NBC/WSJ poll: 50% disapprove of Obama on Gulf spill

AP

President Barack Obama picks up a "tar ball" during a tour of areas impacted by the Gulf Coast oil spill on May 28, 2010.


According to the new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, 50 percent of Americans disapprove of President Obama's handling of the oil spill in the Gulf, versus 42 percent who approve of his handling.

But the public gives him better ratings than it does Congress, the federal government, and BP.

In the poll, a combined 48 percent believe that Obama has done more or as much as expected in dealing with spill.

By comparison, however, 39 percent say the same of Congress, 36 percent say that of the federal government (including the Interior Department and the Environmental Protection Agency), and just 27 percent say that of BP.

The full NBC/WSJ poll -- which was taken June 17-20 of 1,000 adults, and which has an overall margin of error of plus-minus 3.1 percentage points --- will be released at 6:30 pm ET.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4

In addition to 'do you approve' or 'do you dissaprove', these polls need to add ' ...and if so, why?'. I, for one, would like to see just what it is that people think should be done., or what exactly Obama CAN do.

  • 17 votes
#1 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:07 PM EDT

There is an agenda here. There is so much more that could be done. Obama is trying to bring us to our knees. They want the gulf economy to come to a standstill so they will be at the mercy of the government. They are suspending drilling at 1500 meters, but not at 2700 where Petrobra is drilling. Soros owns much of it and they are allowed to drill. Guess who is on the payroll of Soros? Obama's right hand man- Podesta. This is all a coup to destroy our country so Soros can rebuild it. Watch his speeches. Who will be in charge? Guess who?

  • 15 votes
#1.1 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:55 PM EDT

At last; a reasonable voice.

  • 6 votes
#1.2 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:59 PM EDT

MAW - That's because Petrobras is a Brazilian company drilling off their own coast. Obama doesn't have the right to halt their drilling operations. Cynical much?

  • 8 votes
#1.3 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:19 PM EDT

MAW: You are the inspiration for my purchase of stock in tin foil today. Where should I send your tin foil hat?

  • 9 votes
#1.4 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:23 PM EDT

MAW is parroting the nonsense that I heard on Limbaugh this morning, that the Obama administration is dragging their feet on one of the worst environmental disasters ever to further some hidden political agenda. Seriously? SERIOUSLY????

  • 14 votes
#1.5 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:34 PM EDT

Reasonable answer? another Stupid parrot,this what happen,when the Blinds follows the Blunder.

Till Now,there's no EXPERTISE and TECHNOLOGY amongst in Oil Experts icirlce in the Industry knows how to solve and fix this problem beneath 5,000 ft in the ocean bed when accident like this does happened.

At least as this Soros Guy, are smart enough and patriotic ,by not doing this " Idiotic" at his own backyard in the US Gulf but in Brazil,If this "blow up" does happen in Brazil,it's brazil problems,Since Protroba is a state own unlike BP ,brazil can't afford to be forever a permanent Bankrupt country,like unlike BP which they can afford to be bankkrupt and start fresh with their name name like GOPBP.

  • 4 votes
#1.6 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:38 PM EDT

disappointed dem

Petrobras is a Brazilian company who is also drilling in the Gulf, and will need to stop like everyone else.

MAW-1297690

Get up to speed he sold off a lot of his shares, and was not the major holder anyway, the Brazilian government holds most of it. I wish people would get over Soros, move on find something else in your life.

  • 5 votes
#1.7 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:41 PM EDT
Ralph HeodDeleted

Glenn Beck was saying the exact same nonsense. People watch him, parrot him and think they sound intelligent.

  • 3 votes
#1.9 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:08 PM EDT

right.... who was doing these inspections on these rigs the same organization that passed BP's disaster.... that's why you shut them down.

And it was not illegal in the case of a national emergency... try thinking before you make up claims or regergitate rediculous comments made by a fat pill popping ditto head.

you have no business breathing.....so you stop breathing and Obama will stop being president..

  • 3 votes
#1.10 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:11 PM EDT

How hard can this be? President Obama is not fat. It should be quite simple to fit him for a wetsuit. He can dive to the blowout preventer and cap the well. Oh wait, then people would complain that he was grandstanding.

Maybe if he did this under cover of darkness and sealed the blowout with a giant plug, and then had his office issue a press release that attributed the success to BP corporate know how. Yeah, that's the ticket.

I just can't understand why he hasn't fixed this yet. Hell, I have a 32" TV screen and the blowout is smaller than my TV. Looks pretty easy to me, and I only finished the sixth grade.

Must be a conspiracy. Yeah, that's it. He's going to destroy America for his Socialist, Nazi, Fascist, Commie, Muslim, Progressive benefactors. I heard there's a mural of this on a building in New York.

Gotta run. Glenn is on.

  • 7 votes
#1.11 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:18 PM EDT

I agree with drive-by-observer. What exactly is it that people want the President to do, when scientific/engineering minds don't seem to have a clue what to do either? If people want to get angry at government, they should be getting angry at a failure to impose stricter safety regulations on private corporations, regulations that might have prevented or at least lessened the damage from this spill. However, as long as there is this angry contingent of tea-partiers out there who insist on describing everything that isn't completely unregulated capitalism as "socialist," misplaced blame and the potential for such a devastating spill to happen again are what we have to live with.

  • 5 votes
#1.12 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:45 PM EDT

Nice retort David.... I can't believe these people exist let alone breed.

  • 1 vote
#1.13 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:46 PM EDT

MAW, I deliver free meals to 50 shut-ins in our community every week. One of them told me today that he seen on TV that the White House was for sale. Literally for sale as a Washington residence. He was absolutely convinced that this was so and said that he would never have believed that something like that could happen in this country.

Perhaps you and my friend could get together and swap conspiracy theories.

  • 2 votes
#1.14 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:54 PM EDT

Ralph,he got 2 BILLION from BP without going to court.That's an accomplishment.You and the rest could at least show something approaching reasonableness by giving him credit.

  • 2 votes
#1.15 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:01 PM EDT

robby: How could Obama have done any of those things during the first two months of the oil spill months when he was vacationing twice, wining/dining the Mexican PM, Paul McCartney and who knows how many other celebs, criss-crossing the country doing Dem fundraising and campaign stump speeches promoting his failed economic policies, and playing undetermined rounds of golf and games of hoops (smoking and basketball is one dangerous combo, especially with his terrible genetic history). He refused to meet face-to-face with BP execs for nearly the same period. Instead of believing the lies that BP was feeding him throughout this time, he also neglected to convene an immediate summit meeting of every deepwater and oil rig expert in existence, both domestically and internationally, so that an effective plan to stop the leak could have been concluded without the inept, incompetent engineers at BP, AND WHICH HE SHOULD STILL BE DOING! It's never too late, is it? The man is a total disaster. He is wrecking the country on at least a half a dozen different major fronts. His plan is to ruin the country and then offer the federal government as our only salvation. God help us all. We will never survive to 2012.

  • 4 votes
#1.16 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:14 PM EDT

Whatever happened to "drill baby drill" "We don't need any more Govt studies" "Too much Govt regulation" 'The Govt needs to get out of the way". These same people wonder why Obama hasn't fixed it yet??? Republicans remind me of children. They don't want you to interfere in their lives until they screw it up. Then they cry and complain.

  • 3 votes
#1.17 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:24 PM EDT

I enjoy watching Hardball, and feel that Chris is objective much of the time. However, the Wall Street Journal polls are presented as a cross section of U.S. voters. This is an extreme misrepresentation. Note the name, "WALL STREET Journal", Rupert Murdoch. This is an extremely skewed population to the far right. Please report the results of the polls accurately, indicating that the population polled are readers of the Wall Street Journal, not the typical voter in the U.S.

  • 2 votes
#1.18 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:52 PM EDT

This is pretty typical of the delusional, paranoid and baseless BS that parades as truth over the internet. Dude... Pull your head out of your ass and get a life.

  • 1 vote
#1.19 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:53 PM EDT

I was referring to MAW's original statement at the top.

    #1.20 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:23 PM EDT

    April Oil Spill is a REPEAT of JUNE 1979 Gulf Oil Spill, almost IDENTICAL.
    Rachel Maddow Story - The more spills change— the more they stay the same

    http://www.youtube.com/watch/?v=GHmhxpQEGPo&feature=player_embedded

    How many have seen Rachel Maddow Story which compares this 2010 gulf oil spill to the gulf oil spill of 1979? June 1979 (and the gas shortage). I guess no one told Obama about the last Gulf oil spill.

    How many of you have seen the 2009 film "Knowing?" The 1st scene of the Nicholas Cage 2009 film (Nick is in a series of NWO films, next is "Sorceror's Apprentice) can be found on youtube:
    http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/watch?v=hmgeA3dr2uY

    Watch it. See that the exact same oil rig explosion is in the 1st scene of this 2009 film. NWO lets us know what is coming.

    How many of you now think that this oil rig explosion wasn't planned?

    The 1st scene is exactly what happened on 4/20/10. The rig was imploded, just as WTC blgs were imploded by our govt.

    11 master satanists, occultists, masons, kabbalists & witches were ea in his/her assigned spots by Strategic Communication Laboratories, London (paid by neocons) on 911 01: Bush, Cheney, Tenet, Ann (GWB's witch aunt) Cappelletti, Bill Gates, Giuliani, Con di Rice, Schwarzenegger, Silverstein, Soros & Saddam Hussein (not dead hidden) for the MEGA ritual. John (GWB’s witch cousin) Cappelletti's demo co planted nano-thermite in WTC for Silverstein. Obama is carrying on the work the Bushes started.

    911 was a mega ritual. The perpetrators in the US government were not arrested or brought to justice, so they continue on their scourge of destroying America, squandering taxpayer dollars, further sacrificing innocents in Iraq, Afghanisan, Pakistan & anywhere else the military invades and occupies.

    GWB held a book of "America" upside down on his lap before he read "My Pet Goat" to summon demonic spirit of his grandfather Aleister Crowley, 666, baphomet to initiate the MEGA ritual of 911. Burning gold/silver, letting it cool is just one ritual, many happened on 911. What happened to all that gold/silver beneath the WTC which was trucked out during the evacuation of the nanothermite stained steel which was shipped off to India & China within a week after the WTC implosions? Its buried & being hoarded by the persons involved.

    Daughters of Aleister Crowley, Barbara Bush & Ann Cappelletti, conceived in Europe w sex tantra in 1924, b. 1925, gave birth to the grandsons of Aleister Crowley who stirring up the evil participants in this plan to usher in the coming of the antichrist & the evil desire to rule the rest of us of serfs.

    Doesn't anyone care about anything anymore? These people are making a mockery of our lives, our future, God, our Father. The Iluminati Trilogy was written by satanists, by Robert Anton Wilson and Robert Shea. Steve Jackson made it into Illuminati Card Game in 1981. The aim of the game is fulfilled when Illuminati build a power structure consisting of given number of cards, or when Illuminati (satanists/occultists) fulfill its special goal.... Look it up, see the game they have been playing. The WTC implosions, pandemics.

    Barbara Bush Aleister Crowley:

    http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/04/337857.shtml">http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2006/04/george-w-bush-barbara-bush-and.html

    http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/04/337857.shtml

    http://www.rense.com/general77/acrow.htm

    I hear Barb admits her mother had a dalliance with Aleister Crowley in Europe. Barbara Bush and Ann Cappelletti are witch daughters of Aleister Crowley, conceived in 1924 in Paris & at Abbey of Thelema with sex tantra w Pauline Pierce & Ann's 20 yr old Sicilian mother for money.

    Destruction of Twin Towers on 911 was a FREEMASONS SICK ESOTERIC RITUAL!!!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5BGegUXdd0

    or watch 48 videos of "The Arrivals"
    http://wakeupproject.com/VList.asp?Series=1

    Bob Kerrey, 911 commission, says 911 was a 30 yr conspiracy.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDfm3NroVG8&feature=related

    I could list all evidence of the Bush Nazi connection. They are all posted on youtube. Lieberman wants to shut down the Internet so that we can't learn the truth. We certainly aren't getting it from the news media--under control of the satanist/occultist NWO.

    If there is anyone of you who haven't seen September Clues, you MUST WATCH it. Investigation by citizens:

    www.septemberclues.info
    On
    9/11, the US TV networks used computer generated sceneries of Manhattan. Multiple techniques of image manipulation were employed to simulate 'airplanes ...

    SeptemberClues.info | The Central Role of the News ... yet another indication that the 9/11 TV "LIVE" broadcasts were managed by one single, centralized studio...

    www.septemberclues.info/frameindex.htm

    SEPTEMBER CLUES website:
    www.septemberclues.info (Part 1of 8) : " THE 911 NEWSMEDIA COVERAGE "

    Mr. Obama is Bush III, covering up the lies of Bushes & Clintons.

    www.livevideo.com/video/.../september-clues-part1.aspx

      #1.21 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:30 PM EDT
      Reply

      Think about it...the only way President Obama would get positive ratings is if he swam 5,000 feet to the well cap and sealed it himself. All Americans are angry, frustrated, saddened, (any negative feeling you can think of) about this spill. This man-made disaster lays at the feet of BP, Transocean, and Halliburton.

      I'm told the spill is increasing in volume. This leads of more heartache and death to the animals. There is no good news here.

      • 13 votes
      #2 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:10 PM EDT

      Ron:

      Your assessment is so right!

      Bulletin folks...President Obama is NOT going to seal that well.

      Short of sealing that gusher there is not a thing he can do. Polls be damned.

      • 12 votes
      #2.1 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:29 PM EDT

      You're both full of it. People do not expect Obama to know how to stop the leak. But there are things he can do. Like accept the help other countries have offered in the cleanup effort. Why would he refuse ANY help with a disaster of this size? It's insane! So instead of collecting oil while it's still in the water, we watch more and more of it reach shore.

      • 14 votes
      #2.2 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:49 PM EDT

      What help have other countries said they would provide? Who do those countries expect to pay for the help? And exactly what would you do that isn't already being done.

      • 6 votes
      #2.3 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:04 PM EDT

      Clicker- You go ahead and listen to Palin...maybe you could go stick your finger in the dyke too. NOBODY has refused the help! quit watching that crap on Fox its messin with ya.

      • 10 votes
      #2.4 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:14 PM EDT
      Betty_BoopDeleted

      50% approve of Obama on Gulf spill (Cup half full). :-)

      • 9 votes
      #2.6 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:25 PM EDT

      Veteran, on day 3, the Dutch, who are experts, offered to send skimmers. In addition, 12 other countries have offered help. That's what I and others don't understand. Why not let these countries help? That IS something he could have and should have done. Maybe, some of it wouldn't have made it to the beaches. BUT, he'd have to get the Jones Act out of the way, and he won't do that because of his union buddies.

      • 4 votes
      #2.7 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:26 PM EDT

      Please point me to the newspaper of one country with a headline, that says we tried to help, but were told no thanks. I keep seeing this repeated over and over, but I have yet to see it reported anywhere by any real media.

      • 4 votes
      #2.8 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:44 PM EDT

      Take your pick robby. I just ran dutch skimmers on google and came up with 2,750,000 hits in .25 seconds. You must be one of those Obama cheerleaders that is too entitled to have to make an effort on their own. It is just easier to stand up and cheer before you head out the door to the welfare line. Looks to me like they finally did accept their offer. Too bad they didn't do that on May 4th when they were first offered!!!!!

      • 3 votes
      #2.9 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:22 PM EDT

      Right on Rob- San Diego. Just because Obama and his masters on the telepromptor did not tell his worshipers that he had turned down "experienced help" does not mean it did not happen. Open your eyes and do just a little "work" or research and You might think differently about the one you worship

      • 1 vote
      #2.10 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:28 PM EDT

      I agree with Clicker - 13 countries and the U.N. have offered to send their ships and equipment to assist and Obama says "no we don't need your help". That is "stupidity baby stupidity".

      The other stupid thing is that they could have easily fabricated a mile long hose and channeled much of the oil to the surface to offload on ships, but they won't do that either - they will just let it "spill baby spill".

        #2.11 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:34 PM EDT

        On Dutch Skimmers:

        The offer was apparently turned down because EPA regulations do not allow water with oil to be pumped back into the ocean. If all the oily water was retained in the tanker, the capacity of the system would be greatly diminished because most of what is pumped into the tanker is sea water.

        I know the anti-obama camp is correct in alot of their facts and statements... but everyone has to understand they are very used to a president who is more than willing to do things illegally... or without supplying the whole truth.

        In this instance, I definately would have said to hell with all laws and regulations and just done what was required...

        But then i'd probably have that same group on my ass for that instead.

        The "approval ratings" would have been the same.

        • 3 votes
        #2.12 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:03 PM EDT

        thanks for the research - I love FACTS these days!

          #2.13 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:06 PM EDT

          For those individuals who want links on this statement:
          The offer was apparently turned down because EPA regulations do not allow water with oil to be pumped back into the ocean. If all the oily water was retained in the tanker, the capacity of the system would be greatly diminished because most of what is pumped into the tanker is sea water.

          I've done the work for you: ctrl+c / google.com /ctrl+v / Click link / Click Link / Click Link

          http://www.examiner.com/x-325-Global-Warming-Examiner~y2010m6d12-US-reconsiders-Dutch-offer-to-supply-oil-skimmers

          http://www.rnw.nl/english/article/dutch-oil-spill-response-team-standby-us-oil-disaster

            #2.14 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:33 PM EDT

            I know this is hard but keep reading Liquid Wolf. The EPA did finally approve it after realizing how stupid they were being. Too bad our POTUS was just as stupid or we would have had a 45 day start and a whole lot less oil floating around out there. I guess your position is you can't pull the race card, blame it on Bush, so hey blame it on the EPA.

            • 1 vote
            #2.15 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:35 PM EDT

            April Oil Spill is a REPEAT of JUNE 1979 Gulf Oil Spill, almost IDENTICAL.
            Rachel Maddow Story - The more spills change— the more they stay the same

            http://www.youtube.com/watch/?v=GHmhxpQEGPo&feature=player_embedded

              #2.16 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:42 PM EDT
              Reply

              As you know, I am a proud republican and dissagree with most of Obama's politics. Democrats are always wanting to take from the have's and give to the have not's even when the have's have earned their way through years of hard work, stress, sacrifice and risk. The dems want to give it to lazy ass people who do nothing.

              That being said, I think people should cut Obama some slack on the oil spill. What would you have him do?He has let the people that are best suited to deal with it, deal with it and so far they have been unsuccessful. Not his fault.......At least I can be reasonable and admit when he is doing the best he can.

              • 18 votes
              #3 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:16 PM EDT

              proud republican-1888838

              See No Jo, this man to me is a real republican, he is 100% correct. i wish you could like this guy put politics aside on something that is as ovoius as this.

              proud republican thank you, do you think you could talk some since in to No Jo.

              • 4 votes
              #3.1 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:27 PM EDT

              Proud- I'm sure I've dinged you on these posts before, but today I have to say you're a good American with a reasonable viewpoint.

              • 4 votes
              #3.2 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:28 PM EDT

              You get my vote - PR!

              • 2 votes
              #3.3 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:36 PM EDT

              Proud,

              Thank you for restoring my faith in the Republican Party and those that identify more with the other side of the political spectrum. I have been waiting for weeks now for someone like you that, while I will not likely always agree with, but that I can have a reasoned discussion and find SOME common ground. I will not get on a soapbox and argue that my way or my party or my party's leaders are always correct on every issue. I identify more with the Democrats, however, I am an American first! I am willing and ABLE to set aside my feelings for what the other side has, or has not, done and look instead to what makes sense and is right for America.

              I know you will likely come under fire for stating what many on our side have been attempting to make clear since this unfortunate event occurred. I know the inhabitants of the echo chamber will also say something along the lines of "sure all the libs rally around that RINO, he agreed with them!" and then they will want to run you out of the party as you are no longer pure and walk in lockstep with the more radical and extreme members.

              I just wish we could set aside the rancor and realize that we are only hurting ourselves and the future of this country by focusing more on our differences and engaging in ad-hominem attacks rather than on what we have in common and is good for ALL of us. There was a time when that was exactly what tool place in DC and the halls of Congress. Sadly, those days appear to be gone, replaced by the days of filibusters and divisive rhetoric. God help us all...

              • 4 votes
              #3.4 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:37 PM EDT

              If obaba is doing the best he can why was immediate help to contain and cleanup the oil refused? I believe he saw this "opportunity" to try and pass his cap and tax.

              • 5 votes
              #3.5 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:30 PM EDT

              I to am a republican and I am also a gulf coast resident. This is not a democratic or a republican problem. It is a national problem. Regardless of who is and or was in the white house there is only so much that could be done. The problem is capping the well not blaming the politicians. My issue is the speed at which government moves and the red tape involved. I can complain about the democratic white house in this incident, but I also was critical of the republican white house during Katrina.......

              • 4 votes
              #3.6 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:01 PM EDT

              well spoken. are you by chance a moderate? My only wish is that they could more people out on the shore lines. we might not know where to get anymore boats or supplies but there are people who can clean up.

                #3.7 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:19 PM EDT

                As you know, I am a proud republican and dissagree with most of Obama's politics. Democrats are always wanting to take from the have's and give to the have not's even when the have's have earned their way through years of hard work, stress, sacrifice and risk. The dems want to give it to lazy ass people who do nothing. -Proud Republican

                I guess everyone else missed this complete lie because PR think people should cut Obama some slack on the oil spill. Well, whoopie PR. Your other statement shows your complete ignorance. So, PR, where are your facts to back up this ludicrous claim? You believe a lie. You are hoodwinked, played, you know, being made a fool of.

                Proud of Reagan, GH and GW Bush. They all must have made you really make you proud with thier astronomical deficit increases. I guess you were very proud when the republicans repealed the only laws left protecting our economy from the greedy on Wall Street in 2002 resulting in the greatest economic meltdown in 60 years? Even prouder when we invaded and occupied countries carrying out long-term wars and never adding one penny of the costs to the books. I'll bet you were really, really proud when when they cut taxes for the wealthiest, adding trillions to the deficit and then enacted Medicare Advantage for the wealthiest over 65 adding additional trillions to the deficit. How about how proud you must have been when Joe Barton apologized to BP.

                You want to make general statemnts like that, back it up with facts.

                • 6 votes
                #3.8 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:37 PM EDT

                funny how they defend how governemnt always got bigger under republicans, and how our debts always got larger

                who's trying to ruin our country. To me it has been obvious it republicans and thier agenda, and inability to ever work with anyone else and shoving their views down peoples throats.

                The republican party is leading this country into a civil war...and I think that is what they want ...

                • 1 vote
                #3.9 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:16 PM EDT

                Proud Republican and Gus. Good to read some common sense views; now if you could just teach the media a bit of that realistic thinking, we would all be better off.

                I do disagree with the taking from the haves part, though. None of us like to pay more than we think we should, least of all have it given to someone else but WE--republicans, democrats, independents of the middle class--are the victims of an out of balance tax code. My guess is that most of us here are middle class income earners, maybe some more and some less. We pay more taxes than do those who make millions because much of their income is in capital gains. Reagan inherited a 20% capital gains tax rate but felt that tax should be at least close to the level of their federal income tax rate--he raised it to 28% which is about an average rate. George Bush cut that down to 15%. Hedge fund managers who make not just millions but some in the billions last year pay at a 15% tax rate while the average wage earner pays 28% and has a lot less money to start with. So you see, despite the talking points about taxes, it isn't about taking from the average person to give to those with less, it is about restoring a fairness to the tax system. It is not redistribution of wealth to have a fair tax system with those who have the most paying their fair share or at least paying at the same rate as the rest of us.

                • 2 votes
                #3.10 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:31 PM EDT

                Agreed... it's depressing reading comments on just about any topic in the news... American's are rediculously ignorant about everything. But wait..how could this be in the land of the free? We are free to be idiots apparently as well. 50% disapprove of how he's handled this disaster and I'm pretty sure at least 70% of the people who posted can't even handle their own finances let alone balance a check book. All these people being kicked out of their homes because they were stupid enough to get into a loan trap and they all just need more to bitch about, but hate to point the finger at the obvious culprit (BP) because some fat turd on TV or radio convinced them of another conspiracy theory. No wonder only really stupid shows stay on TV nowadays, Americans are truly getting dumber by the minute.

                • 1 vote
                #3.11 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:50 PM EDT

                April Oil Spill is a REPEAT of JUNE 1979 Gulf Oil Spill, almost IDENTICAL.
                Rachel Maddow Story - The more spills change— the more they stay the same

                http://www.youtube.com/watch/?v=GHmhxpQEGPo&feature=player_embedded

                  #3.12 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:49 PM EDT

                  When are we as American going to stand together for the little person and not the stupid republican party that do not care about anyone but the big corporation. For the life of me I can not see why anyone would ever vote for such a bunch of backward thinking politicians. I do not consider myself republican nor democrat. But, I know when a party has my best interest in mind. It certainly not the repugnate ones.

                    #3.13 - Tue Jun 29, 2010 2:51 PM EDT

                    Proud,

                    your statement that the president wants to take from the rich and give to the poor is a statement I have a problem with. People who are not paid a decent wage by big corporations are the working poor. They are not paid enough to fully pay for housing cost. Where I live WalMart pays their checkers a twenty-cents above minimum wage. If a person works an average of 30 to 40 hours a week, they can afford an apartment and bus fair to work or if they have a vehicle, gas for their car. What about food, utilities, clothing, and oh, lets not forget medical cost. The united States is a capitalist society not everyone works in a capitalist society. As a mixed race person, I am sicken by what I feel is the hatred people have against a man because his skin is brown, not white. The president is a man not a monster. IT seems people hate him because of his skin color not his policies because some of the comments made on this blog as well as others are simple racist comments and should not be stated at this defining moment in our history. I am neither republican nor democrat. I vote my best interest beyond skin color or should I say, the race of the person. If corporations would pay people a fair wage the government wouldn't have to subsidize the working poor by giving these people food Stamps, housing assistance, medical assistance, etc. The government is subsidizing the corporation when they do not pay their workers a decent wage. The people who work at some of these retails stores can't afford their employers product. As a middle income person who has been working since I was 16, I can barely afford my insurance cost of $1500 a month, housing cost, etc. because of the greed of corporation in this company. I went back to college recently and I am still under employed.

                      #3.14 - Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:29 AM EDT
                      Reply

                      As I was informed yesterday that polls are meaningless "snapshots", by a poster here, I will post the following news story, and allow others to opine on the meaning of another poll...

                      Gulf oil spill: Well gushing after cap is removed [Updated]
                      The containment cap BP had placed over its blown-out well was removed by an undersea robot vehicle, and the oil company was working to place it again.

                      U.S. Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen, incident commander for the Deepwater Horizon disaster, said BP feared methane hydrates were coming through the pipe leading from the cap to surface vessels, and the cap was removed out of "an abundance of caution."

                      BP also found that one of the vents of the cap had been closed, possibly due to a bump from one of the remotely operated vehicles hovering around the well."

                      http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2010/06/gulf-oil-cap-removed.html

                      NOAA Gulf oil spill map shows deadly oil plume moving closer to St. Petersburg, Florida
                      Updated NOAA oil spill maps show an increase in the size of the BP oil slick, which now extends further south than previous images. The tracking of a massive oil plume has also been charted now just 227 miles from St. Petersburg, Florida

                      “NOAA near shore trajectories continue to show direct onshore impacts into Walton County through Thursday with the uncertainty line extending into Bay County.”

                      http://www.examiner.com/x-55371-Tampa-Gulf-Oil-Spill-Examiner~y2010m6d23-NOAA-Gulf-oil-spill-map-shows-deadly-oil-plume-moving-closer-to-St-Petersburg-Florida

                      My continued sympathies to those in the affected areas...

                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#4 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:18 PM EDT

                      As a Florida resident, I am saddened by your news regarding a giant plume nearing St. Petersburg. These are some of the most beautiful beaches, bays, and islands in the world, with an incredible variety of wildlife. Dolphins and the threatened manatee have been abundant in these areas. I have been one of many kayakers who respected this unique environment. Having said that, I think that we need films of these wonderful animals struggling to breathe covered in oil and toxic dispersants to their death. This horrible catastrophe must be made real to those who call for continuing to drill.

                        #4.1 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:22 PM EDT
                        Reply

                        Any decent leader/ team would have had these guys drilling another well from day 2 as plan B/ Insurance! EPA was probably watching free porn! Can you imagine the amount of oily (pardon the pun) lawyers looking for cash for cons! Also, better sell your gas guzzler-you'll be melting them next year!

                        • 4 votes
                        Reply#5 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:27 PM EDT

                        Uncle Sammy? People have already forgotten the first few days of this disaster was spent looking for survivors/victims...

                        How quickly we forget and start pointing fingers...

                        • 5 votes
                        #5.1 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:32 PM EDT

                        It is obvious that you have never had to find a drilldship during an emergency. At a half a billion to build, we generally do not find them parked ready to be deployed. And once a rig is available, it must be moved on location and prepared for drilling.

                        Do you also think that the gasoline you are using comes directly form a "gas" well?

                        • 1 vote
                        #5.2 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:12 PM EDT

                        Your Uncle Sammy

                        Why would anyone sell their car? All of the oil that has leaked thus far, if were sent to a refinery and made into gasoline, based on the highest estimate for how much has leaked, would last only 5 hours in the country. That is no impact at all.

                          #5.3 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:51 PM EDT
                          Reply

                          Ron-the increase is temporary because the underwater robot in the area somehow interferred with some of the equipment that prevents ice crystals from forming. Itwill be inspected and repaired and the flow will slow down again within the next severalhours,according to Thad Allen's press briefing.

                          What is more disturbingis that the federal government has just ordered dredging stopped-so the sand berms that will protect the coast and barrier islands will be delayed. Why? Seems the feds want the dredges moved.

                          It will stop the berm building cold for seven days-time no one can afford to waste.To underworked overpaid bureaucrats, that matters not at all.

                          Ifthey'd been as picky about inspections as they are about the possible environmentalimpact of mitigation efforts, we'd never have had this problem.

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#6 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:29 PM EDT

                          Most coastal scientists think the berms are a ridiculous idea that will only waste time & money. The berms will only create piles (baskets) of toxic sand that won't stay where intended. They'll keep contaminated waters trapped behind them & won't even prevent oil from reaching the coasts.

                          Why should we be doing that exactly?

                          • 4 votes
                          #6.1 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:20 PM EDT
                          Reply

                          What's up with Chuckie T? He's talking with Andrea about the WSJ poll and immediately stated 'Obama has lost the Independents'...

                          What's up with that? If you say it enough times, it becomes the truth? I think not... That's the FAUX way...

                          • 3 votes
                          Reply#7 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:29 PM EDT

                          Obama gets a zero from me for economy. He loves bankers, hates people. Did over a trillion ($1,000,000,000,000) bailouts for banks, fannie mae, insurance giant AIG, etc and a piddling 4 billion ($4,000,000,000) for the people losing their homes.

                          Do the math that is 250 times more bailout funds for businesses than people.

                          He could have stabilized the market instead of stabilizing his wallet and other rich business owners. He is worse than a Republican at supporting the people versus business.

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#8 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:45 PM EDT

                          Nevermind... You are SO not worth it.

                          • 3 votes
                          #8.1 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:01 PM EDT

                          I agree that the TARP thing was a disaster for American taxpayers and a boon for banks. Too bad then-Secretary of the Treasury Paulson and then President George Bush came up with the no-strings-attached bailout plan and then told Congress (including Sen. McCain and Sen. Obama) and the public that if TARP didn't pass, the world's economy would collaapse.

                          It's also a crime that the banks used this bailout to buy other banks and Main street businesses can't finance inventory or growth.

                          • 2 votes
                          #8.2 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:26 PM EDT

                          who created TARP...who started the bailouts.... dude it was Bush !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                          • 3 votes
                          #8.3 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:21 PM EDT
                          Reply

                          For sure Obama is no socialist as people accused him of! That's as far from the truth as night and day!

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#9 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:48 PM EDT

                          Obama has not handled this situation well at all. It was difficult from the start. But he is the one who attacked the industry from the very start. A President cannot erect walls that he may need to overcome. His first response was to meet with intellectuals rather than industry pros. A bipartisan response would had Dick Cheney overseeing the govt. response.

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#10 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:03 PM EDT

                          A bipartisan response would had Dick Cheney overseeing the govt. response.

                          Holy @!$%#. How about if we find out what went on in his secret energy meetings with big oil and others first, he may be one of the reasons this happened.

                          • 2 votes
                          #10.1 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:34 PM EDT

                          My God you had GOT to be kidding. If Dick can't make money from, shoot it, or screw it, he wants nothing to do with it. He's" been drilled baby drilled" one too many times. He looks good from a wheel chair, counting his profis from Kellogg, Brown & Root!

                          • 2 votes
                          #10.2 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:47 PM EDT

                          That Cheney comment is so friggin sad. I can'tbeleive a human in this entire world would ever ever even come close to saying something so profoundly stupid

                          • 2 votes
                          #10.3 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:24 PM EDT
                          Reply

                          I think this whole admin is terrible- talk but dont walk/ all BP's wells should be shut down til they stop the flow of this nightmare well. But we have a pres who lets them give 20 bill in hush money. No shut their wells down put principal ahead of profit once and for all. Are we the Unted States of America or the United Corporations of America who the heck is in charge. Obama needs to take a stand or step down and let someone with some big nerve carry the big stick not the big mic. Wake up America before they fill the whole gulf w/oil BP aka Big polluter Big Problem Big Pain Bad Protocal Obama well they did give money to our campaign and they do have experts working on this so we don't have to least the Russians were smart enough to cap theirs BP has tried top hat top kill and now its just top crap flowing from BP and Obama-we wont rest til this is cleaned up well rip van winkle can you sleep 40 yrs while mother nature cleans up another man made mess.

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#11 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:04 PM EDT

                          and now that why that repuublican judge ruled in favor of the oil industry the other day for NO mandates. I didn't know thry made 'um that stupid in the military!

                          • 2 votes
                          #11.1 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:50 PM EDT
                          Reply

                          I'd like to know what the general public sheeple expect him to do about it. The only thing he can do is publicly admonish BP and make it clear that they have a lot of work to do in order to fix the situation. Expecting anything beyond that is unrealistic.

                           

                           

                          • 3 votes
                          Reply#12 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:11 PM EDT

                          How about wave the Jones Act? That'd be a good place to start.

                          • 2 votes
                          #12.1 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:51 PM EDT

                          Clicker - why don't you google the Jones Act and learn that it only deals with shipping from a US port to a US port. This canard was started weeks ago by the talking heads regarding the 'offers from other countries' to ship material to the Gulf. Only problem is, besides the Jones Act having nothing to do with international shipping, the offers were not from foreign countries; but from foreign companies that wanted to be paid for their so-called volunteer efforts.

                          And by the way, BP is the party responsible for the clean-up. If the US intervenes on site and in effect takes over, does that relieve BP of its financial and legal responsibilities? See? Things aren't always as simple as they seem, are they?

                          And one last thing - it's "waive" not wave.

                          • 6 votes
                          #12.2 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:35 PM EDT

                          clicker

                          The Jones Act has nothing to do with the response. A FOX talking point only. Name one ship that has been refused because of the Jones Act.

                          here is a link to the US State Department listing of help offered and status. Note: 8 countries offered skimmers and four have been accepted.

                          http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/143488.pdf

                          If you check Mexico, BP bought 2 skimmers from them in early May, and they are currently working in the Gulf.

                          The Jones Act states that a ship cannot be used to transfer goods from a Us port to another Us port if it was not built in the USA or if it has ever been flagged in another country, no exceptions. How then can BP be using 2 Mexican Skimmers if the Jones Act has not been waived. Simple, the Jones Act does not need to be waived.

                          Again FOX BS talking points only. Another FOX conspiracy put out to pasture. Fox - Lies and exaggerations.

                          • 4 votes
                          #12.3 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:52 PM EDT

                          "This canard was started weeks ago by the talking heads regarding the 'offers from other countries' to ship material to the Gulf."

                          I wonder how many posters here think a canard is a yellow bird that sings real pretty...

                          • 3 votes
                          #12.4 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:15 PM EDT

                          Clotho, sadly too many! <grin>

                            #12.5 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:55 PM EDT

                            He will do what was done in 1979 when Carter was President. Nothing. Notice in Maddow's piece. The same boom, hat & shooting junk into the hole was the same that was done in 1979. Gas shortage & price increase resulted, then Reagan was elected.

                            April Oil Spill is a REPEAT of JUNE 1979 Gulf Oil Spill, almost IDENTICAL.
                            Rachel Maddow Story - The more spills change— the more they stay the same

                            http://www.youtube.com/watch/?v=GHmhxpQEGPo&feature=player_embedded

                              #12.6 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:52 PM EDT
                              Reply

                              Ron, I didn't hear you or any DINO say that about Bush. All I heard was abuse and cuss words.

                              Sheila, Did I hear you say such similar things about Bush?

                              Did any of these DINOS cut Bush any slack for Katrina? They conveniently forgot that those on the frontline of Katrina could have done more rather than wait on Bush.

                              Now, that the Bama has met his Waterloo, which is far more greater than Katrina, he is trying to blame Bush and others for his incompetence and neglience. Blame Bush? This is utterly ridiculous. The man is insane! If this was on Bush's watch, this Internet and others would be on fire. Strange I don't hear anything about the Tea Party. I wonder why? The DINOS seem to be unusually silent in their rantings.

                              • 3 votes
                              Reply#13 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:19 PM EDT

                              I agree with Ron.  What do you expect our President to do?  I thinks he's been handling an impossible task with courage, determination and leadership.  Are you telling me the 50% agree with the Republicans that we should apologize to BP?  That 'Drill baby Drill' is the answer?  I just think Americans expect miracles, but don't want to do any of the work to make this nation better.  President Obama can't do it all alone.  Between those who just hate him to hate someone and those who make money off getting others to hate him, I'm amazed he can get as much done in Office as he's done.  Good job, Mr. President.  I didn't vote in the poll, but I'm 100% behind you.

                              • 9 votes
                              Reply#14 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:22 PM EDT

                              I just hope it lasts until November 3rd.

                                Reply#15 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:36 PM EDT

                                wow what an insult to all humanity... listen to yourself

                                  #15.1 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:27 PM EDT
                                  Reply

                                  we are hell bound

                                  • 3 votes
                                  Reply#16 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:40 PM EDT

                                  Just Think if we had followed Sarah Palin and others into a "Drill Baby Drill" mantra, this mes would have never happend. Or perhaps say it is "Anti-American to criticize a company like BP" like that Tea Party candidate said. He's so out of touch, he didn't reaize BP isn't an American owned company. These are the people who are critical of the president? My God how stupid! Come up with a plan, and put that plan into action, don't criticize from your couch.

                                    Reply#17 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:41 PM EDT

                                    There is so much Obama could have done and didn't. He refused help from other countries, he tied up the oil skimmers in port to count life jackets, he said he didn't want skimmers from other areas of the country. There is an agenda here.

                                    • 3 votes
                                    Reply#18 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:51 PM EDT

                                    MAW, seriously, where do you get this stuff? And do you really believe that any President of the United States of America would have the time or inclination to tell skimmers to go count life vests?

                                    Keep posting, though. Good, free entertainment is difficult to find.

                                    • 3 votes
                                    #18.1 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:40 PM EDT
                                    Reply

                                    and if you knew economics, you would get a zero from the rest of the country, who are seeing the turn around.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#19 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:52 PM EDT
                                    Betty_BoopDeleted
                                    Betty_BoopDeleted

                                    The poll makes no sense. Obama, as President, runs the EPA, Homeland Security, and the Interior Department through his cabinet officers. That so many respondents gave Obama's own executive branch departments a much lower rating than they gave Obama himself shows that a significant number of our citizens are (a) ignorant (b) brain-washed Obama Zombies or (c) a combination of (a) and (b), which is the most likely choice.

                                    Obama and the federal agencies under his command ALL get an F in their response. I would give Bush a higher rating during his response to Katrina. Definitely.

                                    • 5 votes
                                    Reply#23 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:16 PM EDT

                                    MAW, "They" want to bring the Gulf economy to a standstill? A coup to destroy our country?

                                    Please, for your own sake try to think about what you are saying. 

                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#24 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:17 PM EDT

                                    For those that " have " in this country I think they got there more byschemeing than any of use would like to admit.  At 33 honestly I don't think there is an American out there who wouldn't cut anyone's throat for a buck!!!!!  What you say sells well on a mug in a tourist shop, but let's get down to real facts when it comes to human nature.  I know quite few people that have and have forgotten where they started, and consistantly don't want anyone to have the same help that they got.  People are sharks.  Stop waving the flaf and wave a nice flag that looks like a 100 bill the real America and its people. Not to mention the 100 bill represent the state religion.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#25 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:21 PM EDT

                                    For those that " have " in this country I think they got there more byschemeing than any of use would like to admit. At 33 honestly I don't think there is an American out there who wouldn't cut anyone's throat for a buck!!!!! What you say sells well on a mug in a tourist shop, but let's get down to real facts when it comes to human nature. I know quite few people that have and have forgotten where they started, and consistantly don't want anyone to have the same help that they got. People are sharks. Stop waving the flaf and wave a nice flag that looks like a 100 bill the real America and its people. Not to mention the 100 bill represent the state religion.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    Reply#26 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:24 PM EDT

                                    If Obama wasn't so afraid of his left-wing, liberal, atheistic, theophobic (fear that there may be a God) constituency, he could have called for a national day of prayer over this disaster...

                                    Many US citizens believe in God and would like to see the Lord invited to take care of things.

                                      Reply#27 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:35 PM EDT

                                      I'm convinced that a lot of the people polled and most of the writers about this article are on drugs or have watched so much Fox News that their little minds are warped.  The president is not supposed to be an engineer.  He is a brilliant, educated man who relies on the best advice he can find.  I know this is a new theory for some of you, but try to keep your eyes open and focused.  He does not shoot off his mouth inadvisably, does not say ridiculous things like "Mission Accomplished" when it certainly wasn't, and didn't fail at a dozen things before joining the "family business."  I suggest reading some material by some honest reporters and watching some other-than-idiot newscasters.

                                      • 5 votes
                                      Reply#28 - Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:38 PM EDT
                                      Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4
                                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.