For members of the Senate Judiciary Committee -- and for many of the veteran journalists squeezed into the Hart Senate Office Building today -- the Kagan hearing is proceeding pretty much like other confirmation debates always have. If anything, the only difference so far is that there are a few less fireworks this time around (so far, at least).
But this hearing would seem very foreign to a lawmaker or reporter who worked on Capitol Hill 75 years ago. For starters, nominees haven't always been required to testify in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee. The first hearings at which a Supreme Court nominee actually testified in person were Justice Harlan Stone's in 1925.
Confirmation hearings also haven't always been open to the public. They regularly held behind closed doors until the 1940s.
The first hearings to be broadcast in total on C-SPAN were Sandra Day O'Connor's in 1981.
The entire confirmation process also takes much longer in the modern era than it did early in the nation's history. According to the Congressional Research Service, between 1789 and 1966, it took a Supreme Court nominee about 10 days to be confirmed once his nomination had been received by the Senate. Between 1966 and now? Seven times as long -- a median of 69 days.


Interesting info on confirmation hearings. Here's a little bit more I found for those interested -
Wiki:
George Washington appointed the most justices; he obviously had an edge over the other Presidents because he was in office when the Court was created.
Four US Presidents did not appoint any Supreme Court justices:
William H. Harrison
Zachary Taylor
Andrew Johnson
Jimmy Carter
Jimmy Carter is the only President of the four who served a full term.
William Howard Taft is the only person in US History to serve as both President of the United States and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
Best wishes to Elena Kagan. This is quite an honor for her.
Elena Kagan's confirmation hearings are turning into a rightwing circus of petty partisan lies. The corrupt conservatives are worried about her beingr Liberal activist judge yet have no problems with their four corrupt radical subversive conservative activistsupreme court jesters who routinely legislate from the bench to aid their corrupt party of sore losers. Huffy Jeffy Sessions and his lisping LogCabin repugnant one voice doesn't deserve to shine Kagan's shoes much less ask her questions. Elena Kagan is making fools out of the repugnant ones questioning her and she will be confirmed as our next Supreme Court Justice.
Court jesters ... another good one, Eric. I hope that you don't mind if I borrow it.