DNC attack: GOP = Tea Party

From NBC's Ali Weinberg
Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine and several Democratic House members today unveiled the new Democratic midterm attack plan against Republicans: GOP = Tea Party.

In an effort to demonstrate what they see as the dangers of Republican Congressional control, Democrats will spend the next few months until Election Day trying to tie all Republicans to policies advocated by some members of the Tea Party, including repealing the health care and Wall Street reform laws, abolishing the Departments of Labor and Education and the EPA, and ending Medicare.

Kaine said the DNC has an "aggressive" plan, along with the White House "to make sure the American people know what the Republicans really believe what their blueprint for governing is," tracking candidates' comments on the campaign trail, distributing research, and airing commercials nationwide.

He said what he sees as the Tea Party's extreme agenda is reflected in the beliefs of most of the GOP House leadership. As evidence of mainstream Republicans' acceptance of Tea Party policies, Kaine pointed to the decisions of some members of Republican House leadership to join the new Tea Party Caucus -- the first official iteration of the movement within the halls of Capitol Hill.

Kaine noted that the caucus garnered support from Republican leaders like NRCC Chairman Pete Sessions and House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence. "The Republican Party agenda has become the Tea Party agenda, and vice versa," he said.

Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz later added, "Essentially, you don't know where the Republican Party ends and the Tea Party begins."

The centerpiece of the DNC's new campaign is a parody of the Tea Party Patriots' "Contract From America" and former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich's 1990s-era Contract With America. The Tea Party's contract laid out the group's 10 priorities, including repealing the health-care law -- the only point that appears on both the Tea Party list and the Democrats.'

The ten agenda items on the DNC's "Republican Tea Party Contract On America" are privatizing Social Security, ending Medicare, extending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, repealing the financial regulation overhaul and the health care reform law, protecting those responsible for the oil spill, abolishing the departments of Education and Energy, as well as the EPA, and repealing the 17th Amendment, which provides for the direct election of senators.

The strategy carries some risk for Democrats. Several vulnerable members are running in conservative-leaning districts. However, in the most recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll (June 17-21), just 24% of self-described moderates viewed the Tea Party positively and 37% viewed it negatively. Another 39% were either neutral, didn't know, or weren't sure. (Conservatives were the only ideological group in which a majority viewed them favorably -- 56%-12%.

"This isn't a joke," Kaine said. "These are things Republicans will pursue if they were back in power, positions that would halt the progress that we have made in a very difficult time."

Repeating a common Democratic campaign line -- that their party must stay in power in order to undo Republican damage -- Kaine said, "The election in November is a choice, and the positions of this contract are what the American people have to look forward to if they put Republicans back in charge."

One reporter at the event pointed out that some of the "Contract On America's" more extreme policies, like repealing the 17th Amendment, do not reflect the beliefs of the Republican leadership. Kaine said, "We welcome anybody on the other side coming forward and disabusing Americans that this is what they plan to do. ... If they violently disagree with any of them, I'm sure that we'll hear that."

"They're one and the same," Rep. Wasserman-Schultz added. "Their standardbearers, their nominees for race after race, they stand at rallies with Tea Party people who embrace this agenda," she said.

Democrats' dare to Republicans to disavow specific points in the contract also highlights the danger for the GOP, particularly for someone like Sessions, who is tasked with trying to get Republicans elected to the House.

The GOP was quick to respond, but didn't refute specific points. Republican National Committee spokeswoman Katie Wright called the Democrats' faux contract, "the DNC's latest attempt to distract voters from the Democrats' failing agenda and falling poll numbers."

In a statement e-mailed to reporters shortly after the Democrats' press conference, Wright wrote that Democrats are unwilling to equate voter frustration with their failed policies. "Not wanting a repeat of last summer's Town Hall meetings, the Democrats strategy for this summer appears be attacking voters as opposed to listening to them," Wright wrote.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

"Failed Policies", Katie Wright?? At least the dems HAVE policies!

This ad campaign needs all the support we can contribute. Even it it's small change- give what you can to the DNC, now more than ever!! I've upped my contri. Maybe if we can 'sponge more money off the rich' like Hannity accuses us of, we can contribute even MORE. How about it, tea-baggers? Want to encourage even MORE giving to the DNC? GO for it, losers!!

  • 7 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:39 PM EDT

drive-by-observer

Fox Noise's Sean Hannity has an agressive plan too. Give everybody the hand jive.

  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:55 PM EDT

"Failed policies", Katie Wright?? At least the dems have policies! -- Drive-by-observer

Translation: It's better to have failed policies than no policies at all.

Thanks, Drive-By. You've summed up the Democrats in one sentence.

  • 3 votes
#1.2 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:04 PM EDT

RIchard:

Thanks for another shot of "I know you are, but what am I". Always refreshing to field another original, yet predictable, toss from out there in RIGHT field.

  • 3 votes
#1.3 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:14 PM EDT

Richard,,,,you really think that going down the same path that led us to this cliff is a good idea? That in itself would make me run from the GOP. And to say the Democrat have no policies,,,,,,wow, where has your head been for 18 months,,,opps don't answer that ,,i already know. Another translation,,,,if you don't know what you are talking about, it's better to stay silent rather than make yourself look like a fool.

  • 4 votes
#1.4 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:21 PM EDT

Funny thing... Democratic policies that have actually moved past the GnOP so far have been successful or haven't had a chance to get fully implemented yet.

What has passed that has actually failed? Even the stimulus bills have worked to stabilize the economy and get things growing again, albeit slowly. Of course, if the Republicans hadn't whittled things out of the stimulus packages things would likely be a little better now, but that's speculation.

No, nothing so far has actually failed.

  • 6 votes
#1.5 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:46 PM EDT

Drive By:

When in Rome . . .

  • 1 vote
#1.6 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:54 PM EDT

bobr:

Haven't been around here long, eh bobr? I even got props from PIETRO the other day and I'm still basking in the glow.

YOU, on the other hand, have no idea what you're talking about and to whom.

  • 2 votes
#1.7 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:30 PM EDT

Well Richard, If the shoe fits, You really should go right ahead and wear it, So far none of the Democrats policies have even came close to failing, Other than the fact that they are wasting time trying to appease Republicans and get some kind of bi-partisan help going for the USA, Rather than do that Republican politicians have been accepting money from insurance companies to stall healthcare and screw their voter, They have been accepting money from Wall St. to screw their own voters, They have fought un-employment extension which screwed their own unemployed voters, Their screwing Hispanic who have voted for them,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Need I go on??

  • 6 votes
#1.8 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:55 PM EDT

No, you don't need to go on, but you and bobr can probably have a good conversation.

By the way, in your litany of criticisms of Republicans, you didn't manage to fit in any substantiation for your assertion that Democrat policies are working.

  • 2 votes
#1.9 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:10 PM EDT

Richard, Washington State

The policies enacted where comprised to the point of truly not getting the job done true. But they are compromise bills. You see the Repubs don't compromise on anything so when they present a bill, they don't get any Dems to water it down. Thats why we have Medicare Pt D that wasn't paid for and doesn't allow Medicare to compete w/ the Big Drug Companies. Yes thats written in there. Medicare is prohibited from bidding on prices for drugs. The Dems problems is that they don't walk lock step like the Repubs. If they did, the the Health Care Bill actually would have repealled the Anti Trust exemption, and made the companies compete for our hard earned dollars. But instead in trying to get support from the Repubs who we're never going to support this bill anyway it was waterdown. Wall Street reform same thing, The bill is a start, but doesn't go anywhere near what it actually should be. Once again watered down for Repub support which only got 3 of them. My premise is this, have Bills so far too the Left that when it is watered down because the Dems are gluttons for punishment, its actually a Bill that works for the people.

But here are the facts, everything the Repubs have offered does little to nothing to change any of the problems we are ALL facing. Having Teabaggers screaming racial slurs at Black Congressmen doesn't help their cause. Having someone like Sharon Angle threaten Second Amendment remedies when she doesn't get her way is just plain idiotic. Having Teabaggers scream about the Government spending but won't have them touch their Social Security and Medicare speaks for itself. The Repubs created massive amounts of debt between 01-06 and didn't care about the deficit. Orrin Hatch (R) Utah has said as much. Darth Cheney said running deficits during wartime didn't matter. Of course, the wars weren't being paid for either. I just have a hard time w/ these Repub decifit hawks now ranting about the decifit when they are the ones that created the bulk of it. GWB came into the office w/ a surplus and also a recession from Clinton. The Dot.com bubble and NAFTA screwed the economy. He then had 911, which would have happened even if Al Gore was in office because of the intelligence agencies reluctance to work w/ one another. But Iraq, thats his. He owns that because he took the country into an unnecessary war that has cost billions if not trillions of our tax dollars. All this done on Repub watch as well.

So instead of being a naysayer and expecting instant gratification from the programs being enacted as flawed as they are, try a little patience. It took over 30 years to get here, it may take another 30 to get out of it.

  • 5 votes
#1.10 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:49 PM EDT
Reply

Was there any doubt at all that the Tea Baggers were the extremists of the GOP, bought and paid for by the GOP? None at all in my mind. I am just glad that the Tea Baggers have shown the dirty side of the GOP wide and clear to the public. Nothing like having the truth out there for all to see!

  • 5 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:40 PM EDT

It's as dirty on the clean side if your looking at at the GOP

  • 1 vote
#2.1 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:23 PM EDT

I like the Tea Baggetts that want to succeed from the union, C-YA!

The Tea Party? Where were they during Reagan, Bush1, Clinton, and Bush2? Hiring illegal, sleeping with the enemy, and watching billions being wasted by government CONtractors while american were dying in their wars for profit. Tea=The Enemy of Americans Party.

  • 3 votes
#2.2 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:09 PM EDT

B. Honest - I for one love to tea bag. It's nice. You really ought to give it a try.

    #2.3 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:12 PM EDT

    I think we should give the Tea "Beggars" and Republicans Texas, New Mexico, And Arizona, Then build a fence around it and cut off all federal aid, Between them they collect more Federal aid paid for by the rest of the USA than the entire Welfare program, Social Security, and Medicare combined.

    • 4 votes
    #2.4 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:00 PM EDT

    Bo,

    Where do you get your facts from? Really, those three states receives more than others?

      #2.5 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:41 PM EDT

      Brainwashed:

      Yes, you are.

      • 1 vote
      #2.6 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:42 AM EDT

      Richard....

      You're the one that is brainwashed. You and people like you care very little about America and the financial mess it is in. People like you are why it's in the ditch.

      All your rhetoric is just that, rhetoric. You have no knowledge nor know anything about truly living life as your ancestors did.

      You care for your self only. To hell with the rest of the world unless they cow-tow to you. That is what you believe and you can't deny it. Deny it and you understand only then that you would be living in denial.

      So say what you wish, attack others, attack me. And what does it accomplish? How much food will it put on your table? How much money will it put in your pocket? What will you have truly accomplished?

      Other than making a fool of yourself at the expense of believing you are the only right ones in America. You can't understand that is the problem that you're already besieged with.

      You can't fathom your ancestors and others that built this country. You can't see that it is the young generation of today that is destroying what was once built. It's right before your eyes yet you are so besieged with hatred that it has blinded you completely into following a false dream.

      The yuppies of today that were the hippies of Woodstock are still stuck in their own excrement. Everything around them stinks because they are the stink. They rail against normal policies that would safeguard America.

      They yell at the top of their lungs anger and hatred. They are no better than the Tea party they rail against with anger and hatred. They are the true racists. They know so yet they refuse to accept so. Their agenda is instilled with racism by attacking and shifting the attacks on others as racists. You think you have all of America brainwashed Richard. You are foolish to even entertain such an idea.

      You and They care very little and know even less about history and the people that brought America out of a great depression. Those people pulled themselves up by their bootstraps and went to work to regain at least some of what they had loss.

      You and people like you are the same old defeatists who defeat themselves rather than work to help themselves. You're the Europeans of 1939 that laid back in the sun on the beaches and reveled in folly.

      You are the reincarnation of the leaders who said Hitler would never strike France nor any other country. Strike he did and wreck havoc he did. Neville Chamberlain thought he also new everything as you think you know everything.

      What did the PM do? He appeased Hitler and signed a pact with him saying Hitler could have Norway just like you try to have your way. It didn't work Richard. Tell me, what happened or do you know?

      How intelligent are you Richard?

      • 1 vote
      #2.7 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:55 PM EDT
      Reply

      This is a brilliant strategy!!!!!!!! Let any "mainstream" (are there any remaining?) Republican candidates try running from the Tea Party and survive...moderate voters who want sensible policy will flock to the Democrats. LOVE IT!

      • 6 votes
      Reply#3 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:48 PM EDT

      That's where you're wrong Ginger> Why do you think Obama has taken his present position on the AZ immigration Bill?

      Mr Obama understands he has lost the moderate vote and the moderates have no quarrel with the Tea party as long as they help defeat Obama and the illegals.

      They care less Ginger. They were lied to and Obama continues to push his agenda in fact he has lost all the popularity he once had. Obama was supposed to be a post racial President.

      He ran on the plank that racism would no longer exist. That was a dream and he himself has fueled racism in America. The DOJ is now the DONJ.

        #3.1 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:11 PM EDT
        Reply

        The DNC should brag about all the successes that Obama and the Democrats have had in the last 2 years. The TV ad for that should run about 3 seconds.

        • 7 votes
        #4 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:56 PM EDT

        2.999 seconds longer than what the Repubs could put up, Huh, Door Knob?

        • 5 votes
        #4.1 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:15 PM EDT

        Drive-thru - where ya been buddy? Sizing up Feisty, maybe fixing to ask her to the malt shop? You two could gaze into each others eyes and have a Vacant Stare contest. Might take weeks to get a winner.

        And I see you're still stuck on stupid. No chance of that ever changing.

        Have a good one Drive-thru. If you could ever figure out how.

        • 4 votes
        #4.2 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:20 PM EDT

        Wow- pretty intelligent post yourself, there, kid. Thanky kindly.

        Acturally, the Feisty one and I have been behind the barn, scheming up a way to get you to post all those good things the Bush years have produced for us all, but so far, you only seem to be stuck on.......YOUR SELF. Oh well, thanks for playing.

        Door Knob.

        • 5 votes
        #4.3 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:30 PM EDT

        Hey Drive-By - looks like poor little JoAnna is a tad jealous!

        Did she REALLY say 'malt shop'? LMFAO!

        Maybe now that you have her attention she'll finally answer the question you've been asking of her for weeks... Nah! Never gonna happen!

        Quick... if you hurry you can still get that 'funny bone' massage! She's a real hummer that one!

        • 4 votes
        #4.4 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:32 PM EDT

        drive-by-observer

        Wow- pretty intelligent post yourself, there, kid. Thanky kindly.

        Got to get down to your level Drive-thru. And it's a long way down pal.

        • 2 votes
        #4.5 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:34 PM EDT

        Feisty, please, everyone wants to know the truth. Are you retarded? It used to be fun picking on you, and easy too, but over time we all come to realize that there just isn't much there there.

        • 3 votes
        #4.6 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:37 PM EDT

        Oooops!

        My bad... I meant she's a real 'hum dinger'!

        • 1 vote
        #4.7 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:40 PM EDT

        And I say this with all due respect Feisty, you're one of the biggest dopes I have ever encountered.

        • 3 votes
        #4.8 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:42 PM EDT

        OK- I'll cut you some slack one more time: Forget about Obama for a little while- we know what you think of the guy already. Take a few minutes and jot down some positive things about YOUR guy, GWB. Why is that so difficult?

        It's like if I said "Rattle snakes are bad", you would say "yeah, but kittens are cute" or some other totally disjointed crap.

        FORGET Obama- you can come back to him later. If you can't come up with anything positive on Bush, then at least get up here on the ol' soapbox and defend all these points the Tea Bag people share with the Repubs, and how they benefit a majority of us Americans.

        Do that- and I'll quit calling you 'Door Knob'. Hell- maybe I'll even let you come behind the barn with me and massage that funny bone of mine.

        • 4 votes
        #4.9 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:43 PM EDT

        Are you retarded?

        ____________

        Ummm... NO...

        Although you appear to be - retarded is an offensive word - but coming from an offensive person it doesn't come as any surprise!

        You picking on me? Honey - I play on the professional team and you poor dear have never made it out of 'Pee Wee' league... so thanks for playing!

        Ps: I'll take being a 'dope' of hope any day over a 'dope of nope'!

        • 5 votes
        #4.10 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:43 PM EDT

        Feisty Redhead Roselle, IL

        Are you retarded?

        ____________

        Ummm... NO...

        You may want to get a professional to check on that for you. Others differ with your self diagnosis.

        You picking on me? Honey - I play on the professional team and you poor dear have never made it out of 'Pee Wee' league... so thanks for playing!

        Gee, ya think? Come back when you have something important to say. The next time will be the first time.

        Have a nice evening pee-wee.

        • 3 votes
        #4.11 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:49 PM EDT

        Let's see JoAnna... what has the President done these nearly two years...

        1. Ordered all federal agencies to undertake a study and make recommendations for ways to cut spending
        1. Ordered a review of all federal operations to identify and cut wasteful spending and practices
        1. Instituted enforcement for equal pay for women
        1. Beginning the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq
        1. Families of fallen soldiers have expenses covered to be on hand when the body arrives at Dover AFB
        1. Ended media blackout on war casualties; reporting full information
        1. Ended media blackout on covering the return of fallen soldiers to Dover AFB; the media is now permitted to do so pending adherence to respectful rules and approval of fallen soldier's family
        1. The White House and federal government are respecting the Freedom of Information Act
        1. Instructed all federal agencies to promote openness and transparency as much as possible
        1. Limits on lobbyist's access to the White House
        1. Limits on White House aides working for lobbyists after their tenure in the administration
        1. Ended the previous stop-loss policy that kept soldiers in Iraq/Afghanistan longer than their enlistment date
        1. Phasing out the expensive F-22 war plane and other outdated weapons systems, which weren't even used or needed in Iraq/Afghanistan
        1. Removed restrictions on embryonic stem-cell research
        1. Federal support for stem-cell and new biomedical research
        1. New federal funding for science and research labs
        1. States are permitted to enact federal fuel efficiency standards above federal standards
        1. Increased infrastructure spending (roads, bridges, power plants) after years of neglect
        1. Funds for high-speed, broadband Internet access to K-12 schools
        1. New funds for school construction
        1. The prison at Guantanamo Bay is being phased out
        1. US Auto industry rescue plan
        1. Housing rescue plan
        1. $789 billion economic stimulus plan
        1. The public can meet with federal housing insurers to refinance (the new plan can be completed in one day) a mortgage if they are having trouble paying
        1. US financial and banking rescue plan
        1. The secret detention facilities in Eastern Europe and elsewhere are being closed
        1. Ended the previous policy; the US now has a no torture policy and is in compliance with the Geneva Convention standards
        1. Better body armor is now being provided to our troops
        1. The missile defense program is being cut by $1.4 billion in 2010
        1. Restarted the nuclear nonproliferation talks and building back up the nuclear inspection infrastructure/protocols
        1. Reengaged in the treaties/agreements to protect the Antarctic
        1. Reengaged in the agreements/talks on global warming and greenhouse gas emissions
        1. Visited more countries and met with more world leaders than any president in his first six months in office
        1. Successful release of US captain held by Somali pirates; authorized the SEALS to do their job
        1. US Navy increasing patrols off Somali coast
        1. Attractive tax write-offs for those who buy hybrid automobiles
        1. Cash for clunkers program offers vouchers to trade in fuel inefficient, polluting old cars for new cars; stimulated auto sales
        1. Announced plans to purchase fuel efficient American-made fleet for the federal government
        1. Expanded the SCHIP program to cover health care for 4 million more children
        1. Signed national service legislation; expanded national youth service program
        1. Instituted a new policy on Cuba, allowing Cuban families to return home to visit loved ones
        1. Ended the previous policy of not regulating and labeling carbon dioxide emissions
        1. Expanding vaccination programs
        1. Immediate and efficient response to the floods in North Dakota and other natural disasters
        1. Closed offshore tax safe havens
        1. Negotiated deal with Swiss banks to permit US government to gain access to records of tax evaders and criminals
        1. Ended the previous policy of offering tax benefits to corporations who outsource American jobs; the new policy is to promote in-sourcing to bring jobs back
        1. Ended the previous practice of protecting credit card companies; in place of it are new consumer protections from credit card industry's predatory practices
        1. Energy producing plants must begin preparing to produce 15% of their energy from renewable sources
        1. Lower drug costs for seniors
        1. Ended the previous practice of forbidding Medicare from negotiating with drug manufacturers for cheaper drugs; the federal government is now realizing hundreds of millions in savings
        1. Increasing pay and benefits for military personnel
        1. Improved housing for military personnel
        1. Initiating a new policy to promote federal hiring of military spouses
        1. Improved conditions at Walter Reed Military Hospital and other military hospitals
        1. Increasing student loans
        1. Increasing opportunities in AmeriCorps program
        1. Sent envoys to Middle East and other parts of the world that had been neglected for years; reengaging in multilateral and bilateral talks and diplomacy
        1. Established a new cyber security office
        1. Beginning the process of reforming and restructuring the military 20 years after the Cold War to a more modern fighting force; this includes new procurement policies, increasing size of military, new technology and cyber units and operations, etc.
        1. Ended previous policy of awarding no-bid defense contracts
        1. Ordered a review of hurricane and natural disaster preparedness
        1. Established a National Performance Officer charged with saving the federal government money and making federal operations more efficient
        1. Students struggling to make college loan payments can have their loans refinanced
        1. Improving benefits for veterans
        1. Many more press conferences and town halls and much more media access than previous administration
        1. Instituted a new focus on mortgage fraud
        1. The FDA is now regulating tobacco
        1. Ended previous policy of cutting the FDA and circumventing FDA rules
        1. Ended previous practice of having White House aides rewrite scientific and environmental rules, regulations, and reports
        1. Authorized discussions with North Korea and private mission by Pres. Bill Clinton to secure the release of two Americans held in prisons
        1. Authorized discussions with Myanmar and mission by Sen. Jim Web to secure the release of an American held captive
        1. Making more loans available to small businesses
        1. Established independent commission to make recommendations on slowing the costs of Medicare
        1. Appointment of first Latina to the Supreme Court
        1. Authorized construction/opening of additional health centers to care for veterans
        1. Limited salaries of senior White House aides; cut to $100,000
        1. Renewed loan guarantees for Israel
        1. Changed the failing/status quo military command in Afghanistan
        1. Deployed additional troops to Afghanistan
        1. New Afghan War policy that limits aerial bombing and prioritizes aid, development of infrastructure, diplomacy, and good government practices by Afghans
        1. Announced the long-term development of a national energy grid with renewable sources and cleaner, efficient energy production
        1. Returned money authorized for refurbishment of White House offices and private living quarters
        1. Paid for redecoration of White House living quarters out of his own pocket
        1. Held first Seder in White House
        1. Attempting to reform the nation's healthcare system which is the most expensive in the world yet leaves almost 50 million without health insurance and millions more under insured
        1. Has put the ball in play for comprehensive immigration reform
        1. Has announced his intention to push for energy reform
        1. Has announced his intention to push for education reform
        • 7 votes
        #4.12 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:49 PM EDT

        Drive-thru - you want to talk about Bush, go right ahead. He's not my favorite President either. There are lots of things I probably agree with you on regarding Bush, and more then likely a few things I disagree with you about. I've made my stance on Bush very clear in many of my postings. I doubt you could find one posting where I defended him.

        You want to be mature and have a detailed discussion about it? We can do that. Leave your friend Feisty home though. Won't get anything done with her around.

        • 2 votes
        #4.13 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:55 PM EDT

        But MIke- kittens are cute!

        • 1 vote
        #4.14 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:56 PM EDT

        I guarantee that you will defend him by opposing every effort to have a thorough investigation of everything that has been "sold" , like the Iraq invasion, to us over the last thirty years.

        • 1 vote
        #4.15 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:01 PM EDT

        Geeze Mike S, learn to work the font size button! Bandwidth ain't free my friend.

        Here Mike, try this regarding Obama. Nearly 10% unemployment, no end in sight. Deficits 4x bigger then the record ones Bush II had. No policy on stopping illegal immigration (other then to sue states that one want), Stimulus plan sold to Americans that it would produce 4 million jobs, we've lost 3 million since that time.

        Lets just start with those.

        • 2 votes
        #4.16 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:03 PM EDT

        Oh, and Drive-thru, what you do behind the barn is your business. I don't even mind that you take a few sheep with you when you go. I mean, if that's what you're into, then so be it. But answer this please, why do you always take the ugly ones?

        • 2 votes
        #4.17 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:08 PM EDT

        Lets start with the fact that unemployment should of skyrocketed, but because of Obama's policies it has stopped. We've stopped the bleeding. Lets what the republicans want.How many jobs would of been lost if there wasn't a stimulus. What would the unemployment percentage been without it. Will it have just stopped with doing nothing? Tax cuts to the rich(hoover tried this and he is infamous for the president letting the Great Depression to happen), saying no to a campaign transparency bill. Saying no to unemployment benefits(which was bipartisan until recently). You think its ok peple are unemployed and they can go do whatever they want because they deserve it? They probably are hard working americans that lost their jobs with the recession. But the Republicans paint them as slackers and try to slam the blame on Democrats by blocking it hoping people won't notice. And it has doubled not counting for Bush's war costs in Iraq. (687 billion to 1.3 trillion). But lets face it, cutting taxes, that reduces the deficit how? Right less income to the government will reduce the deficit. Then the government will have to reduce in size to counter that right? Hopefully with this everything will get better as they just sit and watch(they gotten smalller can't really do much). I believe that would be the ideal republican economic plan right? Except we haven't heard one from any Republican! And with the defecit. Your conservative hero Reagan also doubled the defecit. In my opinion higher taxes for children beats the next Great Depression. I know that sounded bad but it is the lesser of two evils.

        • 3 votes
        #4.18 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:20 PM EDT

        To paraphrase Lt. Col. Frank Slade (Al Pacino in "Scent Of A Woman"), "We're just gettin' warmed up"!!

        • 4 votes
        #4.19 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:11 PM EDT

        Thanks for the reminder Auntie!

        I LOVE that movie... BOOO YA!

        • 2 votes
        #4.20 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:18 PM EDT

        JoannaSmith

        You know your hero Ronald reagan is a traitor right? He sold weapons to the Iranians and claimed he didn't remember any of it. So he actually lied or was senile. I'm not sure which option is better, but he's still a traitor.

        • 3 votes
        #4.21 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:58 PM EDT

        Dear Bob S,

        It's a impressive list for sure, but unfortunately, a few of those accomplishments are really failures and takes away from the creditability of your opinion, but looking through those rose colored glasses will do that!!

      • The prison at Guantanamo Bay is being phased out - Was suppose to be done in the first year of his term - FAILURE
      • Housing rescue plan - Foreclosures are at a all time high this quarter - FAILURE
      • I don't have time to go through each one of the accomplishments you list, but you get the picture!!

        There is some good in there, but you have to look for it and they have not done what this country is begging for JOBS, that's the key phrase"JOBS"

        If the President would have created jobs befroe he did those other "accoplishemtns" he would have a 70 or 80 percent approval rating, instead he followed the party line instead of looking out for ALL Americans!!

          #4.22 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:18 AM EDT

          Max,

          The reason Guantanamo is not already closed is because the Repubs, with the Blue Dogs, blocked him from doing that, same with the housing rescue plan. The Repubs have been using procedural rules to filibuster and block many of his bills that would be helping most Americans. Look to the Repubs for the answers on why they keep blocking anything that will help out the 95% of the Americans who are not already way over wealthy.

          Look to the Banks and Corporations, who have had the lowest taxes in many decades and high profits, yet are still failing to provide jobs. They are hoping to create bad enough numbers on the economy to try to put the Repubs in power, but most of America is seeing through their game and are not buying it. With all of the tax breaks and incentives the Banks are still not making the loans that they were bailed out so that they could make and the Corporations are still not hiring even though they have Trillions of dollars in cash on hand...why is that?? Why do you blame President Obama for the policies of the Uber Rich, after all, THEY are the ones who do the hiring, Not Pres. Obama.

            #4.23 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:32 AM EDT

            Dear B,

            Love Love Love the talking points!!!

            But we live in the REAL world, and your opinion is faulty!!

            I wish I had time to expand on that, but time is money!!

              #4.24 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:59 AM EDT

              Max,

              I happen to live in this real world and understand it very well, apparently better than you do. You need to go back and study some more instead of just relying on old, debunked talking points. Oh, Sorry, you do not have time for that since you have to work to keep the food on your table too and, like you say, time is money. Have fun with that!

              • 1 vote
              #4.25 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:19 AM EDT

              Dear B,

              Your feeble attempt to insult me is laughable and hardly worth a response other than this comment!!

              Democrats contol the house, senate and the white house and you can't get anything done without crying "it's the repubicans fault" .

              It must be tough to go through life with a narrow view of America , Democrats good - Repubicans bad.!!

              I thought you might be worthy of a adult discussion, but I was wrong.

              Man , grow up !!

                #4.26 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:13 PM EDT

                Max, max, max..............

                If you don't understand that "CONTROL" of the Senate is often in the hands of the minority, so long as 41 of them hang together, in so far as they can obstruct, delay , or kill legislation, then we have no chance of having an adult discussion about politics with the likes of you.

                It is a lot like the falsehood that things started to go bad when the Democrats took control of Congress in 2007. Yet you can't name one piece of legislation they passed in the last two years of the Bush administration which caused the economic crash.

                • 2 votes
                #4.27 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:00 PM EDT

                Max Power

                Max can you name any legislation that Bush/Cheney did that didn't add to the deficit?

                • 1 vote
                #4.28 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:47 PM EDT
                Reply

                Finally the DNC get a Back Bone! It's past time

                When you hear folk you know talking about moving from America because they are afraid that the racist elements in the Republican party will reverse this country back to the 1800's it's very, very sad.

                Hopefully rather than run they will stand up now that the party has taken control of this element and is displaying it for all the world to see

                It's shameful, folk are throwing away their own self interest wishing for the good old days when this element hurt and made so many suffer

                We are America we are better than that

                Now to repeat Ms. Palin

                "Time to Take Our Country Back! From the fringe element of course

                Republicans are looking to make this country about the Rich and everyone else

                Those who for whatever reason cannot see through this "class walfare" and are throwing their own families under the bus

                Just think

                No Social Security...................................what % of Ordinary Americans live on it for retirement

                No Health care, not enough that many have died and are dying because Republicans are so sold on Capitalism that they take the money or Ordinary Tax payers, yes that's right because we all know the Rich don't pay taxes

                Remember Boehner and his Republican Friends are already campaigning to give the Rich another One Trillion Dollars

                The Rich have been getting this significant tax cut for 12 years and Republicans say if they don't give it to them they won't give Ordinary Americans Jobs

                Well where are the jobs for the last 12 years?

                Not to mention that Mathmathetics 101 says Giving away another One Trillion Dollars to the Rich will automatically "Increase That Deficit" that Republicans whine about reducing every day on TV

                So thank you Dems now lets' get to work and get this done.

                • 5 votes
                Reply#5 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:56 PM EDT

                Is there any doubt that Democrats are really Demonizocrats? Only here can you find people calling lying a brilliant strategy.

                • 5 votes
                Reply#6 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:59 PM EDT

                Richard:

                Lying? What is it they are lying about? I don't see any items noted on this thread that the far right has not proposed or suggested be repealed and/or implemented if they were to take power. Seems to me that the brilliant strategy lies in the fact that the Dems will be telling the truth.

                • 6 votes
                #6.1 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:50 PM EDT

                Not about the Tea Party, CA, not about the Tea Party. They will demonize them and that always takes lying.

                • 2 votes
                #6.2 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:56 PM EDT

                Richard,

                The Tea Baggers have demonized themselves and the GOBP with their idiotic rants that have been FULLY DOCUMENTED. They are totally clueless about how the Government works or what our Constitution actually says. They are clueless that SS and Medicare/Medicaid are Government Programs. It does not take lying to show them out, only to run vid clips of their own words. Funny thing about facts that way, you say something on record and it does not go away! The GOBP's worst enemy at this point is themselves and the Tea Baggers because they have opened their mouths and let everyone see what idiots they are in trying to go back in history and overturn the good things that we have, and they are not even trying to get the barn doors closed after that horse got out!

                • 2 votes
                #6.3 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:00 PM EDT

                One thing I conceded to idiot Democrats (not all of them are idiots, just the idiots are idiots) a long time ago is that they are without question the best at demonizing. Bar none. Incomparable. Non pareil! Head of the class.

                You're #1 and I will never dispute that. I surrender.

                • 1 vote
                #6.4 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:47 AM EDT

                Richard, Washington State

                Your saying the Dems are demonizing the Tea Party for their own rhetoric. If they don't want their words use against them, then maybe they should be quiet. You Repubs have a habit of lying to the American about alot of things. Iraq has WMD's, taken us into a war where we would be considered "liberators" Death Panels, Sarah Palin? The Repubs have had no real ideas except to attack the Dems for theirs. They have stalled, obstructed, and whipped up their base and the fringe now when some of the programs and bills would actuall help the American People. That ghoul McConnell seeing his Wall Street handlers about Wall Street reform and getting his marching ordersin how to attack the bill. The Wall Street reform bill as imperfect as it was, was imperfect because the Dems we're trying to get Repub support. Waterdown bills help very few except for the people who the bill is to restrict.

                You can't be angry and ranting about this and that because the Repubs would and are doing the same thing. You can't have it both ways. You have to stand w/ your base which includes the Teabaggers and John Birch Society because you have crawled into bed w/ them.

                • 3 votes
                #6.5 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:39 PM EDT
                Reply

                "The Democrats' failing agenda"? If, and that's a BIG IF, the agenda is failing, it's because there is absolutely no participation or cooperation from the party of NO.....

                Bills stacked up in the Senate? "cause the Party of NO doesn't know how to Legislate. The Party of NO has brain cells that haven't worked in years since all they did was follow W over a cliff! No need to think, and saying NO to everything requires nothing!

                Amazing, come on Republicans, celebrate what the TeaBaggers have done! Own Them!, warts and all!

                • 3 votes
                Reply#7 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:59 PM EDT

                Yep, I got an FB post from Cato this morning about it. Dems call it the 'Contract on America' Here are the 10 main points:

              • Repeal the Affordable Care Act (Health Care Reform)
              • Privatize Social Security (or phase it out altogether)
              • End Medicare as it presently exists
              • Extend the Bush tax breaks for the wealthy and big oil
              • Repeal Wall Street Reform
              • Protect those responsible for the oil spill and future environmental catastrophes
              • Abolish the Department of Education
              • Abolish the Department of Energy
              • Abolish the Environmental Protection Agency
              • Repeal the 17th Amendment which provides for the direct election of senators
              • Sounds pretty good to me.

                • 4 votes
                Reply#8 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:01 PM EDT

                Wow,

                From Hope and Change to Republicans are a bunch of tea bagging rasicist.

                That's "visionary". America's leg eagerly anticipates that tingle.

                  Reply#9 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:04 PM EDT

                  bob:

                  You may be on to something there.

                  Kind of like those on the right with the message of NO and stagnation calling those who lean to the left as pinko socialist communist traitor terrorists.

                  Now that's visionary. Some Americans eagerly anticipating those idiotic you betcha's and those I don't read but I can see Russia from my front door.

                  • 4 votes
                  #9.1 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:42 PM EDT

                  CA,

                  During the past election, Obama ran as a post-partisan centrist who would change Washington - no more left vs. right, red vs. blue, finding compromises based on shared values, etc. Now it's tea bag time.

                  Kind of like those on the right with the message of NO and stagnation calling those who lean to the left as pinko socialist communist traitor terrorists.

                  Most of America seems to feel Obama the candidate is not the Obama the president. He took a hard turn left from his centrist campaign. He got the car out of the ditch, turned it around and floored it to Athens. Most don't want to go there and the Republicans are saying nope.

                  Now that's visionary.

                  I don't know if Obama is a communist, socialist, etc., but he is a collectivist, or statist which share basic ideals. Most of America is center-right and does not share these beliefs. Socialism/whatever doesn't work and is the antithesis of what made America the great country it became. Nothing visionary about understanding that and nothing visionary about understanding that all good things do not have to be visionary.

                  Some Americans eagerly anticipating those idiotic you betcha's and those I don't read but I can see Russia from my front door.

                  It's sad that's all some Americans have to cling to.

                  Thanks for your comment CA.

                  • 2 votes
                  #9.2 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:36 PM EDT

                  Bob-1805084

                  When Teabaggers use the N word and spit on Black Congressmen that isn't racist? Obama may have run on the post Partisan agenda and tries to stay above the fray, but when you have Right Wing Tools like Beck, Limbaugh, Palin, Hannity always spewing their special brand of hate, it hard. Like your President GWB said during the debates w/ Kerry, " Its Hard". Of course he was being spoon fed answers via that pack he had hidden under his clothes, but it is hard. And unlike Bush, at least Obama admits to his mistakes.

                  Getting upset because the Teabaggers have given the Dems so much ammo is childish. If they would be quiet and instead of stirred up like some rabid mob, the Dems would have to work much harder. But instead you have John Boehner, that ghoul Mitch McConnell, that tool Jim DeMint all giving and keep giving everytime they open their mouths. You have Teabaggers like Sharon Angle and Rand Paul who run from the media because every time they speak, they insert their heads up their a*%es. They not used to taking questions that they would have to explain their positions because they only go on Fox. Rand Paul found out the hard way w/ Rachael Maddow, Sharon Angles runs away from reporters after stating she having a news conference and its not the first time she's done this. You have people like Breitbart who smears a woman's good name just to go after the NAACP and yes everyone overreacted, including the White House. But, we find out the tape was edited to appear racist.

                  You've made your bed, now sleep in it

                  • 2 votes
                  #9.3 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:05 PM EDT

                  Bob-1805084

                  Your saying the Teabaggers aren't racists? I know this a generalization, but from what is seen on the news, they don't appear to very appreciative of other races, or anyone who aren't them. We have the examples of Congressman John Lewis who was spit upon and call a N word. That appears to be quite tolerant.

                  • 2 votes
                  #9.4 - Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:23 PM EDT
                  Reply

                  Sadly some very good Republican candidates who happen to be centerists or progressive will lose because of the fact that their party is controlled by a bunch of extremists. People have left the Republican party in droves since the extremists gained control. Maybe such losses will wake people up after the Democrtats make a clean sweep and even an occasional "slam dunk" in places that have been traditional Republican strongholds over many years.

                  I don't want a one party system as Karl Rove would have. I like the idea of two or more parties but if the Republicans continue to follow the right wing extremist nut jobs there will no longer be a Republican party and once again the right will be faced with creating a new party more liberal than the last. First it was Federalists, then Whigs and Republicans. What will the new party be called or will they reform and move toward the center. The Democrats moved from the far left as they were in the 80s toward the center will the Republicans move from the far right toward the center? I have a feeling we are about to find out.

                  • 3 votes
                  Reply#10 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:07 PM EDT

                  Wasn't it George W. Bush who said "If you're not with us, you're against us"?

                  I would paraphrase that to advise all Republican candidates out there that if you're not against the Tea Party, we're going to have to assume you're for it.

                  Sooner or later, you're going to have to decide. Or the voters will decide for you.

                  • 7 votes
                  Reply#11 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:18 PM EDT

                  Yeah that was Bush who said that when he was CONvincing America to go to Iraq and get the 9-11 terrorists and Saddam's oil they gave to China. Now they cannot account for 8.7 billion in Iraqi oil money between 2004 and 2007, that was Obama's fault too.

                  The Bush Family more crooked deals then the Mafia could ever dream of!

                  • 4 votes
                  #11.1 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:14 PM EDT

                  Brainwashed,

                  Post that source. Iraq oil went to China? Heck I'll post it for you. Look at the date of the article, the deal was done in 2010.

                  http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/world/3708649/China-to-develop-Iraq-oil-fields

                    #11.2 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:57 PM EDT

                    Paul, he might be talking about the United Nations "Oil for food" program. We didn't buy Iraqi oil at that time, but China did. Saddam didn't use the oil for food.

                    • 2 votes
                    #11.3 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:50 AM EDT

                    Richard,

                    Maybe, but I doubt it though.

                      #11.4 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:16 PM EDT
                      Reply

                      Fallen soldiers' families denied cash as insurers profit

                      Survivors given checkbook accounts, while carriers retain the assets in their corporate accounts; 'turning death claims into a profit center'

                      By Bloomberg News

                      July 28, 2010

                      The package arrived at Cindy Lohman's home in Great Mills, Maryland, just two weeks after she learned that her son, Ryan, a 24-year-old Army sergeant, had been killed by a bomb in Afghanistan. It was a thick, 9-inch-by- 12-inch envelope from Prudential Financial Inc., which handles life insurance for the Department of Veterans Affairs.

                      Inside was a letter from Prudential about Ryan's $400,000 policy. And there was something else, which looked like a checkbook. The letter told Lohman that the full amount of her payout would be placed in a convenient interest-bearing account, allowing her time to decide how to use the benefit.

                      “You can hold the money in the account for safekeeping for as long as you like,” the letter said. In tiny print, in a disclaimer that Lohman says she didn't notice, Prudential disclosed that what it called its Alliance Account was not guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its September issue.

                      Lohman, 52, left the money untouched for six months after her son's August 2008 death.

                      “It's like you're paying me off because my child was killed,” she says. “It was a consolation prize that I didn't want.”

                      As time went on, she says, she tried to use one of the “checks” to buy a bed, and the salesman rejected it. That happened again this year, she says, when she went to a Target store to purchase a camera on Armed Forces Day, May 15.

                      ‘I'm Shocked'

                      Lohman, a public health nurse who helps special-needs children, says she had always believed that her son's life insurance funds were in a bank insured by the FDIC. That money -- like $28 billion in 1 million death-benefit accounts managed by insurers -- wasn't actually sitting in a bank.

                      It was being held in Prudential's general corporate account, earning investment income for the insurer. Prudential paid survivors like Lohman 1 percent interest in 2008 on their Alliance Accounts, while it earned a 4.8 percent return on its corporate funds, according to regulatory filings.

                      “I'm shocked,” says Lohman, breaking into tears as she learns how the Alliance Account works. “It's a betrayal. It saddens me as an American that a company would stoop so low as to make a profit on the death of a soldier. Is there anything lower than that?”

                      Millions of bereaved Americans have unwittingly been placed in the same position by their insurance companies. The practice of issuing what they call “checkbooks” to survivors, instead of paying them lump sums, extends well beyond the military.

                      Touching Americans

                      In the past decade, these so-called retained-asset accounts have become standard operating procedure in an industry that touches virtually every American: There are more than 300 million active life insurance policies in the U.S., and the industry holds $4.6 trillion in assets, according to the American Council of Life Insurers.

                      Insurance companies tell survivors that their money is put in a secure account. Neither Prudential nor MetLife Inc., the largest life insurer in the U.S., segregates death benefits into a separate fund.

                      Newark, New Jersey-based Prudential, the second-largest life insurer, holds payouts in its own general account, according to regulatory filings.

                      I will send anyone the link because it is quite long.

                      • 3 votes
                      Reply#12 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:59 PM EDT

                      One check written by the woman for the entire balance deposited in her regular bank account would have solved her "problem".

                      Then the bank will pay 1% (pretty typical rate these days) and loan it out.

                      Prudential made standard disclosures that all investment firms and insurance companies have to make because they aren't banks and aren't FDIC insured. Yet they are part of a money market account system that handles billions of dollars all the time.

                      The only way there is anything untoward here is if Prudential would not honor a request or a check to transfer the funds to another institution.

                      The fact that some merchants refused the check was more a reflection of their own policies and/or ignorance than a rap on Prudential.

                      They also clearly told her it was being held pending her own decisions on how to manage what is a significant sum of money.

                      There is nothing to demonize here that I can see.

                      Further, if put in a single bank account, FDIC would only have insured $250,000 of the $400,000.

                      It's Prudential's JOB to manage assets!

                      The woman cited in the article also was emotionally distraught and incapable of handling the money when she got it. Prudential handled it, well, PRUDENTLY.

                      Tell me what this woman would have done with a lump sum check? Put it in a drawer for 6 months until she was more emotionally stable and didn't look at the money as a "consolation prize"?

                      So, let's say she got a lump sum check and put it all in her bank account, probably earning 1% or less. The bank shouldn't invest it? Like make a loan?

                      If the thrust of the article is to demonize Prudential, then this poor woman is being used by someone.

                      • 3 votes
                      #12.1 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:56 PM EDT

                      We received a notice regarding a checkbook after my father in laws death. I simply wrote back when I sent the death certificate with the paperwork that I do not want a checking account or a checkbook but a check for the full amount of the policy to be issued instead and they abided by that. Please let people know that just because that is how the company wants to negotiate the payout doesnt mean you have to take it that way.

                      • 2 votes
                      #12.2 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:55 PM EDT
                      Reply

                      You want to be mature and have a detailed discussion about it? We can do that. Leave your friend Feisty home though. Won't get anything done with her around.

                      JoAnna, how you doing this evening? I'm still scrathing my head over this one. Detailed discussion? You, who resort to petty, childish posts whenever someone posts some actual facts that prove how wrong you are. Let me guess, Richard is your husband and niether of you smile much.

                      See, I can do it too.

                      • 3 votes
                      Reply#13 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 PM EDT

                      Jeez, Frank, you really went off the deep end with the husband/wife implication. And don't worry, I am smiling and laughing all the time when I post here. And not just at myself. The lefties here are hilarious.

                      There is no point in coming here besides the fun. My real wife is laughing at you as well.

                      • 2 votes
                      #13.1 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:04 PM EDT
                      Reply

                      If you LIBERALS want to have the country to do as you wish and you want to rid the United States of this Consertitive and my vote you can make a small donation to my ESCAPE FUND. That fund is at Paypal JoeThe1Mac@gmail.com . Remember the next election I could be the deciding vote to have a GOP member remove your guy.

                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#14 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:56 PM EDT

                      Katie Wright, WHERE WERE THE REPUBLICAN RIGHT WHEN BUSH USED FAILED POLICIES?

                      Come on Katie, use your smarts! I have yet to hear that the tax cuts for the wealthy were a failure!

                      I have yet to hear from the Right that two, not ONE, but two wars were a failure under Bush!

                      I didn't hear the Right screaming when Bush put our country into a DEFICIT!

                      The Right didn't get mad when the tax cuts and jobs shipped overseas put us deeper into debt!

                      Lady, what planet do you live on?

                      As far as I'm concerned, we are very lucky that this country didn't dive into a Depression. But failed policies? You must be on dope!

                      HEALTHCARE REFORM

                      FINANCIAL REFORM

                      EXECUTIVE ORDER FOR EQUAL PAY FOR WOMEN

                      Small business loans is on it's way. I could go on and on and on!

                      No, you Katie Wright have your information incorrect! As a Moderate Republican I can only say, "SHAME ON YOU."

                      Signed a Responsible Republican

                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#15 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:35 PM EDT

                      I would suggest that everything bad that has happened in this country in its 200+ year history was the result of "failed policy".

                      • 1 vote
                      #15.1 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:55 AM EDT

                      The Bush Tax Cuts and subsidies for the Oil industry is welfare for the haves against the have nots. Its class warfare pure and simply. When oil companies are making record profits, why do they need a subsidy from the taxpayers? When Bank Executive is skyrocketing but wages and salaries for the middle class are either stagnant or falling what do you call that? Someone wrote prior that the Dems are making more money than some of the Repubs according to some survey they found. So what, just means those are making those salaries are just as foul as the people their getting the money from.

                      This discussion is about how the Dems plan on using the Tea Party against the Repubs and some of our Right Wing friends are having a cow about it. The Repubs have made their beds, trying to refute the facts that the Teabaggers aren't Repubs if ludricious. Your just ashamed as you should be by their tactics and the things they have said and done now. It can't be taken back, it can be edited to look more presentable like the Repubs are doing to Sharon Angle's website. But the end results are the same once light is shined on it. She threatened to sue Harry Reid because he found her original website and posted it. All of a sudden, her rants about Social Security being privatized, ending Medicare, eliminating the EPA, Dept of Education, the Dept. of Energy, letting Corporation do as they want. And Rand Paul's view of the Civil Rigts Act. Let these views be judge by the voters and see where people stand then

                      • 2 votes
                      #15.2 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:19 PM EDT
                      Reply

                      Good for the DNC...It's about time they took the lunacy of the Tea Bagger/GOP thing on. It's about time America realizes that the GOP is the enemy of working Americans. The only people they give a crap about are the plutocrats that pull their strings..

                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#16 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:36 PM EDT

                      Here's a petition to pick NPR instead of Fox "News" for Helen Thomas's seat at the White House news room.  NPR is a trusted news source.  Fox News has become an arm of the Republican party. 

                      http://act.credoaction.com/campaign/fox_or_npr/?r_by=-3114688-D0Q_gKx&rc=mailto2

                      If Fox News would just drop their "Fair and Balanced" motto and just come out and say: "we report the day's events through the lens of the Republican party/Tea party", I would have less heartburn about their slanted coverage. 

                      • 4 votes
                      Reply#17 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:39 PM EDT

                      Colorado Crenshaw..

                      The way to voice an opinion is to refuse to watch Fox News. Their ratings would go down. As for Helen Thomas and NPR, you can't get any more liberal.

                      CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NPR, and ABC all understand that President Obamas approval rating has dropped below 50% in every state in American. That's very bad news.

                      Obama is hurting his own party but he actually is running to protect none other than his position in the oval office. Bringing a lawsuit against AR was to his advantage only. It may prove to have been a disaster for the Democrat Party.

                      We shall see in November.

                        #17.1 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:04 AM EDT

                        NPR is fine with me if they don't have a seat already.

                        Fox already does, so you comment is irrelevant. Haven't you ever noticed that Fox is the one out of many that asks different questions and gets the rest of the room and the president's spokesperson pissed off?

                        Can't we even have one?

                        • 1 vote
                        #17.2 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:58 AM EDT

                        Richard, Washington State

                        Remember when Darth Cheney shot his friend in the face, and waited? Where did he go for the interview? He went to Fox. Why? Because he knew he would get nothing but softball questions. The Bush administration did evrything it possibly could to exclude mainstream media especially MSNBC. So when Fox asks it ridiculous questions, and either Gibbs or Obama seem perturbed, maybe its because its a question w/o any merit or simply something that they can twist into something to stir the base.

                        • 1 vote
                        #17.3 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:20 PM EDT
                        Reply

                        It is pretty obvious that attacking the GOP as being the same as the Tea Party is going to backfire on the DNC. I wish Democrats had a little ability to gauge the mood of the general public. They wouldn't be in the trouble they are in now if they had a clue.

                        • 2 votes
                        Reply#18 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:44 PM EDT

                        Is the Democrats strategy this year simply going to be make up a bunch of stuff, string together some quotes here and there and frame it as the Republican platform, and say it loud and long enough that really stupid people believe it? Hmmmm, it just might work! I would have preferred something more like we did a great job and things are going so well that it is in the country's best interest to re-elect us, but well, you can only press a lie so far, can't you?

                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#19 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:37 PM EDT

                        Citizen Zane

                        What are they making up? All their doing is posting what has been said already. Your claiming that Teabaggers aren't Repubs? Your claiming that some of them aren't racists? Your actually saying the things Sharon Angle & Rand Paul who wants to do away w/ the Civil Rights Act are sane and should be posted?

                        Why?

                        • 2 votes
                        #19.1 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:45 PM EDT
                        Reply

                        I'm neither a Democrat or Republican so I don't have a dog in this fight . I can say that neither party has any real policies. Real policies would prevent the oil companies from destroying the waters of our sea lanes.

                        They would make it possible for people to find a job, lower medical costs, prevent foreclosures on homes, compete with oversea oil giants, insure housing for all Americans,

                        protect our borders, prevent illegal immigration, uphold the federal laws on illegal immigration, hand out strict and swift penalties for terrorist's who have invaded America,

                        destroy every terrorist safe have across and in America, and take care of America first by enforcing the laws of America. Create jobs like they were once created instead of passing ridiculous bailouts and stimulus plans in the hope of jobs being created.

                        Spending money will not create jobs, spending money will not bailout America from disaster. Spending more money will only delay the inevitable. Spending money and handing out checks did not bring America out of the Great Depression.

                        People who pulled themselves up by their bootstraps and worked harder than they had ever worked was the result of working out of the Great Depression. Those people did not rely on help from a federal bureaucracy

                        People pulled together and helped each other. They learned how to do without and how to sacrifice until they could get back on the ground. World War 2 no doubt was a great factor as people went to work on assembly lines across America.

                        We now live in an era when jobs by the millions have been outsourced overseas because of greed. Cheaper labor and people willing to work for cheap wages have cost America an incredible loss. Business owners have sold out their very own nation in the name of greed.

                        Mind you that these are huge business owners but they nonetheless have cost Americans an incredible amount of wages and even their very own job that came with those wages. Illegal immigrants are taking over a once great nation.

                        Majorities are becoming a minority. The United States can't seem to agree on an immigration plan. It can't discover the will to secure and protect its southern borders. It is very willing to allow illegal immigrants to flee across its border causing a sharp increase in the rise of medical cost, a depleted system that was set aside to help American legals.

                        Reglamento de la ley General de Poblacion enacted in Mexico in April 2000 prevents illegal immigration in its country. It clearly states, quote "Illegal immigration is a Felony, punishable-by up to two years in prison. Immigrants who are deported and attempt to re-enter can be imprisoned for ten years.

                        Visa violators can be sentenced to six-year terms. Mexican who help illegal immigrants are considered criminals. Mexico can deport foreigners who are deemed detrimental to economic or national interests, violate Mexican law, are not physically or mentally healthy or lack necessary funds for their sustenance and for their dependents.

                        This law enacted by the Mexican government 10 years ago is a law that any rational nation should have to protect itself from illegal immigrants. The very same government in Mexico that had its strict immigration law enacted praised the American courts for striking down portions of the AR. immigration law.

                        How can any competent government pass its own strict law, enforce it, and then praise a court in America for string down portions of a law that protects another country? That Mexican government is more than willing to enforce its law but,

                        has essentially said, thank you America for not enforcing an illegal immigration law nor having an immigration law in your own sovereign nation. The Mexican government has essentially spat in the faces of every American who believes in the rule of the law and enforcing it.

                        The Dems nor the Repubs have no policies that protect America.

                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#20 - Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:41 PM EDT

                        Are you mad as hell?

                        Are you mad at Wall Street Pay and bonuses?
                        Then why vote for the party that also gives them tax breaks?

                        Are you mad at the federal debt?
                        Then why vote for the party that created it?

                        Are you mad at health care reform?
                        Then why vote for the party that stifled it?

                        Are you mad at Congress?
                        Then why vote for the party of NO?

                        Are you mad at illegal immigration?
                        Then why vote for the party that obstructs immigration reform?

                        Are you mad at unemployment?
                        Then why vote for the party that doesn’t care?

                        Are you mad at Socialism?
                        Then why vote for the party that funds corporate welfare?

                        Are you mad at the direction that America is going?
                        Then why vote for the party that filibusters recovery?

                        It’s time to break the conservative chokehold on America.

                        www.comecleanamerica.net

                        • 4 votes
                        Reply#21 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:41 AM EDT

                        Great post Dan, Thank You!

                          Reply#22 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:49 AM EDT

                          journ-O-list. 400 writers across all networks, newspapers, and magazines getting the word out for the government. They never gave up. They haven't given up. They told us what we needed to hear so Obama would win, and they tell us now what to believe so he can keep making legislation that changes the lives of Americans.

                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#23 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:12 AM EDT

                          First off let's start with the fact that there are 400.000 tea party members included in that membership are the black concervatives and the conservative of color organization. However I fully expect the tea party to grow it is just a baby.

                          Dan you are a very misinformed person corperations do not pay taxes they collect them from the costomer or YOU your cost of living will sky rocket under the choke hold of four democratic taxes.

                          This has to be the richest coment I have heard that the corperations will absorb the cost. That is the biggest bunch of bs I have ever heard. Unless that means fire people and they will so,,,,, not only will corperations the tax payers of this country the ones that do have to stay here fire people but all of the goods they provide will go up to match their tax burden so their tax burden becomes your cost of living.

                          What will you have to give up? It wont be food but everything else you have bought in the past will be surenendered to this overspending heartless administration.

                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#24 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:01 AM EDT

                          Sandyshores

                          So your saying we need to go back to the GWB way of doing business then? Nothing should ever be done to corporations?

                          • 2 votes
                          #24.1 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:03 PM EDT
                          Reply

                          WOW the DNC must really be the home of the most Liberal of the brain dead liberals. Them attacking the tea party and calling the the same as the GOP is like calling all democrats idiots. The truth it is only the Liberals that are Idiots there are some conservative Democrats that are OK. There is a sweet since of humor in this attack though because it is the INDEPENDENTS that formed the tea party not the GOP it is the GOP more than anyone who has been defeated by the tea party but in Nov it will be the tea party and independents that kick the liberals asses out of power and start to bring some sanity back to America. 28 % of the tea party are former Dems, 32% former GOP and the rest are independents you do the math. Good bye Liberals you will not be missed.

                            Reply#25 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:20 AM EDT
                            Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.