• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: The Week Ahead: In recovery
  • Recommended: VIDEO: First Read Minute: Obama reframes terrorism policy, Weiner's tough day
  • Recommended: Republicans' 'Mad Lib' IRS controversy
  • Recommended: First Thoughts: Rules of engagement

The first place for news and analysis from the NBC News Political Unit. Follow us on Twitter.

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 26
    Apr
    2011
    12:03pm, EDT

    The Latino voter lag

    From msnbc.com's Tom Curry:  America’s Latino population grew almost nine times faster than its non-Latino population in the last decade, jumping from 35 million to 50 million, but an analysis of last year’s elections published Tuesday by the Pew Hispanic Center shows that Latinos continue to underperform on Election Day.

    In last fall’s elections, fewer than 7 percent of voters were Latino, even though more than 16 percent of the U.S. population is Latino.

    The Pew study – based on newly released data from the Census’s Current Population Survey -- shows a widening gap over the past 20 years in midterm elections between the number of eligible Latino voters and the number who actually cast a ballot. In 2010 there were 6.6 million Latino voters out of a total of 21.3 million eligible Latino voters.

     “When you look at the Hispanic demographics, particularly among native-born Hispanics, there are an awful lot of people under the age of 18,” said Mark Hugo Lopez, the associate director of the Pew Hispanic Center and the author of the study.

    “What’s happening is a lot of those young people -- about 600,000 a year in the last few years -- have been turning 18,” he explained. “They are U.S.-born and they’re eligible to vote, but as we know, young people generally vote at lower rates than we see among the general population. That’s part of the reason we see this rising gap between the number of Hispanics who are eligible to vote and the actual number who do vote.”

    He added that in presidential election year, too, there’s a growing gap between eligible Latino voters and actual voters, but the gap is bigger in midterm elections. 

    While less than a third of Latino eligible voters said they cast a ballot last fall, nearly half of white eligible voters said they voted and 44 percent of black eligible voters said they did.

    Despite the large disparity between eligible voters and actual voters among Latinos, there was an 18.8 percent increase in the number of Latino voters in 2010 compared to the previous midterm election in 2006. That contrasts with a 3.8 percent decline in the number of white voters between the 2006 elections and last year’s elections.

    Separately, exit poll survey data from last November’s balloting showed that in House races, 60 percent of Latinos voted Democratic, compared to 37 percent of white voters who did. Exit poll surveys in 2008 indicated that Barack Obama won about two out of three Latino voters.

    Looking to next year’s presidential race, analysts are keen to see whether the soaring Latino population in states such as Florida, Virginia, Nevada, and Arizona will benefit Obama’s re-election bid.

    Given their preference for Obama, he could gain ground in states such as Arizona and Texas, both of which he lost in 2008, simply by registering more Latino voters.

    As Matt Barreto, pollster for Latino Decisions and University of Washington political scientist, said recently, “Even if there were no population growth, if you just did Latino voter registration drives, you could continue to dramatically grow the electorate.” 

    You can view the full Pew report here.

    178 comments

    The Latino vote sat home in 2010 & you can rest assured they'll be fired up and ready to go in 2012! The Teapulicans & their antics can kiss the Hispanic vote ADIOS, along with the Seniors who were snookered! America is slowly but surely waking up to what the TRUE agenda is of Republicans -  …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: 2010
  • 4
    Apr
    2011
    12:52pm, EDT

    Study: Health care cost Dems in 2010

    From NBC's Kevin Hurd
    A new analysis by two political scientists shows how one vote on a big bill can affect a congressperson's chances of winning re-election.
     
    In the analysis, Seth Masket of the University of Denver and Steve Greene of North Carolina State University looked specifically at how the health-care bill, stimulus, cap-and-trade, and TARP affected Democrats during the 2010 midterms.
     
    After the election, they looked at how each Democratic member voted on these four issues. They coupled that data with who won re-election and who did not.
     
    Before coming to any conclusions, they accounted for three different factors -- 1) how liberal or conservative a member's district is, 2) the member's voting patterns, and 3) the amount of money spent in the campaigns.
     
    The result: "Democrats paid a substantial price for party unity in the 111th House of Representatives." Greene and Masket cite health care as the most costly vote to the party. Their analysis found supporters of the bill typically ran 6%-8% behind opponents in the election. And 13 members lost their seats because they voted 'yes' on health care.
     
    TARP, by comparison, was found to have had a minor effect on the election. The stimulus was a little tougher to gauge, since a small group of Democrats voted against it. "Our results suggest that as much as it hurt some Democrats, it may have actually helped others," the political scientists wrote in their analysis.
     
    Surprisingly, they found that cap-and-trade didn't have a big impact on whether a House member won or lost in 2010. "It is certainly possible that the cap-and-trade vote harmed some Democrats in some districts, but our evidence does not show any negative impact in the aggregate."
     
    Masket and Greene breakdown their calculations further in a paper and explain how they reached their conclusions using regression analysis. A link is available on Masket's blog. 
     
    Masket and Greene presented their findings at the Midwest Political Science Association meeting in Chicago this past weekend.

    61 comments

    So it's a bad idea to pass a bill even though you don't don't know what it'll do? Huh, now who could have foreseen that? I guess Hope isn't always such a good strategy.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: congress, 2010
  • 9
    Jan
    2011
    2:17pm, EST

    2010 campaign marked by angry rhetoric

    If one word summed up the past two years in American politics, it was this: anger.

    Anger at the nation’s unemployment and all the foreclosures. Anger at President Obama and his health-care effort. Anger at the Tea Party.

    And this anger sometimes manifested itself into over-the-top vitriolic rhetoric, especially coming from the right.

    In the summer of 2009, we saw those rowdy, contentious town-hall meetings protesting the health legislation. We saw a few protestors carrying weapons and reciting Thomas Jefferson’s quote, “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”

    During the campaign season, we saw a Tea Party candidate for Congress produce an advertisement with the message “gather your armies”; we heard Nevada GOP Senate candidate Sharron Angle talking about “2nd Amendment remedies”; and we saw former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) create a “target” list with bulls eyes around vulnerable Democrats who voted for the health-care bill.

    And in Arizona, Republican Ben Quayle, who won his congressional contest, ran an advertisement calling Obama the worst president in U.S. history and vowing to “knock the hell” out of Congress.

    Of course, not all the over-the-top rhetoric came from the right (liberal Congressman Alan Grayson, who lost his bid for re-election, described his GOP opponent as “Taliban Dan” in one TV ad), and some of it wasn’t new (there were plenty of angry protests directed at George W. Bush’s presidency, and political duels and canings are chapters in the nation's history).

    But the recent accumulation of political anger -- in addition to all the attention it received -- created a potent powder keg that was ripe to explode, as it did yesterday in Arizona, when a man opened fire at Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords’ (D) event for constituents, killing six and wounding 14 others --including Giffords, who remains in critical condition.

    "We need to do some soul searching," Pima County (AZ) Sheriff Clarence Dupnik, a Democrat, said yesterday. "It's the vitriolic rhetoric that we hear day in and day out from people in the radio business and some people in the TV business.”

    Dupnik added, "People tend to pooh-pooh this business about the vitriol that inflames American public opinion by the people who make a living off of that. That may be free speech but it's not without consequences."

    To be sure, it appears that the alleged shooter, Jared Lee Loughner, wasn’t a Tea Party protestor. A YouTube site that’s apparently his contains political rhetoric that’s far removed from either the political right or left. ("... I know who's listening: Government Officials, and the People. Nearly all the people, who don't know this accurate information of a new currency, aren't aware of mind control and brainwash methods. If I have my civil rights, then this message wouldn't have happen," the YouTube page says.)

    And members from both political parties quickly -- and strongly -- condemned yesterday’s violence. "An attack on one who serves is an attack on all who serves,” House Speaker John Boehner said on Sunday morning. “Such acts of violence have no place in our society.”

    But the tragedy in Arizona raises this question: Does the political rhetoric from both sides now begin to change, at least in the short term?

    Already, House Republicans -- who gained control of the chamber last week and who are committed to rolling back some of Obama’s legislative achievements -- have suspended all legislative activity for the coming week, including their vote to repeal the health-care law.

    Or does the rhetoric worsen? As the New York Times’ Matt Bai writes, “The more pressing question, though, is where this all ends — whether we will begin to re-evaluate the piercing pitch of our political debate in the wake of Saturday’s shooting, or whether we are hurtling unstoppably into a frightening period more like the late 1960s.”

    444 comments

    "Don't retreat, reload!" - Sarah Palin, former Governor of Alaska "If this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second Amendment remedies." - Sharron Angle, former member of the Nevada State Assembly "If ballots don't work, bullets will."

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, featured, republicans, democrats, congress, 2010
  • 31
    Dec
    2010
    12:30pm, EST

    Top 'shiny metal objects' of 2010

    Here are some of what we like to call “shiny metal objects," some of the most distracting moments of 2010. Thoughts? Did we miss any? Vote for the shiniest of shiny metal objects in our live poll at right.

    - Christine O’Donnell wins/loses, FBI opens criminal probe
    - Sarah Palin’s endorsements/Sarah Palin’s Twitter/Facebook postings
    - Shirley Sherrod “controversy”
    - Sharron Angle
    - Carl Paladino
    - Sue Lowden: Chickens to the doctor
    - Kirsten Gillibrand “challenger”
    - Obama-Clinton 2012 ticket
    - The mosque controversy
    - TSA pat downs
    - James O’Keefe takes New Orleans
    - Obama’s “$200 million a day” India trip
    - The “public option”
    - Bill Halter
    - Eric Massa
    - Liz Cheney criticisms
    - Criticism of START (wound up passing overwhelmingly)
    - Alan Grayson
    - Anthony Weiner
    - Jerry Brown's 'whore' comment
    - Meg Whitman's housekeeper

    93 comments

    Death panel. No doubt. A rumor propagated by the stupid for the more stupid.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, featured, 2010, top-10
  • 31
    Dec
    2010
    11:58am, EST

    Top events/moments of 2010

    Below is a look back at some of the things that happened in 2010 (in somewhat chronological order). What did we miss? And take our live poll at right on what you think was the most significant moment of 2010. Check out our next post of "Shiny Metal Objects of the year."

    - Scott Brown elected
    - Guantanamo remains open
    - Baby killer shouted during health care debate
    - Health care reform passed, signed
    - Financial regulation passed, signed
    - BP oil spill
    - Greece riots
    - Afghanistan casualties rise
    - Bob Bennett loses
    - Sestak beats Specter, loses to Toomey
    - Blanche Lincoln wins, then loses
    - Elena Kagan sworn in
    - Iraq drawdown
    - Glenn Beck rally/Jon Stewart/Colbert rally
    - Tea Party outrage/Republicans take back the House; Boehner to be speaker
    - Harry Reid wins
    - Charlie Rangel censured
    - Rahm Emanuel leaves White House to run for Chicago mayor
    - Wiki, wiki, wiki-leaks of diplomatic cables
    - Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell repealed
    - Joe Miller wins primary, then loses
    - Lisa Murkowski, loses primary, then wins first write-in campaign for Senate since 1954

    14 comments

    What I learned this year: your average voter isn't nearly as partisan as the pundits make them out to be. For instance, Maine returned both Democratic incumbants back to the House, by wide margins, yet turned the State legislature over to the Republicans and elected a Tea Party supported candidate g …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, featured, 2010, top-10
  • 29
    Dec
    2010
    1:40pm, EST

    Feds probing O'Donnell's use of campaign funds

    AP reports that "federal authorities have opened a criminal probe of Delaware Republican Christine O'Donnell to determine if the former Senate candidate broke the law by using campaign money to pay personal expenses."

    This became an issue in her 2010 U.S. Senate bid. A complaint was filed with the Federal Election Commission, because "O'Donnell used more than $20,000 in campaign funds to pay her rent and other personal expenses, according to a complaint filed Monday with the Federal Elections Commission," the AP reported Sept. 21st. It added, "The complaint filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a nonpartisan watchdog group, is the latest in a series of allegations of financial irregularities involving O'Donnell, a conservative Christian activist and frequent candidate who has not had a steady job in years."

    O'Donnell said at the time, "I am confident that we have been ethical. We have not, I personally have not, misused the campaign funds. We have our FEC lawyer, a great attorney, answering those charges if it ever goes anywhere."

    AP today added, "The case, which has been assigned to two federal prosecutors and two FBI agents in Delaware, has not been sent to a grand jury. O'Donnell, who set a state record by raising more than $7.3 million in a tea party-fueled campaign this year, has been dogged by questions about her finances. Her former campaign manager did not immediately respond Wednesday to questions."

    152 comments

    Glad she lost. Oh so very glad. Mr. Merle Haggard: "It was also nice to meet Obama and find him very different from the media makeout. It’s really almost criminal what they do with our President. There seems to be no shame or anything. They call him all kinds of names all day long, saying he& …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, featured, 2010
  • 28
    Dec
    2010
    7:54pm, EST

    Federal judge lifts stay, clearing way for Murkowski certification

    From NBC's Pete Williams
    A federal judge has lifted a stay that blocked the state from certifying the winner of the state's disputed U.S. Senate election. The state is now free to certify Lisa Murkowski as the winner, and she can join other senators in taking the oath of office Jan. 5th in Washington.

    Federal Judge Ralph Beistline also dismissed Republican candidate's Joe Miller's lawsuit, rejecting Miller’s claims that the state's method for tabulating write-in votes violated the federal Constitution. Miller argued that state law required voters to write in a candidate's name precisely, with no abbreviations or misspellings. He challenged the state's interpretation of the law, which allowed votes to be counted despite minor misspellings.

    Last week, the Alaska Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of the state, holding that the key to interpreting election law is preventing votes from being tossed out if a voter's intent can be determined. The state court said the law doesn't require perfection in how a candidate's name is written.

    In his ruling Tuesday dismissing Miller's lawsuit, Judge Beistline called the Alaska law "poorly drafted," and added that, "Wisdom would suggest that the Alaska legislature act to clarify it to avoid similar disputes in the future." Nonetheless, he said the Alaska Supreme Court is the final authority on the meaning of the state's laws.

    "This court declines to second-guess the highest court of the state," he said.

    16 comments

    Ruh-roh, Joe. Sister Sarah's gonna want her money back. Expect a visit from Todd soon. Wink! You betcha!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, featured, 2010, pete-williams
  • 28
    Dec
    2010
    11:24am, EST

    Alaska election officials push judge to act today to lift certification stay

    AP

    Joe Miller (R)

    From NBC's Pete Williams
    Election officials in Alaska are asking a federal judge to act today, so that Lisa Murkowski can be sworn in with other U.S. senators on Jan. 5th.

    "The logistics of the certification process require a quick decision," the state says in newly filed court documents. Senate rules require the certification to be delivered to the Senate before noon on Jan. 3rd -- this coming Monday. What's more, the state says, the certification document must be signed by both Alaska's governor and lieutenant governor, who live in different cities. A state employee is standing by to fly to Washington and deliver the certification, but the judge must lift a stay he put in place November 19th if the process is to be completed in time, election officials claim.

    The state also urges the judge to reject Republican Joe Miller's latest request to keep alive his lawsuit challenging the state's method for counting write-in votes.

    As a footnote, the Constitution requires members of Congress to meet every Jan. 3rd, "unless they shall by law appoint a different day." In late November, Congress did appoint a different day, specifying that in 2011 it would meet on Jan. 5th. Even so, Alaskan officials say in their court filings, "the Secretary of the Senate will not represent to the state that the deadline to deliver the certification is any later than January 3."

    7 comments

    The Miller/Murkowski pageant would be interesting if we were in Alaska, since most of us are not how about posting something of National relevance, maybe a few words on how the good Republicans are attempting to change House rules to facilitate the protection of tax laws designed to enrich the wealt …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, 2010, pete-williams
  • 15
    Dec
    2010
    9:07am, EST

    2010: Resolved in January?

    ALASKA: “Alaska should have a U.S. senator in place by the time Congress convenes in early January, even if all of the legal wrangling between the two rivals contesting the seat isn't resolved by then, a federal judge said Tuesday,” AP writes. “U.S. District Judge Ralph Beistline said in a written order that certification of the race between Republicans Joe Miller and Sen. Lisa Murkowski doesn't necessarily mean the end of the court battle. He said it's possible that the certification could be revoked if it was done in error and suggested the sides submit legal briefings on that issue.”

    Comment

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, 2010
  • 14
    Dec
    2010
    8:54am, EST

    2010: Don’t stop … believing,’ part 5

    Republican Joe Miller is taking his challenge to Alaska's U.S. Senate race to the state Supreme Court," the AP writes. "Miller filed his appeal Monday, three days after a lower court ruled against his lawsuit challenging how the state counted write-in ballots for his rival, Sen. Lisa Murkowski. Arguments are set for Friday."

    Here's the appeal filing, as posted by the Anchorage Daily News.

    The Anchorage Daily News in a Saturday editorial wrote: "We're confident most Alaskans hope Joe Miller will understand that just because you can hold up certification of the U.S. Senate election doesn't mean you should. ... Don't even bother to stick a fork in this one. It's overdone. All Miller will accomplish now by pursuing the court case is delay certification and potentially leave Alaska without its senior senator on duty. That's a disservice to the state Miller claimed he wanted to serve."

    4 comments

    Why is anyone surprised at this? It has NEVER been about what is best for country or state with the "teabaggers". It is their own self-gratification they are most concerned with. "I want, therefore I am owed." The motto of the "teabaggers."

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, 2010
  • 13
    Dec
    2010
    4:38pm, EST

    Joe Miller keeps on keepin' on

    Joe Miller (R) is keeping up his fight for the U.S. Senate. He has appealed to the state Supreme Court, AP reports.

    AP writes:

    The court confirms that Miller filed an appeal Monday. Arguments are set for Friday. ...

    Unofficially, Murkowski garnered more votes than Miller in the Nov. 2 election, but the state's certification of the results is being held up until while Miller's legal case is resolved.

    27 comments

    Looks like Joe Miller graduated with honors from the Norm Coleman college of recounts! What a bunch of sore losers! Sheesh!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, 2010
  • 13
    Dec
    2010
    9:05am, EST

    2010: Judge rules against Miller

    ALASKA: “A state judge has rejected losing Senate candidate Joe Miller's attempt to overturn Sen. Lisa Murkowski's write-in re-election victory, and Friday granted the Division of Election's request for dismissal of Miller's challenge,” the Juneau Empire writes. “Superior Court Judge William Carey found the state's write-in count valid, rejecting every one of Miller's claims.Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell called the ruling "decisive," and said it moved the state closer to having full representation in the U.S. Senate in January.”

    We missed this Thursday, but here’s Stu Rothenberg’s end-of-the-year awards, including the most overhyped candidates (Linda McMahon, Alex Sink, etc.), candidates and personalities he’s sick of (Sarah Palin, FOX and MSNBC after 3 p.m., Eliot Spitzer), candidates who shouldn’t run again (Dino Rossi, Alan Grayon, Christine O’Donnell), Worst Hair (Rick Scott, himself, and Charlie Cook), most embarrassing primary loss (Rick Lazio), Biggest upset (Renee Ellmers, Joe Miller and Lisa Murkowski, etc.), candidates we haven’t seen the last of (Christine O’Donnell, House candidates: Rodney Glassman, John Callahan, Julie Lassa), plus GOP rising stars in the House, the cockiest candidates, the candidates should start to worry about 2012, worst self-inflicted wounds (Rangel, Tom Ganley’s sex assault charge, Bob Etheridge’s caught on tape moment, etc.).

    6 comments

    @!$%# you intellectual giants working for GE for deleting a perfectly good comment . Delete my name from your intellectually dishonest slog.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: politics, 2010
Older posts

Browse

  • featured,
  • decision-2012,
  • first-read,
  • barack-obama,
  • politics,
  • mitt-romney,
  • 2012,
  • white-house,
  • congress,
  • appfeatured,
  • capitol-hill,
  • first-thoughts,
  • obama,
  • republicans,
  • 2010,
  • economy,
  • programming-notes,
  • romney-embed,
  • video,
  • newt-gingrich,
  • democrats,
  • paul-ryan,
  • romney,
  • first-read-minute,
  • updated,
  • rick-santorum,
  • alex-moe,
  • veepstakes,
  • garrett-haake,
  • gingrich-embed,
  • joe-biden,
  • boiler-room,
  • week-ahead,
  • perry,
  • senate,
  • carrie-dann
Also
Advertise | AdChoices
Upload an avatar and edit your bio
Please edit your bio and upload an avatar. Click the pencil icon above to edit.
Edit your blogroll, facebook and twitter links.

Blogroll

Please edit your blogroll by adding entries to the "Blogs" section. Use the "Follow Links" section to add links to Twitter and Facebook. Click the pencil icon above to edit.

Chuck Todd

Chuck Todd became NBC News’ political director in March 2007. He also serves as NBC News' on-air political analyst for "NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams," "Today," "Meet the Press and MSNBC, including "Hardball with Chris Matthews."

Mark Murray

Mark Murray is NBC News' Senior Political Editor. Since joining the network in 2003, he has reported on and written about political races, trends, and issues -- including the 2003 California recall, the 2004 Bush-Kerry presidential race, the 2006 midterm elections, the 2008 presidential contest, the 2010 midterms, and the 2012 presidential race.

Domenico Montanaro

Domenico Montanaro is NBC News' Deputy Political Editor. He writes, reports and edits for First Read, the network's political blog, provides editorial guidance for NBC's broadcast shows and online content, and appears on air. He has covered the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections for NBC and has reported from Capitol Hill.

Ali Weinberg

Will Springer

Natalie Cucchiara

Carrie Dann

Archives

  • 2013
    • May (199)
    • April (233)
    • March (272)
    • February (232)
    • January (254)
  • 2012
    • December (213)
    • November (237)
    • October (344)
    • September (330)
    • August (362)
    • July (268)
    • June (308)
    • May (342)
    • April (291)
    • March (387)
    • February (329)
    • January (446)
  • 2011
    • December (383)
    • November (371)
    • October (341)
    • September (258)
    • August (303)
    • July (232)
    • June (293)
    • May (262)
    • April (277)
    • March (295)
    • February (239)
    • January (277)
  • 2010
    • December (261)
    • November (297)
    • October (267)
    • September (244)
    • August (262)
    • July (285)
    • June (296)
    • May (262)
    • April (300)
    • March (315)
    • February (256)
    • January (242)
  • 2009
    • December (234)
    • November (277)
    • October (312)
    • September (277)
    • August (209)
    • July (325)
    • June (343)
    • May (302)
    • April (316)
    • March (283)
    • February (285)
    • January (362)
  • 2008
    • December (285)
    • November (313)
    • October (514)
    • September (476)
    • August (385)
    • July (372)
    • June (408)
    • May (482)
    • April (510)
    • March (446)
    • February (543)
    • January (946)
  • 2007
    • December (578)
    • November (519)
    • October (607)
    • September (419)
    • August (423)
    • July (387)
    • June (467)
    • May (343)
    • April (254)
    • March (179)
    • February (163)
    • January (203)
  • 2006
    • December (110)
    • November (256)
    • October (224)
    • September (199)
    • August (9)

Most Commented

  • Lawmakers grill IRS officials, Lerner denies wrongdoing (4769)
  • White House defends IRS handling, McConnell asserts 'culture of intimidation' (5639)
  • White House aides learned of IRS details in April, but didn't tell Obama (2788)
  • IRS official to invoke Fifth Amendment at hearing (2163)
  • Heckler repeatedly interrupts Obama speech (1513)
  • First Thoughts: Scandal or bureaucratic incompetency? (2149)
  • IRS official Lerner placed on leave (1164)

Other blogs

  • Daily Nightly
  • The Maddow Blog
  • The Last Word
  • Hardblogger
  • First Read
  • World Blog
  • Field Notes
  • Inside Dateline
  • Behind the Wall
  • The Ed Show
  • Morning Joe
  • Daily Rundown

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • Politics on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise