The Alexi Giannoulias (D)-vs.-Mark Kirk (R) Senate race in Illinois will likely be decided by this question: Which is worse -- Giannoulias' bank problems or Kirk's misstatements about his record/background?
Over the last few weeks, Kirk's various embellishments have dominated the campaign coverage. But today, the Chicago Sun-Times brings up Giannoulias' Broadway Bank -- and even the infamous Tony Rezko.
This was the Tony Rezko who, looking for millions of dollars for a massive South Loop development, turned to Broadway Bank, owned by the family of Alexi Giannoulias. Giannoulias, the Democrat now running for U.S. Senate, had left his post as a senior loan officer at the Chicago bank in late 2005 to mount a successful campaign for Illinois state treasurer, though he still held an ownership stake in the bank.
Rezko's company asked. And Broadway Bank came through.
On Feb. 14, 2006, newly obtained records show, the bank made a $22.75 million loan to a company called Riverside District Development LLC, whose owners, it turns out, included Rezko.
Here's the response from the Giannoulias campaign:
"Alexi left daily operations of the bank in September of 2005, months before this loan was made," says Kathleen Strand of his campaign staff. "He had no knowledge of it, and his name is not on any documents related to the loan.
"This guilt-by-association story is an unfortunate and failed attempt to link Alexi to Mr. Rezko.''


That Chicago smell again. The Bama and his murky associates are stinking up the campaign. Its the Rangel syndrome all over again including Maxine from California. When will it stop. I'm afraid we may have more coming down the pipe. DINOS best start cutting loose from the Bama.
Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens, California Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham, Jack Abramoff, GOP lobbyist, Illinois Gov. George Ryan, Texas Rep. Tom DeLay, House Majority Leader
Giannoulias, the Democrat now running for U.S. Senate, had left his post as a senior loan officer at the Chicago bank in late 2005 to mount a successful...
_________________
What part of 'LEFT his post in 2005' is so difficult to comprehend?
I believe that would mean... he was NO longer working there...
He and his family owned the bank, what's the difference if he was still working there, or not?
Ohhh... That's right... Guilt by association...
Do you really want to play that game?
Do I really want to play what game? He knew exactly what was going on. Don't you get it , he's a crook? You must be drinking some strong koolaid.
I'll take a sip or two of Koolaid over the way the righties gulp down the Hate-or-Aid!
I'm sorry... exactly WHAT crime has he been charged with again?
That would be NONE! Because Dave D. says he's a 'crook' doesn't make it magically true!
Delusional doesn't begin to decribe the right wingers....
David the pimp Vitter, John the adulterer Ensign, oh we forgot those dopes of nope vermin.
Even if he does have something to do with the loan, this is Chicago. Would you expect something else?