Kurt Kelly, was conspicuously absent at last night’s unity rally.

                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#10 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:16 PM EDT

                      it's called cleaning house. Politicians & lawyers aren't the most trustworthy people and many of them have to go. The left took the approach of demonizing this process. It's not hard to figure out why. Many of them know they'd be on "the list" if the left got together and pushed to get candidates who actually represent their party values. It's a smart move but depends on people to not think for themselves and just agree with whatever they tell you.

                      • 2 votes
                      #10.1 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:51 PM EDT

                      Vander Platts has organized against the 3 judges who are on the ballot for reaffirmation, he calls them activist judges because of the Iowa Supreme Court ruling that struck down the GOP marriage law (man and woman) as unconstitutional. According to republicans, any supreme court justice who rules against their view should be thrown off the court. One more piece of evidence that Tea Party republicans will destroy the Constitution if given the opportunity.

                      • 3 votes
                      #10.2 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:56 PM EDT

                      No, Republicans say that any judge who claims a public, government sanctioned contract is a private matter (and thus not something that can be regulated by the government) is an activist judge and should be thrown off the bench. And they're right.

                      • 1 vote
                      #10.3 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:34 PM EDT
                      Reply

                      I can't decide which it is--were they so clueless that they weren't aware of the incident of the prior year or did they remember the incident and think it made their guy look like he was stronger since he won't be knocked out?

                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#11 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:23 PM EDT

                      Either way, it is stunningly insensitive and dare I say, Incompetent? Really? all righty then

                        #11.1 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:32 PM EDT
                        Reply

                        Scott Walker, the latest in a long line of "I made a mistake" republicans. A mistake is a math error, Mr. Walker CHOSE to put on boxing gloves and attack a man who in my book, regardless of party, is an every day hero. What's with republicans this year, they're either arming their troops, reloading, using guns in their ads and now boxing gloves? All meant to do one thing--stoke the anger with subtle visuals associated with violence while pretending to be innocent.

                        Off topic. Glenn Beck decided he should not have made racist accusations against Pres Obama. Well, that's been over a year--why so long, Beck? Could it be the negative media coverage reports before the big God and Honor rally which clearly pointed out that Beck is a fraud. The next morning and since he can no longer make the racist claim (he will anyway in some form or another), he moved to his next line of attack--President Obama's faith. The God I know isn't fond of liars or those who fear false witness--Beck does both. Too many republicans like Beck speak of faith in God but their deeds reflect otherwise.

                        • 7 votes
                        Reply#12 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:25 PM EDT

                        Jody

                        Repond to your off topic.

                        Beck a fraud and racist? My Jody, you Demrats have no problem forgiving your own racists, like Sen Byrd. Oh, he had to do it to get elected, so that makes it forgivable.

                        Tell me Jody what is worst in your view, calling a President a murderer or a racist. Apparently you Demrats had no problem calling Prez Bush a murderer.

                        True, God does not take kindly to liars, remember that Jody.

                        • 5 votes
                        #12.1 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:36 PM EDT

                        he moved to his next line of attack--President Obama's faith.

                        You mean the same Obama that denounced Christianity on behalf of the entire nation and attended church with a racist preacher and never even realized that's what he was listening to? That's very telling of a person according to the left always claiming all Republicans are as bad as {insert whichever Republican was in negative media spotlights recently}. It goes both ways.

                        I don't think Obama is a racist, but I do think he has trouble with thinking of everyone as equals after he told his thoughts about the mosque/Muslims vs the right, illegal immigrants from Mexico vs the right, etc.

                        • 2 votes
                        #12.2 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:56 PM EDT

                        Beck is a fraud and I stand by that comment. As for Bush, I claim he was a bad president, I claim he collapsed the economy, amassed huge national debt, went to war because he wanted to, but you will not find any comment from me calling him a murderer, etc.

                        As for Robert Byrd, like many other democrats and republicans in the pre-civil rights years, their beliefs changed, they came to recognize all people as equal. It is 2010, what is Beck's excuse?

                        STS

                        • 3 votes
                        #12.3 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:03 PM EDT

                        Yes,we all remember President Obama's practicing his faith with the Reverend Wright's sermons of "G-D Damn America" and it's the whites who have cause all our problems.Yes,20 years of faithful Sunday services for the Obamas at Rev Wrights Chicago Church

                        • 2 votes
                        #12.4 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:08 PM EDT

                        President Obama upheld the Constitution--freedom of religion. Didn't know that was such an inexcusable thing to do. Apparently defending religious freedom in the USA is deplorable. President Bush reminded America that we are not at war with Islam--he was right. Apparently, there are no longer many adult republicans in this country, Orrin Hatch is one republican who has sided with President Obama's defense of the Constitution's First Amendment.

                        STS

                        • 1 vote
                        #12.5 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:14 PM EDT

                        that huge national debt went somewhere....into the pockets of his familiy's and cohorts war and oil and financial companies...whom I might add are heavilly invested in by the saudi's hmmmmmmm curious. Mostly you just have to look at where the money goes to know the why's and who's...

                        and the citizen's squabble over some abbot & costello version of who's on first or right or left or liberal or conservative....quite the box were in, and now a good portion of the populace can't think their way out of it....even as your pockets are getting picked clean by the folks that brought you the box in the first place.

                          #12.6 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:23 PM EDT

                          This crap with Reverend Wright has gone on long enough. You may not like what he said (which was played ad nauseum as if that is the only thing he preached), however, if you were born when he was, with no civil rights whatsoever, to be abused by those who looked down on you because of your skin color, then you go off and fight for that very same country only to come back and have to sit at the back of the bus, or can't eat at most restaurants or can only use certain restrooms, and more importantly cannot vote, you would be angry too. Give it a rest with Reverend Wright. That particular sermon is not all there is to the man. After what this country did to black folks, his generation has every right to be angry. He lived it in all its hell.

                          Just maybe, because the President is a person of color, he might understand a little better the issues of those of color.That does not make him any less Christian, American, patriotic, or whatever else you people throw out. It has gone beyond all reason this crap that gets thrown at him.

                          • 3 votes
                          #12.7 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:31 PM EDT

                          Everysome, by that logic, Obama is in the hands of foreign nationals, since most of his stimulus money (his, not Bush's, they're two different programs) went to foreign banks.

                          Joi, I know several black men who were raised in that environment, in the South, went to war for their country, came back, and experienced all the same. They're all kind, loving men who know what it is to sacrifice and forgive. Rev. Wright has no excuse, and neither does Obama.

                          • 2 votes
                          #12.8 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:41 PM EDT

                          I beg to differ C. Smith. How one person handles a situation does not mean the next person has to react the same way. Reverend Wright also responded by becoming a man of the cloth. That sermon is not the only sermon he has given and to judge him on that particular one and draw conclusions is wrong. The President does not need to walk around parading his faith. That is a personal decision and none of our business (or Glen Beck's). Reverend Wright may have strong words and feelings, but to say he has no excuse is not right. And the President, in my opinion, is being judged on that sermon (and who's to say he was even there that day) and because he does not regularly attend church, he is somehow less than what you people say a Christian should be.

                            #12.9 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:17 PM EDT

                            Jody, did you actually watch the spot?

                              #12.10 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:31 PM EDT

                              Not to hurt your feelings C Smith, but what those 'black men' say in front of you and what they're truly feeling may be two entirely different things.

                              Rev Wright had the courage to speak out about the pain that discrimination in his life has caused, which in today's society has become totally unacceptable. However, I guarantee you, as a black person who lived through the civil rights era and Jim Crow- he is not alone is his views.

                              So take comfort in your views that Rev Wright is racist- and all 'black men' who don't speak out about the anger are over it, or have forgotten it. But watch that the same supressed anger doesn't come back to bite you in the rear.

                                #12.11 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:37 PM EDT

                                Jody,

                                I'm not a member of the texting generation, so this question is posed in earnest. You've closed several postings with the letters "STS", what does that mean?

                                  #12.12 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:44 PM EDT

                                  13 deleted, Birdman2010 extrapolating Walker to republicans not being good Samaritans because 'it is in their blood.' Back on-topic.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #12.13 - Wed Sep 1, 2010 1:57 PM EDT
                                  Reply

                                  June, Fl

                                  Please say the following and your post becomes meaningless. "It's the economy stupid". I won't add the other three letter word that makes progressives like you shudder.

                                  • 2 votes
                                  Reply#14 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:28 PM EDT

                                  someone said that we should look at jobs. Go here to see the number of jobs lost under Bush as compared to Obama's time in office.

                                  http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-jobs-lost-in-the-bush-and-obama-administration-2010-2

                                    Reply#15 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:47 PM EDT

                                    Baed on his last Twitter, I'd say he also falls into the Dept of Unfortunate Metaphors...

                                    Actor John Cusack went on a caustic Twitter rampage Sunday evening, attacking former House Majority Leader Dick Armey, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and Fox News.

                                    “I AM FOR A SATANIC DEATH CULT CENTER AT FOX NEWS HQ AND OUTSIDE THE OFFICES ORDICK ARMEYAND NEWT GINGRICH-and all the GOP WELFARE FREAKS,” Cusack tweeted.

                                    Cusack has long been outspoken about politics. He supported Barack Obama in the 2008 presidential election and has contributed to The Huffington Post, but this is the first known time he has stooped to the level of making threats.

                                    He has more than 200,000 Twitter followers

                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#16 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:54 PM EDT

                                    See now this is why the Hollywood types need to stay out of politics. I really don't want to have to stop watching one of my long time favorite actors because he's part of the lunatic fringe...

                                      #16.1 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:24 PM EDT
                                      Reply

                                      Want to see jobs fly away?Pass Cap and Trade and every business in America will have to buy Energy credits through a Federal Brokerage House.Why you ask,because all this is an unwritten tax on business which will not only cut jobs to pay fot the credits but jack prices up to keep their profit margin.Cap and Trade is a Democratic Job KILLER.Your own heating,cooling and regular electric bills will also skyrocket because of this bill.

                                      • 1 vote
                                      Reply#17 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:03 PM EDT

                                      That stupid douche bag would probably sit there and finish his shoe shine instead of risking his well manicured hands before coming to the aid of a distraught woman and her child. Thank GOD for Democrats that don't talk BS but actually do something. The GOP is just a bunch of whining little piss ants that are still dumbfounded how a BLACK MAN can be in office after there A$$ HAT of a moron Bush screwed up the ENTIRE WORLD!!!! I would send this clown to an early grave with my Chuck Norris roundhouse kick. Go back to trolling for votes at your stupid Tea Parties you parasite!

                                        Reply#18 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:23 PM EDT

                                        Ok you teabaggers and repubs...you tell me why the repubs wont pass the small business pkg. to help them...just yesterday small business owners said they are ready to hire but cant get the loans from the banks to do it. This is a repub ploy to make Obama look bad before the Nov. election...you watch...after the election the repubs will pass it and try and take the credit for the jobs going up....they are so disgusting...and you ever informed people cant figure this out. Give me a break....the repubs and the teaparty is backed by the Koch brothers...billionaires...now why is that??? Because the repubs and teaparty will give the rich the tax breaks they want and the country goes back to the way it always was. The rich do better and the middle class guy stays no where and continues to pay for everything in this country...not the rich.

                                        • 2 votes
                                        Reply#19 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:42 PM EDT

                                        There are Conservative Democrats, as there are Liberal Republicans.The two-percent who control the wealth and manipulate the political process are Plutocrats that snicker watching the extreme right and left eighteen percent circle with their noses in each others tails barking. The Plutocrats decide when the climate will change.We're all losers.Micky Mouse for President.Guarenteed

                                          Reply#20 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:48 PM EDT

                                          Are you SURE Tom Barrett is a Democrat? Most Democrats would've either run away or stood by like the typical pacifists they are and let the grandmother get pummeled and her granddaughter taken. Then the Dems would've helped finance the drunken father's defense because HE'S obviously the REAL victim here.

                                            Reply#21 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 5:47 PM EDT

                                            Jeremy-960164

                                            Jeremy, you need to learn about the difference between favorability ratings and job approval ratings. Favorability ratings are about whether voters like Obama as a person. Job approval ratings are about, as the term suggests, they think he is doing his job.

                                            You're right that Obama is better liked as a person than for the job he's doing, but your numbers are way off. At the moment, Obama's favorables are at around 50%, and his job approval numbers are still in the mid-40s

                                            http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/fav-obama.php

                                            http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/jobapproval-obama.php

                                            Your other argument, that "Obamas approval numbers ARE in the 30s for his policies," is factually incorrect as well. When voters are asked separately about how they think he is doing his job on the economy, health, and foreign policy, the polls are currently showing approval ratings in those fields at around 39%, 43% and 46%, respectively.

                                            http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/jobapproval-presobama-economy.php

                                            http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/jobapproval-presobama-health.php

                                            http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/-jobapproval-presobama-foreignpolicy.php

                                              Reply#22 - Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:32 PM EDT
                                              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.